:cool: Lets see those ''film'' shots

dsmithhfx · 01-28-2016, 02:29 PM

Originally posted by drmoss_ca

A new CR2 in the Bessa III and I could finish the film. FujiPro 400H, 39ºC Unicolor presskit, X1 scans:

Chris

Whoa. You should deffo shoot more color.

dsmithhfx · 01-28-2016, 05:37 PM

stevebrot · 01-28-2016, 07:53 PM

Originally posted by Wild Mark

My first shots with a Spotmatic - ever - just testing to see if it worked.

Used a ST55/1.8 and Kodak 400

That would be an affirmative. Congratulations!

Steve

Swift1 · 01-29-2016, 01:45 PM - **5 Likes**

Hasselblad 500c/m
Carl Zeiss Planar C T* 80/2.8
Kodak Ektar 100
Epson V500

Arvid · 01-29-2016, 02:30 PM - **2 Likes**

Originally posted by Swift1

Hasselblad 500c/m
Carl Zeiss Planar C T* 80/2.8
Kodak Ektar 100
Epson V500

Great angle and awesome colours, as usual. I just got myself my first roll of Ektar (35mm though). There are a lot of people presenting stunning results with it, you are one of the regulars. I'm curious to see how I'll be able to scan it and hope that I'll have something to show you in this thread. Once again I can't help but notice how many great photographs and photographers are gathered in this fine thread.

_Ben · 01-29-2016, 05:35 PM

Originally posted by Swift1

Hasselblad 500c/m
Carl Zeiss Planar C T* 80/2.8
Kodak Ektar 100
Epson V500

I like that angle as well. I warmed mine up a bit in Color Efex Pro. I like your DOF, gonna tuck that away for later.

Pentax 645, 75mm?, Ektar 100, Epson v550.

Name: plymouth02a.jpg
Views: 297
Size: 140.4 KB

Name: plymouth02a.jpg
Views: 297
Size: 140.4 KB

Swift1 · 01-29-2016, 05:46 PM - **1 Like**

You should resize the image to 1200 pixels wide and re-post.
Can only see a small portion of your image because it's too large for web viewing.

dsmithhfx · 01-29-2016, 06:22 PM

Originally posted by Swift1

You should resize the image to 1200 pixels wide and re-post.
Can only see a small portion of your image because it's too large for web viewing.

You can set a max size in your preferences & it will scale anything larger to fit.

_Ben · 01-29-2016, 06:43 PM

Originally posted by Swift1

You should resize the image to 1200 pixels wide and re-post.
Can only see a small portion of your image because it's too large for web viewing.

My browser says that that is only 693px wide?

dsmithhfx · 01-29-2016, 06:54 PM

Tom S. · 01-30-2016, 05:48 AM

Originally posted by _Ben

My browser says that that is only 693px wide?

The picture is 40 MB in size and over 6600 pixels in width. I have resized it to 1000 pixels. Please keep this in mind in the future.

_Ben · 01-30-2016, 06:22 AM

Originally posted by Tom S.

The picture is 40 MB in size and over 6600 pixels in width. I have resized it to 1000 pixels. Please keep this in mind in the future.

I looked at the size of the image in the link and it wasn't very big either. Looking deeper the attributes were huge, like you said. I assumed the IMG link would display the same as the in the link. Wrong

I wonder how many giant MF images I have hosted over there?

45 Mike · 01-30-2016, 10:42 AM

Hmm, using HTML, I can display an image that is 3000x2000 pixels, as 300x200 pixels.
I can also specify an image that is 300x200 pixels to be displayed as 3000x2000 pixels.

Apparently in this forum, a user can override the specified dimensions and set a maximum width and height.

I dunno, I set my max to 1000 pixels and I am happy.

Swift1 · 01-30-2016, 11:15 AM

Originally posted by _Ben

I like that angle as well. I warmed mine up a bit in Color Efex Pro. I like your DOF, gonna tuck that away for later.

Pentax 645, 75mm?, Ektar 100, Epson v550.

Attachment 296940

It's a cool photo, and a nice looking 'Cuda.

dsmithhfx · 01-30-2016, 05:06 PM

01-29-2016, 05:35 PM	#12741
_Ben Senior Member Join Date: Apr 2015 Location: Pensacola Florida Photos: Gallery Posts: 130	Originally posted by Swift1 Hasselblad 500c/m Carl Zeiss Planar C T* 80/2.8 Kodak Ektar 100 Epson V500 I like that angle as well. I warmed mine up a bit in Color Efex Pro. I like your DOF, gonna tuck that away for later. Pentax 645, 75mm?, Ektar 100, Epson v550. Last edited by Tom S.; 01-30-2016 at 05:49 AM.

