 |
 | 13 Likes | Search this Thread |
| 01-03-2013, 06:29 AM | #2 |
| 01-03-2013, 07:49 AM | #3 |
| New archive index- Look here first  Originally posted by baro-nite  Well done and thank you! I might split it, depending on support, into Pentax, major third party brands and others. That would make it simpler but would need 3 stickys I had held off doing this due to the promise of the new indexing function but found that it was really not good enough especially for third party and legacy lenses Last edited by Lowell Goudge; 01-24-2013 at 03:08 PM. | |
| 01-03-2013, 05:48 PM | #4 |
| 01-05-2013, 02:58 PM | #5 |
| 01-13-2013, 10:24 AM | #6 |
| 01-17-2013, 05:09 PM | #7 |
| 01-17-2013, 06:30 PM | #8 |
| Originally posted by 8540tomg Well done Lowell. A lot of time and effort here. Thanks Tom G It actually was pretty easy, and the only challenge is keeping it up to date, if it gets any longer I will split it up, likely into 3 segments, Pentax, major 3rd party and "others" | |
| 01-18-2013, 01:30 AM | #9 |
| Originally posted by Lowell Goudge Thanks Tom It actually was pretty easy, and the only challenge is keeping it up to date, if it gets any longer I will split it up, likely into 3 segments, Pentax, major 3rd party and "others" | |
| 01-18-2013, 04:24 AM | #10 |
| Originally posted by jt_cph_dk Hi Lowell, I would like to help cleaning up the douple threads on the SMC Pentax (K) 1.8/55 lens. Do I copy my photo links to the first thread and delete the second? (I prefer the title of the second thread because it is the more short, neutral, correct one). Kind regards | |
| 01-18-2013, 06:12 AM | #11 |
| Originally posted by Lowell Goudge If its only your posts, yes, that's it, you don't even need to delete the second thread, just tell me which one you do not want to be added to and I will mark it duplicate do not use  | |
| 11-04-2013, 11:49 AM | #12 |
| 02-26-2014, 11:44 AM | #13 |
| Originally posted by altopiet @Lowell Goudge, is it at all possible to add something to the "Important: Before Posting"? It's something that's been bothering me for a long time, and I might've mentioned it before... Can we ask posters to post a re-sized RAW version of the image to enable viewers to see the difference. I'm sure most of the images are posted by masters in PP, and don't reflect the real capabilities of the lenses...alternatively, can they indicate shortly, what PP has been done to an image? As it is most of the imigages posted are a huge waste of valuable time of those looking to see what the actual capabilities of a lens are, before deciding to purchase it, almost as useless as the reviews given in that section Aside from that, asking people to post their raw images is asking them to give away the negatives | |
| 02-27-2014, 12:01 AM | #14 |
|
| Bookmarks |
| Tags - Make this thread easier to find by adding keywords to it! |
| 135mm, 35mm, 50mm, camera, f/2.3, f/2.8, f/3.5, f2.8, lens, macro, pentax, pentax lens, sample photo, samples, sigma, smc, smc pentax 135mm, takumar |
Post #1 by Lowell Goudge 
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| All these lens threads in this K-5 section? | stormtech | Pentax K-5 & K-5 II | 2 | 01-15-2013 08:59 PM |
| weighted average price for lenses in reviews section | whojammyflip | Pentax SLR Lens Discussion | 21 | 11-14-2010 12:05 PM |
| I was going to put this in the cartoon section | jeffkrol | General Talk | 18 | 05-28-2010 06:27 AM |
| How not to sell stuff in the Photo/Video Section of Craigslist | dragonfly | General Talk | 2 | 02-03-2010 02:54 AM |
| My first post in this section | daleroy | Post Your Photos! | 6 | 10-25-2008 01:26 AM |
