Forgot Password
Pentax Camera Forums Home
 
Log in or register to remove ads.

Showing results 1 to 17 of 17 Search: Liked Posts
Forum: Pentax Full Frame 05-16-2014, 08:03 PM  
Pretty Good Video on Equivalence
Posted By jsherman999
Replies: 416
Views: 30,412
.

If the numbers bore you, if you just like plain talk and reasonable examples, this is a fairly good video (if a bit long) :














Youtu.be






A still from the video showing same FOV on FF ("1x") and m43 ("2x"), and the settings (f-stop, ISO) that would be needed to get the same image in DOF & noise:




He gets into which camera companies are 'lying' by not converting aperture (f-stop) when they convert focal length, but I don't think they're 'lying' as much as just sticking to convention, even if that convention is misleading.

Anyway, enjoy.

.
Forum: Canon, Nikon, Sony, and Other Camera Brands 10-01-2013, 03:52 PM  
NikonForums.com official joins our network of web sites!
Posted By normhead
Replies: 8
Views: 1,401
Who knows, maybe if after a year or two Pentax seems stagnant, I'll have to pick up a by then heavily discounted D800 and some second hand lenses to go with it. After all I plan to use it for landscape... even AF is a frill. But, these new offerings may a sign that Ricoh is determined to get back into the game...and may be willing to put out some serious coin to make the brand palatable to users other than hiking/landscape/wildlife guys like myself. I really don't see a lot of other photographers out where I go... I'm not sure we're really the kind of niche I'd want to stake my livelyhood on. ANd honestly, it would just take one disaster where I missed out on something because I didn't have more resolution to make me pull the trigger. I'm not opposed to all things Nikon. I just see things as an eb and flow. Nikon may be better at a point in time, but Pentax will close the gap or catch up...I'm willing to give Pentax some time to make some more noise... but the clock is running. That Sigma DP2 is really making me aware of the limitations of 16 MP APS-c on a bayer array.
Forum: Canon, Nikon, Sony, and Other Camera Brands 09-24-2013, 03:29 AM  
Calling all Nikon fans!
Posted By Adam
Replies: 32
Views: 3,729
Today I have a bit of exciting news to share, and I wanted to post it here first before it goes 100% public. I will soon be launching www.nikonforums.com, a brand new site (very similar in scope and spirit to PF) for Nikon users. My long-term goal is to provide exceptional communities for users of all camera brands, but we have to take things one step at a time :) So Nikon is next, then Canon, then mirrorless, and then perhaps serious compacts (but that's TBA).

The new site already has a fairly big following on Facebook, and it will officially be launched on October 1st. It has a number of features that PF doesn't, and if users end up liking them, I will of course add them here as well. One of the key areas of PF that I'm looking to improve are the lens and camera databases, and the new site has something along the lines of what I'd like to see running on PF. Anyway...

As I know that there are lots of users here who have either jumped ship or are using Nikon gear as a second system, I am looking for a handful of PF members to be the first to join the new site and do a bit of beta testing. While the new site's content isn't 100% finished yet, the software, design, and sections are all ready to go, so it won't feel like anything's missing. You can already post lens reviews, upload photos to the gallery, make your own blogs, post on the forum, etc.

As a sign of my thanks for trying out the new site, everyone who joins as a beta tester will get an upgraded account with lots of photo space. There will also be a number of giveaways hosted when the site goes live, so be sure not to miss those if you're into Nikon.

If you're interested in trying out the new site, please shoot me a PM and I will set up and account for you. Thanks for looking!
Forum: Canon, Nikon, Sony, and Other Camera Brands 11-08-2012, 08:18 AM  
D600 announced - $2099
Posted By tuco
Replies: 316
Views: 30,366
Homemade case using a $30 USD sewing machine for a D600 inside.






Forum: Canon, Nikon, Sony, and Other Camera Brands 08-17-2012, 10:34 AM  
Full Frame Sony NEX imminent?
Posted By falconeye
Replies: 46
Views: 6,134
As you may have seen (or not), SAR today announces that Sony is going to release a full frame mirrorless

-> (SR5) Sony NEX goes Full Frame!!!! | sonyalpharumors

And it gives the rumor the highest possible credibility: SR5=almost certainly correct!


That's good news (and bad news for Pentax as the K-0x line of cameras would be ideally positioned to occupy this niche (first) -- another epic chance missed).


The rumor says it is a NEX camera which would imply the E-mount.

So, I used camerasizes.com [ Compare camera dimensions side by side ] to quickly verify that the E-mount is indeed large enough to accomodate a full frame sensor (I used a Nikon FF camera because there are no images (yet) of a K-mount dSLR with FF sensor ;) -> cf. attachment.

