[arnold]

Note: It is mid winter here.

Note: This is mid winter here.
These were taken by a Voigtlander Perkeo 6x6, Kodak Ektar

Fuzzy Tree

---

Last edited by arnold; 07-13-2013 at 01:15 AM.

[pentaxk1000denver]

Thanks all. Here's a couple more. I recently acquired a Pentax-M 20/4, and wow, what a fun lens! Fireworks from 7/4 (Ektar 100):



And here's a rather long exposure (somewhere around an hour to ninety minutes I believe) from my Hasselblad, on Velvia 25:

[Jonathan Mac]

Thanks all. Here's a couple more. I recently acquired a Pentax-M 20/4, and wow, what a fun lens! Fireworks from 7/4 (Ektar 100):

And here's a rather long exposure (somewhere around an hour to ninety minutes I believe) from my Hasselblad, on Velvia 25:

I love the star-trail shot. I recently tried a star-trail shot on film on a clear night - Yashica 124G with Ilford FP4+ at f/8 for 75 minutes - the negative was completely blank!

[manntax]

X-posted from my post photos thread - since that one concentrates on how DA 40mm XS performed on full frame camera - I though that I would post them here too - just with the intention of sharing

Kodak Ektar 100 and SMC DA 40mm XS, some PP to bring the levels and fix the colors.

1)


2)


3)


4)


-manntax

[mattt]

Wow! - I never would have guessed the 40mm xs would suite 135 film. Lovely shots too.

[TomB_tx]

Handheld available light macro on film means the grain of high speed film becomes part of the picture, especially when you crop to recompose and find what you should have shot to begin with. This was either a 50 2.8 SMC-A on MX or a 60 Elmarit 2.8 on Leicaflex - I was using both. Without extension tubes max was 1:2 - so I should have added the extension to fill the frame. ISO 400 - probably Fuji.

[manntax]

Wow! - I never would have guessed the 40mm xs would suite 135 film. Lovely shots too

Yes! exactly my thought so I did a whole film to simple check it - especially that I couldn't find anything convincing really.
What I found out is that this lens is extremely viable on 135mm film and fully covers the 36x24 frame. Also I didn't observe *any* vignetting whatsoever in real life situations.
Generally an exciting addition to my collection of lenses - highly recommended and I consider it as yet another hidden gem from Pentax stable - so to speak :P

Here's another one from the same film - slightly abstract view of local sculpture - my attempt to some BW PP

[wuzet]

Pentax 67, Takumar 67 105/2.4, Fuji Reala 100

[Eagle94VT]

I really enjoy Kodak Ektar film:


My youngest son:




And the boys together. I promised more ice cream if they sat still for the shot!





These are not from my Pentax gear, but my EOS 3 with the new Tamron 24-70 VC.

[Swift1]

Pentax KX Motor, SMC Pentax "K" 50/1.4, expired Kodak Gold 200

[wuzet]

Pentax 67, Takumar 67 105/2.4, Fujichrome MS100/1000

[rob1234]

P67
45/4
Velvia 100F

[Jonathan Mac]

I really enjoy Kodak Ektar film:

My youngest son:



And the boys together. I promised more ice cream if they sat still for the shot!




These are not from my Pentax gear, but my EOS 3 with the new Tamron 24-70 VC.

Great shots, wow, I really wish I could get such clear and detailed scans of my film shots. Mine don't even come close.

[gofour3]

Experimenting with the 67 120/3.5 Soft lens & Helicoid extension tube. (P67II & Kodak E100G)





Phil.

[wuzet]

Pentax 645, Planar 80/2.8, Fujichrome MS 100/1000