:cool: Lets see those ''film'' shots

Cuthbert · 07-06-2016, 04:11 AM - **3 Likes**

Little chromed naked lady watches two old guys talking about cars:

50s nostalgia:

Triumph TR2 mirror:

TR8:

Waffles:

Blue, yellow and white:

Same Sprite as before, but different camera, lens and less good composition:

BC3, Prakticar 50mm f1.4, P-C Filter, Gold 200.

Last edited by Cuthbert; 07-06-2016 at 04:18 AM.

dsmithhfx · 07-06-2016, 05:13 AM - **2 Likes**

Swift1 · 07-06-2016, 12:25 PM - **5 Likes**

Contax G2
Carl Zeiss Planar T* 35/2
Fuji Superia 400
Epson V750-M Pro

**Jacquot** · 07-06-2016, 04:23 PM - **1 Like**

Originally posted by Swift1

Contax G2
Carl Zeiss Planar T* 35/2
Fuji Superia 400
Epson V750-M Pro

Love this!

IgorZ · 07-06-2016, 09:21 PM - **1 Like**

Originally posted by Swift1

So, today I finished a roll of Ektar and quickly had it developed. I got the negatives back and they look very very thin.
Well, long story short, I think I accidentally had my Contax set to ISO 640 for the entire roll.
Surprisingly, I got fairly decent images...

Contax G2
Carl Zeiss Planar T* 35/2
Kodak Ektar 100 @640
Epson V750-M Pro

That's a very interesting look... Did they all come out so "retro"?

Swift1 · 07-06-2016, 09:39 PM - **3 Likes**

Originally posted by IgorZ

That's a very interesting look... Did they all come out so "retro"?

They all did come out very similar.
This is from the same roll

AtitG · 07-06-2016, 10:16 PM - **4 Likes**

Provincial life 2 by Atit Go, on Flickr
Pentax MZ-L
Kodak colorplus 200

Last edited by AtitG; 07-07-2016 at 10:00 AM.

dsmithhfx · 07-07-2016, 01:31 AM - **2 Likes**

edmundrt · 07-07-2016, 03:29 PM - **2 Likes**

Zenza Bronica ETRC, Zenzanon-EII 75mm f2.8
Kodak New Portra 160

**Jacquot** · 07-07-2016, 05:15 PM - **1 Like**

Originally posted by Swift1

They all did come out very similar.
This is from the same roll

Great colors in that wall. Nice photograph... Spyder version, right?

skierd · 07-07-2016, 11:52 PM - **2 Likes**

The last of the shots from my Oregon trip finally came back. Olympus XA, Kodak Ektachrome EPP 100

dsmithhfx · 07-08-2016, 05:06 AM

stevebrot · 07-08-2016, 03:26 PM

Originally posted by Swift1

So, today I finished a roll of Ektar and quickly had it developed. I got the negatives back and they look very very thin.
Well, long story short, I think I accidentally had my Contax set to ISO 640 for the entire roll.
Surprisingly, I got fairly decent images...

Contax G2
Carl Zeiss Planar T* 35/2
Kodak Ektar 100 @640
Epson V750-M Pro

Originally posted by Swift1

They all did come out very similar.
This is from the same roll

This is amazing. The thin look and low saturation is expected. The relatively fine grain was not. I like the look

Steve

Swift1 · 07-08-2016, 03:57 PM - **2 Likes**

Originally posted by stevebrot

This is amazing. The thin look and low saturation is expected. The relatively fine grain was not. I like the look

Steve

I do too.
Some of the frames on that roll were a bit too underexposed (I'm using AE without compensation), so after that roll I purposely shot another roll of Ektar at iso 400. At 400 it's a bit easier to scan, and still retains the "inky" look.

Contax G2
Carl Zeiss Planar T* 35/2
Kodak Ektar 100 @iso400
Epson V750-M Pro

Eyewanders · 07-08-2016, 06:03 PM

Originally posted by Swift1

I do too.
Some of the frames on that roll were a bit too underexposed (I'm using AE without compensation), so after that roll I purposely shot another roll of Ektar at iso 400. At 400 it's a bit easier to scan, and still retains the "inky" look.

Contax G2
Carl Zeiss Planar T* 35/2
Kodak Ektar 100 @iso400
Epson V750-M Pro

Ektar continues to please, in new and surprising ways.

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
K20D test shots at Lets Go Digital	schufosi777	Pentax News and Rumors	6	04-20-2013 11:31 AM
Macro Cool Macro shots	derajjjg	Post Your Photos!	2	12-27-2009 09:36 PM
Lets see your Moon and Mars shots	Igilligan	Post Your Photos!	9	12-05-2009 08:55 AM
Way cool bat shots	and	General Talk	7	10-01-2009 02:54 AM
Cool Shots & Info	Fl_Gulfer	Post Your Photos!	0	12-10-2007 11:44 AM

07-06-2016, 04:11 AM - 3 Likes	#13711
Cuthbert Veteran Member Join Date: Nov 2013 Photos: Gallery Posts: 1,740	Little chromed naked lady watches two old guys talking about cars: 50s nostalgia: Triumph TR2 mirror: TR8: Waffles: Blue, yellow and white: Same Sprite as before, but different camera, lens and less good composition: BC3, Prakticar 50mm f1.4, P-C Filter, Gold 200. Last edited by Cuthbert; 07-06-2016 at 04:18 AM.

