Originally posted by amoringello I would normally argue that Pentax should be the authority on their own DNG file format.. but from the statements above, this is obviously a fallacy. The guy obviously made up a story to get me to go away.
To be clear, Pentax doesn't have a special DNG format. The DNG format belongs to Adobe, and Pentax makes use of it. DNG is pretty universal, and Pentax does nothing custom with it. This is why a K-5 DNG could be opened in most RAW processing applications long before the K-5 was officially supported. The only difference was in cropping out the extraneous pixels along the edges.
My guess is that ACR has some bug in its interpretation of certain RAW parameters, and this bug has been directly duplicated by other RAW processing software who license the DNG format library from Adobe (like Silkypix/DCU). Most likely this parameter gets introduced only under specific conditions (ie. multi-exposure). This wouldn't be the first time that Adobe software can't read its own format properly.
Meanwhile, RAW processors that created their own DNG library instead of licensing it (ie. dcraw, Bibble, etc.) don't have this issue.
So it's entirely possible that this isn't Pentax's fault at all.