Originally posted by torashi Have you ever considered keeping film alive?
All you need is a nice K2, battery and film. You already have a bunch of nice lenses. Just let a lab do all the processing and scanning.
No, for a number of reasons, and not necessarily in order of priority:
- The sheer flexibility of digital (even though it does require a lot of re-education photography wise).
- Without getting expensive large-roll attachments, what film camera can allow you to take 300 or 400 shots in one or two photosessions?
- And then let you view these shots without the expense of development, even on a large TV - without the expense of large-size prints.
- And where could you obtain film (negative or slide) with an ASA rating of 2000, let alone 20,000 etc.
No, as much as I am currently overwhelmed by the complexity of menu choices on modern digital cameras, compared to the old set ASA, choose aperture or choose shutterspeed or put it all (exposure) onto auto, and shoot, I would not go back to film even though I still own a Pentax ME, which, as far as I know, still works.
After I get my KP, I will go to Focusingscreens.com and invest in a central microprism EC-A focusing screen, and continue to (gradually) familiarise myself with all the various menu settings of a digital camera.
I am quite comfortable with digital technology (my last 20 yrs I worked as a classroom instructor on PC's and PC software, and digital file organisation (folders, sub-folders, sub-sub....you know what I mean!!). I use an app on my Android tablet to control my whole audio-visual system, and have even set up macro-buttons to turn on different combinations equipment in this app. So diigital is cool!!