Forgot Password
Pentax Camera Forums Home
 
Log in or register to remove ads.

Showing results 1 to 25 of 30 Search:
Forum: Monthly Photo Contests 06-19-2011, 08:40 PM  
Snow Storm
Posted By P67
Replies: 0
Views: 974
Night shot from front porch. Kodak Tmax 400.
Forum: Monthly Photo Contests 06-19-2011, 08:22 PM  
Theme Contest #58: June, 2011 (Black and White)
Posted By P67
Replies: 15
Views: 11,265
Great to see another film shooter, especially with MF. Shoot, scan, and post. Good luck.
Forum: Monthly Photo Contests 05-25-2011, 06:23 PM  
Orchid
Posted By P67
Replies: 0
Views: 929
Fuji Astia 100f. Canoscan 9000f.
Forum: Film Processing, Scanning, and Darkroom 12-16-2010, 12:27 PM  
Anyone using Canon 9000f scanner?
Posted By P67
Replies: 9
Views: 14,223
Matt - I've been using said scanner for about 6 weeks now. Previous model was a Microtek i800 pro - for about 2 years using Silverfast. Using the stock Scan Gear for now with the 9000 as it is very good, before upgrading - make that IF.

In a nutshell - this could be the BEST scanner out there for the money. I don't think you could spend twice as much to find a better scanner. It simply blows the i800 away - and that's using stock software. The Canon is just so dang easy to use by comparison it actually makes scanning enjoyable - if that's possible.

First - the film holders for medium format are well designed and easy to use. The i800 had really good holders, but stressed the film with the clamping pressure. The 9000 - slip it under the two little ski's at the one end - lay film down flat - click other end - slide film to adjust - done. Even has a gadget to flatten the curled film - which I have not needed.

I shoot allot of Velvia and Kodak - colour and B&W from Acros to Ilford. It had eaten up every one of them flawlessly. I'm re-doing ALL my scans previously done with the i800. Even scanning some of the new Ektar - even without the IT-8 profile used in SF - has been spot on.

The film had a lot of marks and dust from previous uses trying to prevent CA with the i800. The 9000 - NONE - no CA visible whatsoever. The marks and scratches? Used the infra red FARE on low - almost gone. Used medium strength - PERFECT - I mean not a scratch or mote. Best of all - does not affect the image quality. No softening of features.

I've used the optional methods to dial in the scan using the Recommended method. This allows the gamma change, plus Levels and Curves adjustments with saturation before scanning. Excellent results - although a fair amount of work.

What I like best - is the Colour Match method. This uses your monitor profile - be it Adobe1998 or sRGB etc. I use a Mac - so I calibrate the profile, and refine it. Save the profile, and that's what the Canon uses for scanning. The end result can be fine tuned to match the film type or if you use a Calibrating Device.

Each film type is different - so I've created profiles for them. Example is Ektar - with it's reddish characteristics on skin tones - stronger blues over water or at altitudes - I scan - and put that image on the screen. Bring up Calibration software - and fine tune. Scan - tune and when I'm happy with the result - create a Profile - Ektar Adobe1998.

When I'm scanning Ektar film - I invoke that profile - and get my version of Colour Match bang on. I've done the same for Velvia 100 - Velvia 100F - etc, where there is enough difference between the films to create a separate profile.

Why do that - and not just do it post processing? The effort to create a colour match profile means you do it ONCE. Well, a few fine tunes - then you are done. The resulting scan - means little to NO post processing. Sure - crop - adjust Levels a tiny bit to suit. You can basically just clean up to suit and you are done in a couple of minutes unless you have specifics in mind.

Fast - YES. Normal E6 MF 6x7 scan takes less than 1 minute. The Ektar with FARE on medium - took about 3 minutes. B&W - just fabulous scans - but here I use similar created profiles for each type of film - to bring out the nuance of that film ie: Acros vs Delta 100. But I've found the "Recommended" method better where I can fine tune the scan using the histogram and Curves for each shot. This gets the most out of the B&W - night vs day shots etc, then I fine tune post processing for effect. You can also select scan rates with in between settings like 1600 dpi - right up to 9600.