Indeed, it is: the NEX-7's E-mount (overlaid in green) is slightly larger (by a mm or two) than the F-mount (overlaid in red -- common parts appear pink). The green screws are from the F-mount. Moreover, the electronic E-mount contacts (bow of green dots in the bottom part of the mirror box) align perfectly with the F-mount's shield, leaving enough room for full frame optics. BTW, the new Canon mirrorless mount would not support full frame ...

From the very beginning, Sony's E-mount looked full frame to me (just like K-mount or F-mount) and I consider this newest rumor to be credible.
Forum: Canon, Nikon, Sony, and Other Camera Brands 05-27-2012, 01:12 AM  
Some Full-frame shots & thoughts
Posted By TOUGEFC
Replies: 5,592
Views: 735,409
All 85mm1.8G, pretty much everyone is wide open








Forum: Pentax News and Rumors 03-17-2012, 12:07 PM  
Rumor: Pentax FF Sept 18-23, 2012
Posted By jsherman999
Replies: 528
Views: 95,065
I work with a guy who collects model train equipment and has built extensive tracks/landscapes, etc. He told me he probably has around $20K invested in the hobby. Where I'm from it's routine to buy $25,000 fishing boats that are used three times per year, even if that amount represents 50% of yearly income. Of course, the Harley's that stay parked in garages 95% of the time are everywhere.... And more power to all those folks - they own things that make them happy in their own way.

On my wife's laptop, she has downloaded every picture of our kids that I've ever uploaded to picasaweb for the extended family to view - thousands & thousands of shots. They cycle on her screensaver after the laptop has been idle for a couple minutes - she sometimes just lets the screensaver go, watching the pictures, many of which document events that have already started to slip the mind.... As a life-documentation project, with some creative asides, my photography hobby has already paid for itself. :)

.
Forum: Pentax News and Rumors 02-11-2012, 01:18 AM  
PentaxForums.com to Interview Pentax Japan on Feb 11 - Preliminary responses up!
Posted By Adam
Replies: 286
Views: 59,562
An update: the interview has been conducted and we (when I say we I mean the guys over in Japan right now) couldn't get the Pentax rep to stop talking! In addition, they are letting us play with the new lenses after the show closes for the day. The interview was in Japanese and it has been videotaped. Once the transcript and subtitles are ready, they will be posted!

The new Ricoh guys seemed to be very, very enthusiastic about growing the Pentax brand. More later :)
Forum: Pentax K-01 02-03-2012, 08:12 PM  
Hands-On Photos of the K-01 from Pentax Singapore User Group
Posted By creampuff
Replies: 299
Views: 112,416
Managed to get the new Pentax K-01 (courtesy of our local country distributor Emjay, kudos to the terrific team there) for our monthly Pentax user group outing today.

Everybody present who tried it were suitably impressed, and even more so when the suggested price was mentioned. Many among the group plan to get one. No brainer upgrade for those shooting manual focus. The screen is good enough that any viewfinder is frankly redundant. New 40mm lens is really flat. Could do with a recessed thumb grip but the design definitely grows on you. Ribbed rubber texture is secure. Image quality is terrific, as is video. Camera is so quiet and vibration free. Breaks new ground in the mirrorless segment but DSLR purists will never understand this camera, but who cares, this camera will attract new users in a big way particularly price wise. Overall a big thumbs up to this camera.

While many will no doubt continue to discuss about the supposed pros and cons of the camera ad nauseum without even handling the camera, now that I've tried it, have to say I am more than happy to add this camera to my collection because of the commonality of lenses, batteries and user interface with my K-5. More images from other Singapore users will be posted later...









Forum: Pentax News and Rumors 09-23-2011, 09:43 AM  
The forthcoming Pentax Mirrorless Camera
Posted By falconeye
Replies: 553
Views: 129,586
That's one way to look at it.

However, when the digital "revolution" started in photography some dozen years ago, all the action was in the small sensor area.

What then has happened some six years ago was an unanticipated success of entry-level dSLRs many people upgraded to, making FT and APSC very wide-spread. And mirrorless system cameras try to carry this to a smaller package which is certainly appealing to many who did upgrade.

We're now another six years later and three things are happening at the same time now:

1. cellphone cameras replace P&S.
2. mirrorless replace/make obsolete entry-level dSLRs (Q, N1, GH, PEN, NX, NEX, X10, ...)
3. larger sensors become affordable (FF like APSC some six years ago and MF like FF some six years ago).

All three are exciting developments and will probably be complete in another six years. APSC SLRs aren't though meaning there won't be any new ones then. I may be wrong. But I don't see heavy investments anymore in the APSC SLR segment. Look what happened to FT SLRs...
Forum: Pentax SLR Lens Discussion 04-26-2011, 04:23 AM  
Pentax DA 18-135mm, general discussions and samples
Posted By audiobomber
Replies: 307
Views: 100,397
Here you go then: https://picasaweb.google.com/bonhommed/18135Vs18250#

I used auto exposure, It was a cloudy day so light was changing. I took two shots of each scene and posted the sharper one, I repeated the brick wall shots in manual focus (two shots per scene) but took the photos down because they didn't add anything. All the AF photos were as sharp or sharper. I used a tripod and 2s lockup for the brick wall shots. I squared the camera to the wall for the brick closeups, it was not square for the photos of the entire house, focus was on the window in the middle of the wall.

