:cool: Lets see those ''film'' shots

Swift1 · 10-13-2014, 08:47 PM - **2 Likes**

Hasselblad 500c/m
Carl Zeiss Planar C T* 80/2.8
FujiPRO 160NS
Epson V500

Cuthbert · 10-14-2014, 01:25 AM - **2 Likes**

Leica M3 + Jupiter 12 + Kodak Ultramax.

Today I would use Ektar or Portra, the colours with the Ultramax and Kodak Gold are too washed out for my taste.

**Jacquot** · 10-14-2014, 04:36 AM

Originally posted by Swift1

Hasselblad 500c/m
Carl Zeiss Planar C T* 80/2.8
FujiPRO 160NS
Epson V500

Nice light!

**gofour3** · 10-14-2014, 07:35 AM

Originally posted by Cuthbert

Leica M3 + Jupiter 12 + Kodak Ultramax.

Today I would use Ektar or Portra, the colours with the Ultramax and Kodak Gold are too washed out for my taste.

Like the reflections!

Phil.

Lauke_101 · 10-14-2014, 07:48 AM - **1 Like**

Shot in Brussels last summer with my Yashica Electro 35 GS. Some more shots from the same roll show this blue band through the left side, but not all. Could that still be a light leak?

Swift1 · 10-14-2014, 11:20 AM

Originally posted by Jacquot

Nice light!

Thanks David.

---------- Post added 10-14-2014 at 11:22 AM ----------

Originally posted by Lauke_101

Shot in Brussels last summer with my Yashica Electro 35 GS. Some more shots from the same roll show this blue band through the left side, but not all. Could that still be a light leak?

Great colors and composition.
It could be flare, but is more likely a leak.

**Clarkey** · 10-14-2014, 01:16 PM

Originally posted by Lauke_101

Shot in Brussels last summer with my Yashica Electro 35 GS. Some more shots from the same roll show this blue band through the left side, but not all. Could that still be a light leak?

Nice shot:
How were these scanned? Better question - does the streak show up on the negative?

LFLee · 10-14-2014, 05:20 PM - **1 Like**

cross-posted on Medium Format section...

PENTAX 67II + 105mm, Fujifilm Pro 400h.

morning light, on Appalachian Trail, Maryland section.

SpartanD63 · 10-15-2014, 01:09 AM - **1 Like**

Originally posted by LFLee

cross-posted on Medium Format section...

PENTAX 67II + 105mm, Fujifilm Pro 400h.

morning light, on Appalachian Trail, Maryland section.

Every shot I see you post from your 67 is beautiful... Makes me tempted to pick up one...

...And I was going to upload some scans of my film I'd developed myself, but it would appear that my $2.50 garage sale scanner (Epson 2400) has died.... Time to save up for a v600/700...

dracluff · 10-15-2014, 04:43 AM

Originally posted by Swift1

Hasselblad 500c/m
Carl Zeiss Planar C T* 80/2.8
FujiPRO 160NS
Epson V500

That is a nice shot Colton. I always love browsing through these galleries and your shots are one of the reasons that it is so enjoyable. I shoot mostly B&W but some of you shots are making me want to shoot some slides or some ektar.
Dan

Lauke_101 · 10-15-2014, 07:44 AM

Originally posted by Clarkey

Nice shot:
How were these scanned? Better question - does the streak show up on the negative?

Took a closer look at the negatives and yes, it does show up all the way through to the sprocket holes. But on the entire roll, there's only 5 streaks and their locations are not related to longer intervals between those frames.

Oh well, I haven't replaced the seals yet so that is probably the culprit.

LFLee · 10-15-2014, 08:18 AM - **1 Like**

Originally posted by SpartanD63

Every shot I see you post from your 67 is beautiful... Makes me tempted to pick up one...

...And I was going to upload some scans of my film I'd developed myself, but it would appear that my $2.50 garage sale scanner (Epson 2400) has died.... Time to save up for a v600/700...

Thanks.

btw, check out Epson webstore... from time to time they have really good deal on refurbished scanner, with great discount and free shipping.

---------- Post added 10-15-2014 at 11:19 AM ----------

another P67II+105mm... Fuji Pro 400H.

manntax · 10-15-2014, 08:27 AM

Originally posted by LFLee

another P67II+105mm... Fuji Pro 400H.

Very nice shots - as others have said - your images from that camera are very appealing, however, to me they are slightly on the overexposed (during PP perhaps ) side. I know this is intentional and can be appealing, but my question is about printing - how do they print or di you process them differently to print ? I have the feeling that printed like that would look somehow washed out , no ?

