ProfHankD

Thanks for reply Hank,

I am using t70-300 more than one year, and did several trials; tripod, mirror lock-up,
aperture and shutter values, different light conditions.
Sometimes it produce good results, but generally not. I think it has focus problems,
and it needs very precise focussing in order to obtain better results.
Or my copy is not so good.
But when I look 55-300 results, they seem much more usable results than my tamron.

Here some good examples;

iso100, 300 f5.6 1/320
http://farm5.static.flickr.com/4119/4923366073_bd19d2717e_b.jpg

iso100, 300mm f11 1/320
http://farm5.static.flickr.com/4080/4909804027_17b9cd1d83_b.jpg

Hi,

I saw your review about the smc takumar 300 f4.
I have a plan to get one because I can't afford for neither dfa nor a* 300mm.

So, I have tamron 70-300, but I am very dissapointed about the sharpness of it.
if you had an experince or oppinion about
this takumar and consumer teles like tamron/sigma 70-300, pentax 55-300 etc,
your thougths are heighly appreciated.

I want a much better 300mm than my tamron with a reasonable price.

Thanks
Ali