For those who can't be bothered to peep, the 18-135mm has better resolution than the 18-250mm in every photo, at 18mm and 135mm, in the center, border and corners, wide open and stopped down. I had the same result vs my 18-55 II, the 18-135mm beats it in every possible way.

Mechanically the 18-135 is a dream. It makes the 18-55 feel cheap and comparing it to the 18-250 is like comparing a modern rifle to a blunderbuss.
Forum: Flashes, Lighting, and Studio 01-11-2011, 06:15 PM  
Cactus V5 radio flash trigger review
Posted By Class A
Replies: 274
Views: 104,019
Cactus V5 Review

Gadget Infinity, the company that brought us the Cactus V4 flash radio triggers created a significantly improved V5 version.


What is it?

One V5 unit can function as a
  • Flash/Strobe radio trigger transmitter

  • Flash/Strobe radio trigger receiver

  • Wireless remote trigger for a camera

  • Safe-sync hot shoe adapter for high-voltage flashes

  • Flash stand

This versatility is quite an improvement over the Cactus V4.
See section “Discussion” below for an elaboration of the above mentioned functionalities.

Highlight Features
  • Rock solid performance (100m range, automatic temperature adaptation)

  • Sync-speed up to 1/1000s

  • Compatible with old flashes (flash trigger voltage range of 0—300V)

  • Compatible with low-voltage flashes (e.g., Pentax) even in cold weather

  • Both female tripod thread and male hot shoe with a locking mechanism

  • Female hot shoe still usable in transmitter mode

  • No exotic batteries. Rechargeable AAAs work as well

  • Low-battery indicator

  • Easy channel selection during operation

  • Multi-channel mode

In particular in combination, the last two features are a game changer! They open up completely new applications. See bullet “Handling” in section “Discussion” below for an elaboration.

Specifications
  • Radio frequency: 2.4 GHz

  • Channels: 16 (1—5 allow multi-channel operation)

  • Max. sync speed: 1/1000s

  • Maximum effective distance: 100 m (conservative figure)

  • Operating Temperature: -20°C to +50°C

  • Flash trigger voltage supported: 0–300V

  • Power: 2 x AAA 1.5V batteries/rechargeables

  • Dimensions: 82mm x 70mm x 37mm (LxWxH) (including stand)

  • Weight: 58g


What’s in the Box?
In addition to a user manual and a "When the Light Dances 2" album (showing sample photos with corresponding strobist lighting diagrams), a V5 Duo box contains the following:


Features and Controls



Discussion
Handling
The ease of handling the V5 is one of its absolute highlights. First, the mode switch (“Tx” = Transmitter, “Rx” = Receiver, “Off”) is at the side and can be accessed while a flash is mounted. One can even change the batteries while the unit is in use (e.g., part of a flash stand rig). The battery compartment slides in and out with a click action similar to an SD card mechanism.


The Cactus V5 review by Brian Hursey features a video demonstrating the battery compartment action.

The best part, however, is that channel selection is not done via DIP switches but through a channel dial at the side that can be accessed while the unit is in use.


This means one can set up multiple flashes in the room and then dynamically choose one flash by dialling in the right channel on the transmitter on camera. This way one can move around with the camera and always choose a flash that will not be seen in the image or that just gives the best light for a particular moment.

Furthermore, for flashes/strobes set to channels 2–5 (marked in blue on the channel selection dial) one can choose to fire them individually or all at once. The latter is achieved simply by setting the transmitter to channel 1. This is very handy for multi-strobe setups to support testing each strobe’s contribution individually first and then simply let them fire all, once one is satisfied with the direction and levels of all individual strobes.

Further “goodies” include the ability for half-pressing the test button. Such a half-press will be confirmed with the LED lighting up in amber rather than in green. Receivers set to the same channel (or on channels 1–5 for multi-channel operation) will just respond with their LED lighting up in amber. This allows verification of channel settings, etc., without actually firing flashes.


The same LED can also light up in red. It does this – blinking slowly – to indicate a low-battery status. A nice touch to receive an advance warning instead of being surprised by dead batteries.

Reliability
The maximum distance between transmitter and receivers is specified to be 100m but this seems to be a very conservative figure. In a trial setup the triggers still worked 150—170m apart.


This was achieved in lowish temperature and with a receiver containing rechargeable Sanyo Eneloops which were close to depletion. Very impressive performance and heads and shoulders above the Cactus V4! It is unlikely that anyone will actually need the triggers to work at such distances but it is good to have this sensitivity safety margin for buildings with thick walls and difficult reception conditions. A tester even found the V5 to have more reach than the PocketWizards. The PocketWizards only worked at 50% of their advertised range and it is unknown why.