Thanks

LesDMess · 10-15-2014, 08:32 AM

Originally posted by LFLee

Thanks.

another P67II+105mm... Fuji Pro 400H.

I also really like the slightly overexposed results on both of these. Your online images are something to be very proud of!

LFLee · 10-15-2014, 08:50 AM

Originally posted by manntax

Very nice shots - as others have said - your images from that camera are very appealing, however, to me they are slightly on the overexposed (during PP perhaps ) side. I know this is intentional and can be appealing, but my question is about printing - how do they print or di you process them differently to print ? I have the feeling that printed like that would look somehow washed out , no ?

Thanks

Thanks for the comment! I personally at a stage to experiment those 'overexposed' look (like those typically seen in film wedding photo) but apparently still learning and not quite there.

Printing is always a issue, different lab print differently and only few left that print directly from negatives (in this case my images turn out fine, and actually some still underexposed, in my opinion)... and those that I send digital file to print varied even greatly from store to store...

I guess if I want to print large, I will have to stick with one lab and adjust my image according to that lab.

Originally posted by LesDMess

I also really like the slightly overexposed results on both of these. Your online images are something to be very proud of!

Thanks for the kind words! Still learning and figuring this out (lab, scanning, etc.), this is my 17th roll of 120 film.

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
K20D test shots at Lets Go Digital	schufosi777	Pentax News and Rumors	6	04-20-2013 11:31 AM
Macro Cool Macro shots	derajjjg	Post Your Photos!	2	12-27-2009 09:36 PM
Lets see your Moon and Mars shots	Igilligan	Post Your Photos!	9	12-05-2009 08:55 AM
Way cool bat shots	and	General Talk	7	10-01-2009 02:54 AM
Cool Shots & Info	Fl_Gulfer	Post Your Photos!	0	12-10-2007 11:44 AM

10-13-2014, 08:47 PM - 2 Likes	#10171
Swift1 Veteran Member Join Date: Sep 2009 Location: Oregon Photos: Gallery \| Albums Posts: 5,079	Hasselblad 500c/m Carl Zeiss Planar C T* 80/2.8 FujiPRO 160NS Epson V500

10-14-2014, 01:25 AM - 2 Likes	#10172
Cuthbert Veteran Member Join Date: Nov 2013 Photos: Gallery Posts: 1,740	Leica M3 + Jupiter 12 + Kodak Ultramax. Today I would use Ektar or Portra, the colours with the Ultramax and Kodak Gold are too washed out for my taste.

10-14-2014, 04:36 AM	#10173
Jacquot Loyal Site Supporter Join Date: May 2008 Location: Sun City Center, FL Photos: Gallery Posts: 2,544	Originally posted by Swift1 Hasselblad 500c/m Carl Zeiss Planar C T* 80/2.8 FujiPRO 160NS Epson V500 Nice light!

10-14-2014, 07:35 AM	#10174
gofour3 Site Supporter Join Date: Oct 2008 Location: Vancouver, Canada Posts: 8,089	Originally posted by Cuthbert Leica M3 + Jupiter 12 + Kodak Ultramax. Today I would use Ektar or Portra, the colours with the Ultramax and Kodak Gold are too washed out for my taste. Like the reflections! Phil.

10-14-2014, 07:48 AM - 1 Like	#10175
Lauke_101 Senior Member Join Date: Jul 2009 Location: Netherlands Posts: 160	Shot in Brussels last summer with my Yashica Electro 35 GS. Some more shots from the same roll show this blue band through the left side, but not all. Could that still be a light leak?

10-14-2014, 11:20 AM	#10176
Swift1 Veteran Member Join Date: Sep 2009 Location: Oregon Photos: Gallery \| Albums Posts: 5,079	Originally posted by Jacquot Nice light! Thanks David. ---------- Post added 10-14-2014 at 11:22 AM ---------- Originally posted by Lauke_101 Shot in Brussels last summer with my Yashica Electro 35 GS. Some more shots from the same roll show this blue band through the left side, but not all. Could that still be a light leak? Great colors and composition. It could be flare, but is more likely a leak.

10-14-2014, 01:16 PM	#10177
Clarkey Site Supporter Join Date: Jan 2008 Location: Brampton, ON, Canada Photos: Gallery Posts: 2,456	Originally posted by Lauke_101 Shot in Brussels last summer with my Yashica Electro 35 GS. Some more shots from the same roll show this blue band through the left side, but not all. Could that still be a light leak? Nice shot: How were these scanned? Better question - does the streak show up on the negative?

