Forgot Password
Pentax Camera Forums Home
 

Reply
Show Printable Version Search this Thread
03-11-2009, 01:32 PM   #1
Veteran Member
artobest's Avatar

Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Swansea, Wales
Posts: 455
Film forum taking off?

Today I noticed there were 19 people visiting the film forum when I logged on. Is this a record? If so, is it indicative of an upsurge of interest in our favourite medium, or just the quality of the forum?

03-11-2009, 01:36 PM   #2
Banned




Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Savannah, U.S./Baguio City, P.H.
Posts: 5,979
im not sure if thats a record, but I am certainly all for a more popular film sub-forum.
03-11-2009, 01:37 PM   #3
Veteran Member




Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Toronto
Posts: 3,915
maybe more people after trying digital want to try some film. like me.
03-11-2009, 01:57 PM   #4
Banned




Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 80
I've been analog for 40 years. I'm all for it. Maybe that way we'll have film forever. I'd never swith to digital. I had a D40x in my hands. Tried it and didn't like it. Have more fun with my spottie.

03-11-2009, 02:00 PM   #5
Veteran Member
Gooshin's Avatar

Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Toronto, the one in Canada.
Posts: 5,611
i enjoy the format given my lens library.

i am shooting film until FF becomes cheap.
03-11-2009, 05:52 PM   #6
Veteran Member




Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Toronto
Posts: 3,915
my guess would be that most of the people who started with Pentax Film cameras probably moved on to more advanced Film and Digital bodies long ago.
03-11-2009, 06:07 PM   #7
Pentaxian
jgredline's Avatar

Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: LosAngeles, Ca.
Photos: Albums
Posts: 10,530
Over the past two months I have shot film 80% of the time. My wife and kid noticed I don't even have a digital in my truck any longer and that is that I have 2 K20D's and 1 K10D. Go figure
03-11-2009, 06:07 PM   #8
Ira
Inactive Account




Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Coral Springs, FL
Photos: Gallery | Albums
Posts: 5,218
I can't speak for others, but I can speak for my own 52-year-old old ass:

Some guys in my age group, who started in the 70s and continued with it as a hobby or profession up until now, they've seen or done it all in film and digital. But the majority of my age group dumped the SLRs for a point-and-shoot film compact and VHS-C (or other format) camcorder when the kids started spewing out of our wives.

The kids grew, we had to pay the bills and listen to our wives to stop that nonsense, and then we bought digital cameras--to shoot the KIDS, of course.

Which makes no sense, because since you see them every day anyway, what kind of fun is shooting THEM!?

So years and years and years go by, and the majority of us non-pros or heavy hobbyists have been using these crappy, then better, then even fairly decent digital cameras, including digital SLRs.

But it just isn't the same thing. It doesn't look the same as film. You can't play with what you're shooting like you can with film. And it doesn't FEEL as good as shooting film, where you take your time with every single shot or it's gonna cost you.

Plus, it's those same stupid shots of your kids and the wife.

But with film, you send your rolls to Santa Claus who sends them BACK to you fully developed! And I feel like it's the 70s again. AND NO KIDS IF YOU CAN HELP IT!

It's just a different experience than with digital.

If you're single and without kids, your experience may vary.

03-11-2009, 07:47 PM   #9
Inactive Account




Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Brisbane, QLD, AUS
Posts: 3,262
Man, when you pull a reel of BW negatives outta the fixer and see it for the first time in the light...magic. Just beautiful.

I started out on digital, and moved to film. I think it's better for kids of my generation to learn on digital, what with our notoriously short attention spans and lack of financial sense.
03-11-2009, 10:14 PM   #10
Site Supporter
stevebrot's Avatar

Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Vancouver (USA)
Photos: Gallery | Albums
Posts: 26,189
I have been enjoying shooting a little film lately. I say enjoying because my Ricoh XR7 is so much lighter and better balanced than my K10D. Then there is the matter of hand holding in low light. The larger format makes that task so much easier that I truly don't miss the SR.

The scanned results are quite acceptable and in some cases better than what I get with the K10D. Think tonality and texture and you will understand what I mean. The main issue at this point is getting quality scans made. I have been having Costco do the processing and scanning. They do a pretty good job, but like machine prints, the scan brightness is often skewed. Dynamic range is often somewhat lacking as well. At this rate it looks like my next major purchase might be a scanner rather than a camera or lens!