Tester Jared Luke tested the V5 at 7fps and they did not miss a beat. Tester Rudy's measurements confirm that the Cactus V5 could support up to 39 fps!

Compared to the Cactus V4, performance was not only improved in terms of reach but also in terms of temperature robustness. The V5 uses an FST (frequency self-tune) mechanism behind the scenes which automatically compensates for frequency drift due to drastic temperature changes. This means the triggers will work in a temperature range of -20ºC to +50ºC and may only require a bit of settling in time until the FST has automatically made the necessary adjustments. Tester Rudy confirmed operation at -10ºC.

Compatibility
The V5 allows the usage of old high trigger-voltage flashes as it supports a trigger voltage range of 0—300V. This means one can purchase almost any flash, old or new, and the V5 will work with it. In contrast, many other triggers exclusively support either a 0—12V or a 12—300V range only.

Unlike the Cactus V4, the V5 does not support flashes with reversed polarity. In my opinion that is a plus rather than a minus since it means that Pentax flashes will not require a modification anymore in order to work in cold temperatures. Flashes with reversed polarity are very rare and not being able to use them is a very small price to pay for supporting modern flashes with a very low flash trigger voltage in low temperature.

Camera remote trigger
The required camera remote trigger cable is camera-specific and an optional accessory. Luckily, for Pentax users the required cable is a standard 3.5mm male to 2.5mm male audio adapter cable, such as this one. With a receiver connected to the camera, the trigger button on a transmitter set to the same channel essentially becomes the shutter release button of the camera. In other words, half-press for AF (also works continuously in AF-C mode, as long as AF is assigned to shutter button half-press), bulb mode, rapid firing, combination with self-timer, etc. are all supported.

If the camera is set to bulb mode, the shutter will be open as long as the user presses the trigger button on the remote transmitter. However, to save the user from keeping the button pressed for extended periods of time, after two seconds, there is a change in operation. The transmitter signals this mode change by turning off the green confirmation light. After that, the user can let go of the button. A further press of the button after an arbitrary time, will close the shutter again. In a way one gets the best of both worlds: a) easy “shutter-closed while button pressed”-mode for the first two seconds and b) convenient “shutter-opens on first press, shutter-closes on second press”-mode for longer exposures. The receiver is rated to keep the camera shutter button pressed for 12 hours non-stop with a fresh set of AAA alkaline batteries.

The automatic mode change may turn out to be problematic when a number of exposures need to be made around the two second mark, sometimes ending before and sometimes ending after it. Practice will show whether this may be a real world problem and/or another mode change timeout amount would be preferable.

On-camera flash
Even when a V5 is used as a transmitter, e.g., on the hot shoe of a camera, the female hot shoe continues to work. This means one can not only trigger flashes remotely but also fire a flash on camera flash, e.g., as a fill flash.


Note that a V5 in Tx (transmitter) mode shields the camera from any high flash trigger voltage. It thus effectively works as a Safe-Sync hot shoe and hence allows using old high trigger voltage flashes on camera. A respective device costs $47.19 and does not offer all the other cool features of the V5!

Mounting Options
The V5 features a female tripod thread and a male hot shoe. The latter has a locking mechanism and hence allows safe operation even in tilted setups, such as on umbrella swivels. The locking mechanism of all my flashes worked fine with the female hot shoe of the V5 and allowed adventurous setups. Brian Hursey’s review contains a video demonstrating the secure fit.


The V5 may also function as a flash stand, if used on the supplied flash stand. One can, of course, also use the flash stand for a flash.


Again, such a flash stand may cost $8.95 on its own. Admittedly, the Nikon AS-19 seems to be sturdier but the V5 flash stand does the job just fine.

Transceiver Design
A V5 unit is a transceiver, i.e., it can be used as a transmitter or receiver, depending on user choice. The one disadvantage this entails is that a receiver cannot have a male hot shoe with an integrated female tripod thread (without involving costly solutions). An integrated tripod thread would avoid the potential mounting challenges resulting from this (see “Room for Improvement?” below). However, the transceiver design also has advantages:
  • the manufacturer only needs to design, produce and stock one device. The respective cost savings translate into a more competitive price for the user.

  • if a transmitter breaks, one can continue shooting by turning a receiver into a replacement transmitter.

  • one can reassign receiver/transmitter roles depending on current needs, e.g., if multiple photographers participate in a shoot.

  • A superfluous transmitter can be used as a camera trigger, etc.

Note that a V5 Duo box only contains one set of connection cables (see above “What’s in the box?”). This means that buying two receivers at once in a V5 Duo box only fully works if one a) can fire sufficiently many flashes by using the V5 female hot shoes, or b) purchases extra connection cables as an accessory.

