Forgot Password
Pentax Camera Forums Home
 
Log in or register to remove ads.

Showing results 1 to 14 of 14 Search: Liked Posts
Forum: Pentax Medium Format 05-13-2021, 05:17 PM  
645d for portraits
Posted By TDvN57
Replies: 15
Views: 2,039
I agree there are other lenses available that are perhaps more perfect for portraits than the two zooms I am using. I don't have the 90mm but have read only good feedback about it.

My most loved portrait lens is the 645 FA150 f2.8 but I eventually sold it, because using it with an aperture wider than 5.6 makes the dof too shallow. At 2.8 it is almost impossible to take a close framed headshot with the nose teeth and eyes in focus, forget about the ears. People with ear jewelry can get rather adamant if their costly adornments are out of focus. :-)

I also like the two famous P67 105mm 2.4 and the P67 55-100. The reason I migrated to the two zooms 45-80 and 80-160 is autofocus. For me it is just more flexible and I can keep the subjects the main topic. Fiddling with manual focus in a dynamic setting became very distracting for me and took my attention away from the people.
.

.
Forum: Film SLRs and Compact Film Cameras 07-07-2020, 01:31 AM  
MX, LX or Super Program
Posted By womble
Replies: 49
Views: 7,431
As you can see from the above, everyone has a slightly different take on your question. For me, I would go for the LX first, then the MX and the Super A last, although I like them all.

LX. Mine had a CLA not long after I got it, and apart from one user-induced problem that required repair (I dropped it on a rock), it has worked flawlessly since. I've always said that if in some bizarro alternate reality I could only keep one 35mm camera, the LX would be it.

MX. My second-ever 35mm camera. Got stolen in France. Since had several more and have kept one "silver" one and one black one. They both work flawlessly although the silver one had to have a repair for the common battery-drain problem, which of course, only affects the light meter. When I went on a (probably) once-in-a-lifetime trip around the world, I took the LX and MX with me. The black one, despite a CLA, occasionally has a 'slip' and one gets an over-lapping frame or two. Hasn't happened for a while though.

Super A. I have one which I had CLAed and use occasionally. I like the little thumb grip, and the greater choice of auto-modes (although I nearly always use Av, even on my digital cameras). It feels more "plastic-y" than the LX/MX and if I was to go on a trip, it wouldn't be the camera I took with me.

Just my tuppence worth.

K.
Forum: Film SLRs and Compact Film Cameras 07-06-2020, 12:24 AM  
What is happening to my LX??
Posted By Eyewanders
Replies: 46
Views: 4,390
Excellent to hear! A smoothly shooting LX is, in my opinion, nearly as good as it gets. I've almost picked up a late model dozens of times over the past 6 or 7 years but always back out at the last minute. Mine (an earlier serial) still works well enough that I just decided to let it be. It can't be my daily driver but I still love each time I pick it up. My MXs are the workhorses that I abuse, along with a couple of Konica in more recent years. The T4 below has taken top-spot for a daily driver for over 2 years now running, arguably becoming my "favorite", but the LX (and MX) are hair's breadth behind. :)

brother from another mother by Kevin Rosinbum (Eyewanders Foto), on Flickr
Forum: Film SLRs and Compact Film Cameras 07-05-2020, 08:57 PM  
MX, LX or Super Program
Posted By climbmountainway
Replies: 49
Views: 7,431
I was the US moderator for the Pentax LX Guestbook Messenger forum for at least 7 years (the other two were from Canada and the UK). The LX was issued in two runs, the first one was unreliable, the second was (research serial numbers). Both runs developed sticky mirror syndrome when the mirror bounce foam failed in time, and often developed failure of the self timer/DOF lever due to its attached push button activation access eventually de-threading its mechanism attachment and thus its possible operation (difficult to get repaired BTW). Its shutter, averaging center weighted meter, build, and quiet operation were accurate, did not hold memory between shots, and spoke quality. It had an accurate and long lasting quilted horizontal metal shutter. A working body can use any K mount lens with an on lens manual aperture adjustment. It signaled aperture to the body's meter through a mechanical linkage. Its auto exposure was achieved by aperture priority mode. It offered interchangable viewfinders, winder, and motor drive (with accessories). It was truly a system Professional film camera.

