 |
 | Search this Thread |
| 02-27-2017, 03:30 PM - 11 Likes | #14791 |
|
From July 2012  Pentax MZ-S SMC PENTAX-F 28/2.8 Kodak Ektachrome E100VS Epson V500 | |
| 02-27-2017, 04:54 PM - 1 Like | #14792 |
 Originally posted by murrelet  Thanks for the tip. I'll have to try LensTagger. At the moment, I try to put this info as keywords. But would rather have to equipment info as EXIF and info about the image keyworded. Do note that LensTagger's interface sometimes leaves a little to be desired. From a UX standpoint, I'd call it "what happens when a programmer designs the UI": functional, but a bit clunky at times.  | |
| 02-27-2017, 07:44 PM | #14793 |
| Originally posted by g026r I do both keywords & exif, simply because that was I can find everything multiple ways. Do note that LensTagger's interface sometimes leaves a little to be desired. From a UX standpoint, I'd call it "what happens when a programmer designs the UI": functional, but a bit clunky at times. Steve | |
| 02-27-2017, 08:10 PM | #14794 |
| Originally posted by stevebrot Does it write the changes to the imported source file or are they written at export? | |
| 02-27-2017, 11:01 PM - 3 Likes | #14795 |
|
Find the squirrel.  Pentax 645Nii | 67 90/2.8 | Provia 400x | Epson V750 | |
| 02-27-2017, 11:31 PM - 1 Like | #14796 |
| Originally posted by chickentender Find the squirrel. Pentax 645Nii | 67 90/2.8 | Provia 400x | Epson V750  | |
| 02-28-2017, 12:09 PM - 5 Likes | #14799 |
| First roll through the P 67
Well, I've finally put a roll of 120 through the Beast of the Southern Wild--I must say, the negatives look great, but I'm afraid the scans aren't striking me as particularly well done. I think a bit of confusion with the counter help might have resulted in a pretty low-rez, "generic" file--I might have these rescanned at a different lab along with my next roll, just to see what's "really" there. Otherwise, I'm still pretty optimistic about the new system: all of these were shot with the 55/4, which seems sharp indeed, and it looks as if my Manfrotto 410 and Uni-loc 1700 are up to locking things down. Likewise, I'm digging the colors of Ektar--these were almost all "SOC" with a bit of slider work in ACR.     Last edited by CreationBear; 02-28-2017 at 12:49 PM. | |
| 02-28-2017, 05:15 PM | #14800 |
| Originally posted by CreationBear Well, I've finally put a roll of 120 through the Beast of the Southern Wild--I must say, the negatives look great, but I'm afraid the scans aren't striking me as particularly well done. I think a bit of confusion with the counter help might have resulted in a pretty low-rez, "generic" file--I might have these rescanned at a different lab along with my next roll, just to see what's "really" there. Otherwise, I'm still pretty optimistic about the new system: all of these were shot with the 55/4, which seems sharp indeed, and it looks as if my Manfrotto 410 and Uni-loc 1700 are up to locking things down. Likewise, I'm digging the colors of Ektar--these were almost all "SOC" with a bit of slider work in ACR. | |
| 02-28-2017, 06:57 PM - 2 Likes | #14801 |
|
Ha, thanks--definitely juggling a lot of variables here, including figuring out how to use an incident light meter. I'm still a little overwhelmed just looking through the 67's finder--a lot of real estate! The 55/4 is a trip as well, especially coming from a crop sensor K5: At any rate, a lot to learn--hope to see some from the Bronica soon as well. | |
| 02-28-2017, 08:48 PM - 4 Likes | #14802 |
|
Have I mentioned lately that I love my lab? Well, I love my lab. They got in some alpha rolls of Cinestill's 120 format 800T, and gave me one to try out. (With the promise that I report back to them about any issues I had with it. I believe they received between 50 to 100 rolls, so I'm not that special amongst their clients.  )I've shot the 35mm before and I can't say that I was enamoured of it. Results on 120 were much more pleasant, though I had some unfortunate electrostatic discharge visible to varying degrees on all frames. But that's why it's a pre-retail alpha.   Pentax 6x7. Super-Multi-Coated Takumar/6x7 105mm f2.4. Cinestill 800T alpha. Last edited by g026r; 02-28-2017 at 11:22 PM. | |
| 02-28-2017, 11:10 PM | #14803 |
| Originally posted by alvarossorio Asahi Pentax + Takumar 58 f2 Alcalá de Henares (Spain) Ektar 100 Tetenal C-41 Originally posted by g026r Have I mentioned lately that I love my lab? Well, I love my lab. They got in some alpha rolls of Cinestill's 120 format 800T, and gave me one to try out. (With the promise that I report back to them about any issues I had with it. I believe they received between 50 to 100 rolls, so I'm not that special amongst their clients. )I've shot the 35mm before and I can't say that I was enamoured of it. Results on 120 were much more pleasant, though I had some unfortunate electrostatic charge visible to varying degrees on all frames. But that's why it's a pre-retail alpha. Pentax 6x7. Super-Multi-Coated Takumar/6x7 105mm f2.4. Cinestill 800T alpha. | |
| 03-01-2017, 07:10 AM | #14805 |
| Originally posted by Jonathan Mac .Those look really nice. I haven't tried Cinestill yet due to availability and price, but based on these I think I'll be very tempted. | |
|
| Bookmarks |
| Tags - Make this thread easier to find by adding keywords to it! |
| architecture, details, ektar, exposure, film, goats, grandma, hood, kodachrome, kodak, lab, legs, lens, lunch, lx, mx, pentax, phil, photos, post, q7, roll, sarajevo, scans, shot, shots, steve, thanks, tokina, velvia |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| K20D test shots at Lets Go Digital | schufosi777 | Pentax News and Rumors | 6 | 04-20-2013 11:31 AM |
| Macro Cool Macro shots | derajjjg | Post Your Photos! | 2 | 12-27-2009 09:36 PM |
| Lets see your Moon and Mars shots | Igilligan | Post Your Photos! | 9 | 12-05-2009 08:55 AM |
| Way cool bat shots | and | General Talk | 7 | 10-01-2009 02:54 AM |
| Cool Shots & Info | Fl_Gulfer | Post Your Photos! | 0 | 12-10-2007 11:44 AM |
