Thanks for the reply! I don't think I'd be sticking real large glass on the 5n...my biggest is the Siggy 50-150mm. Besides, I'd still have the K-7 for something like that. I'm really looking at a narrow band of photography applications that I think the Sony would fit...namely, an outstanding sensor in an ultra portable body that I will primarily use in A-priority mode and manual focus for landscape shooting from a tripod and walk around travel/street photography. I don't need the variety of external controls for either, and I primarily shoot in live view when using a tripod.
Since you have both K5 and 5n, can you comment a bit on the IQ between the two? Not worried about high ISO, but wondering if the Sony matches the Pentax for DR and recovering details in shadows, as the K5 is famous for. Thanks again!
Originally posted by tsammyc Don't think you can change the auto bracketing, but the same range in HDR mode seems to be quite effective.
On Nick's comment I have a K5, KX and 5N. The 5N with K-mount lenses mounted feels hugely different from the KX in size and weight especially with pancakes like the DA40. Compared to the E-mount lenses, the larger heavier K-mount lens doesn't bother usage and I'm confident of the maximum IQ for the minimum weight but the E mount lenses are nice as they are lighter. I told myself I won't acquire any E mount lenses, but the new ones seem to have excellent sharpness if you follow Christine Tham's thread. I also went shooting one day with my 5N and DA 60-250, which weighs 1.2kg, and monopod. Even with a gigantic lens, it felt a lot lighter than using the K5 and I was happy. Here's a shot.