Forgot Password
Pentax Camera Forums Home
 

Reply
Show Printable Version Search this Thread
11-18-2008, 08:41 PM   #1
Senior Member
kibipod's Avatar

Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Ohio
Posts: 276
istD or DS

Hi Pentax shooters,

I am considering a 2nd DSLR body. I will buy used. What is the big difference between D and DS or DS2? I know D takes CF and DS takes SD card. Thats not important to me. I am also aware of the battery grip difference. I want to know if there is any image quality, color rendition etc diffrence.

Your inputs aprreciated.

Subho

11-19-2008, 07:50 AM   #2
Veteran Member




Join Date: May 2007
Location: York Region Canada
Posts: 641
Only used the istD not the others on your list.

The istD is SLOWWWWWWW to write to a card. I think, but not sure, that improved with the later versions.

Image quality on the D is good, i had many great shots with that camera.

If you can afford one, why not get a good used K10D, better write speeds, SR among some features the istD lacks..

Dave
11-19-2008, 08:06 AM   #3
Syb
Veteran Member
Syb's Avatar

Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Near Utrecht, Netherlands
Photos: Gallery
Posts: 1,221
I have the Ds. I chose it then because it was newer, wrote faster and (but about that I am not sure) gave more setting options. I have never regretted my purchase.

I never regretted the upgrade to a K10d either. So I am with the other poster, that you should consider buying a used K10d.

Good luck!
11-19-2008, 09:35 AM   #4
Inactive Account




Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Oregon coast
Photos: Gallery
Posts: 30
DS

I have a K10D and a DS. I really like my K10D and got it before I had the DS. I wanted a smaller camera to keep in the car most of the time so I would always have a camera. I originally planned on a P&S but the more I looked the more I was drawn to a D, DS or DS2. I settled on the DS because it was newer and more available. It is bigger than the P&S I intended to get but with a small bag it is pretty easy to carry and have available. The DS takes great pictures. I print to 12x18 and have no issues with print quality. I really like the smaller size of the DS but miss the SR sometimes. I plan on keeping both for now.

11-19-2008, 10:21 AM   #5
Veteran Member
Marc Sabatella's Avatar

Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Denver, CO
Photos: Gallery
Posts: 10,685
QuoteOriginally posted by kibipod Quote
I want to know if there is any image quality, color rendition etc diffrence.
They all use the same sensor, so the images are essentially identical if you shoot RA. If you shoot JPEG, there might be subtle differences in the in-camera processing, but probably nothing you couldn't change in option settings (eg, changing the saturation, contrast or sharpness controls).

They're all fine cameras, although at this point buying a Pentax DSLR without SR or SDM support seems a little odd. On the other hand, if it's a specialized application where you know you won't need either of those but will need TTL support, that would totally make sense.
11-19-2008, 08:02 PM   #6
Site Supporter
Site Supporter
Lowell Goudge's Avatar

Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Toronto
Photos: Gallery | Albums
Posts: 17,892
QuoteOriginally posted by kibipod Quote
Hi Pentax shooters,

I am considering a 2nd DSLR body. I will buy used. What is the big difference between D and DS or DS2? I know D takes CF and DS takes SD card. Thats not important to me. I am also aware of the battery grip difference. I want to know if there is any image quality, color rendition etc diffrence.

Your inputs aprreciated.

Subho
I think the biggest issue is the differences in levels of support to older lenses.

The *istD and DS have TTL flash metering, no others do, this means you can use non A lenses with external flash.

The D also supports TTL flash with its internal flash, I believe, but please someone correct me if I am wrong, that the DS does not support TTL flash with the onboard flash.

if you are a user of old manual focua lenses, this can be important.

The D is also bigger, and has dual thumb sheels like the K10D and K20D, making it easier to use as a second body if you have either of those two cameras.

On the down side, it is probably the slowest in writing to memory, but that is just a sign of the technology, it is a fine camera and I still use mine regularly.
11-20-2008, 02:30 AM   #7
Forum Member




Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Finland
Posts: 70
QuoteOriginally posted by Lowell Goudge Quote
please someone correct me if I am wrong, that the DS does not support TTL flash with the onboard flash.
This is correct.

11-20-2008, 05:24 AM   #8
Site Supporter
Site Supporter
Lowell Goudge's Avatar

Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Toronto
Photos: Gallery | Albums
Posts: 17,892
QuoteOriginally posted by solisti Quote
This is correct.
since the DS does not spupport TTL with the on board flash, this makes the *istD the best second body for if you intend to use a loit of Manual apature lenses
11-20-2008, 11:58 AM   #9
Veteran Member




Join Date: May 2007
Location: Lakeway, Texas
Posts: 313
I have a *ist D Pentax with 28-80mm Lens plus the battery grip, neck strap and genuine Pentax bag. 2 gig CF card included. Has the original manual also. Missing all the cords PC/Video etc. Good condition.

Now listed in Marketplace with pics.

Last edited by Bob Tuttle; 11-23-2008 at 10:00 AM.
11-20-2008, 02:53 PM   #10
Veteran Member
awo425's Avatar

Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: NYC, USA
Posts: 481
I have istD and I had DS for 4 years.

istD has great layout for controls and ergonomics , way ahead of the DS.
Pictures with DS are a little bit sharper even in RAW, i am not shooting jpeg.
I read that some filter (forgot the name) that is installed in front of the sensor on istD is the reason for this.

Also DS is slow saving pictures to the card and istD is reeeeeeeeeeealy slooooooooow.


Take 4 frames in RAW in a burst mode and you can go make coffee, camera will be busy for a minute +
For some it will be a problem, I do not care much.

I sold istDS and I am still using my istD because of the ergonomics and the fact that i can use TTL flash with M42 lenses.

Oh and a few more things, AUTO ISO is really funky in ISTD, the screen is small 1.8 or 2', this features are better on DS.

But overall istD is a great little camera especially for travel and I still love it to the extent that my K10D is for sale now, but I will keep my istD.
Reply

Bookmarks
  • Submit Thread to Facebook Facebook
  • Submit Thread to Twitter Twitter
  • Submit Thread to Digg Digg
Tags - Make this thread easier to find by adding keywords to it!
camera, ds, dslr, photography

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
*istD vs K7 eccs19 Pentax DSLR Discussion 10 09-11-2010 02:47 PM
*istD question eccs19 Pentax DSLR Discussion 2 07-17-2010 10:13 AM
*istD? Classic_Obsession Pentax DSLR Discussion 21 07-01-2010 10:02 PM
*istD / IR Billgscott Pentax DSLR Discussion 3 02-25-2009 06:17 PM
*istD wanted drscg General Talk 1 01-08-2009 01:53 PM



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 07:38 AM. | See also: NikonForums.com, CanonForums.com part of our network of photo forums!
  • Red (Default)
  • Green
  • Gray
  • Dark
  • Dark Yellow
  • Dark Blue
  • Old Red
  • Old Green
  • Old Gray
  • Dial-Up Style
Hello! It's great to see you back on the forum! Have you considered joining the community?
register
Creating a FREE ACCOUNT takes under a minute, removes ads, and lets you post! [Dismiss]
Top