:cool: Lets see those ''film'' shots

Jonathan Mac · 08-09-2012, 06:44 AM

More Fuji Pro 400H (at 200) in Segovia. For a few of these I remember the lens used, for the others I don't. I've quickly become too lazy to take notes.

M 85mm f/2

K 28mm f/3.5

sm. pelle · 08-09-2012, 08:09 AM

70' Camaro it was.

Found one more:
K-1000 Helios 44 58mm/f2 and film Kodak Gold 200

rob1234 · 08-09-2012, 12:43 PM

ME, K24/2.8, RVP50

**gofour3** · 08-09-2012, 12:50 PM

Originally posted by sm. pelle

70' Camaro it was.

Found one more:
K-1000 Helios 44 58mm/f2 and film Kodak Gold 200

Yea Fred and I were correct, it was a 70' Camaro! I had a 78' and 84' Z28, but the body style was not as nice as the older ones. Too much plastic and not enough chrome.

Phil.

eddie1960 · 08-10-2012, 04:14 PM

a couple on superia from a test roll on my SF1

with the DA35 2.4 @ 2.4 not a great shot but the lens seems fine on ff

and with the smc super tak 55 1.8 @ or about 1.8

last with the tak 135 3.5 @ 3.5

I like the camera, wish it had the wheels the z1 has but then for $18 beggars can't be choosers

hollywoodfred · 08-11-2012, 04:47 AM

I finally finished my first roll of Velvia 50 slide film and just recently got the results from Dwayne's. Of course, I messed up many of them with unwanted vignetting because I used the wrong hood for the lens (another lesson learned the hard way

). What follows are cropped from the originals (Shot with the K2 and scanned by me with the 9000F). And on a whim, I also converted them to black and white.

Cadillac, K24/2.8, polarizing filter

converted to B&W in PSE8

Cadillac, K24/2.8, polarizing filter

converted to B&W in PSE8

Late 40's Chevy, M50/1.4, 81A filter

Converted to black & white

Late 40's Chevy, M50/1.4, 81A filter

Converted to black & white

Nesster · 08-11-2012, 09:05 AM

From a few years ago, Retina IIa, I forget the film

rob1234 · 08-11-2012, 09:34 AM

More RVP50:

ME K24/2.8, f/8(?). RVP50 @ ISO 50

KJon · 08-11-2012, 06:21 PM

@Nesster re "Self-Portrait", Subtle. Very Subtle. Major points for clever on this one. (And it almost makes me want to dust off my Retina IIa and run a roll of film through it. Almost).

Best,
Kevin

paulusje · 08-12-2012, 01:57 AM

Long expired Fuji velvia RVP50, underexposed some but they still turned out ok

Pentax ME-Super with Pentax K 28 f/3.5

wehavenowaves! · 08-12-2012, 04:57 PM

hey guys i had a question about expired film. what are some of the results of using expired film. i just took a vacation and got my film back. one of the rolls has a SERIOUS blue tint to it. the skys are completely saturated and the contrast might be pretty messed up too. i honestly dont even know if the film was expired or not. or i heard the same results can also occur if the lab used auto color correction when the scanned the negatives. any ideas? i will put up an example or two later. thanks.

paulusje · 08-13-2012, 01:18 AM

Originally posted by wehavenowaves!

hey guys i had a question about expired film. what are some of the results of using expired film. i just took a vacation and got my film back. one of the rolls has a SERIOUS blue tint to it. the skys are completely saturated and the contrast might be pretty messed up too. i honestly dont even know if the film was expired or not. or i heard the same results can also occur if the lab used auto color correction when the scanned the negatives. any ideas? i will put up an example or two later. thanks.

If the negatives look ok then it's a scanning error.
If the negatives have a colour shift then it can be due to expired film or maybe they messed up the temperature of one of the liquids used during development .
Just my two cents

wehavenowaves! · 08-13-2012, 05:47 AM

here are some examples of my messed up shots. i tried to compare some of the negatives. ***i have no idea how to "read" a negative*** the negatives look somewhat similar. perhaps a bit different from another roll. i guess its worth noting that some of the exposures were worse that others. most of them if i just tuned the contrast and saturation down, came to bit of a more nuetral tone. ideas???

