Originally posted by chse The optical construction is the same but the number of aperture blades is different - Cosina has more
Look in the forum I remeber someone did
But seriously- sit back and relax- they are all not this great! You get nearly the same effect with a 50mm/1.4 and its a better (and cheaper) lens imo with much nicer bokeh. If you really want a longer bright lens try the Nokton 58mm/1.4.
I have both the Cosina and the Nokton (Who's got LBA? This guy! --->me<---) and
the Nokton is the better lens - 'better' bokeh, definitely, and sharper at f/4+.
One of the main reasons to get a 1.2 lens is the crazy-beautiful bokeh that
it can give you - but the Nokton is known for bokeh. You should consider it
as an alternative, yes.
But the Cosina (incidentally, Voigtlanders and some Zeiss are now made by Cosina) is
a superb lens, also - and up until about 45 days ago, the Cosina 55 1.2 could be
had for about 1/2 of the Nokton. Now it seems to be $290 (Cosina) vs. $380 (Nokton)
Nokton bokeh examples:
Few more Cosina examples: But stop it down just 1, and the Cosina starts getting very sharp:
Here's the culprit:
I think Kelly (Pirate) and Duh_Vinci have better examples, and I know a few
other folks have the Cosina, but can't remember who right now.
.