Compared To

Cactus V4
The Cactus V4 remains a very attractive choice because of its low price, compatibility with old flashes (0—300V voltage trigger range) and the fact that the receivers accept AAA batteries. The transmitter uses a special L1028 12V battery which lasts for a year though.

Although the V5 loses the ability to support flashes with reversed polarity, as mentioned above this is more than made up for by the fact that Pentax flashes now always work without requiring a modification anymore.

My main niggle with the V4 was the fact that if one forgot to turn the receiver on, there was no way to do it after a flash had been mounted on the hot shoe. The V5 solves that problem by locating the on/off (mode selector) switch at the side.

Even though I never needed more than the ~15m range the V4 have given me, the 100m range of the V5 instil a lot more confidence regarding reliability and I am sure the V5 will be used in many professional settings.

Unfortunately, the V5 are a bit more fuzzy about a minimal distance between transmitter and receiver than the V4 were. This may only be a problem in cases when one could use a flash cable anyhow, but why be forced to buy a flash cable if radio triggers could continue to work?

Luckily, by setting the V5 to channel 16, I got them to work in close proximity to each other, such as triggering a flash on a flash bracket –
– or in macro situations.

The featured bottle is tiny and the flash is on the left hand side, extremely close to the camera.

The V5 are considerable bigger than the V4.


In use this is not a problem at all but it means that the V5 take up considerable more space in a camera bag. On the flip side, the V5 have no protruding antenna thus eliminating any related accidents involving camera straps, etc. Note that the V5 are still smaller than PocketWizards Plus II (approximately 8cm * 6cm * 3.5cm compared to 3.6cm * 5.4cm * 10.2 cm).

Yongnuo RF-602
The Yongnuo RF-602 also features long range operation and can function as a camera trigger but it does not reach 1/180 sync speed on Pentax cameras without tricks/modifications. Its maximum trigger voltage of 12V prohibits the use of older high trigger voltage flashes. A major disadvantage compared to the V5 is the inability to change the channel on the fly. I find the dynamic flash selection ability of the V5 to be one of its main attractive features.

Yongnuo RF-603
The upcoming Yongnuo RF-603 features a TTL pass-through functionality (for on-camera flashes only) but has been heavily criticised for having no locking mechanism on the male hot shoe. It does not feature a female tripod thread. Again, dynamic flash selection through a handy channel dial is not supported. As the RF-602, it is a camera-specific trigger, which I consider to be a disadvantage.

Flash Wave
In the past, when budget triggers had reliability problems, the Flashwaves where a good choice for those who needed the reliability and were prepared to spend considerably more money. Nowadays, other triggers have caught up. I don't think we'll see any complaints about reliability with the Cactus V5. I find the Flash Wave III a bit pricey for what they offer:
  • US $129.95 compared to the US $59.95 for the Cactus V5 Duo.

  • Advertised range more than twice the advertised range of the Cactus V5.

  • remote camera trigger functionality only releases shutter but cannot AF (based on an older version. I do not know about the latest FW III version.)

  • Transmitter uses special CR2450, 23A battery.

  • Does not mount on a female hot shoe.

  • Channel selection via tiny DIP switches.


Room for Improvement?

The V5 does not support passing TTL information between camera and flashes. It does not even provide a TTL pass-through feature for on-camera flashes. However, given the choice between on-camera TTL pass-through and the Safe-Sync functionality of the V5, I would choose the latter any day. Supporting both at the same time might be difficult. A TTL pass-through would make the triggers camera-specific which I regard as a disadvantage. In any event, just as real programmers don’t eat quiche, real strobists don’t use TTL. :) Seriously, I find manual control of flashes gives me the best and most consistent results. A remote flash power control feature would be quite something but I do not think TTL-support for on-camera flash only is an essential feature and/or worth paying the money for. If, for whatever reason, one needs a TTL pass-through on cameras with a sync port one can put the flash on the camera hot shoe and have the transmitter be triggered through the sync port. The one advantage I can think of a TTL pass-through has, is that it would allow usage of an AF assist light of the flash. Other features that are enabled by dedicated hot-shoes, e.g., rear curtain shutter, would only make real sense if the receiver supported TTL as well.

Cactus V4 owners may be sad to hear that the two trigger systems are not compatible with each other, i.e., V4 receivers will not listen to V5 transmitters and vice versa. Maintaining the compatibility would have been nice but is technically impossible with a switch from the 433MHz to the better 2.4GHz system. However, one can use both V5 and V4 transmitters in tandem (e.g., V4 transmitter on top of a V5 transmitter) in case one wants/needs to reuse existing V4 receivers.

The above image appears in Karel Donk's V5 review.

The multi-channel functionality is great but it could have easily been made even better by designating a certain receiver channel (e.g., channel 1) to always fire if the transmitter is set to any of the “blue” channels 1–5. This would have supported the use of a “common light” group of flashes that is constantly involved in all scenarios while one selectively adds different accent/key lights on channels 2–5. Maybe we will see such more elaborate uses of multi-channel functionality in future products.

