|
Forum: Digital Processing, Software, and Printing
02-28-2010, 09:09 PM
|
| |
Well, the RAW update certainly had an impact to Aperture 2 and impacted compatibility with the DNG from the K-7 that had been working fine all along. I am starting to think Apple is not aware of the "break" they caused for current Aperture users. An update should not create an "Unsupported File" issue with standard DNG Adobe files coming out of the K-7.. My guess is Apple messed up.
|
|
Forum: Digital Processing, Software, and Printing
02-28-2010, 08:37 AM
|
| |
Hello all, I posted this on DP but hope to get additional insight here. So I have been using Aperture 2 for some time now with my K-7 and have had no support issues. I recently loaded the new Aperture RAW update and now all of my DNG files from the K-7 are shown as unsupported files. Any ideas?? Please tell me Apple didn't pull one of their famous fixes to force me to Aperture 3...
I was provided a link that allowed me to revert to the prior RAW firmware and this fixed my issue however I am trying to figure out why I should not be able to update to the new RAW firmware and retain support for my prior K-7 files. I cannot believe Apple would release the new RAW knowing it caused unsupported files in all prior DNG files from the camera that were fine prior to the upgrade. I tried to choose a new RAW profile in Aperture but the file states loading and cannot be changed. I cannot be the only one impacted here. Any ideas???
|
|
Forum: Pentax DSLR Discussion
09-16-2009, 08:09 PM
|
| |
Did a few tests today (More to come).. Using the camera in bright outdoor conditions had no noticeable impact on focus point brightness. I am inclined to worry less about this "difference" as I don't think it indicates imminent component failure down the road. As for nitpicking, well, you got me there.. I tend to break things down too much but I guess its an occupational habit. I am also a hardcore gadget guy (New items get released and I am typically the first to get them), early adoption may have caused my tendency to test for anomalies and I am very thorough (call me analytical). I'll continue to test image quality tomorrow between the two cameras. Interesting find today that the LCD colors and saturation were quite different on both units when settings matched. New unit was washed out and yellow tinted compared to the punchy saturated LCD on the first unit. I dialed the LCD to match though via the adjustments menu. Overall, happy so far, realize that components may differ but with standard manufacturing process's the delta's should not be that great from one unit to the other. Its interesting to me but in the end the comment about taking pictures is correct. The only caveat is that if something warrants long term functionality concern then its something that should not be ignored. Anyway, the comments are good, thanks.. Also, I did not switch brands and I am getting back into photography after years using film. Did my research (drove my wife crazy) and choose the K-7 and purchased some Limited FA's. It provided the best bang for the buck, superior features (IMHO), solid weather resistant build quality, and stellar image quality as far as I am concerned.
|
|
Forum: Pentax DSLR Discussion
09-15-2009, 06:04 PM
|
| |
Thanks Peter. I'll try your suggestion tomorrow and see how performance is outside.
|
|
Forum: Pentax DSLR Discussion
09-15-2009, 05:22 PM
|
| |
Peter...
Thanks for the thoughts.. Your comment about the reason for making the box might be valid and makes sense I guess. The legal aspect also easy my mind so appreciated.. As for the VF. I still have the original K-7 and have compared the two with the same lens, focusing on the same items. The replacement is dimmer and again, the square (center point for example) is not consistently bright on all four sides. The bottom is bright, the top is dim and varies. I guess my concern is longevity as well as getting proper feedback on focus point in bright conditions. The first unit I received won't pose a problem but the new unit makes me wonder. You mention "dimmer"..Is this feature automatic or are you suggesting a setting exists (I don't recall seeing anything in the menu) Thanks again
Schmik...
You might be a great guy but if double posts bother you don't read them. These are two separate forums and its possible not everyone reads both. You know the reasons for a forum right?? it's to solicit feedback and share comments/information. My goal is feedback and thoughts so posting on both forums results in more of this. In the end the common consensus is to not worry and that its normal, then I might stick with what I have and stop worrying. Case in point, Peters response which was of value to me. So take it easy my friend, remember what post are for and ignore them if they bother you instead of wasting bandwidth.