Swift1 · 08-13-2012, 03:46 PM

Originally posted by wehavenowaves!

here are some examples of my messed up shots. i tried to compare some of the negatives. ***i have no idea how to "read" a negative*** the negatives look somewhat similar. perhaps a bit different from another roll. i guess its worth noting that some of the exposures were worse that others. most of them if i just tuned the contrast and saturation down, came to bit of a more nuetral tone. ideas???

It could be color shift of the film, but even so, I would think that with proper scanning, you should get better results. I've shot some very expired film and never had anything come out like that.
How was it scanned?
It could maybe have been developed wrong. What kind of film? Was it slide film by chance? It almost looks cross-processed.

I hope you don't mind, I saved one of your images and did a quick edit to it.

Swift1 · 08-13-2012, 04:04 PM

I finally got through scanning my B&W from Yosemite so today I started scanning a 120 roll of Provia 100 that I shot a month ago.

Pentax 67, SMC Pentax 67 90/2.8, Fujichrome Provia 100

08-09-2012, 06:44 AM	#7261
Jonathan Mac Pentaxian Join Date: Apr 2009 Location: Madrid, Spain Posts: 10,897	More Fuji Pro 400H (at 200) in Segovia. For a few of these I remember the lens used, for the others I don't. I've quickly become too lazy to take notes. M 85mm f/2 K 28mm f/3.5 K 28mm f/3.5

08-11-2012, 04:47 AM	#7266
hollywoodfred Veteran Member Join Date: Jan 2012 Location: Vinton, Iowa Photos: Albums Posts: 358	I finally finished my first roll of Velvia 50 slide film and just recently got the results from Dwayne's. Of course, I messed up many of them with unwanted vignetting because I used the wrong hood for the lens (another lesson learned the hard way). What follows are cropped from the originals (Shot with the K2 and scanned by me with the 9000F). And on a whim, I also converted them to black and white. Cadillac, K24/2.8, polarizing filter converted to B&W in PSE8 Cadillac, K24/2.8, polarizing filter converted to B&W in PSE8 Late 40's Chevy, M50/1.4, 81A filter Converted to black & white Late 40's Chevy, M50/1.4, 81A filter Converted to black & white

08-13-2012, 05:47 AM	#7273
wehavenowaves! Forum Member Join Date: Jan 2011 Location: Seoul Posts: 98	here are some examples of my messed up shots. i tried to compare some of the negatives. *i have no idea how to "read" a negative* the negatives look somewhat similar. perhaps a bit different from another roll. i guess its worth noting that some of the exposures were worse that others. most of them if i just tuned the contrast and saturation down, came to bit of a more nuetral tone. ideas??? Attached Images

08-13-2012, 03:46 PM	#7274
Swift1 Veteran Member Join Date: Sep 2009 Location: Oregon Photos: Gallery \| Albums Posts: 5,079	Originally posted by wehavenowaves! here are some examples of my messed up shots. i tried to compare some of the negatives. *i have no idea how to "read" a negative* the negatives look somewhat similar. perhaps a bit different from another roll. i guess its worth noting that some of the exposures were worse that others. most of them if i just tuned the contrast and saturation down, came to bit of a more nuetral tone. ideas??? It could be color shift of the film, but even so, I would think that with proper scanning, you should get better results. I've shot some very expired film and never had anything come out like that. How was it scanned? It could maybe have been developed wrong. What kind of film? Was it slide film by chance? It almost looks cross-processed. I hope you don't mind, I saved one of your images and did a quick edit to it. Last edited by Swift1; 04-06-2014 at 11:51 AM.