A further “Interlink”/“Relay” mode would have been nice. In such a mode, a transceiver can be used to trigger a camera and a remote trigger for flashes, e.g., by automatically switching to transmitter mode one channel higher up after having fired the camera. This way one would need one V5 unit less to remote control a camera that fires remote flashes.

Some users may wish for an automatic power-off feature, which is absent from the V5. In my experience, however, such auto-features always get in the way when you least need it to happen. It is easy enough to develop a routine of turning off devices after usage and I much prefer the occasional depleted rechargeable set of batteries over misfires because the receivers powered themselves off.

The V5 have a higher power consumption than the V4. This is to be expected because they are a much more complex unit with a lot more features. The transmitter draws 2mA and the receiver 22mA when sitting idle (measurements courtesy by Rudy).

The size of the V5 male hot shoe locking mechanism makes operating it easier but in combination with the different vertical placement of the female tripod thread it can create a mounting challenge on some tripods, quick-release plates or spigots.


One might argue that removing the height difference between tripod thread and male hot shoe could fix the problem is visualised above but this would prevent the V5 to be mounted on cameras with a bulging built-in flash housing (such as the Olympus E-5). One can address the problem by using an additional flash stand, such as the Gissin AS-21, with an integrated tripod thread.

There will be some tension applied to a V5 unit mounted on a spigot and heavy equipment on the female hot shoe since the hot shoe is not aligned with the female tripod thread. However, the unit seems sturdy enough to survive such stress without harm.

Ideally, there would be a mode switch “Tx/Rx” separate from an “on/off” switch. This would allow a) leaving a unit in a dedicated mode, just turning it on and off, and b) switching the unit off in darkness and/or without paying attention. The current mode switch demands a bit of attention when switching the unit off because the “off” position is in the middle and cannot be set by simply pushing the switch to a stop.


Summary
The Cactus V5 is a significant improvement over the Cactus V4 which were already very attractive triggers.

Pros:
  • Excellent handling (easy access to on/off switch and batteries)

  • Dynamic selection of flashes during a shoot

  • Single or group selection of flashes

  • Safe on-camera flash usage while triggering other flashes

  • Works as a wireless camera trigger

  • No more exotic batteries, even rechargeable AAAs work

  • Low-battery indicator

  • High compatibility (0—300V trigger voltage and Pentax compatibility)

  • Hot shoe lock and female tripod thread

  • Great range and cold weather performance

  • High maximum sync-speed

  • 2.4GHz operational frequency does not interfere with radio emission of some flashes (e.g. the Canon EX series).

  • Flash stand included

Cons:
  • Tripod thread location may create mounting challenges

  • A bit large in the bag

  • Minimum distance between transmitter and receiver could be lower
    (has not been a problem in practice, though)

  • Incompatible to Cactus V4

  • Higher power-consumption compared to Cactus V4

  • No on-camera TTL pass-through for the transmitter

In closing, I can wholeheartedly recommend the Cactus V5. There are many more “pros” than “cons”. I especially like the ability to change the transmitter channel and thus the flashes addressed while moving around with the camera.

The few “cons” are the result of necessary compromises and completely addressing them (if possible at all) would no doubt make it tough to sell the V5 Duo for US $59.95. That's a bit more than the US$ 39.95 for a Cactus V4 transmitter/receiver pair (the Cactus V4 will not be phased out). The US $20 seem well justified for the additional features. A single Cactus V5 will be US $34.95. The release date is January 24, 2011 (PST).

The V5 will be the right choice for those who appreciate the V4 features but need/want the extra flexibility, increased range, improved reliability, extended compatibility, excellent handling, and new application scenarios provided by the V5.
Forum: Pentax SLR Lens Discussion 01-29-2011, 09:27 PM  
Cosina 55mm f1.2 worth in usd?
Posted By Deimos
Replies: 9
Views: 4,335
Amazing shots! These lenses are like creativity in a bottle!

I wager the price on these lenses will only increase as they become more renowned and more scarce. I read that the later Pentax mount copies might be the best of all because they were the latest and had the benefits of the most revisions and current manufacturing tech and tolerances.
Forum: Pentax K-5 & K-5 II 10-19-2010, 12:46 PM  
K-5, ISO12800 Practical Portrait (Part 3)...
Posted By JohnBee
Replies: 20
Views: 7,085
Following our last example, it was pointed out(by a number of people) that the lighting may have contributed to the final IQ of the sample. Therefore, I have just received permission from dgaies to release a low light sample at the same sensitivity.

To which I think should put to rest any/and all doubt that the K-5 is indeed a serious low light performer :)

UNPROCESSED RAW: ISO12800, 1/80s

FULL SIZE: RAW EXTRACTION(JPG) DOWNLOAD...

