Forgot Password
Pentax Camera Forums Home
 
Log in or register to remove ads.

Showing results 1 to 25 of 30 Search: Liked Posts
Forum: Pentax K-3 & K-3 II 04-16-2015, 08:00 AM  
why I won't buy a k3 (Warning: Satire Thread)
Posted By Parallax
Replies: 103,043
Views: 4,843,111
Forum: Pentax Price Watch 05-26-2015, 12:47 PM  
K-3 Body Now Down to $749 at B&H With Free Grip
Posted By Biro
Replies: 26
Views: 3,853
The K-3 body is now down to $749 at B&H with the free BG-5 battery grip included. This makes it a better deal than the $703 from a third-party seller on Amazon.com. And there'll be no questions about the warranty for U.S. buyers.

Pentax K-3 DSLR Camera Body 15530 B&H Photo Video

Forum: Pentax SLR Lens Discussion 10-13-2011, 11:26 PM  
This LBA thang is all messed up!
Posted By wolfiegirl
Replies: 480
Views: 42,052
Hi Guys,

So I've had my k100d for close to 5 years now and have been faithfully using my little lens kit of 18-50 and 50-200 as a point and shoot (hello auto and pre programmed modes!) depending on what I needed it for. Most times the 18-50 lives permanently on my body and the photos turn out great for me (as compared to my little 3.5megapixel fujifinepix point and shoot that I had before).

A few weeks ago I was noticing that I was constantly taking photos of flowers etc (it's Spring here, down under) and feeling the lack of a proper macro. Details of petals constantly got wiped out, lots of blurry pics, and I'd maybe get 1 out of 10 - 20 shots that I was happy with enough to send off to someone to identify the flowers for me.

I realised I needed to step up and buy a macro lens.

Off I went to the trusted interwebs, only to discover to my horror that what looked like the most suitable macro lens for my needs on the Pentax website was a whopping $700 or so. Um, no thank you.

I started researching and remembered why I had settled on a Pentax in the first place. According to a dpr review, by buying a Pentax you were really saving money because you could use ANY Pentax lens ever made! The idea of buying old lenses and the ability to interchange them should I ever upgrade to something further along the track was something that resounded deeply into the heart of my cheapskate soul. So after a little bit (and I do mean a little bit) of dabbling I went in search of lenses. I think you guys all know where this leading, don't you? :cool:

One week and close to $300 later I now have about 9 lenses on their way to me (I thought buying a camera that allowed for the use of older lenses was a SAVING?!). I managed to only do one smart thing so far and that was to ask on freecycle, which resulted in one freebie lens - which has a case of fungus in the lens. I didn't know what I was asking for at the time, and to be honest, when things come to you for free, it really is rather tempting fate to be specific about the state said freebie comes in. Least that's my reasoning anyway. I can just imagine the giver muttering to themselves: "why so picky??? you're getting it for free aren'tcha??"

I'll be honest though, after reading some of the posts here I am a bit skeeered to put that fungus encrusted lens onto my precious k100d. Don't want to infect my sparkly lens kit!! Which means of course I've started looking into buying (and bidding on!!) a spare dslr body for any other 'dodgy' lenses that come my way.

What has this resulted in? Sleepless nights trawling gumtree, ebay, and any other classifieds places that I can think of.

And 9 more bids on ebay which, if they go for the max amount I've put in for each item, will come to a whopping $537.20. I repeat, I thought doing it the Pentax way was supposed to save me money?!

The irony is that none of these lenses that I've purchased and am bidding on is in fact one that will suit my macro needs. Don't believe me?

Here's what I've gotten so far:

1. SMC/S-M-C/Super-/Auto-/Takumar 55mm F1.8

2. Ozunon GMC 55mm Auto Zoom 1:3.5-4.8 35-75mm (this was the freebie that has fungus on the inside)

3. A spotmatic that has a standard 50mm Pentax lens attached to it (the pic looks like it's a 1:1.8 Super Tak.. hold on a sec. Didn't I just buy that one??? F&^& I didn't even notice that last night!),

4. A midrange 180mm fixed lens non Pentax and a Panagor Extension Bellows (Thanks Rico for telling me I needed a bellows if I wanted to play around with macros. No, really, Thanks. :p)

5. Vivitar with leather case, Auto Telephoto 135mm 1:2.8 that doesn't even fit a Pentax (I only noticed this when I got the 'you've won' email this morning).

6. Takumar F ZOO MACRO 28-80 mm 1:3.5-4.5. Why oh why oh why did I not take this off my 'watch list' after I read the reviews on here? The purchase resulted after the email prompted me not to 'miss out' on my item and it was late, and I was super tired, and I thought oh heck, I better bid! It didn't help that there were 7 suckers in front of me that seemed fairly keen on the lens. :hmm:

7. KA MIRANDA 70-300 F4.5-5.8 MACRO+bonus Camera bag and a MZ-50. This had a slight haze on the back lens, which when I went all warlike to check the listing, to my chagrin I realised the seller had in fact put all this information down. *I* had simply in my newbie confusion saw that no one had bid, and read a line that said 'some hazing but takes pics fine, and the bargain hunter in me put in a bid. :ugh: Not to mention the fact that I'm HAPPY with my 50-200mm Pentax lens...

8. SMC Pentax-M 1:1.7 50mm prime lens

9. That dratted Kiron 28-70mm macro that most likely won't fit on my k100d and should really be sold off to someone with a Canon. And where on earth, pray tell me, am I supposed to find them???

So why on earth did I buy them??? I mean, I don't even NEED to get an slr - and I already have TWO sitting here on my desk!! I'm never going into film unless you can tell me how I can justify the money I'll spend on film and developing. And don't tell me it'll be worth it if I invest in a dark room and I'll be shocked at the quality film has vs digital. :mad:

1. Coz of that spectacular database on this evil forum that tells me the quality of each lens I come across and how much I should pay for it. An auction that ends in 1hr and 22mins that has a lens that's worth $60 but is only going for $32 and has only 3 bidders? BID! BID! BID!

