|
Forum: Digital Processing, Software, and Printing
01-24-2010, 07:38 AM
|
| |
In reference to Picasa, I will never use it again. It screwed me once, not going to do it again. I opened the program one day and ALL - I repeat ALL my photos were added a second time, but EACH one under it's own folder. It was a mess. In fact still is. I even tried to deleting and reinstalling. Some config file "remembered" and it was no different. The separate folder Picasa said these folders were in didn't even exist.
|
|
Forum: Digital Processing, Software, and Printing
01-23-2010, 01:58 PM
|
| |
Marc - That's what I've noticed. The batch renaming and such so far in Bridge has been a Godsend. I'm not sure if LR does this, I haven't even looked. But for now I've figured it out. Once I get everything making sense, which i can tell is going to take a while then I'll look into the Lightroom Beta. I understand it can also do a lot of the more common Photoshop enhancements.
|
|
Forum: Digital Processing, Software, and Printing
01-22-2010, 05:20 PM
|
| |
I couldn't find a subforum that this fit in, and since this invovles software I thought would be the closest fit.
I have created a mess for myself. I have 3 separate locations that I have saved photos. 2 external hard drives and my Mac's internal hard drive. Each of these sources is duplicated in one way or another. Is there any easy way (or less complicated then checking folder by folder, file by file) to combine these sources into 1? Otherwise I feel like burning it all to DVD and starting fresh for late 2009 forward. If I have duplicates so be it.
Also, I've been using Adobe Bridge with the CS3 suite, and it seems very useable for organizing. Is there anything you've used that you like better and why? Currently using JPG but will be making jump to RAW if that matters.
I've heard about Lightroom and Catpure 1, do they compare to Bridge for organizational purposes?
Thanks!
|
|
Forum: Sold Items
01-14-2010, 04:26 PM
|
| |
| |
|
Forum: Sold Items
01-11-2010, 03:21 PM
|
| |
PentaxForums.com Marketplace Listing
Item for Sale
Magic Lantern Guide for K10
Asking Price
$15.00
Shipping Destinations
United States
Item Description
Magic Lantern Guide for Pentax K10D
Are you the original owner of the item being sold?
Yes
Are you selling or trading this item?
Selling
Item Condition (Key)
New
Mint
Item Location
Houston, TX
Shipping Charge
Free
Shipping Services
Accepted Payment Types
PayPal Check/Money Order
Return Policy & Additional Details
Umm...not accepting return on this one. It's a book that's new
Please send me a private message if interested in the item!
|
|
Forum: Pentax SLR Lens Discussion
11-09-2009, 12:15 PM
|
| |
No worries, I wasn't clear as I see in my original post. I meantioned the MF lenses I have as a point of reference. Otherwise I'd be perfectly happy with my little Takumar. I'm assuming your comment about photos of children prior to mid-1980s was an attempt at sarcasm? Kinda funny actually.
|
|
Forum: Pentax SLR Lens Discussion
11-09-2009, 12:10 PM
|
| |
If I push ISO 1600, it works. With normal size 4x6 prints, I'm satisfied with the results from my K100D. However, this is a significant limitation. I'd love to get the 35/2 somewhere. I have found one for just over $300 in as new condition. This is so frustrating that there are so few "afordable" (everyone's definition of that is different) AF options available. It really makes me want to get a D90 just to use the AF-S 35/1.8, AF-D 24/2.8, and AF 50/1.4D. All 3 of those great lenses under $400. Grr...
I think I may have to really consider what my needs are, and what system would best suit them now, before I invest anything further into a specific brand. Granted, I'll never part with what I have, my K100D and Pentax MF primes are jewels.
|
|
Forum: Pentax SLR Lens Discussion
11-09-2009, 10:49 AM
|
| |
Definately need something under 50mm
|
|
Forum: Pentax SLR Lens Discussion
11-09-2009, 09:52 AM
|
| |
| |
|
Forum: Pentax SLR Lens Discussion
11-08-2009, 11:55 PM
|
| |
I've decided to delay a new body until this summer, and really master some fundamentals. But in the meantime, I want to get something that will be a good investment.
So, I'm looking for a good all around prime. Going to have a rather active 14 month old at Christmas and don't want to miss those great shots. Looking for something that will pair will with my K100D Super. Was considering the DA 40 LTD, but with the crop factor I'm not sure that's wide enough. I know the SMC A-50/2 is often too close for some of the shots I want to get. The Takumar 28/2.8 us just about right, and a 35mm would probably work too.