I could go on - but on the recommendation of emails with Mr. D. Brooks - Shutterbug - and his blog write up on it - I bought the Canon - even over the Nikon 8000ED. He basically said - you can have twice the hardware with the Nikon - or twice the resolution with the Canon.

DigiFotoBlog

I also do film astrophotograhy - and this is where I see a difference using Silverfast - my demo version. Using HDR48 at 2400 - and the Two scan method - it does one pass for highlights, and a second for shadow detail - then combines them into a single film - makes a difference. It would also make a difference for various landscape frames under specific lighting conditions.

Best of all - Canon now bundles SF - with the 9000F. I bought mine without SF - delivered for about $200 in Canada. A friend of mine has the Epson 600 - and although similar specifications - thinks the Canon gives cleaner scans especially on difficult lighting - both using stock software.

I recommend getting an extra film holding tray. This thing is so fast - you spend more time fiddle futzing with change over than scanning. Get another tray loaded whilst the first is scanning.

I have not done any photos or tried FARE on them - yet. I've shot slides all my life. But I do have a mountain of family photos to do. I expect no less from the Canon on those.

Hope this helps.
Forum: Monthly Photo Contests 10-14-2010, 07:32 PM  
Frozen Rope - Water Cannon
Posted By P67
Replies: 2
Views: 1,797
RE: contest #50 Water. Lens: Pentax 200 SMC Camera: Pentax 67ii Shutter speed: .15s Aperture: f/22. Y15 filter Fuji Acros 100 at ISO 80.
Forum: Monthly Photo Contests 10-04-2010, 04:48 PM  
Frozen Rope - Water Cannon
Posted By P67
Replies: 2
Views: 1,797
Y 15 filter. Fuji Acros 100 at ISO 80.
Forum: Film SLRs and Compact Film Cameras 07-11-2010, 04:08 PM  
I Use A K1000
Posted By P67
Replies: 83
Views: 27,267
Wonderful words - and I also live by them - my old Konica TC. Treasured photographs from trips to Europe, Africa - and no batteries required, never missed a beat.

Well said - right from the heart - and the Viewfinder. Thank you.

Igor
Forum: Site Suggestions and Help 06-29-2010, 02:45 PM  
B&H Contest theme nominations
Posted By P67
Replies: 360
Views: 24,089
Nature - animals - cars - all typical in many ways.

Weather is more dramatic - and plays with light and dynamics. Wide spectrum of subjects covered by weather - storms - damage to objects - etc. Or do we narrow it down a bit to say - Clouds?

OK - I'm going with Airplanes - kidding -

Weather - I'm in.
Forum: Pentax Medium Format 06-06-2010, 06:46 AM  
New 645D review with samples from pro-photographer
Posted By P67
Replies: 25
Views: 13,831
After carrying the 67 - make that two of them - plus lenses, pretty much anything else would be compact. One hair on your head is not enough, but one in your soup - is too much. It's all relative.
Forum: Film SLRs and Compact Film Cameras 01-12-2010, 11:13 PM  
Ektar 100 Review and Discussion
Posted By P67
Replies: 11
Views: 12,157
I've shot a few rolls of Ektar in 120 format. The single item that gave the most improvement regardless of ISO used (typically 64 to 80) is the use of a filter - specifically KR 1.5.

This smoothed out the reds, skin tones are good now, and cuts back the blue cast in bright sky or over water. Over all a better balance for landscape or people. Greens can be odd when shooting lens wide open ie: f/2.8. Background greens out of focus get a funny colour shift. I shot a street scene with 2 vehicles - bright yellow and midnight blue/gray - background green bushes and trees. Went from f/2.8 to f 22. Greens odd wide open to about f/5.6 where they stabilized.