Both had metal bodies, the MX was simpler, with no autoexposure, yet with indexed lights set against a visible bracket in the viewfinder that made it easy to bracket exposure. It had a cloth shutter which would underlast the LX by two thirds longevity. Its simple electronics were prone to dust working its way under its bonnet through its shutter speed/ meter sensitivity dial; the LX was not so disposed (as had water resistant seals similar to the Pentax DSLR). The MX offered half and full stop over and under indexed lights averaging center weighted manually adjustable metering indicators. ASA/ISO settings were adjustable in 1/3 exposure stop increments. The MX was very lightweight and somewhat weather resistant in use with an integrated noninterchangeable viewfinder, I carried it backpacking a half dozen years. Fuji Velvia transparency film was my bread and butter from my shooting slide keepers library sales. It was better built than its alike sized predecessor, the Olympus OM1.

The LX and MX had a very similar viewfinder brightness and view area scope. LX Standard FA-1 Interchangeable Eye-Level Pentaprism Finder featured silver-coating and shows 98% vertical, 95% horizontal of picture area plus full data viewfinder display; and offers a built-in diopter correction by adjustment screw. The MX required a slip over glass lens back viewfinder eyeframe diopter correction. The LX finder was removable by a release lever. 7 other Prisms were available. The fixed MX viewfinder and changeable LX viewfinder focusing screens, though not multicoated for the MX, and multicoated for the LX, were interchangeable with one another.

The ME Super and Super (Program) A slightly different cameras offered more automation of exposure, without half stop manual metering (and offering push button shutter speed adjustments, and automatic shutter speed metering, and the Super [Program] A offering both aperture or shutter speed autoexposure with A series lenses which can still be set to A aperture automation on Pentax DSLRs) but used the same metering cell as the MX, and ME -- so were accurate, and did not hold memory between shots (which was a big metering advance over the K series cameras). The ME Super had a metal body, the A series plastic bodies. The winders on the LX, ME super, and MX were 2 fps, with the LX and MX also offering motor drives up to 5 fps. The Super A up to 3.5 fps for its now hard to find motordrive. The ME winder II fit both the Super Program and ME Super bodies. Any of their viewfinders were good, with the earlier K series bodies, MX, LX, and ME Super having pentaprisms. Only one A series had this, the cheaper units used penta mirrors.

The seals on the backs and mirror up bounce will rot after many years in a humid climate. But, finding one in pristine shape, from someone who purchased it and lodged it hardly used in a closet and case, is still very much possible. Good hunting.

If you wish to purchase one, condition is everything. I picked up a functional and clean ME Super body with winder II for under $30. The advantages of any of these are the now inexpensive, yet excellent M series SMC lenses, often with a common 49mm filter size, as are readily found on ebay for peanuts. I literally wore out the aperture on a 35mm f2, but enjoyed its color and rendition detail daily for 5 years, along with a 100mm M tele, an M series 2 28MM , and a 20mm f4 M with a 49mm filter which I still use. Occasional bargain lenses which would work well with the LX, M, and A series benefits are the M and A telezooms. I still hold 5 M series optics, used mostly for Video on digital bodies (with manually available aperture adjustment). The remote screw on 4 pin wired release for the LX MD and winder is interchangeable with the ME Super Winder II. The MX winder has no remote, unlike its motor drive, which interchanges batteries and AC power resources including a remote connection on then available battery packs with the LX.
Forum: Film SLRs and Compact Film Cameras 07-05-2020, 09:16 AM  
MX, LX or Super Program
Posted By TwoUptons
Replies: 49
Views: 7,431
I had a Super Program for years. Apart from a bent rewind knob, it never gave me any problems.
I loved its meter, and especially its TTL flash. It was a great balance between the automation of "the future" with the ergonomics of "the past".
My favorite Super Program trick was firing a Sunpak 544 "potato masher" flash with the pc socket while using a AF280 as TTL fill... I got TTL exposure (mostly) with a ton of reach.
I got rid of it when I got my PZ-20, which did all the same things only focused and wound film for me, so was better suited to the event stuff I was doing at the time.

While I had the Super Program I got an MX as a more advanced backup over my K1000. One of the smoothest cameras I've ever used. Wonderful ergonomics, huge viewfinder.
I got rid of it when I moved away from shooting on a regular basis.

I've always loved the LX, but I've never been able to justify one over a MX. I don't really care about the interchangeable finder, the film rewinding trick is really neat, but I can burn a lot of blank frames for the money I'd save swapping rolls with a LX.
The only thing I'm jealous of is the meter, but I'm far more likely to do that kind of wacky low-light stuff with digital now at ISO settings that would have been impossible with film.
So while I totally get the LX legend, It's not my thing.

When I started shooting more film again, I picked up some older bodies cheap. One was a MX (since serviced as it was a little flaky). I keep coming across Super Programs, and they are generally very inexpensive, but I've never bought one...
I'm not terribly worried about the reliability... I just have that functionality elsewhere, and if I want to shoot film, it's nearly always a manual camera...
Now if I came across one that I knew was my old one, I'd like it back just to have the same one that took so many of my favorite images, but unless KEH keeps better records than I think they do, that won't happen...

