[jgredline]

Old Pics:

[jgredline]

Some of my film shots can be found here:

https://www.pentaxforums.com/forums/post-your-photos/39927-aurora-borealis.html

https://www.pentaxforums.com/forums/post-your-photos/40037-midnight-sun-mountain-scene.html

https://www.pentaxforums.com/forums/post-your-photos/40036-pond.html

https://www.pentaxforums.com/forums/post-your-photos/41712-mountain-view-s.html

https://www.pentaxforums.com/forums/post-your-photos/40043-day-november.html

https://www.pentaxforums.com/forums/post-your-photos/40041-photos-mordor-valhalla.html

https://www.pentaxforums.com/forums/post-your-photos/41683-midnight-sun.html

https://www.pentaxforums.com/forums/post-your-photos/39928-fox.html

I like your pond images. My guess is if you want more comments, you should post the images here. A couple at a time though. Most folks don't like clicking on links.

[jgredline]

These are taken with my 1964 Spotmatic, Super Tak 55MM F/1.8 and Kodak BW400CN..

Removed offensive family snap



One of my favs from this series at the river.

[RoxnDox]

That image is shot by John Shaw!

Remove it immediately unless you are John Shaw!

Are you certain? I looked at John Shaw's website and didn't see it, nor does this image have his name on it as the images he displays do. On the other hand, this image is in Pumalite's photobucket almbum along with a lot of similar shots. Seems a rather harsh thing for you to say unless you have some evidence to back it up.

Jim

[Pål Jensen]

Are you certain? I looked at John Shaw's website and didn't see it, nor does this image have his name on it as the images he displays do. On the other hand, this image is in Pumalite's photobucket almbum along with a lot of similar shots. Seems a rather harsh thing for you to say unless you have some evidence to back it up.

Jim

Of course I'm sure. This is the back of John Shaws first book. No doubt it is the same image!:

[RoxnDox]

Of course I'm sure. This is the back of John Shaws first book. No doubt it is the same image!:

OK, well you didn't exactly show that evidence in your first message... So, now that there is some *evidence* presented, let's see what Puma lite says.

Jim

[TomE]

Wow, looks like the only thing missing from the photo on the back of John Shaws book is the bar code.

Tom

[CSoars]

Some of my film shots can be found here:

https://www.pentaxforums.com/forums/post-your-photos/39927-aurora-borealis.html

https://www.pentaxforums.com/forums/post-your-photos/40037-midnight-sun-mountain-scene.html

https://www.pentaxforums.com/forums/post-your-photos/40036-pond.html

https://www.pentaxforums.com/forums/post-your-photos/41712-mountain-view-s.html

https://www.pentaxforums.com/forums/post-your-photos/40043-day-november.html

https://www.pentaxforums.com/forums/post-your-photos/40041-photos-mordor-valhalla.html

https://www.pentaxforums.com/forums/post-your-photos/41683-midnight-sun.html

https://www.pentaxforums.com/forums/post-your-photos/39928-fox.html

Thanks for the links, this thread is getting unwieldy, especially since people reply and 'quote' the stream of images, meaning the same ones load multiple times.

Love those Northern Lights shots with the LX; I only see them once every year or so in my city. Your colour MF work is outstanding too! I'm itching to make good use of the IDM meter in my LX, it's not being used to it's potential I see.

[Pål Jensen]

Wow, looks like the only thing missing from the photo on the back of John Shaws book is the bar code.

Tom

The image without bar code can be found inside the book...

[stevebrot]

Of course I'm sure. This is the back of John Shaws first book. No doubt it is the same image!:

Oh my! Copyright theft on the Pentax forums!



I know the standard of quality here is pretty high, but posting another person's images to look good...that is pretty bad. My faith in the basic goodness of photo types is badly shaken.

Steve

[jgredline]

Thanks for the links, this thread is getting unwieldy, especially since people reply and 'quote' the stream of images, meaning the same ones load multiple times.

You do bring up a very good point. I am the most guilty of this..
Folks, when quoting or commentng on others work, lets start to leave the images off and refer to the image by post number... At work I still have a slow DSL connection, so I would appreciate it.

As for this Picture that Puma posted, lets not get into mud slinging. I see 4 0r 5 people intertwined already, when it should have been settled by 2 people and a mod...There is enough Mud slinging in PF as it is. We do not need it infiltrating the film section as well.

Lets get back to posting ''our'' film images....
Thank you...

[pasipasi]

Me Super + Cosina 135/2.8 + Kodak Ultra 400



Olympus 35rc + Kodak 400cn + Pentax AF280t flash



Pentax SF7 + FA28-70/4 I think + Kodak Ultra 400



Pentax P30t + M50/1.7 + Agfa APX 100

[zplus]

First some hp5 400 print scans:




Some color negs printed on b&w, print scans:




I think this was BW400CN but processed like it was regular b&w film, neg scan:


Now some randoms, I think mostly fuji superia 800:

[Pumalite]

I'm 85 years old. For all I know; he used My picture to do his book

[zplus]

I'm 85 years old. For all I know; he used My picture to do his book

The plot thickens...