I have shot a wide variety of landscape - cityscape - night, plus many test rolls. So far - I'm indifferent. This is coming from a guy that loves Kodak E200 with 16 pro paks in the freezer, now limited to astro photography work only.

Comparing shots of the same landscape - with a 165 lens - bracketing exposures with KR 1.5 filter - taken within 10 minutes between Ektar 100 and Velvia 100 - goes to the Velvia. If I ever get caught up on my scanner work, I may get the comparison posted. Ektar shots in my gallery.
Forum: Film SLRs and Compact Film Cameras 01-12-2010, 10:00 PM  
First shots with Reala
Posted By P67
Replies: 4
Views: 2,481
Interesting comparison. I don't think Ektar would have come close to the colour rendition of the flowers. The cabin shot - probably - as I have found the browns to be quite good with Ektar - but the Reala did a great job here as well.

I'm just getting too much variation with Ektar, and have gone back to Velvia.
Forum: Pentax Medium Format 01-03-2010, 10:13 PM  
What tripod head to use?
Posted By P67
Replies: 11
Views: 5,098
I bit the bullet, and found an good used Swiss Arca B1 ball head. I did a fair amount of research, and if you have large lenses, or heavy set up - then this is the one they all seemed to talk about. It has some features not found on other ball heads. The odd shaped ball is different, in that as you back off the tension, and say the camera starts to droop to one side. The B1 will actually allow it to go over to a point, then start to slow down the drooping due to this shaped ball. The outfit comes to a gentle stop, instead of a clunk. The long and short is - excellent product but expensive.

The other item I'm very pleased with is the Berlebach tripod. Yes, they are wood. They are no heavier than comparable carbon fibre model made to support the same weight. They are cheap compared to CF models. My model will hold 26 lbs - but it is not max'd out. You cannot buy that kind of performance from a CF tripod for under $300.
Forum: Pentax Medium Format 01-03-2010, 09:45 PM  
55mm f/4 VS the 55-100 zoom
Posted By P67
Replies: 6
Views: 3,673
Hey Tuco - how are you? Those ND's are expensive regardless of size. If you go to that listed site by Ian Cameron shown in the above post - he uses these filter extensively. When he needs more from the standard .03 or .06, he combines it with a Polarizer filter and adjusts to suit.
I have never used this combination, but it appears to work for him. Filters are one of the reasons I shoot the 90 - 135 - 165 combo - same filter size. The older 200 lenses as well. I guess you have checked the Schneider and Hoya websites.
I love the thought of these zooms and am committed to Pentax at this time. Lenses for astro work, landscape. It's like I need to hire someone to carry my stuff.
BTW - and not to hijack this thread - the Hassi filters - do they screw on?
Forum: Film SLRs and Compact Film Cameras 01-03-2010, 08:59 AM  
B&W film use
Posted By P67
Replies: 24
Views: 5,844
Try different films, don't be afraid to experiment with the f stop, and see how it goes. If you become hooked on B&W - you can read up on the use of filters. Filters, and their proper use, makes all the difference with most B&W photography.
Forum: Pentax Medium Format 01-03-2010, 08:48 AM  
6X7 mirror/shutter slap
Posted By P67
Replies: 21
Views: 9,716
Since going to to the 67, I've all but retired my favourite 35mm cameras. When I shoot landscape or astro, I want the larger sized film. That's why I went to MF in the first place. I started with the 67's, and still use them, but the 67ii is a jewel by comparison.