2.The AMAZING (and I do mean AMAZING) photos that I see on this forum. I can't help but think, gee, if I just branched out from my generic kit lens, I could take piccies like that too!!!!

3. That darn marketplace on here with lots of lovely descriptions and prices that just look so reasonable!

4. All this talk of photography and lenses and how they make me feel like if I buy this lens, it could be the only thing that stands between me, my camera, and the next "IT" pic.

5. I really am getting bored with the range of my 2 lenses, and after 5 years I really do think it's time that I got off my butt and started to do some 'real' photography work and make my little k100d work for its food and board.

I tell you though, the amount of buyer's remorse that I have felt in the last 5 days has been absolutely excruciating. That being said, the highs when I spot something that might have value and could cause me to become the next Ansell Adams has also been out of this world. My world literally stopped, and my heart was POUNDING in a thumpity thump way that I've never experienced before in all my bargain hunting days when I was in an op shop and spotted a Pentax slr with lens in it. The world continued to slow when I took the lens off the camera and inspected it, and saw clear near mint perfect glass on either side of the lens. But then time came back to normal when I shook the barrel and I heard rattling. :( Thank you Rico for that very entertaining and knowledgable article on what to look out for when buying second hand lenses!!!

So you can imagine my excitement when a coworker that rarely comes in spotted the Pentax MG body I had discarded on my desk and showed interest in buying it. A bit more lengthy discussion revealed he owns a Canon (!!!) and has an addiction to old cameras! It was like the clouds had parted and I could potentially scrape back the hundreds I had spent in the last 5 days and even possibly make a profit! :cool: Not to mention knowing these bodies and lenses that I couldn't use would go to a good home. Very important, a good home.

The last irony for me though, is that should I win these next 9 auctions I've got going, I may as well have spent the cash on that macro I was eyeing in the first place. :hmm:

From one LBAddict to another, I just thought you might appreciate what I'm going through at the moment. Oh, and between you and me? I think we're all screwed.
Forum: Pentax K-5 & K-5 II 09-24-2011, 11:56 AM  
K5 and SDXC card???
Posted By Adam
Replies: 19
Views: 7,430
Yup I think that's right- you can take advantage of the 64gb/128gb cards, but the max speed is probably class 6 or 10 (I'm not sure on that).
Lexar 128GB Professional 133x SDXC Card LSD128CRBNA133 B&H Photo
Forum: Pentax K-5 & K-5 II 09-23-2011, 03:34 PM  
Is Otis a Fool?
Posted By Smeggypants
Replies: 156
Views: 20,527
From the K-5 in London Thread ....

Caught Otis in London ....


Forum: Pentax Camera and Field Accessories 06-15-2011, 12:22 PM  
Camera Clip System
Posted By theprisoner6
Replies: 16
Views: 5,519
I was just sent a link to an interesting camera clip system for carrying and quickly accessing SLRs. Has anybody seen anything like this? Essentially it is a clip system that attaches your camera by the tripod mount to your belt or backpack shoulder strap. It is not in full scale production... yet . He has produced 100 units so far. The inventor is seeking investment money via the link below. There is a video demonstrating the product at the same link.

Capture Camera Clip System by Peter Dering — Kickstarter
Forum: Pentax K-5 & K-5 II 05-12-2011, 12:37 PM  
Wow, this guy really hates the K5 and says Pentax is 2 generations behind Canikon
Posted By crossover37
Replies: 131
Views: 22,153
This review was just posted on Amazon and this guy really dislikes the K5.


--------------------------

He sees the K5 as a worse camera than the K20D?
Forum: Ask B&H Photo! 03-29-2011, 10:12 AM  
K5 $1299.00?
Posted By Stringmike
Replies: 16
Views: 4,711
Many of us were led to believe that the $100 discount was applied on the existing price listed on the B&H website of $1399 for a final price of $1299 and that this offer would be valid through April 2.

I put a K-5 in my basket yesterday for a final price of $1299, went briefly to another web site to move funds for the purchase and when I returned the B&H price had increased by $100 to $1399. This happened to a number of us linking to your offer from this site. The explanation given was that B&H had raised the price of the K-5 to $1499 and the $100 off now lowered the price to $1399 - exactly what it was before the $100 cut was introduced.

As a result, a number of us, feel a bit miffed at B&H and have switched our purchases to your competitors, a couple of whom have prices significantly below yours.

It may not have been anyone's intention at B&H to mislead us (we all have a high regard for your store and service), but there was definitely a miscommunication that has led to unhappy customers (including me!)

Mike
Forum: Flashes, Lighting, and Studio 01-11-2011, 06:15 PM  
Cactus V5 radio flash trigger review
Posted By Class A
Replies: 274
Views: 104,027
Cactus V5 Review

Gadget Infinity, the company that brought us the Cactus V4 flash radio triggers created a significantly improved V5 version.


What is it?

One V5 unit can function as a
  • Flash/Strobe radio trigger transmitter

  • Flash/Strobe radio trigger receiver

  • Wireless remote trigger for a camera

  • Safe-sync hot shoe adapter for high-voltage flashes

  • Flash stand

This versatility is quite an improvement over the Cactus V4.
See section “Discussion” below for an elaboration of the above mentioned functionalities.

Highlight Features
  • Rock solid performance (100m range, automatic temperature adaptation)

  • Sync-speed up to 1/1000s

  • Compatible with old flashes (flash trigger voltage range of 0—300V)

  • Compatible with low-voltage flashes (e.g., Pentax) even in cold weather

  • Both female tripod thread and male hot shoe with a locking mechanism

  • Female hot shoe still usable in transmitter mode

  • No exotic batteries. Rechargeable AAAs work as well

  • Low-battery indicator

  • Easy channel selection during operation

  • Multi-channel mode

In particular in combination, the last two features are a game changer! They open up completely new applications. See bullet “Handling” in section “Discussion” below for an elaboration.

