|
Forum: Troubleshooting and Beginner Help
03-04-2012, 03:19 PM
|
| |
The hot shoe of my K20D swings forward/backward when the flash is mounted. I can clearly notice that this motion is due to the fact that the camera's hot shoe is no longer tightly attached to the body. Probably the best solution will be to go to a local service, but, if possible, I would prefer to take a look by myself to the interior (base) of the hot shoe in order to see if there is something easy to be done to fix the problem. Can someone give some advise in order to proceed to inspect (and repair if possible) the state of the hot shoe ??. (Please, be indulgent with me because of my bad English !!)
|
|
Forum: Post Your Photos!
12-19-2010, 03:38 AM
|
| |
In the "Parc del Form", in Barcelona, young men and children can enjoy of playing mountain games.
|
|
Forum: Post Your Photos!
12-19-2010, 03:22 AM
|
| |
Probably you have seen a lot of pictures of "Correfocs", an event frequently taken place in Catalonia villages and cities. But I'm almost sure you never have been one of the main hero is a such furious dragon as this one !!!
|
|
Forum: Pentax DSLR Discussion
07-04-2009, 01:45 PM
|
| |
Sorry, I'm new in the forum...(I'm also new with Pentax, in fact) What do you mean with "bump (ten character rule)"?
|
|
Forum: Pentax DSLR Discussion
07-04-2009, 05:50 AM
|
| |
I have a Pentax K20D , a Sigma 28/1.8 EX DG Macro and a Tamron 28-200 XR DII . I feel happy with the camera and the Sigma. The Tamron I'm just testing. I have just a little question about the Shake Reduction info in the EXIF. For the Sigma in this section the SRFocalLength is always 58. This value does not corresponds to the real focal length of the lens, that otherwise is correctly recorded in the focal length of the EXIF. When I'm using the Tamron the situation is similar, and in fact the the SRfocalength is always two times the real focallength. That explains the value of 58 obtained with 28 mm lens. But at 200 mm the SRFocalLength makes an exception and it takes always a 51 value.... and as a matter of fact all the pictures at this 200 mm focal length presents a certain quantity of motion even when they were taken at a reasonable shutter speed. Something is going wrong in the lens? or in the camera?
|