I've hung most every lens combination, right up to the big 400 EDIF plus a 1.4x converter, over stressing my 30 year old aluminium tripod, and have not had any issue regarding mirror slap, using common sense. Now that its on a solid Berlebach tripod with a B1 ball head, mirror slap has become a moot point regardless of shutter speed or shooting situation. A complete non issue.
Forum: Pentax Medium Format 01-03-2010, 08:24 AM  
55mm f/4 VS the 55-100 zoom
Posted By P67
Replies: 6
Views: 3,673
I have none of the lenses mentioned, and have pondered this question for months. It has come down to this for me, as age has become a factor. Simplifying life, the back pack, the accessories for landscape work ie: filters for B&W plus colour, the tripod - you know the drill, means zoom lenses for me.
Will this stop me from acquiring other lenses? Probably not. Astro photography and special situations make the faster lenses useful. Besides, how can one resist owning fine lenses? The technical and visual work of Desertscape have been a great help. The astro work of the Nightfly - compelling evidence for fixed fast lenses.
The work of this man, in particular, has convinced me that the zooms are exceptional tools. His generous description of f stops and filter used were very helpful. Ian Cameron's Photo Galleries at pbase.com
Forum: Pentax Medium Format 12-29-2009, 12:10 AM  
Finally got a scanner!
Posted By P67
Replies: 10
Views: 4,615
Doing it yourself is really where the fun lies in this hobby. Nice set of B&W shots. They look like wet scans.

So, do the crabs end up on the barbie in the first photo?
Forum: Pentax Medium Format 12-28-2009, 11:35 PM  
6X7 mirror/shutter slap
Posted By P67
Replies: 21
Views: 9,716
You can buy the tripod or do the old timers trick. Use a rope or strap. You need the strap for the 67, and just let it hang down after attaching it to the camera. Tie a thin, but strong rope to the strap, long enough to reach the floor. Now bring the camera up to eye level, and step on the rope with one foot, and pull up gently. Adjust the rope length to suit. Lock your elbows against the sides of your chest.

If you wear a leather belt - and it's long enough you can use that. Slip the Pentax strap thru the belt buckle before attaching it to the camera lug. Belt should easily reach the ground with the extra length from the Pentax strap. You will be amazed at how solid this set up is - and cheap.
Forum: Pentax Medium Format 12-28-2009, 11:11 PM  
Just some ordinary and unshamed exposition of just aquired phototgraphy stuff
Posted By P67
Replies: 29
Views: 5,443
So, if I take off the prism I should be able to see this as well?

Nicely done my friend. Your versatility with photography is always inspiring.
Forum: Pentax Medium Format 11-23-2009, 09:49 PM  
First 67 scans
Posted By P67
Replies: 23
Views: 5,900
I love night photography, and this is one of the main reasons for me choosing Acros. My astro buddy - Nightfly - and I are presently experimenting with long exposure astro photos. Some good stuff with moon beams and star trails.

I agree, with results speaking for many films. If a make of film fits your eye and gives you that special result - that's what it's all about as far as I'm concerned. Acros and Delta 100 are my personal favourites with HP5 when I need more speed. I also like supporting Ilford - for their products and commitment to B&W films.
Forum: Pentax Medium Format 11-23-2009, 04:58 PM  
Pentax 67II
Posted By P67
Replies: 2
Views: 30,755
I'm surprised not to find any review or words about the 67ii. I've been using a P67 for a few years now for both astrophotography and landscape. A great rugged camera and well suited for astro with a battery bypass device developed by my friend.

I recently acquired a 67ii and can state that it surpasses the functionality of the older 67. Ergonomically - it seems to naturally fit the hands, and all functions to adjust exposure, MLU, ISO - everything is right where it should be. Additional features like a internal shade to block stray light from entering the view finder which could change the exposure reading, especially when using the timer mode. Timer mode, matrix, centre, or spot meter, which brings me to the AE prism.

The single most improved feature is the addition of AE and metering. Many times in low light conditions, the older 67 would require your to play with half stops on the lens to get the meter as close to the -< as possible, with the shutter dial being adjusted between .2 and .4. With AE on manual - the display visible in the view finder would show a .2 or .4 as the shutter speed selected. Switch to AE function and the in-between setting of .3 comes up. Adjust the lever to Auto on the lens, turn the dial and view the DOF, and fire away - knowing the best shutter speed is being selected for that exposure. Great for fast shooting situations.