Specifications
  • Radio frequency: 2.4 GHz

  • Channels: 16 (1—5 allow multi-channel operation)

  • Max. sync speed: 1/1000s

  • Maximum effective distance: 100 m (conservative figure)

  • Operating Temperature: -20°C to +50°C

  • Flash trigger voltage supported: 0–300V

  • Power: 2 x AAA 1.5V batteries/rechargeables

  • Dimensions: 82mm x 70mm x 37mm (LxWxH) (including stand)

  • Weight: 58g


What’s in the Box?
In addition to a user manual and a "When the Light Dances 2" album (showing sample photos with corresponding strobist lighting diagrams), a V5 Duo box contains the following:


Features and Controls



Discussion
Handling
The ease of handling the V5 is one of its absolute highlights. First, the mode switch (“Tx” = Transmitter, “Rx” = Receiver, “Off”) is at the side and can be accessed while a flash is mounted. One can even change the batteries while the unit is in use (e.g., part of a flash stand rig). The battery compartment slides in and out with a click action similar to an SD card mechanism.


The Cactus V5 review by Brian Hursey features a video demonstrating the battery compartment action.

The best part, however, is that channel selection is not done via DIP switches but through a channel dial at the side that can be accessed while the unit is in use.


This means one can set up multiple flashes in the room and then dynamically choose one flash by dialling in the right channel on the transmitter on camera. This way one can move around with the camera and always choose a flash that will not be seen in the image or that just gives the best light for a particular moment.

Furthermore, for flashes/strobes set to channels 2–5 (marked in blue on the channel selection dial) one can choose to fire them individually or all at once. The latter is achieved simply by setting the transmitter to channel 1. This is very handy for multi-strobe setups to support testing each strobe’s contribution individually first and then simply let them fire all, once one is satisfied with the direction and levels of all individual strobes.

Further “goodies” include the ability for half-pressing the test button. Such a half-press will be confirmed with the LED lighting up in amber rather than in green. Receivers set to the same channel (or on channels 1–5 for multi-channel operation) will just respond with their LED lighting up in amber. This allows verification of channel settings, etc., without actually firing flashes.


The same LED can also light up in red. It does this – blinking slowly – to indicate a low-battery status. A nice touch to receive an advance warning instead of being surprised by dead batteries.

Reliability
The maximum distance between transmitter and receivers is specified to be 100m but this seems to be a very conservative figure. In a trial setup the triggers still worked 150—170m apart.


This was achieved in lowish temperature and with a receiver containing rechargeable Sanyo Eneloops which were close to depletion. Very impressive performance and heads and shoulders above the Cactus V4! It is unlikely that anyone will actually need the triggers to work at such distances but it is good to have this sensitivity safety margin for buildings with thick walls and difficult reception conditions. A tester even found the V5 to have more reach than the PocketWizards. The PocketWizards only worked at 50% of their advertised range and it is unknown why.

Tester Jared Luke tested the V5 at 7fps and they did not miss a beat. Tester Rudy's measurements confirm that the Cactus V5 could support up to 39 fps!

Compared to the Cactus V4, performance was not only improved in terms of reach but also in terms of temperature robustness. The V5 uses an FST (frequency self-tune) mechanism behind the scenes which automatically compensates for frequency drift due to drastic temperature changes. This means the triggers will work in a temperature range of -20ºC to +50ºC and may only require a bit of settling in time until the FST has automatically made the necessary adjustments. Tester Rudy confirmed operation at -10ºC.

Compatibility
The V5 allows the usage of old high trigger-voltage flashes as it supports a trigger voltage range of 0—300V. This means one can purchase almost any flash, old or new, and the V5 will work with it. In contrast, many other triggers exclusively support either a 0—12V or a 12—300V range only.

Unlike the Cactus V4, the V5 does not support flashes with reversed polarity. In my opinion that is a plus rather than a minus since it means that Pentax flashes will not require a modification anymore in order to work in cold temperatures. Flashes with reversed polarity are very rare and not being able to use them is a very small price to pay for supporting modern flashes with a very low flash trigger voltage in low temperature.

Camera remote trigger
The required camera remote trigger cable is camera-specific and an optional accessory. Luckily, for Pentax users the required cable is a standard 3.5mm male to 2.5mm male audio adapter cable, such as this one. With a receiver connected to the camera, the trigger button on a transmitter set to the same channel essentially becomes the shutter release button of the camera. In other words, half-press for AF (also works continuously in AF-C mode, as long as AF is assigned to shutter button half-press), bulb mode, rapid firing, combination with self-timer, etc. are all supported.

If the camera is set to bulb mode, the shutter will be open as long as the user presses the trigger button on the remote transmitter. However, to save the user from keeping the button pressed for extended periods of time, after two seconds, there is a change in operation. The transmitter signals this mode change by turning off the green confirmation light. After that, the user can let go of the button. A further press of the button after an arbitrary time, will close the shutter again. In a way one gets the best of both worlds: a) easy “shutter-closed while button pressed”-mode for the first two seconds and b) convenient “shutter-opens on first press, shutter-closes on second press”-mode for longer exposures. The receiver is rated to keep the camera shutter button pressed for 12 hours non-stop with a fresh set of AAA alkaline batteries.

The automatic mode change may turn out to be problematic when a number of exposures need to be made around the two second mark, sometimes ending before and sometimes ending after it. Practice will show whether this may be a real world problem and/or another mode change timeout amount would be preferable.

