Originally posted by MRRiley Then I invite you to field test your DA* 16-50 or DA* 60-250 at one of these events and let us know. The article states that they've seen this issue on high-end-sealed lenses as well. You have to remember that "weather sealed" does not mean "air tight" or "hermetically sealed." Limited air intrusion is normal even in a sealed lens otherwise it would be very difficult to extend the lens from it's least interior volume to it's most interior volume (or vice versa depending on internal pressurization).
Mike
The 50-135 would handle it, the 16-50 probably would(It lived through Heie's torture with powdery sand). Canon especially cheap out on seals, a large number of L lenses aren't even sealed at the front, they rely on a "Labyrinth seal" from the filter. Works well for water, not so much for sand. Non internal zooms do have a higher risk, but with Pentax, your body is in danger, not the lens.(It draws air through the camera, rather than a hole in the bottom of the lens like Canikon) Don't buy it? Attach a sealed zoom, zoom it in and out while placing your finger near the mic port. You'll feel air, and when that port isn't enough, it draws through the SD card. This design has flaws though, as dust would intrude the shutter box faster.
Furthermore, I've taken my 16-50 into a room with two boxes of corn starch dispersed and low power lasers going off(My friend got a Galaxian, 500 beams of less than 1mw light with powder is interesting). My breathing is what stopped that madness, not my camera.(Didn't get many good shots though, it would've lent itself to videography better)