-

PROCESSED RAW: ISO12800, 1/80s

Click(view image) for full size sample


PROCESSED RAW CROP: ISO12800, 1/80s


As with the previous sample, this was processed with minimal NR(single pass) and very little PP. In a word... Amazing!

I would also like to take this opportunity to thank our good man dgaies who has gone far out of his way to provide us with these wonderful samples! - So thanks buddy! we couldn't have done this without you(literally :p).

/...the end/
Forum: Pentax K-5 & K-5 II 10-17-2010, 12:54 PM  
A couple K5 shots (100 vs 51200)
Posted By dgaies
Replies: 91
Views: 26,786
So I took a series of test shots with the K5 through the entire iso range. If anyone wants the raw files to look at I'll be glad to post them somewhere, I just need to figure out where.

In the meantime, I thought I would just post two downsized images for now, one at iso100 and the other at iso 51200. Both processed in LR3 using the default settings, except I bumped up the color noise reduction a little on the 51200 (to 50). I have to be honest, I have no idea what that means exactly as I just downloaded LR3 a couple days ago and have next to no experience processing raw files :o

Then I downsized them and I applied light sharpening as I normally would if I were posting something on the web. Again, I was just looking to see if 51200 was even potentially usable (without going through a lot of trouble) for stuff like web postings. Not saying I would make a point to use 51200, but it could be worse ;)

EDIT: here are links to the RAW files (via Multiupload)

100, 200, 400, 800, 1600, 3200, 6400, 12800, 25600, 51200


ISO 100 (K5 + FA77, f/8, 4s)


ISO 51200 (K5 + FA77, f/8, 1/125s)
Forum: Pentax SLR Lens Discussion 10-18-2010, 09:27 AM  
DA 35mm/2.4 - A Plastic Wonder! -- DAL35 vs FA35 vs DA35m vs A35 (many photos!)
Posted By frank
Replies: 141
Views: 119,550
DAL 35/2.4 - A Plastic Wonder!

I got the new DA35/2.4 lens along with my new K5 camera a few days ago. It is a beautiful looking lens, kinda like a smaller sized FA77. But when held in hand, it feels really light. It's probably the lightest non-pancake lens I've every had. Yeah, it's plastic lens with a plastic mount like all the DAL lenses, and it doesn't come with quickshift feature. Why Pentax called this one as a DA instead of a DAL is beyond me, but I'd call it as DAL35 in this short review simply because it has a plastic mount, it doesn't have quickshift feature, and it's easier to differentiate from the DA35 macro lens.

I got it purely because of its price and curiosity, not because I need another 35mm lens (I already have the FA31 and FA43 Ltd lenses, two of my favorite lenses). Well, after two days play, I really like this little lens, and think its light weight is a selling point instead of a drawback. It is so light and compact, I don't feel much extra weight at all when mounted on the K5 camera. Believe it or not, this has been the only AF lens that I've ever used to actually take photos ever since I got the new K5 camera. Normally I'd try all my lenses on a new camera just to make sure the camera and all my lenses are matching well. But this time I decided to give this lens a really good run.

30mm to 50mm happens to be my favorite focal length on cropped dSLR cameras, and I've had pretty much all Pentax 35mm lenses except that mystery SMC M 35/1.4 which never came to production stage. The results from the K5 and DA35/2.4 have been very satisfactory so far, and I do think I've got some keepers.

Pentax has made quite a few 35mm lenses, other than this new DAL35, there is a DA35 macro which is still under production, and the highly rated FA35/2 might still be in production too. I guess sometimes we are spoiled by so many options offered by Pentax, just don't know which one to buy or keep. A few friends asked me to do a thorough comparison between a few Pentax 35mm lenses, two of them even offered their DA35 macro, FA35/2 and a rare A35/2 to me for the comparison review. To be honest, I'm not really good at reviewing lenses, normally when I got a new lens, I'd just bring it out for a spin instead of shooting some charts at home. But since this is probably the only prime lens under $250usd currently offered by Pentax, I'd like to see how it stands against the other few 35mm lenses too.

Enough said, let's get to the points. Obviously Pentax designed this lens based on the FA35/2. Both lenses have the same 6 elements in 5 group optical design, both feature the AL element to minimize aberrations, and both can focus as close as 30cm. The new DAL35 is much lighter at 124g vs 195g for the FA35 (and 215g for the DA35 macro). To save the cost, this new DAL35 lens doesn't come with bayonet fitting for a matching lens hood, only a 49mm screw on lens hood can be used. But this lens has Pentax Super Protect coating on the first lens element to help minimize dust & water to stay on the lens. AF is very fast, even faster than the FA35/2 which is considered as one of the fasted AF lenses by Pentax. During the test against the other 3 35mm lenses, I felt that DAL35 is actually slightly faster than F2.4. Photos taken at the same settings (iso/aperture/shutter speed) appear to be brighter than those from the other 35mm lenses. It is more or less an F2.2 lens I think.

