:cool: Lets see those ''film'' shots

Nesster · 03-11-2009, 12:23 PM

Puma, what film was that? Looks like the photos are nicely aged... no substitute for that

Fuji Arcos 100, Ricoh Diacord, yellow filter. First pic is a contact sheet scan, the other two are film scans using the Epson software.

Pumalite · 03-11-2009, 01:00 PM

Originally posted by Nesster

Puma, what film was that? Looks like the photos are nicely aged... no substitute for that

Fuji Arcos 100, Ricoh Diacord, yellow filter. First pic is a contact sheet scan, the other two are film scans using the Epson software.

That was 30 years ago. Sorry.

Pumalite · 03-11-2009, 01:06 PM

I have here 2 I took with my Hassie:

The first in the studio; hours of work, sweat and glycerine (cropped)
The other outside. (cropped)

artobest · 03-11-2009, 02:33 PM

A couple more from me. Rollei Retro 100 and Ilford HP5.

Last edited by artobest; 04-12-2009 at 09:01 AM.

Pumalite · 03-11-2009, 02:48 PM

Nice reflections.

**fs999** · 03-11-2009, 03:12 PM

All those photos from the past are wonderful !

Canon A-1 • Vivitar Series I 70-210mm f:3.5 Macro
Agfachrome 200
Dizzy Gillespie, 1982 in Auch-en-Gascogne - France

Canon A-1 FD 35-70mm f:4
Agfachrome 50 L Professional

Last summer in Florival - Alsace - France...
Pentax *ist • Sigma 28-70mm f:2.8 EX Aspherical
Fujichrome Velvia 100F

Pentax *ist film camera
Sigma 28-70mm f:2.8 EX Aspherical
Fuji Neopan 400 in ID-11

jgredline · 03-11-2009, 05:36 PM

Samsung 200 speed color film.

Tri-x 400

More Tri-x 400

Last edited by jgredline; 03-19-2009 at 08:22 AM.

Ira · 03-11-2009, 05:51 PM

Oh, man. Are you SURE that Santa Anita one was shot on neg? That's the kind of color that totally arouses me.

You must have done some stuff to that digitally (don't we all?), but that color makes me weak in the knees, like a little girlie-man. Did you scan the print or the neg? I love the retro look. Something about the unreal saturation that inspires me.

Please--give me a CLUE. It looks totally chrome-like to me.

But to capture that water, I guess it would have to be at least 200.

jgredline · 03-11-2009, 05:57 PM

Originally posted by Ira

Oh, man. Are you SURE that Santa Anita one was shot on neg? That's the kind of color that totally arouses me.

You must have done some stuff to that digitally (don't we all?), but that color makes me weak in the knees, like a little girlie-man. Did you scan the print or the neg? I love the retro look. Something about the unreal saturation that inspires me.

Please--give me a CLUE. It looks totally chrome-like to me.

But to capture that water, I guess it would have to be at least 200.

Thank you. I remember that shot well. I shot it with my k1ooo and 50 F/1.4 lens @F/8. The only tweaking I did was increase contrast a tad and that be it. That samsung hi def film did put out some great colors. I say did, because I can't find it any longer.

geauxpez · 03-11-2009, 07:27 PM

I got some "film shots" for ya -- how about these: Originals shot with an Olympus OM2n on 35mm film (either Kodak Ultra Color 100 or Kodak HiDef 200) professionally transferred to slides then run through a Daylab to transfer to Polaroid, then doing an emulsion lift to heavy watercolor paper. Whew -- that made me tired. (c:

The watercolor paper backing doesn't show up in the scans.

jgredline · 03-11-2009, 07:37 PM

Originally posted by geauxpez

I got some "film shots" for ya -- how about these: Originals shot with an Olympus OM2n on 35mm film (either Kodak Ultra Color 100 or Kodak HiDef 200) professionally transferred to slides then run through a Daylab to transfer to Polaroid, then doing an emulsion lift to heavy watercolor paper. Whew -- that made me tired. (c:

The watercolor paper backing doesn't show up in the scans.

I love the workmanship of these...well done.

jgredline · 03-11-2009, 07:43 PM

K1000, TRI-X 400, M50 wide open @F/1.4

More Tri-x 400

**GregK8** · 03-11-2009, 07:52 PM

With my K1000 and Sigma Pantel 135mm tele on Plus-X (I think)

jgredline · 03-11-2009, 08:00 PM

Originally posted by GregK8

With my K1000 and Sigma Pantel 135mm tele on Plus-X (I think)

Bravo!!!!!!!!!!!!!

**GregK8** · 03-11-2009, 08:20 PM

Originally posted by jgredline

Bravo!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Even a blind squirrel finds a nut once in a while

03-11-2009, 07:52 PM	#73
GregK8 Site Supporter Join Date: May 2008 Location: Western New York Photos: Gallery \| Albums Posts: 614	What's That Thing You're Pointing at Me? With my K1000 and Sigma Pantel 135mm tele on Plus-X (I think)

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
K20D test shots at Lets Go Digital	schufosi777	Pentax News and Rumors	6	04-20-2013 11:31 AM
Macro Cool Macro shots	derajjjg	Post Your Photos!	2	12-27-2009 09:36 PM
Lets see your Moon and Mars shots	Igilligan	Post Your Photos!	9	12-05-2009 08:55 AM
Way cool bat shots	and	General Talk	7	10-01-2009 02:54 AM
Cool Shots & Info	Fl_Gulfer	Post Your Photos!	0	12-10-2007 11:44 AM

03-11-2009, 12:23 PM	#61
Nesster Veteran Member Join Date: Oct 2006 Location: NJ USA Photos: Gallery Posts: 13,072	Puma, what film was that? Looks like the photos are nicely aged... no substitute for that Fuji Arcos 100, Ricoh Diacord, yellow filter. First pic is a contact sheet scan, the other two are film scans using the Epson software.

