:cool: Lets see those ''film'' shots

malinku · 04-29-2016, 01:33 AM - **2 Likes**

two shots from my first roll of Fuji Velvia 50. Not impressed with the how the scans turned out so it looks like I'm in the market for a Side projector.
So I can get the full slide experience.

And a shot from my Kodak Reflex loaded with Fuji Provia 100

**arnold** · 04-29-2016, 02:08 AM

What model Kodak Reflex do you have? They are expensive to fix, so I just use my other Retinas instead. Rather than asking for trouble with my S which seems in fine shape. They are just too complicated for reliable use.
Are you shooting with wide aperture? There is a place for shallow depth of field, but other times it just makes the whole picture seem out of focus, when one part is in focus but the majority is not.

RR84 · 04-29-2016, 06:02 AM - **1 Like**

400TX (D76) / SL / ST50mm f1.4 (8)

dsmithhfx · 04-29-2016, 06:16 AM - **1 Like**

malinku · 04-29-2016, 10:26 AM

Originally posted by arnold

What model Kodak Reflex do you have? They are expensive to fix, so I just use my other Retinas instead. Rather than asking for trouble with my S which seems in fine shape. They are just too complicated for reliable use.
Are you shooting with wide aperture? There is a place for shallow depth of field, but other times it just makes the whole picture seem out of focus, when one part is in focus but the majority is not.

It is the TLR Kodak made in the 40s. As for depth of field. I had to shoot with a low f-stop Due to it being a cloudy day and having 100 iso film.

Eyewanders · 04-29-2016, 01:22 PM

Originally posted by malinku

two shots from my first roll of Fuji Velvia 50. Not impressed with the how the scans turned out so it looks like I'm in the market for a Side projector.
So I can get the full slide experience.

And a shot from my Kodak Reflex loaded with Fuji Provia 100

RVP50 can be *very* difficult to scan generally. Were those lab scans or done at home?

malinku · 04-29-2016, 06:21 PM

Originally posted by chickentender

RVP50 can be *very* difficult to scan generally. Were those lab scans or done at home?

Scanned at home

Swift1 · 04-29-2016, 08:20 PM - **4 Likes**

Zenza Bronica ETRSi
Zenzanon MC 50/2.8
Kodak Ektar 100
Epson V500

dsmithhfx · 04-30-2016, 04:25 AM

UgurUgurlu · 04-30-2016, 05:49 AM - **2 Likes**

Olympus Mju III
Kodak Colorplus

kidz14127 · 04-30-2016, 06:43 AM - **3 Likes**

Pentax LX / FA 31 Ltd / Portra 400 @ 200

Army of Malayan Tapir by akhbarbima, on Flickr

Pentax LX / K 50/1.7 / Solaris Ferrania 800 @ 400

Another Empty Chair by akhbarbima, on Flickr

g026r · 04-30-2016, 10:29 PM - **3 Likes**

Ran some different slide films through my Flexaret V. Of them, only the Velvia 50 turned out in a manner that I'd call "as expected." Something happened with the Provia—probably mis-metering on my part—and most of the frames were overexposed. As for the Rollei CR 200, well, very yellow is the phrase I'd use to describe them.

(Anyone else shot CR 200? Is that to be expected?)

Meopta Flexaret Va.
Meopta Belar 80mm f3.5.
1 & 2: Rolleichrome CR200.
3 & 4: Fujichrome Provia 100F.
5 & 6: Fujichrome Velvia 50.

nickthetasmaniac · 05-01-2016, 01:51 AM - **2 Likes**

M2 and Ektar 100 - Chinese New Years in KL

V550 scans

**arnold** · 05-01-2016, 02:07 AM

Originally posted by g026r

Ran some different slide films through my Flexaret V. Of them, only the Velvia 50 turned out in a manner that I'd call "as expected." Something happened with the Provia—probably mis-metering on my part—and most of the frames were overexposed. As for the Rollei CR 200, well, very yellow is the phrase I'd use to describe them.

(Anyone else shot CR 200? Is that to be expected?)

Meopta Flexaret Va.
Meopta Belar 80mm f3.5.
1 & 2: Rolleichrome CR200.
3 & 4: Fujichrome Provia 100F.
5 & 6: Fujichrome Velvia 50.

They look nice, clear and crisp to me.

---------- Post added 01-05-16 at 19:09 ----------

Originally posted by nickthetasmaniac

M2 and Ektar 100 - Chinese New Years in KL

V550 scans

The reds look good. Digital often blows them.

dsmithhfx · 05-01-2016, 04:32 AM - **1 Like**

04-30-2016, 10:29 PM - 3 Likes	#13227
g026r Pentaxian Join Date: Sep 2013 Location: Toronto Photos: Gallery Posts: 2,074	Ran some different slide films through my Flexaret V. Of them, only the Velvia 50 turned out in a manner that I'd call "as expected." Something happened with the Provia—probably mis-metering on my part—and most of the frames were overexposed. As for the Rollei CR 200, well, very yellow is the phrase I'd use to describe them. (Anyone else shot CR 200? Is that to be expected?) Meopta Flexaret Va. Meopta Belar 80mm f3.5. 1 & 2: Rolleichrome CR200. 3 & 4: Fujichrome Provia 100F. 5 & 6: Fujichrome Velvia 50. Last edited by g026r; 05-01-2016 at 02:13 PM.