Anyway, after a couple of days play and some tests, here are my over impressions about this lens:

1. Looks beautiful, compact and light weight
2. Makes sharp photos even at wide open aperture
3. Produces very pleasing bokeh and colors
4. Hard to see any CA in the actual photos
5. SP coating for easy cleaning
6. Can focus down to 30cm for some nice closeups
7. Plastic mount might feel cheap, but it's not the first ever
8. Widest aperture is actually faster than F2.4, It's more like a F2.1 to F2.2 lens

Overall I'd say this is a plastic wonder.


In the following I'd show some testing results between these four lenses: DAL35, FA35, DA35macro and A35/2, with some sample photos taken by the DAL35 and a K5 camera. All chart testing photos were taken indoor under somehow controlled lighting condition with the camera mounted on sturdy tripod, 2 second mirror up was used for all testing photos (but not for the sample photos). Pictures speak for themselves.

Here is the lineup:





The FA35 has slightly bigger rear element:



Shooting the chart
The camera was set to manual white balance and manual exposure, same iso/aperture/shutter speed were set for all lenses in the same set photos. As I said above, from the chart testing results you can see that the results from DAL35 appear to be slightly brighter than the other lenses. But I kept all settings the same anyway.

Here is the chart:



Here I'll only show the 100% crops of the centers and corners.

F2
FA35 center:

A35 center:

FA35 corner:

A35 corner:


F2.4 (F2.5 for FA35 and A35)
DA35 center:

FA35 center:

A35 center:

DA35 corner:

FA35 corner:

A35 corner:


F2.8
DA35 center:

FA35 center:

DA35macro center:

A35 center:

DA35 corner:

FA35 corner:

DA35macro corner:

A35 corner:


F4
DA35 center:

FA35 center:

DA35macro center:

A35 center:

DA35 corner:

FA35 corner:

DA35macro corner:

A35 corner:


F5.6
DA35 center:

FA35 center:

DA35macro center:

A35 center:

DA35 corner:

FA35 corner:

DA35macro corner:

A35 corner:


F8
DA35 center:

FA35 center:

DA35macro center:

A35 center:

DA35 corner:

FA35 corner:

DA35macro corner:

A35 corner:


F11
DA35 center:

FA35 center:

DA35macro center:

A35 center:

DA35 corner:

FA35 corner:

DA35macro corner:

A35 corner:


F16
DA35 center:

FA35 center:

DA35macro center:

A35 center:

DA35 corner:

FA35 corner:

DA35macro corner:

A35 corner:



CA (or whatever it's called) in high contrast area

Wide open aperture (F2 to A and FA35, F2.4 for DAL35, F2.8 for DA35 macro)
DA35 center:

FA35 center:

DA35macro center:

A35 center:

DA35 edge:

FA35 edge:

DA35macro edge:

A35 edge:


F4
DA35 center:

FA35 center:

DA35macro center:

A35 center:

DA35 edge:

FA35 edge:

DA35macro edge:

A35 edge:


F8
DA35 center:

FA35 center:

DA35macro center:

A35 center:

DA35 edge:

FA35 edge:

DA35macro edge:

A35 edge:



Bokeh

Wide open aperture (F2 to A and FA35, F2.4 for DAL35, F2.8 for DA35 macro)
DA35:

FA35:

DA35macro:

A35:


F4
DA35:

FA35:

DA35macro:

A35:


F8
DA35:

FA35:

DA35macro:

A35:



Here are some sample photos I took w/ K5 and DAL35/2.4. All photos taken in RAW (PEF), then converted by Pentax Photo Utility v4.3.


For more samples, please take a look at here:


https://www.pentaxforums.com/forums/pentax-dslr-discussion/118504-k-5-da-35mm...ny-photos.html


































100% crops of a few photos (all taken w/ DAL35 at wide open aperture)











Forum: General Talk 10-01-2010, 12:35 PM  
The bitchin and moaning has gone to far !
Posted By JACOBY
Replies: 81
Views: 17,193
You got it man. People are never happy when I hear someone complain I tell them to come and work with me for a day. I work with special needs people I tell myself I got it made compared to these folks. And I don't have very much. But I'm glad I wake up every mourning.
Search took 0.00 seconds | Showing results 1 to 17 of 17

 
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 06:20 PM. | See also: NikonForums.com, CanonForums.com part of our network of photo forums!
  • Red (Default)
  • Green
  • Gray
  • Dark
  • Dark Yellow
  • Dark Blue
  • Old Red
  • Old Green
  • Old Gray
  • Dial-Up Style
Hello! It's great to see you back on the forum! Have you considered joining the community?
register
Creating a FREE ACCOUNT takes under a minute, removes ads, and lets you post! [Dismiss]
Top