On-camera flash
Even when a V5 is used as a transmitter, e.g., on the hot shoe of a camera, the female hot shoe continues to work. This means one can not only trigger flashes remotely but also fire a flash on camera flash, e.g., as a fill flash.


Note that a V5 in Tx (transmitter) mode shields the camera from any high flash trigger voltage. It thus effectively works as a Safe-Sync hot shoe and hence allows using old high trigger voltage flashes on camera. A respective device costs $47.19 and does not offer all the other cool features of the V5!

Mounting Options
The V5 features a female tripod thread and a male hot shoe. The latter has a locking mechanism and hence allows safe operation even in tilted setups, such as on umbrella swivels. The locking mechanism of all my flashes worked fine with the female hot shoe of the V5 and allowed adventurous setups. Brian Hursey’s review contains a video demonstrating the secure fit.


The V5 may also function as a flash stand, if used on the supplied flash stand. One can, of course, also use the flash stand for a flash.


Again, such a flash stand may cost $8.95 on its own. Admittedly, the Nikon AS-19 seems to be sturdier but the V5 flash stand does the job just fine.

Transceiver Design
A V5 unit is a transceiver, i.e., it can be used as a transmitter or receiver, depending on user choice. The one disadvantage this entails is that a receiver cannot have a male hot shoe with an integrated female tripod thread (without involving costly solutions). An integrated tripod thread would avoid the potential mounting challenges resulting from this (see “Room for Improvement?” below). However, the transceiver design also has advantages:
  • the manufacturer only needs to design, produce and stock one device. The respective cost savings translate into a more competitive price for the user.

  • if a transmitter breaks, one can continue shooting by turning a receiver into a replacement transmitter.

  • one can reassign receiver/transmitter roles depending on current needs, e.g., if multiple photographers participate in a shoot.

  • A superfluous transmitter can be used as a camera trigger, etc.

Note that a V5 Duo box only contains one set of connection cables (see above “What’s in the box?”). This means that buying two receivers at once in a V5 Duo box only fully works if one a) can fire sufficiently many flashes by using the V5 female hot shoes, or b) purchases extra connection cables as an accessory.

Compared To

Cactus V4
The Cactus V4 remains a very attractive choice because of its low price, compatibility with old flashes (0—300V voltage trigger range) and the fact that the receivers accept AAA batteries. The transmitter uses a special L1028 12V battery which lasts for a year though.

Although the V5 loses the ability to support flashes with reversed polarity, as mentioned above this is more than made up for by the fact that Pentax flashes now always work without requiring a modification anymore.

My main niggle with the V4 was the fact that if one forgot to turn the receiver on, there was no way to do it after a flash had been mounted on the hot shoe. The V5 solves that problem by locating the on/off (mode selector) switch at the side.

Even though I never needed more than the ~15m range the V4 have given me, the 100m range of the V5 instil a lot more confidence regarding reliability and I am sure the V5 will be used in many professional settings.

Unfortunately, the V5 are a bit more fuzzy about a minimal distance between transmitter and receiver than the V4 were. This may only be a problem in cases when one could use a flash cable anyhow, but why be forced to buy a flash cable if radio triggers could continue to work?

Luckily, by setting the V5 to channel 16, I got them to work in close proximity to each other, such as triggering a flash on a flash bracket –
– or in macro situations.

The featured bottle is tiny and the flash is on the left hand side, extremely close to the camera.

The V5 are considerable bigger than the V4.


In use this is not a problem at all but it means that the V5 take up considerable more space in a camera bag. On the flip side, the V5 have no protruding antenna thus eliminating any related accidents involving camera straps, etc. Note that the V5 are still smaller than PocketWizards Plus II (approximately 8cm * 6cm * 3.5cm compared to 3.6cm * 5.4cm * 10.2 cm).

Yongnuo RF-602
The Yongnuo RF-602 also features long range operation and can function as a camera trigger but it does not reach 1/180 sync speed on Pentax cameras without tricks/modifications. Its maximum trigger voltage of 12V prohibits the use of older high trigger voltage flashes. A major disadvantage compared to the V5 is the inability to change the channel on the fly. I find the dynamic flash selection ability of the V5 to be one of its main attractive features.

Yongnuo RF-603
The upcoming Yongnuo RF-603 features a TTL pass-through functionality (for on-camera flashes only) but has been heavily criticised for having no locking mechanism on the male hot shoe. It does not feature a female tripod thread. Again, dynamic flash selection through a handy channel dial is not supported. As the RF-602, it is a camera-specific trigger, which I consider to be a disadvantage.

Flash Wave
In the past, when budget triggers had reliability problems, the Flashwaves where a good choice for those who needed the reliability and were prepared to spend considerably more money. Nowadays, other triggers have caught up. I don't think we'll see any complaints about reliability with the Cactus V5. I find the Flash Wave III a bit pricey for what they offer:
  • US $129.95 compared to the US $59.95 for the Cactus V5 Duo.

  • Advertised range more than twice the advertised range of the Cactus V5.

  • remote camera trigger functionality only releases shutter but cannot AF (based on an older version. I do not know about the latest FW III version.)

  • Transmitter uses special CR2450, 23A battery.

  • Does not mount on a female hot shoe.

  • Channel selection via tiny DIP switches.


Room for Improvement?

The V5 does not support passing TTL information between camera and flashes. It does not even provide a TTL pass-through feature for on-camera flashes. However, given the choice between on-camera TTL pass-through and the Safe-Sync functionality of the V5, I would choose the latter any day. Supporting both at the same time might be difficult. A TTL pass-through would make the triggers camera-specific which I regard as a disadvantage. In any event, just as real programmers don’t eat quiche, real strobists don’t use TTL. :) Seriously, I find manual control of flashes gives me the best and most consistent results. A remote flash power control feature would be quite something but I do not think TTL-support for on-camera flash only is an essential feature and/or worth paying the money for. If, for whatever reason, one needs a TTL pass-through on cameras with a sync port one can put the flash on the camera hot shoe and have the transmitter be triggered through the sync port. The one advantage I can think of a TTL pass-through has, is that it would allow usage of an AF assist light of the flash. Other features that are enabled by dedicated hot-shoes, e.g., rear curtain shutter, would only make real sense if the receiver supported TTL as well.

