|
Forum: Pentax SLR Lens Discussion
06-09-2011, 03:30 PM
|
| |
| |
|
Forum: Pentax SLR Lens Discussion
06-08-2011, 08:15 AM
|
| |
An image slightly compressed :
Image 6 43mm f5.6
An image at 16mm for yusuf:
image 16mm |
|
Forum: Pentax SLR Lens Discussion
06-08-2011, 07:40 AM
|
| |
Hello friends, this my new 16-50 repaired, i would an your opinion about if this is accettaple for 16-60 or not: the right side appears slighty soften in some images:
on tripod, sr disaled:
image 1, 43mm f5
image 2, 43mm f4
image 3 36mm f4 (perfect)
image 4 36mm f4
image 5 50mm f5.6
free hand:
image 1 22mm f3.5 (looks perfect)
image 2 24mm f3.5 (soft on the right)
Any images are soft on the righ, others perfetc in a casual way.
This appears strange to me, the problem is only at infinite focus.
But probably is only my impression.
What do you think? Is accettable for a 16-50?
ps.: location south Italy.
|
|
Forum: Pentax SLR Lens Discussion
06-01-2011, 03:00 PM
|
| |
Ok, i solved, yesterday the 16-50 return from Pentax and now it's perfect, thanks to all for the support.
selar, the location is south Italy.
|
|
Forum: Pentax SLR Lens Discussion
02-20-2011, 06:47 AM
|
| |
| |
|
Forum: Pentax SLR Lens Discussion
02-20-2011, 05:58 AM
|
| |
| |
|
Forum: Pentax K-5 & K-5 II
11-10-2010, 02:01 PM
|
| |
In my case is a camera fault.
The problem on mine was real.
Not always occur, but often. Even when the machine is on professional tripod (Manfrotto 055proB). I'm Photographer for 10 years and have never had a similar problem. I send back K-7 in warranty and never solved the problem.
I hope that this problem is solved in K-5.
|
|
Forum: Pentax K-5 & K-5 II
11-10-2010, 08:05 AM
|
| |
| |
|
Forum: Pentax K-5 & K-5 II
11-10-2010, 07:00 AM
|
| |
I had this probem with my K-7 and i want uprade to K-5 mainly for solve this issue.
|
|
Forum: Pentax SLR Lens Discussion
04-04-2010, 03:51 AM
|
| |
Mmhh 40mm have more resolution in the borders...this is a comparison:
 |
|
Forum: Pentax SLR Lens Discussion
04-01-2010, 05:49 AM
|
| |
Dear pentaxians, I'm very undecided between this 2 limited lenses. Is the 35mm worse than 40mm in non macro situations?
Let me know in portraits and landscapes how does the 35mm compared to 40mm.
Best reards.
Massimo.
|
|
Forum: Pentax Camera and Field Accessories
12-21-2009, 03:27 AM
|
| |
hello pentaxians...
I was in my photographic store any days ago to look a 055cxpro3 (3 sections) and an 055cxpro4 (4 sections). The vendor was recommending a 4 section tripod and he said that with with carbon models the old rule of 3 section vs. 4 section tripods was no longer true.
Is it really true?!?!!?
Best regards
|
|
Forum: Pentax SLR Lens Discussion
08-14-2009, 03:01 AM
|
| |
Dear pentaxians...
I noticed that the Pentax has released simple DA lenses weather resistant (18-55 WR, 50-200 WR).
Now, i would to know if anyone know if Pentax has plans to produce the DA Limited series in WR format.
|
|
Forum: Pentax SLR Lens Discussion
12-22-2008, 03:18 PM
|
| |
Thanks a lot.
Massimo Lucio
|
|
Forum: Pentax SLR Lens Discussion
12-22-2008, 01:52 AM
|
| |
Thanks for you response James.
to me interest that the body of my K10 remains totally sealed. So the 17-70
is a good choice for my purposes.
Do you know also others DA lens partially sealed?
Best regards
Massimo Lucio
|
|
Forum: Pentax SLR Lens Discussion
12-21-2008, 05:23 PM
|
| |
Dear friends, first of all my compliments for this splendid forum. Here Massimo from Latina, Italy.
I have a question:
I want to know if DA 17-70 is weather sealind or "partial" weather sealing:
for example, I have read that the lens has the seal on the bayonet and then the sealing of the srl body is kept.
Is it true?
Best regards.
Massimo Lucio.
|
