Here's my interpretation. Don't take it word for word.
-- First and foremost, when is the FF planned for release?
Kitazawa - First and fore most, of course ...
-- Just as a continuation of last year's interview regarding FF and Mirrorless 645 :-)
Kitazawa - Those are the focus again :-)
-- Has the development of FF started?
Kitazawa - Basically, yes. Whether we'll bring it to market or not depends on the market itself. The important thing is to figure out what Pentax can do in the FF market. We want to make a clear distinction between what Pentax offers from what Nikon, Canon, and Sony are offering. Figuring out what our customer base is hoping for from us. These are the things we want to firm-up and build into our products. The development will take a while for sure. We are progressing in the area where we have to incorporate interchangeable lenses, however.
-- Continuing with the FF topic, last time there was a hint that you prefer mirror-less FF to avoid mirror-slap. Is there any development in that front?
Kitazawa - That's a very difficult question. We currently offer both SLR and mirror-less in the APS-C segment. From what we can gather from our users, the mirror-less systems are used in a casual shooting capacity. The SLR systems are being used by enthusiasts. We think that the majority of our current customer base falls in that category. The mirror-less format, due to the lack of the mirror box, allows for further minitualization and radical designs. We can produce systems that are even more affordable. We did consider mirror-less FF till last year, but if you asked me, I'd lean towards SLR FF. Products have to closely match what the customers want. It's important to develop a new niche with radical design, but it's no good if it is not received well by the customers. As far as mirror-less design is concerned, it is more suitable for medium format applications where mirror slap is a bigger concern.
-- Mirror-less and SLR, they both have their advantages and disadvantages. One of the aspects is the variety of available interchangeable lenses. SLR system is easier to use for telephoto lenses and offers a wide variety of older lenses, for example.
Kitazawa - Absolutely. If we were to introduce another mirror-less, we will have to consider a new mount vs the K mount. If we are to design a new mirror-less system, we would probably go for a new mount. To really get any benefit from it, we would increase the mount diameter over the K mount to increase the amount of light passing to the sensor as well as shortening the flange distance to aim for a smaller body design.
-- Aside from SLR vs mirror-less, as far as the FF design is concerned, isn't it a tough call to go with a new mount vs continuing with the K mount?
Kitazawa - That's one of the biggest concerns. Pentax has not changed the mount in so long, we gained the reputation of "no nonsense interchangeability". We think that this is one of the main aspect that keeps bringing our customers back ….