Steve
03-11-2009, 10:19 PM   #11
Site Supporter
stevebrot's Avatar

Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Vancouver (USA)
Photos: Gallery | Albums
Posts: 26,189
QuoteOriginally posted by jgredline Quote
Over the past two months I have shot film 80% of the time. My wife and kid noticed I don't even have a digital in my truck any longer and that is that I have 2 K20D's and 1 K10D. Go figure
Last weekend I was at a snowbound lodge in the mountains and did not even take a digicam with me. The XR7 with my standard three-lens kit (28, 50, 70-150) and the Olympus XA thrown in for convenience and backup were more than adequate. The weather was lousy for photos, but it was still nice to be carrying half the weight as the digital setup.

Steve
03-11-2009, 10:24 PM   #12
Forum Member




Join Date: May 2008
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 57
QuoteOriginally posted by k100d Quote
maybe more people after trying digital want to try some film. like me.
+1

although I haven't taken the full plunge yet. Still got my k100d for travel (although I'm thinking of bring my film camera on trips. don't know about traveling with film though...)
03-11-2009, 11:06 PM   #13
Inactive Account




Join Date: May 2008
Location: Edmonton, Canada
Posts: 322
Started with film, had a stint with digital and the DA limiteds, then 'regressed' back to film.

I love the build and operation of the MX and LX. I love massive, bright viewfinders and the ease of manual focus. I love shooting & developing my own B&W.

Think a big part of it is what gooshin said; I dig primes and while Pentax is the best of the SLR makers in developing them for APS-C, there are gaps that i'd like to see filled, esp. regarding speed. But then I look at Canon's fast prime glass, and choke on the price tags. For my purposes, manual focus suits me better for low light & candid... it's quiet and easy to touch up accurately (re: big viewfinders). I shoot faster without the little AF motor zig-zig-zagging for micro-adjustments.

I miss digital for the convenience and fun of mucking about with off-camera flash, night exposures, etc. I think I might like to get a new-ish digi P&S for on-the-fly travel updates, video recording, etc; but basically a gadget. I shoot much less colour because of the hassle of developing, scanning and correcting the WB, but when I do, Fuji serves me well. Honestly, I don't really print too often, and usually present my .jpgs at around 1280 pixels on the longest edge, so 35mm is very suitable for what I do.

For photography as a craft, my heart lies with B&W film in a way no CMOS or CCD can replace. One day in the future I hope to get a dark room up and running so I'm not limited to a hybrid workflow.
03-11-2009, 11:09 PM   #14
Damn Brit
Guest




It wouldn't surprise me if there were many older people still shooting Pentax but don't have a computer.
03-11-2009, 11:33 PM   #15
Inactive Account




Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Nanaimo, BC
Posts: 261
I was given my Spotmatic F by my father, who bought it new in 1974. He hadn't used it in over 20 years, so he figured I'd get some use out of it. I didn't really pay it much attention until I had my K200D for awhile, and then I decided to try it out.

I liked it so much, I sold my K200D for more money to buy Takumar lenses. I don't do my own B&W yet, but there's a magic about film photography. I really, really like not being able to see what I just shot. I found I missed some of the best opportunities when I was looking at the display of my K200D. With the Spotmatic, you just shoot, wind, shoot, wind, shoot. Once you learn the camera, you know what to expect. I'm having a lot of fun trying out the different brands of film to see what kinds of colors I get and how to use that information depending on what I shoot.

Also, automatic exposure and motion-tracking autofocus are much overrated. With a little practice, you can capture anything, moving or not. Shot on Fuji Superia 400 with an SMC Tak 55/1.8.
Attached Images
 
Reply

Bookmarks
  • Submit Thread to Facebook Facebook
  • Submit Thread to Twitter Twitter
  • Submit Thread to Digg Digg
Tags - Make this thread easier to find by adding keywords to it!
film, forum
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Suggestion Non-Pentax cameras in Pentax Film SLR forum ChrisPlatt Site Suggestions and Help 12 04-14-2014 10:06 AM
FORUM USAGE GUIDE: an explanation of forum features! Adam Site Suggestions and Help 82 10-24-2013 06:52 PM
Suggestion Film processing and darkroom forum needed ChrisPlatt Site Suggestions and Help 26 06-14-2010 12:23 AM
I suggest making the price watch forum it's own forum in the market place Clinton Site Suggestions and Help 1 03-27-2010 10:48 AM
Suggestion Film Forum puderse Site Suggestions and Help 8 08-07-2009 06:26 AM



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 07:10 PM. | See also: NikonForums.com, part of our network of photo forums!
  • Red (Default)
  • Green
  • Gray
  • Dark
  • Dark Yellow
  • Dark Blue
  • Old Red
  • Old Green
  • Old Gray
  • Dial-Up Style
Hello! It's great to see you back on the forum! Have you considered joining the community?
register
Creating a FREE ACCOUNT takes under a minute, removes ads, and lets you post! [Dismiss]
Top