07-06-2016, 05:13 AM - 2 Likes	#13712
dsmithhfx Pentaxian Join Date: Sep 2015 Location: Toronto Posts: 5,153

07-06-2016, 12:25 PM - 5 Likes	#13713
Swift1 Veteran Member Join Date: Sep 2009 Location: Oregon Photos: Gallery \| Albums Posts: 5,079	Contax G2 Carl Zeiss Planar T* 35/2 Fuji Superia 400 Epson V750-M Pro

07-06-2016, 04:23 PM - 1 Like	#13714
Jacquot Loyal Site Supporter Join Date: May 2008 Location: Sun City Center, FL Photos: Gallery Posts: 2,544	Originally posted by Swift1 Contax G2 Carl Zeiss Planar T* 35/2 Fuji Superia 400 Epson V750-M Pro Love this!

07-06-2016, 09:21 PM - 1 Like	#13715
IgorZ Veteran Member Join Date: Aug 2015 Location: Ottawa Posts: 1,735	Originally posted by Swift1 So, today I finished a roll of Ektar and quickly had it developed. I got the negatives back and they look very very thin. Well, long story short, I think I accidentally had my Contax set to ISO 640 for the entire roll. Surprisingly, I got fairly decent images... Contax G2 Carl Zeiss Planar T* 35/2 Kodak Ektar 100 @640 Epson V750-M Pro That's a very interesting look... Did they all come out so "retro"?

07-06-2016, 09:39 PM - 3 Likes	#13716
Swift1 Veteran Member Join Date: Sep 2009 Location: Oregon Photos: Gallery \| Albums Posts: 5,079	Originally posted by IgorZ That's a very interesting look... Did they all come out so "retro"? They all did come out very similar. This is from the same roll

07-06-2016, 10:16 PM - 4 Likes	#13717
AtitG Senior Member Join Date: Jan 2014 Posts: 269	Provincial life 2 by Atit Go, on Flickr Pentax MZ-L Kodak colorplus 200 Last edited by AtitG; 07-07-2016 at 10:00 AM.

07-07-2016, 01:31 AM - 2 Likes	#13718
dsmithhfx Pentaxian Join Date: Sep 2015 Location: Toronto Posts: 5,153

07-07-2016, 03:29 PM - 2 Likes	#13719
edmundrt Veteran Member Join Date: Jul 2014 Location: Nagoya Posts: 577	Zenza Bronica ETRC, Zenzanon-EII 75mm f2.8 Kodak New Portra 160

07-07-2016, 05:15 PM - 1 Like	#13720
Jacquot Loyal Site Supporter Join Date: May 2008 Location: Sun City Center, FL Photos: Gallery Posts: 2,544	Originally posted by Swift1 They all did come out very similar. This is from the same roll Great colors in that wall. Nice photograph... Spyder version, right?

07-07-2016, 11:52 PM - 2 Likes	#13721
skierd Veteran Member Join Date: Mar 2011 Location: Fairbanks, AK Photos: Gallery Posts: 1,472	The last of the shots from my Oregon trip finally came back. Olympus XA, Kodak Ektachrome EPP 100

07-08-2016, 05:06 AM	#13722
dsmithhfx Pentaxian Join Date: Sep 2015 Location: Toronto Posts: 5,153

07-08-2016, 03:26 PM	#13723
stevebrot Otis Memorial Pentaxian Join Date: Mar 2007 Location: Vancouver (USA) Photos: Gallery \| Albums Posts: 42,007	Originally posted by Swift1 So, today I finished a roll of Ektar and quickly had it developed. I got the negatives back and they look very very thin. Well, long story short, I think I accidentally had my Contax set to ISO 640 for the entire roll. Surprisingly, I got fairly decent images... Contax G2 Carl Zeiss Planar T* 35/2 Kodak Ektar 100 @640 Epson V750-M Pro Originally posted by Swift1 They all did come out very similar. This is from the same roll This is amazing. The thin look and low saturation is expected. The relatively fine grain was not. I like the look Steve

07-08-2016, 03:57 PM - 2 Likes	#13724
Swift1 Veteran Member Join Date: Sep 2009 Location: Oregon Photos: Gallery \| Albums Posts: 5,079	Originally posted by stevebrot This is amazing. The thin look and low saturation is expected. The relatively fine grain was not. I like the look Steve I do too. Some of the frames on that roll were a bit too underexposed (I'm using AE without compensation), so after that roll I purposely shot another roll of Ektar at iso 400. At 400 it's a bit easier to scan, and still retains the "inky" look. Contax G2 Carl Zeiss Planar T* 35/2 Kodak Ektar 100 @iso400 Epson V750-M Pro

07-08-2016, 06:03 PM	#13725
Eyewanders Veteran Member Join Date: Jan 2008 Location: Land of the Salish Sea Photos: Gallery \| Albums Posts: 3,343	Originally posted by Swift1 I do too. Some of the frames on that roll were a bit too underexposed (I'm using AE without compensation), so after that roll I purposely shot another roll of Ektar at iso 400. At 400 it's a bit easier to scan, and still retains the "inky" look. Contax G2 Carl Zeiss Planar T* 35/2 Kodak Ektar 100 @iso400 Epson V750-M Pro Ektar continues to please, in new and surprising ways.