Cactus V4 owners may be sad to hear that the two trigger systems are not compatible with each other, i.e., V4 receivers will not listen to V5 transmitters and vice versa. Maintaining the compatibility would have been nice but is technically impossible with a switch from the 433MHz to the better 2.4GHz system. However, one can use both V5 and V4 transmitters in tandem (e.g., V4 transmitter on top of a V5 transmitter) in case one wants/needs to reuse existing V4 receivers.

The above image appears in Karel Donk's V5 review.

The multi-channel functionality is great but it could have easily been made even better by designating a certain receiver channel (e.g., channel 1) to always fire if the transmitter is set to any of the “blue” channels 1–5. This would have supported the use of a “common light” group of flashes that is constantly involved in all scenarios while one selectively adds different accent/key lights on channels 2–5. Maybe we will see such more elaborate uses of multi-channel functionality in future products.

A further “Interlink”/“Relay” mode would have been nice. In such a mode, a transceiver can be used to trigger a camera and a remote trigger for flashes, e.g., by automatically switching to transmitter mode one channel higher up after having fired the camera. This way one would need one V5 unit less to remote control a camera that fires remote flashes.

Some users may wish for an automatic power-off feature, which is absent from the V5. In my experience, however, such auto-features always get in the way when you least need it to happen. It is easy enough to develop a routine of turning off devices after usage and I much prefer the occasional depleted rechargeable set of batteries over misfires because the receivers powered themselves off.

The V5 have a higher power consumption than the V4. This is to be expected because they are a much more complex unit with a lot more features. The transmitter draws 2mA and the receiver 22mA when sitting idle (measurements courtesy by Rudy).

The size of the V5 male hot shoe locking mechanism makes operating it easier but in combination with the different vertical placement of the female tripod thread it can create a mounting challenge on some tripods, quick-release plates or spigots.


One might argue that removing the height difference between tripod thread and male hot shoe could fix the problem is visualised above but this would prevent the V5 to be mounted on cameras with a bulging built-in flash housing (such as the Olympus E-5). One can address the problem by using an additional flash stand, such as the Gissin AS-21, with an integrated tripod thread.

There will be some tension applied to a V5 unit mounted on a spigot and heavy equipment on the female hot shoe since the hot shoe is not aligned with the female tripod thread. However, the unit seems sturdy enough to survive such stress without harm.

Ideally, there would be a mode switch “Tx/Rx” separate from an “on/off” switch. This would allow a) leaving a unit in a dedicated mode, just turning it on and off, and b) switching the unit off in darkness and/or without paying attention. The current mode switch demands a bit of attention when switching the unit off because the “off” position is in the middle and cannot be set by simply pushing the switch to a stop.


Summary
The Cactus V5 is a significant improvement over the Cactus V4 which were already very attractive triggers.

Pros:
  • Excellent handling (easy access to on/off switch and batteries)

  • Dynamic selection of flashes during a shoot

  • Single or group selection of flashes

  • Safe on-camera flash usage while triggering other flashes

  • Works as a wireless camera trigger

  • No more exotic batteries, even rechargeable AAAs work

  • Low-battery indicator

  • High compatibility (0—300V trigger voltage and Pentax compatibility)

  • Hot shoe lock and female tripod thread

  • Great range and cold weather performance

  • High maximum sync-speed

  • 2.4GHz operational frequency does not interfere with radio emission of some flashes (e.g. the Canon EX series).

  • Flash stand included

Cons:
  • Tripod thread location may create mounting challenges

  • A bit large in the bag

  • Minimum distance between transmitter and receiver could be lower
    (has not been a problem in practice, though)

  • Incompatible to Cactus V4

  • Higher power-consumption compared to Cactus V4

  • No on-camera TTL pass-through for the transmitter

In closing, I can wholeheartedly recommend the Cactus V5. There are many more “pros” than “cons”. I especially like the ability to change the transmitter channel and thus the flashes addressed while moving around with the camera.

The few “cons” are the result of necessary compromises and completely addressing them (if possible at all) would no doubt make it tough to sell the V5 Duo for US $59.95. That's a bit more than the US$ 39.95 for a Cactus V4 transmitter/receiver pair (the Cactus V4 will not be phased out). The US $20 seem well justified for the additional features. A single Cactus V5 will be US $34.95. The release date is January 24, 2011 (PST).

The V5 will be the right choice for those who appreciate the V4 features but need/want the extra flexibility, increased range, improved reliability, extended compatibility, excellent handling, and new application scenarios provided by the V5.
Forum: Site Suggestions and Help 12-28-2010, 12:12 AM  
News "Top Likes" - Reputation system enhancements
Posted By Adam
Replies: 62
Views: 31,391
In the past, our reputation system could only reward individuals for posting quality threads or replies on the forum. After reading user suggestions, we've decided to enhance the system so that it's of more benefit to the entire community.

Thus, we're proud to announce our new "Liked Posts" dropdown, which will be found in the upper-right corner of every thread on the forum. This dropdown will display the 5 (subject to change) posts that have gotten the most reputation clicks (or "Likes") within the thread. Thus, it will now be much easier to find the "meaty" posts within a thread (assuming people click the like buttons!).

Attachment 79132

To like a post, click on the link/thumbs-up icon in the lower-right corner of the post (or upper-right if the post is an announcement/article, such as this one). There's an option in your user cp that allows you to switch between the text link and the icon.

