Originally posted by revdocjim While I agree in principle and was very happy with the work Eric did on my ESII, you can read a rather entertaining counterpoint to the CLA business, particularly as it relates to Leica rangefinders
here.
I agree that servicing a perfectly functional Leica every time it changes hands is extreme, and that coming apart and going back together again too often is worse than never giving it a CLA at all. But most of our Pentax and other mechanical bodies are running on their factory builds, and if they don't need to be cleaned, lubed and adjusted now, they will in the future.
Even a stone-cold reliable Pentax can't go 30 years between CLA's without something going squidgy. Besides, if you are taking photos with your 30-year old Pentax, don't you want to be sure it won't quit halfway through your once-in-a-lifetime trip to Groovefunkistan? Now is the time for us to send in our 25, 30, 40, 50 year old Pentaxes, especially if they've never been serviced. Don't wait for it to break!
Now, I do have a Leica, and I did get it CLA'd when I took ownership. But it was a 1957 M2, and the CLA it got when I bought it was the first one it'd ever had. The vulcanite was peeling, the RF was a little off, the shutter was sticky down low. It
needed it. Plus, i could feel grit when I moved the advance lever. That's never good!