10-14-2014, 05:20 PM - 1 Like	#10178
LFLee Veteran Member Join Date: Aug 2009 Location: Southern California Photos: Gallery \| Albums Posts: 2,292	cross-posted on Medium Format section... PENTAX 67II + 105mm, Fujifilm Pro 400h. morning light, on Appalachian Trail, Maryland section.

10-15-2014, 01:09 AM - 1 Like	#10179
SpartanD63 Veteran Member Join Date: Aug 2012 Photos: Gallery \| Albums Posts: 351	Originally posted by LFLee cross-posted on Medium Format section... PENTAX 67II + 105mm, Fujifilm Pro 400h. morning light, on Appalachian Trail, Maryland section. Every shot I see you post from your 67 is beautiful... Makes me tempted to pick up one... ...And I was going to upload some scans of my film I'd developed myself, but it would appear that my $2.50 garage sale scanner (Epson 2400) has died.... Time to save up for a v600/700...

10-15-2014, 04:43 AM	#10180
dracluff Senior Member Join Date: Jul 2009 Location: Dartmouth Photos: Gallery \| Albums Posts: 202	Originally posted by Swift1 Hasselblad 500c/m Carl Zeiss Planar C T* 80/2.8 FujiPRO 160NS Epson V500 That is a nice shot Colton. I always love browsing through these galleries and your shots are one of the reasons that it is so enjoyable. I shoot mostly B&W but some of you shots are making me want to shoot some slides or some ektar. Dan

Thread Tools	Search this Thread
	Search this Thread: Advanced Search

10-15-2014, 07:44 AM	#10181
Lauke_101 Senior Member Join Date: Jul 2009 Location: Netherlands Posts: 160	Originally posted by Clarkey Nice shot: How were these scanned? Better question - does the streak show up on the negative? Took a closer look at the negatives and yes, it does show up all the way through to the sprocket holes. But on the entire roll, there's only 5 streaks and their locations are not related to longer intervals between those frames. Oh well, I haven't replaced the seals yet so that is probably the culprit.

10-15-2014, 08:18 AM - 1 Like	#10182
LFLee Veteran Member Join Date: Aug 2009 Location: Southern California Photos: Gallery \| Albums Posts: 2,292	Originally posted by SpartanD63 Every shot I see you post from your 67 is beautiful... Makes me tempted to pick up one... ...And I was going to upload some scans of my film I'd developed myself, but it would appear that my $2.50 garage sale scanner (Epson 2400) has died.... Time to save up for a v600/700... Thanks. btw, check out Epson webstore... from time to time they have really good deal on refurbished scanner, with great discount and free shipping. ---------- Post added 10-15-2014 at 11:19 AM ---------- another P67II+105mm... Fuji Pro 400H.

10-15-2014, 08:27 AM	#10183
manntax Veteran Member Join Date: Jan 2012 Photos: Albums Posts: 1,972	Originally posted by LFLee another P67II+105mm... Fuji Pro 400H. Very nice shots - as others have said - your images from that camera are very appealing, however, to me they are slightly on the overexposed (during PP perhaps ) side. I know this is intentional and can be appealing, but my question is about printing - how do they print or di you process them differently to print ? I have the feeling that printed like that would look somehow washed out , no ? Thanks

10-15-2014, 08:32 AM	#10184
LesDMess Pentaxian Join Date: May 2011 Location: Santa Cruz, CA Photos: Albums Posts: 3,235	Originally posted by LFLee Thanks. another P67II+105mm... Fuji Pro 400H. I also really like the slightly overexposed results on both of these. Your online images are something to be very proud of!

10-15-2014, 08:50 AM	#10185
LFLee Veteran Member Join Date: Aug 2009 Location: Southern California Photos: Gallery \| Albums Posts: 2,292	Originally posted by manntax Very nice shots - as others have said - your images from that camera are very appealing, however, to me they are slightly on the overexposed (during PP perhaps ) side. I know this is intentional and can be appealing, but my question is about printing - how do they print or di you process them differently to print ? I have the feeling that printed like that would look somehow washed out , no ? Thanks Thanks for the comment! I personally at a stage to experiment those 'overexposed' look (like those typically seen in film wedding photo) but apparently still learning and not quite there. Printing is always a issue, different lab print differently and only few left that print directly from negatives (in this case my images turn out fine, and actually some still underexposed, in my opinion)... and those that I send digital file to print varied even greatly from store to store... I guess if I want to print large, I will have to stick with one lab and adjust my image according to that lab. Originally posted by LesDMess I also really like the slightly overexposed results on both of these. Your online images are something to be very proud of! Thanks for the kind words! Still learning and figuring this out (lab, scanning, etc.), this is my 17th roll of 120 film.