Attachment 79133 Attachment 79134

When liking a post, you can also type a thank-you comment which will be visible to the owner of the post. Each like will add to the user's reputation score, which will be used to award various added account features (suggestions welcome).

Finally, the number of likes any post has gotten, if greater than zero, will be shown in the upper-left corner of each post, beside the date.

Attachment 79135

We hope you enjoy this new feature!
Forum: Pentax News and Rumors 10-30-2010, 04:54 PM  
Announced firmware update for K-5
Posted By falconeye
Replies: 84
Views: 22,881
Michaelina2, thanks for pointing this out. Maybe, I should be a bit more cautious when it comes to this particular topic.

The issue is not a "nasty problem" for a K-7 photographer. But it may be for Pentax because it can dampen the enthusiasm for their product. From the context I thought it was more clear what I meant.


You seem to think that this kind of testing pays any bills.
And to buy a product in anticipation to return it is fraud.
For reasons too early to talk about, I've no concern I may test a preselected copy.


I did not request anything. The initiative is theirs. The reason why you don't understand everything is that Pentax knows more about this than you do.

Beyond this point, I won't discuss the "issue" in this thread. It's not the place and not the time.


Adam, full support for SDXC doesn't require to use its full speed. Cameras not even use full SDHC speed.

The 20 buffer limit (if it materializes exactly so) means that about ~17 images are buffered while ~3 are written within a 3s window. Even with double write speed, this would increase to 17+6.5 images within a 3.5s window or 23.5 rather than 20 images, a 17% increase of RAW buffer size for a 100% increase in writing speed.

SDXC will be required for video capacity, not speed.
Of course, the speed is nice once the card is in the card reader ;)
Forum: Pentax Camera and Field Accessories 10-27-2010, 08:24 PM  
Why buy expensive tripod?
Posted By interested_observer
Replies: 41
Views: 11,944
I am going to say that you have received very good advice so far. When I first acquired my dSLR I had also won an evilbay auction for a cheeeep tripod (11 cents and $7 shipping). The first year I used it very little, then more over time - then it broke and fell apart. I did learned quite a bit from it. What I liked and what I hated. A ball head yes - a pan and tilt head - absolutely not. Also, that a lot of personal preference goes in to this. So, I had put a lot of thought in to what to get next for a tripod.

I wanted and needed something I could travel with in my carry on luggage, so I had size restrictions. I selected the Benro A-168M (its aluminum and referred to as the travel angle - it also comes in carbon fiber model for more $$$$). It came with a ballhead (a cheap POS that I used once - liked the concept, hated the implementation) and went looking for another ballhead. Benro has since come out with a complete line of more substantial ballheads that make the free one they included with my tripod a real embarrassment. I spent $150 on the legs. Some would consider them a bit light, but they work for me very well.

Now, I knew that I wanted to take stitched panoramas shots both in the vertical as well as in the horizontal. I also knew that (for me) its impossible to get a tripod perfectly level, and I did not want to spend a lot of time trying to get it level on each setup, so that when I panned (turned the ball head) it would pan on a level horizontal plane. So, I went looking for a "panning ballhead". Just about all the ball heads have a panning base. However, if the tripod is not level, the panning base will not turn on a horizontal plane. To fix this you need the panning base on top of the ballhead (you level the assembly via moving the ballhead, thus the panning base on top of the ballhead is level). Now that puts a bit more weight higher up, but for me that is a small price to pay. I settled on an Acratech GP (you can turn it upside down and it becomes a panning ballhead and its also a gimble). Its expensive $400, but the other options are even more $$$(Really Right Stuff, Arca Swiss, etc.). 90% of my shots are from a tripod and its worked out to be a very good investment.

Now - the rest of the story. I started out with a K100 body which I kept when I upgraded to the K20 body. I am out taking shots, and started bringing my K100 to take some other shots with. Then I wanted to use one body one way on a tripod and the other body another way - but needed a second tripod. So, I went shopping on Craigslist for a second hand used tripod in reasonably good condition - reasonably priced (under $100 - took about 6 weeks of looking). I wound up buying a Manfrotto 3001 Pro with a 486RC2 ballhead. Now, I find I hate the 486RC2 ballhead because it has a safety catch that I need to work with one hand, while the second hand pulls the release to attach and detach the camera body being held by the third hand (that I don't have). Personal preference (other folks apparently do not have the problem). So, now I am out shopping for another ballhead - however as good as the GP ballhead is, I really do not want to spend another $400 (my wife saw the charge and told me it better be gold plated and jewel encrusted). I have a nodal ninja 3 that I will be using on the second tripod (that has a built in panning base), so - that removes the "panning" requirement. That opens up the entire universe of Acra Swiss (A-S) ballheads (Acratech, Kirk, Acra Swiss, etc.) and brings the price down to a floor of about $80 on up, depending on what you want. I want to keep everything A-S compatible so that everything is interchangeable (able to mount either camera on either tripod or on the NN3).

I have used the term Acra Swiss - which is a company that developed a quick release plate and clamp system. Acra Swiss comparable means that one company's camera base plate will fit into another company's ball head clamp. This style of release plate and clamp works VERY well for me.

So, that is my tale of woe. The cheap tripod taught me a lot of what I wanted and needed. Understand that has let me define my requirements so that I can purchase what I need. Unfortunately - I find my needs are somewhat expensive, so its a pay as I go proposition. I also brown bag my lunch and thus add to my camera / mechanical support piggy bank.

The other thing is that I have found that some of the ballhead companies have videos that explain and show capabilities very well. I would recommend watching to see if that is what you need...