Once you stop down the lens - the metering system automatically goes from matrix - for wide open wide angle shots - to centre weighted to average the scene. Select Spot - to get into those special lighting situations. In either case - AE is right there to select shutter speed, and it is displayed in the "heads up" view finder.

If you want to have more control - turn the EV dial to jump into manual mode. Dial in + or - exposure by 1/3 stop - up to 3 full stops in total. No need to reach around for the stop dial on the lens. It's all right there.

The frame counter is also shown in the heads up display. This can be changed - albeit by having the camera program changed - to display the f stop instead. Much more useful for my purposes.

Lastly - it meters with either inner - or outer lens ring connection. I've used the 67ii for astro photos with my Tec telescope at f7. The field flattener from Tec is designed to have the 67 cameras attached directly using the outside ring. Takes a bit of practice, but work well and locks up solid. I also use the 1.4x converter turning the scope into f/10. When you first turn on the camera with the finger lever, the meter will show a confused figure - and an arbitrary shutter speed that is way off the mark. Wait for the display to extinguish after 20 seconds, the activate the meter by touching the shutter button, or go manual. The meter will usually display the corrected value. Mine first showed 4s when turned on with the Tec, then cycling the AE changed the shutter speed to .4. I was shooting a 1/2 moon at the time.

In simplified terms - if you are serious about medium format photography, and love your older P67 or 6x7 camera, then get your hands on a 67ii. Once you do - you will NEVER let go. It's that good.
Forum: Pentax Medium Format 11-23-2009, 03:21 PM  
First 67 scans
Posted By P67
Replies: 23
Views: 5,900
Great captures - well done. Which of the Neopan films did you use? I've converted over to Fuji as well and more specifically Acros 100. I find this film stunning. For colour negative I'm using Kodak Ektar 100.

In both films, however, I've found that depending upon lighting conditions the best contrast and balance comes by shooting at ISO 64 - develop normally at 100. In darker lighting conditions I will change to ISO 80 or 100 (love the 67ii for simplifying this feature), but overall 64 for me. Adjust to taste and do it on the fly in the same roll of film.

As far as scanners go - that V700 is a great unit. I have the Microtek I800 which works very well except on E6 transparencies. Banding and CA in spots for some reason especially astro photography. Using the stock software with other films gave good results. Using Silverfast - WOW. Amazing control and adjustment parameters over stock software. It's really the software the makes the difference.

Keep shooting and posting - and I will be looking in on your gallery.
Forum: Pentax Medium Format 11-23-2009, 02:53 PM  
Pentax 6x7 gear
Posted By P67
Replies: 17
Views: 11,175
What film did you use & lens - f stop etc.

Interesting shot - love B&W
Forum: Photography Articles 10-12-2009, 07:53 PM  
Attracting, photographing and feeding hummingbirds
Posted By P67
Replies: 4
Views: 8,409
I love these birds, and you have encouraged me to install some feeders. We have many flowers and bushes, and I often see a few here and there, but would love to see more.

A more elusive beauty rarely exists.
Forum: Pentax Lens Articles 10-07-2009, 10:16 PM  
Beware cheap "circular" polaizers
Posted By P67
Replies: 34
Views: 62,503
Thanks for the article. I stick to what's known as filters make or break the shot. You pay more for quality, and Hoya, B&W, Tiffen, Pentax are what I stick with.

A lesson there for all of us.
Search took 0.00 seconds | Showing results 1 to 25 of 30

 
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 09:11 PM. | See also: NikonForums.com, CanonForums.com part of our network of photo forums!
  • Red (Default)
  • Green
  • Gray
  • Dark
  • Dark Yellow
  • Dark Blue
  • Old Red
  • Old Green
  • Old Gray
  • Dial-Up Style
Hello! It's great to see you back on the forum! Have you considered joining the community?
register
Creating a FREE ACCOUNT takes under a minute, removes ads, and lets you post! [Dismiss]
Top