-Eric
Forum: Film SLRs and Compact Film Cameras 07-05-2020, 08:13 AM  
MX, LX or Super Program
Posted By UncleVanya
Replies: 49
Views: 7,431
My dad worked for Pentax when the LX was in its heyday. The principle advantage of that camera over the MX is the metering. The TTL off the film plane metering is superb. It can adapt in auto mode to changing light conditions and does a fine job with flash exposures. The meter being in the body was a direct response to Nikon and the F2 where only some heads had metering and people complained.

Overall I felt it was a fantastic body.

My dad's best friend worked for Nikon and later Pentax after dad had changed jobs to something with less travel. His best friend thought the MX was the pinnacle of Pentax manual focus film bodies. He also loved the F Nikon over the F2 for what it is worth.

If I were buying today the LX would be just too expensive for me over either of the other two given the lack of film shooting I do. But I always wanted one... To go with my F2.

But I have come to realize the differences between equipment are mostly convenience and fluff vs shot selection and thoughtful image making. Enjoy any of these I'm sure they will all work.
Forum: Film SLRs and Compact Film Cameras 07-05-2020, 07:39 AM  
MX, LX or Super Program
Posted By tonyzoc
Replies: 49
Views: 7,431
I think alot of the distrust of the LX comes from folks like myself who never owned one. We see $400 price and read stories in here about mirror box issues and we're afraid to buy one. I'd bet overall the LX is actually one of the most reliable bodies Pentax has made considering it's dust proof design. I've been thinking of getting one soon myself and as part of the cost I would assume a CLA would be in it's near future.
As for the MX, I've owned many over the years and I've never had one fail or had a CLA. I currently own 2. It's a simpler camera and much cheaper so even it it had a serious failure it easy enough to buy another.
I also love the SuperProgram. It was my first "purchased new" Pentax and I've used it heavily. The only issue I had with it, is the meter wouldn't always turn on when shutter 1/2 pressed which occurred 10+ years into owning it. I'd have to exercise the shutter release while off to get it to turn on. I currently have 2 bodies (not my original) and both work fine.
So...considering you can get a good working MX and SuperProgram for around $100 each, you might as well get all 3 cameras.
Forum: Film SLRs and Compact Film Cameras 07-05-2020, 04:40 AM  
MX, LX or Super Program
Posted By Wasp
Replies: 49
Views: 7,431
I have owned all three. It's hard to pick one, they all have their good and not so good points.

The MX is probably the best pick, being all mechanical. That said, it is not indestructible and you will need the services of a good repair tech at some stage. In use, it is very basic. There is no auto exposure. You can swop focusing screens and it will take a motor drive/winder.

The Super Program a.k.a. Super A (which is what I had) can do auto exposure. The most useful part is TTL auto flash. This was a real game changer for me. It will take a motor drive/winder but you can't swop focusing screens.

The LX only does aperture priority auto exposure and it has TTL auto flash. You can swop out the prism and focusing screen. If you wear glasses the high eye point prism is good to have, but you will have to find one first. Keeping an LX up and running can be a challenge - spares are scarce and some techs don't like working on them.
Forum: Film SLRs and Compact Film Cameras 03-08-2009, 06:48 PM  
:cool: Lets see those ''film'' shots
Posted By frank
Replies: 26,400
Views: 3,333,809
I got some here, taken either by SuperProgram or MZ-3, or maybe LX, all on Gold Kodak 100:







































Forum: Film SLRs and Compact Film Cameras 02-23-2020, 06:49 PM  
Pentax mx dirty focusing screen
Posted By Wheatfield
Replies: 10
Views: 1,842
I've been known to be wrong, but I believe the LX screens will throw the exposure meter off a bit.
I live in a very dry climate, so while I don't have to worry about fungus, I do have rather dusty equipment. I've learned to embrace dirt.

Edit: I see Steve has better information.
Forum: Film SLRs and Compact Film Cameras 06-24-2020, 10:31 PM  
What is happening to my LX??
Posted By Wheatfield
Replies: 46
Views: 4,390
I'd have to pull my remaining LX apart to be sure, but it seems to me there is a cover glass between the screen and the prism. It's really delicate work in there, and the screen is VERY delicate. It will scratch is you look at it sharply.
Also, make sure it isn't inside the prism. Look through it while it's off the camera.
Forum: Film SLRs and Compact Film Cameras 06-24-2020, 10:08 AM  
What is happening to my LX??
Posted By Wheatfield
Replies: 46
Views: 4,390
Glad to help out. Depending on how badly corroded the resistor is, it may take extensive exercising to get it working properly. Yours doesn't look too bad. One of my cameras simply couldn't make a proper exposure on automatic because of this. Of course, I rarely used the thing on automatic, so when it bit me, it bit me hard.