This video gives an overview of a ballhead with both a panning base and on top of the ballhead.
GP Ballhead instructional Video*::*Acratech

Here is a video on the Acra Swiss comparable
Quick Release System Instructional and Tutorial*::*Acratech

Here are a few more videos on related items.
Product Info*::*Acratech

Here are some tripod videos















You Tube



















You Tube



















You Tube





:cool:
Forum: Pentax SLR Lens Discussion 10-28-2010, 02:30 AM  
Poll: is it logical to sell fa50/1.4 and goto da35/2.4 ?
Posted By openyourap
Replies: 32
Views: 6,759
I'd always want the normal range covered, so would want something around 35mm. You might like to look at the 35 Limited macro. It's just a touch slower, but macro offers another raft of shooting possibilities.

Depending on your style, however, you might also look a little wider still - 21mm 3.2 Limited.
Forum: Photographic Technique 10-27-2010, 05:53 PM  
Mixing Flash Trigger Brands
Posted By pop4
Replies: 4
Views: 5,656
From all that I have read, mixing and matching tends not to work. The only exception that I am aware of seems to be the Phottix Atlas units, which are compatible with some of the 433Mhz Pocketwizard Triggers.

Personally, I can also confirm that Yongnuo RF-602 and Cactus V2/s units aren't compatible. All reports also indicate the new Meike RC-7 triggers and the Yongnuo RF-602 aren't compatible.

I don't know too much about the technical side of things, but I do know that triggering receivers is a tad bit more complex than just having the same frequency.
Forum: Troubleshooting and Beginner Help 10-24-2010, 01:39 PM  
Dirt cheap diffuser
Posted By Jasvox
Replies: 29
Views: 6,205
several tricks to consider....you can cut a ping-pong ball to fit over the pop-up flash like a "Smelfin" type, you can cover the flash with a coffee filter, you can cut out a bounce from card stock and covered in smooth tin foil and attached at a 45 degree angle (FinnBounce), rolling paper over flash, etc...never used a condom though.

The FinnBounce and the Smelfen
The DIY FinnBounce


Jason
Forum: Pentax K-5 & K-5 II 10-20-2010, 01:55 PM  
I am a pro shooter and here is why I am so excited for my K-5 to get here tomorrow
Posted By benisona
Replies: 102
Views: 28,349
Long time lurker, first time poster...

Like I said I am a pro shooter. I am the head shooter for the University of Colorado athletic program, as well as a landscape and portrait photographer. It is not my main job (I am finishing up my PhD in neuroscience) but it is a huge passion and actually pays a lot of the bills these days.

My first DSLR was a pentax K10D because of the combo of features and price. My pro career was launched when a picture I took after work of Folsom field went viral via CU alums.

****'em up, ****'em up, go CU | Flickr - Photo Sharing!

I was contacted by the CU athletic dept out of the blue and they asked me to come shoot for them, so serendipity has been on my side and I have never looked back.

even got a shot in nat geo using the trusty K10D:

When Gods Watch... | Flickr - Photo Sharing!

The university bought me a K20D, so I have extensive experience with that camera as well. I also recently won a nikon d90 and have gotten quite a lot of experiance with that body as well. I also have rented the nikon D3s on multiple occasions.

I know a lot of people in this forum are not really into HDR photography, but for me it is a passion. Little did I know when I bought the K10D, but it was just about the best camera for HDR that money could buy (and it still holds up great in many regards, the only camera with better bracketing options is the Mark III/IV, and the CCD has pretty nice DR). Needless to say I actually like the results for landscape, and handheld HDR much better than the K20D.

Now to the K-5, here is why it is pretty much my dream camera and why it may keep me in pentax for a long time to come (I was dreaming of a mark iv but those desires have really subsided)
1) 7fps is hugely fast (I have shot the D3s many times at 10fps and it is almost too fast at that speed). I see people freaking out about the buffer being too small but as a preo sports shooter, we never really burst longer than a second, and we almost always shoot jpeg. It will also really help with hand held HDR.
2) high ISO. obviously it will really help with sports and low light shooting, but what I am really excited about is the ability to do handheld HDR in more situations. With high FPS, shake reduction and great high ISO IQ, I will be able to burst off a bracket using high ISO to keep the shutter speed down. I already do this a lot on my K10 and 20 (check my flickr site for examples).
3) auto focus. the will help with all the shooting I do.
4) 16 mega pixels. Don't get me wrong my 10 megapixel shots from my K10D have been blown up to billboard size all over the state (using genuine fractals plugin) and I have 40x60's in my house at 10 mgpix and they look amazing, but the extra resolution should make everything that much better.
5) better metering and DR. (ps will someone please do an official DR test, I can even supply the shot starting tomorrow, just tell me what to shoot).

I'd love to start a dialoge with anyone who shares similar taste in photographic subject ect. I just had surgery this morning so I'm a bit loopy on pain meds, but just wanted to share my excitement.

check out my full pentax porfolio on flickr....

Flickr: @!ex's Photostream

best,
Alex
Forum: Pentax SLR Lens Discussion 10-18-2010, 05:35 PM  
DA 35mm/2.4 - A Plastic Wonder! -- DAL35 vs FA35 vs DA35m vs A35 (many photos!)
Posted By creampuff
Replies: 141
Views: 119,554
Guys, I think all of you reading this lens shootout should give Frank his due credit by clicking on the Reputation icon on the bottom left of his avatar. I know Frank personally for a number of years now and he is definitely highly respected for the depth of his knowledge on things relating to Pentax.

Very personable and objective, you'll get no mumbo-jumbo, airy fairy theoretical bullshit from him, and having owned just about every recent Pentax lens I can think off, whatever he says is backed by plenty of experience. It is largely through his efforts that he has steadily grown the Singapore Pentax community through his tireless Pentax monthly outings and his personal interaction to help newbies and experienced shooters alike to discover what makes Pentax unique. I can personally attest to so many who have opted to make Pentax their choice due to him personally.

