Originally posted by Andi Lo Depends on your body. Any body that doesnt need aperture ring to control aperture should use DA 10-17mm fine. Some bodies you can manipulate aperture still if by using Tv mode (this pretty much means ALL mz series bodies can control DA aperture?). Full frame for the DA 10-17 starts at 14mm. At 10mm even with Panorama mode you can still see the hood unfortunately.
In terms of image quality. I think the extreme corners are just a tad unsharp / blurry, but not as bad as using Sigma 10-20mm on the Canon 5ds. The center and corner is great.
I've said it several times but I'll say it again; 14-17mm fisheye on mz-7 is love <3
Will post some pics later when I get back
Hi Andy,
older thread. But do you have some samples from DA fisheye zoom on your MZ-7 ?
Sounds cool shooting at 14 mm, and just applying the panorama function
Originally posted by titrisol At the beginning I thought it was a gimmick
but after using this mode in the MZ7 with wide angles and with the 17/4 fisheye I have gotten to like it.
I believe the 10-17 in film should be tremendous, and the panorama mode will help you eliminate most of the vignetting... it did with the 17-55
Thanks for the info. The 10-17 is moving up on my wish list
Do you have some scanned examples of your shots ?