Forgot Password
Pentax Camera Forums Home
 

Reply
Show Printable Version Search this Thread
07-30-2009, 05:23 PM   #1
Senior Member




Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Pilsen, Czech Republic
Posts: 224
What film body - Cost/Performance wise

Hi, I've never shot film DSLR before, but I'm really tempted to try it with some Pentax film body.

I own DA 40/2.8 (full frame compatible?), FA 28/2.8, A50/1.7 and M42 Pentacon 135/2.8 and I'm looking for a used body that will work with these lenses (it means it has to work with lenses without aperture ring). I don't really need AF, but it would be nice.

I have two questions:

1) Which film body would you recommend (price is important, working with lenses without aperture ring)?

2) Which film body would you recommend (price is important, doesn't have to work with lenses without aperture ring)?

Thank you.

07-30-2009, 05:42 PM   #2
Veteran Member




Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Toronto
Posts: 3,911
1. ZX-L, PZ-1P
2. MZ-5n (program mode for your DA), ME Super (manual focus, does not work with DA)

Pentax Camera Bodies
07-30-2009, 05:48 PM   #3
Senior Member




Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: South Carolina, USA
Posts: 273
1. SF1n, PZ-1, PZ-1p
2. SF1n, PZ-1, PZ-1p

Seriously, the SF1n is a really nice camera that got overshadowed by the PZ series not two years after its release. It was Pentax' flagship from 1988 to 1991(ish). They're fully-featured cameras and easy to use once you get a hang of its user interface, and very cheap these days. I've used one, and I think they've got great ergonomics and handle quite nicely.

And the PZ-1(p) is quite possibly Pentax' film masterpiece. It handles and operates almost exactly like a DSLR with its front and rear control dials. It's the SF1n, but better.
07-31-2009, 04:45 PM   #4
Forum Member
scimitar12's Avatar

Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Sterling, VA
Photos: Gallery
Posts: 70
I agree with the above. Having all of them (except the zx-l) I have to say the best option is the sf-1n, considering the cost factor. Once you get past the heft of the camera I think you will realy like the feel; how it naturally fits in your hands

08-05-2009, 06:07 PM   #5
Veteran Member
Nick Siebers's Avatar

Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Madison, WI
Photos: Gallery | Albums
Posts: 2,165
I was ready to love the SF1n. But no DOF preview! I think a PZ-1p is the way to go. I've never owned one, but I like the handling of the PZ70, and the added features would be nice.

If you are thinking manual focus, you can use a DA40 on a Super Program - that's a great combo.
08-05-2009, 11:53 PM   #6
Veteran Member
frank's Avatar

Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Singapore
Photos: Gallery
Posts: 3,202
Get a SuperA/SuperProgram or ProgramA/ProgramPlus, and you are ready to have some film fun w/ your existing lenses including DA ones
08-06-2009, 01:53 PM   #7
Senior Member




Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Pilsen, Czech Republic
Posts: 224
Original Poster
Thank you all for replies. I'll try to get hold of one

08-06-2009, 05:40 PM   #8
Site Supporter
Site Supporter
ChrisPlatt's Avatar

Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Rockaway Beach NYC
Posts: 7,697
The Super Program/Super A is one Pentax body I will never own.
IMO the LCD exposure readout in the finder is not very intuitive.
To judge yourself download the manual at pentaximaging.com

Chris
08-06-2009, 07:12 PM   #9
Veteran Member
frank's Avatar

Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Singapore
Photos: Gallery
Posts: 3,202
QuoteOriginally posted by ChrisPlatt Quote
The Super Program/Super A is one Pentax body I will never own.
IMO the LCD exposure readout in the finder is not very intuitive.
To judge yourself download the manual at pentaximaging.com

Chris
It's just personal preference I guess. I know a lot guys like the SuperProgram/SuperA more than ME Super or MX, or even LX
08-06-2009, 07:20 PM   #10
Site Supporter
Site Supporter
Lowell Goudge's Avatar

Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Toronto
Photos: Gallery | Albums
Posts: 17,891
I would agree with all that suggest the PZ-1/PZ-1p

it is like a film version of the *istD, down to dual thumb wheels, special functions, and the shutter at 1/8000 with 1/250 sync is great.
08-06-2009, 08:31 PM   #11
Moderator
Site Supporter
Blue's Avatar

Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Florida Hill Country
Photos: Gallery | Albums
Posts: 17,377
QuoteOriginally posted by ChrisPlatt Quote
The Super Program/Super A is one Pentax body I will never own.
IMO the LCD exposure readout in the finder is not very intuitive.
To judge yourself download the manual at pentaximaging.com

Chris
I guess using the SuperProgram doesn't bother me because of using the K1000 and Spot F. However, the SuperProgram has a couple of things going for it as a mf body. 1st, it has ttl flash capabilities. Second, it has a 1/2000 shutter speed.
08-06-2009, 09:22 PM   #12
Veteran Member
frank's Avatar

Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Singapore
Photos: Gallery
Posts: 3,202
QuoteOriginally posted by Blue Quote
I guess using the SuperProgram doesn't bother me because of using the K1000 and Spot F. However, the SuperProgram has a couple of things going for it as a mf body. 1st, it has ttl flash capabilities. Second, it has a 1/2000 shutter speed.
And 3rd, it works pretty well even w/ DA lenses (try that w/ an MX or LX ). 4th, the small grips do enhance the handling quite a bit. Plus DOF preview, timer, Tv mode and etc. It does have some followers
08-07-2009, 01:18 AM   #13
Veteran Member




Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Umeå, Sweden
Posts: 755
1) MZ-6/ZX-L (two names, same camera)

2) MZ-6/ZX-L, Super Program, ME Super

Check out my review of the MZ-6. I very much recommend this camera -- it ticks all your boxes!
08-07-2009, 09:22 AM   #14
Moderator
Site Supporter
Blue's Avatar

Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Florida Hill Country
Photos: Gallery | Albums
Posts: 17,377
QuoteOriginally posted by frank Quote
And 3rd, it works pretty well even w/ DA lenses (try that w/ an MX or LX ). 4th, the small grips do enhance the handling quite a bit. Plus DOF preview, timer, Tv mode and etc. It does have some followers
Very true. Its buttons are along the same style as the ME Super and ME F as well.
08-07-2009, 09:41 AM   #15
Veteran Member
Nesster's Avatar

Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: NJ USA
Photos: Gallery
Posts: 13,072
I happen to be one of the Pgm enthusiasts - they are great to grip while out walking, not too small, and reliable. Not to mention: they are gateway drugs... erm... cameras to the 645.
Reply

Bookmarks
  • Submit Thread to Facebook Facebook
  • Submit Thread to Twitter Twitter
  • Submit Thread to Digg Digg
Tags - Make this thread easier to find by adding keywords to it!
aperture, body, film, film body, lenses, price

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
The Startup cost of Shooting Film little laker Film SLRs and Compact Film Cameras 9 03-28-2010 11:22 AM
which is better IQ wise Mystic Pentax SLR Lens Discussion 12 12-11-2009 09:46 PM
Performance of 31 LTD on a FF/film body aegisphan Pentax SLR Lens Discussion 21 10-05-2009 10:13 PM
cost of film developing Gooshin Film SLRs and Compact Film Cameras 16 08-25-2008 04:47 AM
Future body: better ISO performance? switters Pentax News and Rumors 12 09-25-2007 05:40 AM



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 05:52 PM. | See also: NikonForums.com, CanonForums.com part of our network of photo forums!
  • Red (Default)
  • Green
  • Gray
  • Dark
  • Dark Yellow
  • Dark Blue
  • Old Red
  • Old Green
  • Old Gray
  • Dial-Up Style
Hello! It's great to see you back on the forum! Have you considered joining the community?
register
Creating a FREE ACCOUNT takes under a minute, removes ads, and lets you post! [Dismiss]
Top