Now, I'm off to duplicate this response on the other thread.. :lol:
|
|
Forum: Pentax DSLR Discussion
09-15-2009, 02:58 PM
|
| |
Well,
Received my replacement K-7 yesterday and the body is nice and tight (My prior unit is being returned because of clicking/flexing on the back of the body near the MENU button). Unfortunately I cannot be satisfied due to the following "potential" issues, especially considering the cost of this camera and the Limited Primes I purchased. I may be lining up a third replacement with Pentax as I bought this direct. As for the issues, here they are for your thoughts/comments:
1) Pentax assured me that the replacement would NOT be a refurbished unit and this may in fact be the case. However, I find it interesting that the UPC code on the box has a RED CIRCLE stamped onto it. My first box had no such "mark" which makes me wonder if this designates a refurbished unit. Again, not sure but absolutely makes me wonder
2)Autofocus indication points in the viewfinder. On my first unit the autofocus confirmation points that you see through the viewfinder were bright, clear, and solid red. The new replacement unit's points are dim by comparison and inconsistently lit (the bottom of the points being brighter than the faded tops.)
I really love this camera and really don's want to get another bad copy. Its got everything that I want in a camera from a technology point of view. IQ concerns are real though and if my third copy has issues I will probably initiate the "three strikes your out rule. Pentax, if your listening, please assure I'm good next round. :(
|
|
Forum: Pentax DSLR Discussion
09-03-2009, 08:19 AM
|
| |
Fantastic work Soccerjoe5, again. Simply fun to watch and motivates me to try more with my K-7.. Your blog has been saved in my favorites and I look forward to enjoying more of your work. By the way, great group of friends you have there and your adventures will never be forgotten.
|
|
Forum: Pentax DSLR Discussion
08-31-2009, 07:04 PM
|
| |
Am I seeing this correctly. Did you guys just highjack my thread to talk about Pentax Germany... Stay out of my sandbox..Go play in your own yard :D
|
|
Forum: Pentax DSLR Discussion
08-31-2009, 01:29 PM
|
| |
Hmmm. Rinse it with some water? :p
|
|
Forum: Pentax DSLR Discussion
08-31-2009, 07:59 AM
|
| |
Thanks for the comments so far, I am starting to lean towards exchanging the unit. I must admit though I often have bad luck and have convinced myself that the new unit I have will end up having other problems (Green line, etc);)
|
|
Forum: Pentax DSLR Discussion
08-30-2009, 08:03 AM
|
| |
OK. New to the forum and a proud new K-7 owner. First I will say that I am very happy so far with the purchase and the camera is truly feature packed (it will take me some time to understand the endless adjustments this camera offers).
So, why my post. Well, after reading countless post and hearing concerns about noise, image sensor QC problems (green line) etc, non-of which I have problems with so far, I pulled the trigger and have no regrets. However, I noticed something that worries me and am looking to see if this is an isolated issue with my camera, a larger more common issue, and if its an issue I should be concerned about. I noticed that every time I press the MENU button on the back of the camera I was getting a metallic click as well and have determined that the back metal cover is actually flexing and hitting whatever resides behind it. If you examine the back of the camera you will notice a seam line that runs the length of the camera (below the screen and buttons on the bottom) where the back and the base of the camera seal together. This seam is flexing and gives slightly. This does not happen anywhere else on the camera and only when pressing the MENU button. It seems perhaps the camera may not be sealed properly? This back cover may be unimportant in terms of sealing but my to concerns are if it flexes and there is movement between the two layers could water dust and moisture enter, and also if long term operation might be affected. I bought the camera from Pentax direct and can return for an exchange but I worry a replacement might yield other problems.
As far as firmware. Has anyone received their Pentax with the latest firmware installed. Mine arrived with the first load and I had to upgrade to the recent release. I was hoping to get the most recent production by buying from Pentax direct but now I am not so sure. I assume recent production might have better QC now that Pentax is aware of the possible sensor issue.
Thanks and I look forward to your thoughts.
|