Any suggestions?
|
|
Forum: Pentax DSLR Discussion
11-04-2009, 01:52 PM
|
| |
Right now shipping is free. Tax is well, whatever your local tax is unless Best Buy has no facility in your state.
|
|
Forum: Pentax DSLR Discussion
11-04-2009, 07:26 AM
|
| |
Best Buy has it for 799.99, but after tax most places your back to same as the rest. Some people might like being able to return it to a brick and mortar store if there's a problem though.
|
|
Forum: Pentax SLR Lens Discussion
11-01-2009, 05:04 PM
|
| |
I've been playing around some yesterday and today with some nature type photos, and have totally realized I have so much more to learn. And at this point, these lenses are far more capable than I am.
So here's some first attempts at practicing with getting things in focus.
Granted, these aren't the low light shots I would typically take but it's a start.
I made a slight diopter adjustment and it seems to have helped some.
Of course I could really use the viewfinder on the K-7 or D90.
The biggest issue seems to be that the point I focus on doesn't end up being the
where the image if focused. For instance:
Image 1: I focused on the red center of the flower, but it appears to be focused upper middle of the left petal. However this image shows overall greater detail than the other two.
Image 2: For some reason this image has more visible noise than the other 2 and I can't figure out why as no settings were change in any of these shots. Focal point was the
center protruding piece of the flower. While this does show detail, the rest of the flower is too soft.
Image 3: In an attempt to correct issue with #2, I ended up getting the entire flower in the same general focus, subject flower is too soft.
Anyway, wasn't so much looking for a critique as I was saying "man do I have ways to go" But, you know what. I had fun finding the "shots". I don't even mind that they aren't perfect.
|
|
Forum: Pentax DSLR Discussion
10-30-2009, 11:35 AM
|
| |
This is exactly what I was going to ask about. On prints this size: are the diferences in nose and detail, at lower ISO where the K-7 "shines", going to be noticeable?
|
|
Forum: Pentax SLR Lens Discussion
10-30-2009, 10:51 AM
|
| |
Great information. I'm in impatient person that unfortunately enjoys something that takes patience. I think maybe before I purchase anything should study and practice use with my MF lenses. Then maybe the rest will fall in line as to my body choice for an upgrade.
|
|
Forum: Pentax SLR Lens Discussion
10-30-2009, 10:29 AM
|
| |
Actually, I wouldn't much trust anything Pop Photo says anymore. The 2 sources I did read about the Nikon said was a great lens, 1 of them indicating it was the sharpest Nikon prime around.
The 50mm Canon is definately a value lens. Platic, cheap construction, but decent optics.
Besides, I admitted that the Pentax glass was superior. I'm not saying that the Canikon stuff is better, but at least they have those options.
|
|
Forum: Pentax SLR Lens Discussion
10-30-2009, 06:18 AM
|
| |
Thanks guys. I have couple examples of MF primes. They are great no doubt. And a very valid point about SR in body, vs those inexpensive primes without IS or VR. Not to mention that Nikon 50/1.8 would require a D80/D90 to work. All very good points.
I've just been frustrated at what I feel is loss of some good shots due to having to focus manually in lower light situations or for specific shots where I want the sharpness of these primes over the kit lens. Also, with the K100D I've had shots that the view finder has led me to believe are in focus and the result is an out of focus shot. Frustrating. Maybe it's just me needing more practice with these lenses.
|
|
Forum: Pentax DSLR Discussion
10-29-2009, 04:24 PM
|
| |
Anyone know when this is actually supposed to release? Seems like an great deal.
|
|
Forum: Pentax SLR Lens Discussion
10-29-2009, 02:28 PM
|
| |
I've been lurking for a while, and thought I'd throw a question out there. And I'd like to say up front, i'm not troll - just an honest question about something important to me.
Okay don't get me wrong, I'm not talking 50 bucks. I'm talking about new Pentax or 3rd party glass in sub $200-250 range.
I have a K100D Super. I've had it for 2 yrs with the 18-55mm kit lens, an A 50/2 , A 24/2.8, and a Takumar 28/2.8. I've also got some cheap manual zooms like Vivitar 70-150mm that I was actually VERY impressed with. In the grand scheme of things I've spent little compared to what I could have or may spend going forward. I want value out of my hard earned greenbacks.
So for me, it's time for an upgrade body wise, and the availability of AF primes for that specific setup is going to be a key factor. Now I love my Pentax gear I have, and I will keep it regardless of what brand I choose (Considering K-x/K7 or D90). From what I've seen, the primes available at an enthusiast level from pentax are much more spendy than the competition.
For example:
Nikon:
AF-S Nikkor 35mm F1.8G DX - $199 or less
Nikkor 50mm f/1.8 AF - $125 or less
Canon:
28mm/2.8 $250
50mm/1.8 $100
I realize these are not perfect, but their pretty good. Especially for someone in beteen beginner and prosumer bracket. It seems that what Pentax and 3rd party companies have to offer doesn't even start until $330ish. Albeit arguably, it's nicer glass.
So my question after all that is - do such lenses exist for the K mount, or is this just the way it is?
|
