Originally posted by Adam It looks like they are somewhere in between the pre-increase prices and the old unilateral prices.
Was that the plan all along?
Make an increase of prices appear like drop in prices (by using silly high prices inbetween)?
They raised the price of the FA 77/1.8 but not that of the FA 31/1.8?
I think such price games are fundamentally wrong.
Imagine a poor sod that bought the 50-135/2.8 for $1599.95 only to discover a few weeks later that it can now be had for $999.95. Is that how Ned Bunnell wants to "
raise the perceived value" of Pentax lenses?
P.S.: Thumbs up, Adam, for posting the table including the old prices!