Originally posted by Des The images look to me to be in the class of a F*300 or FA*300 with TC, a combination which would cost something like $US1100-1200. The F*300 alone usually sells for more than $1000. Of course the Pentax 300s are better built and considerably lighter, but I don't think it's a silly comparison. That is not to mention the astronomical prices for the FA*400mm f5.6 (like, $2,500).
Some idea of prices for the AF version of the Sigma 400 f5.6 tele macro, e.g.:
Sigma 400mm APO 5.6 Tele MACRO 77mm 1:3 Pentax: For Sale and Wanted Forum: Digital Photography Review - $US550 in October 2013
That has to be the lens I bought on eBay for $550 last October. I am pretty sure it did come from California (after all, it has a very dark tan ;-) ).
I can say that, despite what Vivitar says, it works with the Vivitar Series 1 1.4x teleconverter, though I have not gotten around to doing any formal tests of IQ and am NOT a pro. It does not increase the focal length reported to the camera, though - still shows up as 400mm, hence the shake reduction may not be quite optimally tuned, but probably not important at that focal length. I've attached a few handheld bird snapshots from last spring taken with the combo (a chipping sparrow, bathing yellow-rumped warbler, and bathing Carolina wren in my back yard). They were not done with a tripod, not cropped, not sharpened or otherwise postprocessed, or anything else. So not to be compared to the amazing shots posted on this site, but they demonstrate that the lens at least works with that TC.
Yikes - I see it's gone up to $300 with 8 days left. Don't people know about ignoring eBay listings and sniping at the very end? Maybe that MF version would pay for a K5iis (but won't someone then have to buy a nice birding lens?).