Forgot Password
Pentax Camera Forums Home
 

Reply
Show Printable Version Search this Thread
11-11-2012, 02:16 AM   #1
Senior Member
Navmaxlp's Avatar

Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Pennsylvania
Photos: Albums
Posts: 167
Adorama gives a nod to Pentax...twice

According to Adorama, Pentax leads the pack in low light performance for both medium format and APS-C:

Tested and Compared: 21 Top Cameras For Digital Low-Light Photography from Adorama Learning Center

Good to be getting respect

11-11-2012, 02:27 AM   #2
Banned




Join Date: Jan 2009
Photos: Gallery
Posts: 9,675
Looks great.
11-11-2012, 02:29 AM   #3
Administrator
Site Webmaster
Adam's Avatar

Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Arizona
Photos: Gallery | Albums
Posts: 51,608
Exposure is always good

Adam
PentaxForums.com Webmaster (Site Usage Guide | Site Help | My Photography)



PentaxForums.com server and development costs are user-supported. You can help cover these costs by donating or purchasing one of our Pentax eBooks. Or, buy your photo gear from our affiliates, Adorama, B&H Photo, KEH, or Topaz Labs, and get FREE Marketplace access - click here to see how! Trusted Pentax retailers:
11-11-2012, 04:40 AM   #4
Veteran Member




Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 11,913
Pentax strong!

11-11-2012, 09:19 AM   #5
Junior Member




Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Richardson, TX
Photos: Gallery
Posts: 33
One must give credit to all the camera testers and reviewers out there. In all the articles I have read, like the one posted above, they objectively report on the best equipment without being swayed by brand recognition, and Pentax consistently does well. I look forward to seeing Pentax compete in the full frame category, and I'm ready to buy when they do, provided that design decisions lean towards low-light performance instead of pixel packing.

The article ranks Nikon's D800E over their other full frames. It is interesting to note that DxOMark measures the ISOs differently. At 3200, the measured ISO of the D800E is 2220 (SNR 31.3dB) and the measured ISO of the D600 is a little higher at 2355 (SNR 31.1dB). I can't be bothered with figuring out what is more significant, the difference in measured ISO or the difference is SNR, because I doubt I could perceive the difference. I would notice the $1,200 price difference.
11-15-2012, 08:35 PM   #6
Veteran Member




Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Madison, Wis., USA
Posts: 1,506
QuoteOriginally posted by Adam Quote
Exposure is always good
Groan .......
11-16-2012, 03:04 AM   #7
Senior Member
Navmaxlp's Avatar

Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Pennsylvania
Photos: Albums
Posts: 167
Original Poster
QuoteOriginally posted by glanglois Quote
Groan .......
HAHAHA! It took me a few to understand what you were saying...yes I'm that slow.

Reply

Bookmarks
  • Submit Thread to Facebook Facebook
  • Submit Thread to Twitter Twitter
  • Submit Thread to Digg Digg
Tags - Make this thread easier to find by adding keywords to it!
adorama, camera, dslr, photography

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Family Misses Flight After TSA Gives Pat-Down To Girl With Cerebral Palsy jogiba General Talk 5 04-29-2012 07:54 AM
is 135mm long enough? or: do I really have to think twice? slartibartfast Troubleshooting and Beginner Help 18 02-07-2012 02:12 PM
People My son gives a hot kiss to my wife :d cem.kumuk Photo Critique 8 08-31-2010 11:14 AM
SciFi Lit nod to Pentax mel General Talk 3 04-30-2010 09:11 PM
Aussie wanting to buy a 60-250 from Adorama... AdrianN Photographic Technique 5 10-14-2009 03:11 PM



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 11:04 AM. | See also: NikonForums.com, CanonForums.com part of our network of photo forums!
  • Red (Default)
  • Green
  • Gray
  • Dark
  • Dark Yellow
  • Dark Blue
  • Old Red
  • Old Green
  • Old Gray
  • Dial-Up Style
Hello! It's great to see you back on the forum! Have you considered joining the community?
register
Creating a FREE ACCOUNT takes under a minute, removes ads, and lets you post! [Dismiss]
Top