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
K20D test shots at Lets Go Digital	schufosi777	Pentax News and Rumors	6	04-20-2013 11:31 AM
Macro Cool Macro shots	derajjjg	Post Your Photos!	2	12-27-2009 09:36 PM
Lets see your Moon and Mars shots	Igilligan	Post Your Photos!	9	12-05-2009 08:55 AM
Way cool bat shots	and	General Talk	7	10-01-2009 02:54 AM
Cool Shots & Info	Fl_Gulfer	Post Your Photos!	0	12-10-2007 11:44 AM

08-09-2012, 08:09 AM	#7262
sm. pelle New Member Join Date: Jul 2011 Posts: 13	70' Camaro it was. Found one more: K-1000 Helios 44 58mm/f2 and film Kodak Gold 200

08-09-2012, 12:43 PM	#7263
rob1234 Veteran Member Join Date: Apr 2010 Location: Wiltshire/Hampshire Photos: Albums Posts: 1,760	ME, K24/2.8, RVP50

08-09-2012, 12:50 PM	#7264
gofour3 Site Supporter Join Date: Oct 2008 Location: Vancouver, Canada Posts: 8,091	Originally posted by sm. pelle 70' Camaro it was. Found one more: K-1000 Helios 44 58mm/f2 and film Kodak Gold 200 Yea Fred and I were correct, it was a 70' Camaro! I had a 78' and 84' Z28, but the body style was not as nice as the older ones. Too much plastic and not enough chrome. Phil.

08-10-2012, 04:14 PM	#7265
eddie1960 Veteran Member Join Date: Aug 2010 Location: Toronto Photos: Gallery \| Albums Posts: 13,666	a couple on superia from a test roll on my SF1 with the DA35 2.4 @ 2.4 not a great shot but the lens seems fine on ff and with the smc super tak 55 1.8 @ or about 1.8 last with the tak 135 3.5 @ 3.5 I like the camera, wish it had the wheels the z1 has but then for $18 beggars can't be choosers

08-11-2012, 09:05 AM	#7267
Nesster Veteran Member Join Date: Oct 2006 Location: NJ USA Photos: Gallery Posts: 13,072	From a few years ago, Retina IIa, I forget the film

08-11-2012, 09:34 AM	#7268
rob1234 Veteran Member Join Date: Apr 2010 Location: Wiltshire/Hampshire Photos: Albums Posts: 1,760	More RVP50: ME K24/2.8, f/8(?). RVP50 @ ISO 50

08-11-2012, 06:21 PM	#7269
KJon Veteran Member Join Date: Jun 2009 Location: Connecticut, USA Photos: Gallery Posts: 542	@Nesster re "Self-Portrait", Subtle. Very Subtle. Major points for clever on this one. (And it almost makes me want to dust off my Retina IIa and run a roll of film through it. Almost). Best, Kevin

08-12-2012, 01:57 AM	#7270
paulusje Senior Member Join Date: Mar 2012 Posts: 134	Long expired Fuji velvia RVP50, underexposed some but they still turned out ok Pentax ME-Super with Pentax K 28 f/3.5

08-12-2012, 04:57 PM	#7271
wehavenowaves! Forum Member Join Date: Jan 2011 Location: Seoul Posts: 98	hey guys i had a question about expired film. what are some of the results of using expired film. i just took a vacation and got my film back. one of the rolls has a SERIOUS blue tint to it. the skys are completely saturated and the contrast might be pretty messed up too. i honestly dont even know if the film was expired or not. or i heard the same results can also occur if the lab used auto color correction when the scanned the negatives. any ideas? i will put up an example or two later. thanks.

08-13-2012, 01:18 AM	#7272
paulusje Senior Member Join Date: Mar 2012 Posts: 134	Originally posted by wehavenowaves! hey guys i had a question about expired film. what are some of the results of using expired film. i just took a vacation and got my film back. one of the rolls has a SERIOUS blue tint to it. the skys are completely saturated and the contrast might be pretty messed up too. i honestly dont even know if the film was expired or not. or i heard the same results can also occur if the lab used auto color correction when the scanned the negatives. any ideas? i will put up an example or two later. thanks. If the negatives look ok then it's a scanning error. If the negatives have a colour shift then it can be due to expired film or maybe they messed up the temperature of one of the liquids used during development . Just my two cents

08-13-2012, 04:04 PM	#7275
Swift1 Veteran Member Join Date: Sep 2009 Location: Oregon Photos: Gallery \| Albums Posts: 5,079	I finally got through scanning my B&W from Yosemite so today I started scanning a 120 roll of Provia 100 that I shot a month ago. Pentax 67, SMC Pentax 67 90/2.8, Fujichrome Provia 100