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
K20D test shots at Lets Go Digital	schufosi777	Pentax News and Rumors	6	04-20-2013 11:31 AM
Macro Cool Macro shots	derajjjg	Post Your Photos!	2	12-27-2009 09:36 PM
Lets see your Moon and Mars shots	Igilligan	Post Your Photos!	9	12-05-2009 08:55 AM
Way cool bat shots	and	General Talk	7	10-01-2009 02:54 AM
Cool Shots & Info	Fl_Gulfer	Post Your Photos!	0	12-10-2007 11:44 AM

04-29-2016, 01:33 AM - 2 Likes	#13216
malinku Veteran Member Join Date: Nov 2014 Posts: 402	two shots from my first roll of Fuji Velvia 50. Not impressed with the how the scans turned out so it looks like I'm in the market for a Side projector. So I can get the full slide experience. And a shot from my Kodak Reflex loaded with Fuji Provia 100

04-29-2016, 02:08 AM	#13217
arnold Site Supporter Join Date: Aug 2012 Location: Queensland Photos: Gallery \| Albums Posts: 4,294	What model Kodak Reflex do you have? They are expensive to fix, so I just use my other Retinas instead. Rather than asking for trouble with my S which seems in fine shape. They are just too complicated for reliable use. Are you shooting with wide aperture? There is a place for shallow depth of field, but other times it just makes the whole picture seem out of focus, when one part is in focus but the majority is not.

04-29-2016, 06:02 AM - 1 Like	#13218
RR84 Senior Member Join Date: Dec 2015 Posts: 161	400TX (D76) / SL / ST50mm f1.4 (8)

04-29-2016, 06:16 AM - 1 Like	#13219
dsmithhfx Pentaxian Join Date: Sep 2015 Location: Toronto Posts: 5,146

04-29-2016, 10:26 AM	#13220
malinku Veteran Member Join Date: Nov 2014 Posts: 402	Originally posted by arnold What model Kodak Reflex do you have? They are expensive to fix, so I just use my other Retinas instead. Rather than asking for trouble with my S which seems in fine shape. They are just too complicated for reliable use. Are you shooting with wide aperture? There is a place for shallow depth of field, but other times it just makes the whole picture seem out of focus, when one part is in focus but the majority is not. It is the TLR Kodak made in the 40s. As for depth of field. I had to shoot with a low f-stop Due to it being a cloudy day and having 100 iso film.

04-29-2016, 01:22 PM	#13221
Eyewanders Veteran Member Join Date: Jan 2008 Location: Land of the Salish Sea Photos: Gallery \| Albums Posts: 3,343	Originally posted by malinku two shots from my first roll of Fuji Velvia 50. Not impressed with the how the scans turned out so it looks like I'm in the market for a Side projector. So I can get the full slide experience. And a shot from my Kodak Reflex loaded with Fuji Provia 100 RVP50 can be very difficult to scan generally. Were those lab scans or done at home?

04-29-2016, 06:21 PM	#13222
malinku Veteran Member Join Date: Nov 2014 Posts: 402	Originally posted by chickentender RVP50 can be very difficult to scan generally. Were those lab scans or done at home? Scanned at home

04-29-2016, 08:20 PM - 4 Likes	#13223
Swift1 Veteran Member Join Date: Sep 2009 Location: Oregon Photos: Gallery \| Albums Posts: 5,079	Zenza Bronica ETRSi Zenzanon MC 50/2.8 Kodak Ektar 100 Epson V500

04-30-2016, 04:25 AM	#13224
dsmithhfx Pentaxian Join Date: Sep 2015 Location: Toronto Posts: 5,146

04-30-2016, 05:49 AM - 2 Likes	#13225
UgurUgurlu Senior Member Join Date: Jan 2015 Posts: 114	Olympus Mju III Kodak Colorplus

04-30-2016, 06:43 AM - 3 Likes	#13226
kidz14127 New Member Join Date: Sep 2014 Posts: 14	Pentax LX / FA 31 Ltd / Portra 400 @ 200 Army of Malayan Tapir by akhbarbima, on Flickr Pentax LX / K 50/1.7 / Solaris Ferrania 800 @ 400 Another Empty Chair by akhbarbima, on Flickr

05-01-2016, 01:51 AM - 2 Likes	#13228
nickthetasmaniac Pentaxian Join Date: Dec 2008 Posts: 2,361	M2 and Ektar 100 - Chinese New Years in KL V550 scans

05-01-2016, 02:07 AM	#13229
arnold Site Supporter Join Date: Aug 2012 Location: Queensland Photos: Gallery \| Albums Posts: 4,294	Originally posted by g026r Ran some different slide films through my Flexaret V. Of them, only the Velvia 50 turned out in a manner that I'd call "as expected." Something happened with the Provia—probably mis-metering on my part—and most of the frames were overexposed. As for the Rollei CR 200, well, very yellow is the phrase I'd use to describe them. (Anyone else shot CR 200? Is that to be expected?) Meopta Flexaret Va. Meopta Belar 80mm f3.5. 1 & 2: Rolleichrome CR200. 3 & 4: Fujichrome Provia 100F. 5 & 6: Fujichrome Velvia 50. They look nice, clear and crisp to me. ---------- Post added 01-05-16 at 19:09 ---------- Originally posted by nickthetasmaniac M2 and Ektar 100 - Chinese New Years in KL V550 scans The reds look good. Digital often blows them.

05-01-2016, 04:32 AM - 1 Like	#13230
dsmithhfx Pentaxian Join Date: Sep 2015 Location: Toronto Posts: 5,146