A BIG kudos to you, Frank for your tireless efforts.
Forum: Pentax SLR Lens Discussion 10-18-2010, 03:34 PM  
DA 35mm/2.4 - A Plastic Wonder! -- DAL35 vs FA35 vs DA35m vs A35 (many photos!)
Posted By frank
Replies: 141
Views: 119,554
Thanks guys for your feedback.

From the results you can see that DA35macro certainly has the best center and corner sharpness, that's inline w/ my experiences with this wonderful lens. FA35 might have slightly better resolution, but the difference really isn't much especially considering we are viewing at 100% crops on a 16.3mp sensor. You probably won't feel the difference during actual shooting.

DAL35 is very comparable to the other 3 lenses in other aspects too, actually I like the slight softer and smoother bokeh from DAL35 better than the others. The difference is there if I view those bokeh samples on my Dell WFP2408 monitor side by side, but I can't see much difference on my laptop screen where I have to scroll all the samples up and down to compare.

The new lens might have some improved coatings as well, it seems to let more light pass through at the same aperture. Or maybe Pentax should call it DAL 35/2.2? It's just a number, you won't see any difference during actual use though.

Anyway, I guess you won't see much difference between the FA35 and DAL35 during actual shooting, the A35 is probably too old to compare w/ the new lenses, DA35macro is truly one of the best lens in sharpness and resolution test. But when shooting at a subject some distance away, it's not the best lens out there.

I'm glad that Pentax released such a reasonably priced little lens with very good optical quality. Hope we'd see some similar 50/85mm lenses in the future.

Oh btw, big thanks to Clicker for upgrading my photobucket account to a pro one without my knowing it, otherwise we won't be able to see these sample photos but the 'bandwidth exceed' sign.
Forum: Pentax Camera and Field Accessories 10-13-2010, 03:12 PM  
Which ($<30) tripod will hold Pentax K-x and 55-300mm lens?
Posted By jayp
Replies: 15
Views: 7,221
Yes, the weight of the tripod is important too, especially in wind. I haven't had the dolica out in windy situations yet, but I'd like to note that it does have a hook attached to the center shaft allowing you to add more weight if needed.

It also has spiked feet that can be withdrawn by twisting the feet, this can help quite a bit in muddy/grass situations I have found. Not bad for the price, if you are on a tight budget.

Don't get me wrong though, if I had the budget for a manfrotto and ball head I would have gotten that without a second thought. But excellent for ~$40 if you aren't willing to spend that much.

Jay
Forum: Photographic Technique 09-19-2010, 01:09 AM  
The new KEH catalog is here! The new KEH catalog is here!
Posted By photolady95
Replies: 20
Views: 4,872
Go here:

Request Catalog - Buy & Sell New & Used Cameras ? Canon, Nikon, Hasselblad, Leica & More - KEH.com

And fill in your info.

I got mine today too. Glanced through it, haven't read the whole thing yet. Lots of glass to check out.
Forum: Site Suggestions and Help 09-28-2010, 09:35 AM  
Suggestion book review database - revisited
Posted By Lowell Goudge
Replies: 9
Views: 1,119
Adam

I had cause to look up the specifications today for the SF1. Although I knew about this for a long time, I don't think people really appreciate that not all pentax country sites have the same data and links.

I have attached below the link to Pentax canada, because they have scanned copies of virtually every camera manual etc, accessable thropugh the website as PDF downloads.

Film cameras are here

Pentax Canada - Film Camera Support

Digital cameras are here

Pentax Canada - Digital Camera Support

There are some lenses and accessories also in these pages
Forum: Pentax SLR Lens Discussion 09-24-2010, 01:29 PM  
70-300mm: Sigma -vs- Tamron
Posted By Ash
Replies: 29
Views: 15,441
This debate features often on the forum, and I'd implore you to do a quick search on the forum for similar discussions in the past.
Overall, the Tamron offers a slight edge with contrast, colour rendition and sharpness (but not by very much at all) - in this price range, you do get what you pay for and there aren't any other options in AF to consider. But I'd suggest Pentax's own DA 55-300 as a much better option (considerably better sharpness, colours and contrast throughout the focal range) but is clearly more expensive (again not by all that much). It really is very good value for money. I myself have this lens despite having a Tamron 70-200/2.8 as well. It's that versatile and good.
Forum: Troubleshooting and Beginner Help 09-19-2010, 11:56 AM  
Value of swivel ?
Posted By K(s)evin
Replies: 16
Views: 4,170
When swiveling the flash to hit a vertical wall which is relatively close, it can give more pleasant lighting. With just tilt, the light will bounce off of the ceiling and straight down on your subject. By swiveling the flash to bounce off of the vertical wall, its' reflected light (from the side) will create the 'Rembrandt triangle', which is a more pleasing effect, especially on faces.

Wow, I do remember something from college!:p

K-r
Forum: Film SLRs and Compact Film Cameras 09-22-2010, 05:54 PM  
Omg! I want one!!!!
Posted By ChrisPlatt
Replies: 13
Views: 3,100
Me too. Too bad the LX2000 is so expensive! :eek:
Fortunately the black ones work just as well...

Chris
Forum: Film SLRs and Compact Film Cameras 09-20-2010, 01:48 PM  
A film SLR feels better than a digital SLR ?
Posted By spystyle
Replies: 114
Views: 20,555
Oh I like the ME too :)

What can't they make a dSLR that's as fun to use ?
Search took 0.00 seconds | Showing results 1 to 25 of 30

 
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 03:51 AM. | See also: NikonForums.com, CanonForums.com part of our network of photo forums!
  • Red (Default)
  • Green
  • Gray
  • Dark
  • Dark Yellow
  • Dark Blue
  • Old Red
  • Old Green
  • Old Gray
  • Dial-Up Style
Hello! It's great to see you back on the forum! Have you considered joining the community?
register
Creating a FREE ACCOUNT takes under a minute, removes ads, and lets you post! [Dismiss]
Top