03-11-2009, 01:00 PM	#62
Pumalite Banned Join Date: Jan 2009 Posts: 80	Originally posted by Nesster Puma, what film was that? Looks like the photos are nicely aged... no substitute for that Fuji Arcos 100, Ricoh Diacord, yellow filter. First pic is a contact sheet scan, the other two are film scans using the Epson software. That was 30 years ago. Sorry.

03-11-2009, 01:06 PM	#63
Pumalite Banned Join Date: Jan 2009 Posts: 80	I have here 2 I took with my Hassie: The first in the studio; hours of work, sweat and glycerine (cropped) The other outside. (cropped)

03-11-2009, 02:33 PM	#64
artobest Veteran Member Join Date: Jul 2008 Location: Swansea, Wales Posts: 455	A couple more from me. Rollei Retro 100 and Ilford HP5. Last edited by artobest; 04-12-2009 at 09:01 AM.

03-11-2009, 02:48 PM	#65
Pumalite Banned Join Date: Jan 2009 Posts: 80	Nice reflections.

03-11-2009, 03:12 PM	#66
fs999 Loyal Site Supporter Join Date: Jul 2008 Location: Luxembourg Photos: Gallery Posts: 8,645	All those photos from the past are wonderful ! Canon A-1 • Vivitar Series I 70-210mm f:3.5 Macro Agfachrome 200 Dizzy Gillespie, 1982 in Auch-en-Gascogne - France Canon A-1 FD 35-70mm f:4 Agfachrome 50 L Professional Last summer in Florival - Alsace - France... Pentax ist • Sigma 28-70mm f:2.8 EX Aspherical Fujichrome Velvia 100F Pentax ist film camera Sigma 28-70mm f:2.8 EX Aspherical Fuji Neopan 400 in ID-11

03-11-2009, 05:36 PM	#67
jgredline Veteran Member Join Date: Oct 2007 Location: LosAngeles, Ca. Photos: Albums Posts: 10,628 Original Poster	Samsung 200 speed color film. Tri-x 400 More Tri-x 400 Last edited by jgredline; 03-19-2009 at 08:22 AM.

03-11-2009, 05:51 PM	#68
Ira Inactive Account Join Date: Mar 2009 Location: Coral Springs, FL Photos: Gallery \| Albums Posts: 5,216	Oh, man. Are you SURE that Santa Anita one was shot on neg? That's the kind of color that totally arouses me. You must have done some stuff to that digitally (don't we all?), but that color makes me weak in the knees, like a little girlie-man. Did you scan the print or the neg? I love the retro look. Something about the unreal saturation that inspires me. Please--give me a CLUE. It looks totally chrome-like to me. But to capture that water, I guess it would have to be at least 200.

03-11-2009, 05:57 PM	#69
jgredline Veteran Member Join Date: Oct 2007 Location: LosAngeles, Ca. Photos: Albums Posts: 10,628 Original Poster	Originally posted by Ira Oh, man. Are you SURE that Santa Anita one was shot on neg? That's the kind of color that totally arouses me. You must have done some stuff to that digitally (don't we all?), but that color makes me weak in the knees, like a little girlie-man. Did you scan the print or the neg? I love the retro look. Something about the unreal saturation that inspires me. Please--give me a CLUE. It looks totally chrome-like to me. But to capture that water, I guess it would have to be at least 200. Thank you. I remember that shot well. I shot it with my k1ooo and 50 F/1.4 lens @F/8. The only tweaking I did was increase contrast a tad and that be it. That samsung hi def film did put out some great colors. I say did, because I can't find it any longer.

03-11-2009, 07:27 PM	#70
geauxpez Veteran Member Join Date: Jul 2008 Location: Atlanta Photos: Gallery Posts: 1,196	I got some "film shots" for ya -- how about these: Originals shot with an Olympus OM2n on 35mm film (either Kodak Ultra Color 100 or Kodak HiDef 200) professionally transferred to slides then run through a Daylab to transfer to Polaroid, then doing an emulsion lift to heavy watercolor paper. Whew -- that made me tired. (c: The watercolor paper backing doesn't show up in the scans.

03-11-2009, 07:37 PM	#71
jgredline Veteran Member Join Date: Oct 2007 Location: LosAngeles, Ca. Photos: Albums Posts: 10,628 Original Poster	Originally posted by geauxpez I got some "film shots" for ya -- how about these: Originals shot with an Olympus OM2n on 35mm film (either Kodak Ultra Color 100 or Kodak HiDef 200) professionally transferred to slides then run through a Daylab to transfer to Polaroid, then doing an emulsion lift to heavy watercolor paper. Whew -- that made me tired. (c: The watercolor paper backing doesn't show up in the scans. I love the workmanship of these...well done.

03-11-2009, 07:43 PM	#72
jgredline Veteran Member Join Date: Oct 2007 Location: LosAngeles, Ca. Photos: Albums Posts: 10,628 Original Poster	K1000, TRI-X 400, M50 wide open @F/1.4 More Tri-x 400

03-11-2009, 08:00 PM	#74
jgredline Veteran Member Join Date: Oct 2007 Location: LosAngeles, Ca. Photos: Albums Posts: 10,628 Original Poster	Originally posted by GregK8 With my K1000 and Sigma Pantel 135mm tele on Plus-X (I think) Bravo!!!!!!!!!!!!!

03-11-2009, 08:20 PM	#75
GregK8 Site Supporter Join Date: May 2008 Location: Western New York Photos: Gallery \| Albums Posts: 614	Originally posted by jgredline Bravo!!!!!!!!!!!!! Even a blind squirrel finds a nut once in a while