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
K20D test shots at Lets Go Digital	schufosi777	Pentax News and Rumors	6	04-20-2013 11:31 AM
Macro Cool Macro shots	derajjjg	Post Your Photos!	2	12-27-2009 09:36 PM
Lets see your Moon and Mars shots	Igilligan	Post Your Photos!	9	12-05-2009 08:55 AM
Way cool bat shots	and	General Talk	7	10-01-2009 02:54 AM
Cool Shots & Info	Fl_Gulfer	Post Your Photos!	0	12-10-2007 11:44 AM

01-28-2016, 02:29 PM	#12736
dsmithhfx Pentaxian Join Date: Sep 2015 Location: Toronto Posts: 5,146	Originally posted by drmoss_ca A new CR2 in the Bessa III and I could finish the film. FujiPro 400H, 39ºC Unicolor presskit, X1 scans: Chris Whoa. You should deffo shoot more color.

01-28-2016, 05:37 PM	#12737
dsmithhfx Pentaxian Join Date: Sep 2015 Location: Toronto Posts: 5,146

01-28-2016, 07:53 PM	#12738
stevebrot Otis Memorial Pentaxian Join Date: Mar 2007 Location: Vancouver (USA) Photos: Gallery \| Albums Posts: 42,007	Originally posted by Wild Mark My first shots with a Spotmatic - ever - just testing to see if it worked. Used a ST55/1.8 and Kodak 400 That would be an affirmative. Congratulations! Steve

01-29-2016, 01:45 PM - 5 Likes	#12739
Swift1 Veteran Member Join Date: Sep 2009 Location: Oregon Photos: Gallery \| Albums Posts: 5,079	Hasselblad 500c/m Carl Zeiss Planar C T* 80/2.8 Kodak Ektar 100 Epson V500

01-29-2016, 02:30 PM - 2 Likes	#12740
Arvid Senior Member Join Date: Feb 2013 Photos: Gallery Posts: 168	Originally posted by Swift1 Hasselblad 500c/m Carl Zeiss Planar C T* 80/2.8 Kodak Ektar 100 Epson V500 Great angle and awesome colours, as usual. I just got myself my first roll of Ektar (35mm though). There are a lot of people presenting stunning results with it, you are one of the regulars. I'm curious to see how I'll be able to scan it and hope that I'll have something to show you in this thread. Once again I can't help but notice how many great photographs and photographers are gathered in this fine thread.

01-29-2016, 05:46 PM - 1 Like	#12742
Swift1 Veteran Member Join Date: Sep 2009 Location: Oregon Photos: Gallery \| Albums Posts: 5,079	You should resize the image to 1200 pixels wide and re-post. Can only see a small portion of your image because it's too large for web viewing.

01-29-2016, 06:22 PM	#12743
dsmithhfx Pentaxian Join Date: Sep 2015 Location: Toronto Posts: 5,146	Originally posted by Swift1 You should resize the image to 1200 pixels wide and re-post. Can only see a small portion of your image because it's too large for web viewing. You can set a max size in your preferences & it will scale anything larger to fit.

01-29-2016, 06:43 PM	#12744
_Ben Senior Member Join Date: Apr 2015 Location: Pensacola Florida Photos: Gallery Posts: 130	Originally posted by Swift1 You should resize the image to 1200 pixels wide and re-post. Can only see a small portion of your image because it's too large for web viewing. My browser says that that is only 693px wide?

01-29-2016, 06:54 PM	#12745
dsmithhfx Pentaxian Join Date: Sep 2015 Location: Toronto Posts: 5,146

01-30-2016, 05:48 AM	#12746
Tom S. Veteran Member Join Date: May 2008 Location: S.E. Michigan Photos: Albums Posts: 4,317	Originally posted by _Ben My browser says that that is only 693px wide? The picture is 40 MB in size and over 6600 pixels in width. I have resized it to 1000 pixels. Please keep this in mind in the future.

01-30-2016, 06:22 AM	#12747
_Ben Senior Member Join Date: Apr 2015 Location: Pensacola Florida Photos: Gallery Posts: 130	Originally posted by Tom S. The picture is 40 MB in size and over 6600 pixels in width. I have resized it to 1000 pixels. Please keep this in mind in the future. I looked at the size of the image in the link and it wasn't very big either. Looking deeper the attributes were huge, like you said. I assumed the IMG link would display the same as the in the link. Wrong I wonder how many giant MF images I have hosted over there?

01-30-2016, 10:42 AM	#12748
45 Mike Veteran Member Join Date: Feb 2014 Photos: Albums Posts: 1,350	Hmm, using HTML, I can display an image that is 3000x2000 pixels, as 300x200 pixels. I can also specify an image that is 300x200 pixels to be displayed as 3000x2000 pixels. Apparently in this forum, a user can override the specified dimensions and set a maximum width and height. I dunno, I set my max to 1000 pixels and I am happy.

01-30-2016, 11:15 AM	#12749
Swift1 Veteran Member Join Date: Sep 2009 Location: Oregon Photos: Gallery \| Albums Posts: 5,079	Originally posted by _Ben I like that angle as well. I warmed mine up a bit in Color Efex Pro. I like your DOF, gonna tuck that away for later. Pentax 645, 75mm?, Ektar 100, Epson v550. Attachment 296940 It's a cool photo, and a nice looking 'Cuda.

01-30-2016, 05:06 PM	#12750
dsmithhfx Pentaxian Join Date: Sep 2015 Location: Toronto Posts: 5,146