---------- Post added Jun 24th, 2020 at 11:13 AM ----------



As an aside, this won't work without film in the camera, as the meter reads off the film plane for longer exposures.
Put a piece of undeveloped film across the shutter window, or else exposures will all just go to infinity.
One of the claims to fame of the LX was that when used on automatic during longer exposures (longer than 1/30th IIRC) it would adjust exposure during the exposure if the scene brightness changed.
Forum: Film SLRs and Compact Film Cameras 06-24-2020, 12:55 AM  
What is happening to my LX??
Posted By pentaxpete
Replies: 46
Views: 4,390
Stevebrot here is the 'Story' how I ended up with 2 LX cameras -- I bought one first when I was a Photography Tutor in the 1980's at Barking College at discount price through a Student who worked in a camera dealers. Then years later had trouble with erratic exposure so gave to Harrow Technical ( Famous PENTAX repairers) and paid in advance. Then some Yobbos set fire to some rubbish bins outside and fire spread inside premises . Everyone who had a Camera in there was contacted to say they had been damaged by water and fire so would get a free replacement. A BOX arrived with brand NEW Later LX with SMC 50mm f1.4 Pentax-M lens when mine had the f1.7 lens ! 2 years went past then I got a phone call from Harrow Technical asking when I was going to collect my LX that i had paid for and was in for repair !! So i said I had " Been Abroad for a long time " and RUSHED there and was handed my earlier LX undamaged by the Fire ! So I got 2 LX cameras !

---------- Post added 24-06-20 at 09:05 AM ----------

acoulter --- I went to USA on a 'Pentax Club of Great Britain trip about 30 years ago with 2 ME Supers -- I noticed that I was getting some strange exposure read-outs such as 1/2000th @ f16 when I KNEW from experience in bright light for FP4+ it should be 1/125th @ f16 ! Luckily we had a Pentax Company Executive on the trip and he told me to rock the exposure compensation dial back and forth several times and after doing it the LED's were giving accurate read-outs -- that is a FAULT with ME Supers -- there gets dust or condensation under the Exposure Compensation Dial on the contacts.
regarding the Aperture Lever in Camera Lens mount -- I got given a KX body free by a Camera Club member who had sent it off for sale to Ffordes in Scotland and they sent it back as Not Working -- I had a look and that Aperture lever was stuck compared with my other Pentaxes where I could 'Pull it around' -- so I dropped a minute amount of OIL into the ring and pulled gently and it MOVED as it should and KX has been working ever since !
Forum: Film SLRs and Compact Film Cameras 06-24-2020, 08:57 AM  
What is happening to my LX??
Posted By Wheatfield
Replies: 46
Views: 4,390
It's circled in the picture below. The LX originally used copper windings for the resistors, which was fine as long as the camera saw a lot of use, but most cameras didn't, and especially now, film cameras just aren't being used the way they were meant to be used.
The ISO resistor adjusts the meter sensitivity, the aperture cam follower resistor is what lets the camera do open aperture metering by simulating stopping down the lens electronically. You will sometimes hear people referring to it as the aperture simulator.
Anyway, copper will oxidize, consequently the feeler that runs up and down the resistor doesn't make proper contact, causing the problem you have seen.
Later LX cameras did use gold windings. I had all three of my LX bodies sent for repair while Pentax Canada was still servicing them. I had the ISO and aperture cam follower resistors replaced with the new style ones at that time.
If you shoot a roll of film a week, the aperture cam follower resistor should stay clean, but do exercise the ISO resistor frequently by rotating the ISO adjustment dial from stop to stop multiple times whenever you load a new roll of film, or weekly if you tend to shoot sporadically with the camera.
Search took 0.00 seconds | Showing results 1 to 14 of 14

 
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 01:49 PM. | See also: NikonForums.com, CanonForums.com part of our network of photo forums!
  • Red (Default)
  • Green
  • Gray
  • Dark
  • Dark Yellow
  • Dark Blue
  • Old Red
  • Old Green
  • Old Gray
  • Dial-Up Style
Hello! It's great to see you back on the forum! Have you considered joining the community?
register
Creating a FREE ACCOUNT takes under a minute, removes ads, and lets you post! [Dismiss]
Top