Forgot Password
Pentax Camera Forums Home
 
Log in or register to remove ads.

Showing results 1 to 22 of 22 Search: Liked Posts
Forum: Lens Sample Photo Archive 03-02-2012, 02:20 PM  
Pentax DA 21mm f/3.2 AL Limited samples
Posted By einstrigger
Replies: 375
Views: 108,456
Human Subject :) Although not near minimum focusing distance.

1/180s F/4 ISO 100
Forum: Canon, Nikon, Sony, and Other Camera Brands 06-20-2011, 03:04 PM  
Nikon D7000 as compared to Pentax K5
Posted By einstrigger
Replies: 19
Views: 18,448
This could be due to the Nikon having a 921k-dot lcd compared to the K20D's 230k-screen when viewing in camera. So no amount of tweaking the brightness settings will work since the effective number of pixels being displayed are different. BTW, the K-5 and K-r have the 921k lcd screens as well. As for downloading to the computer, the D7000 is known to slightly overexpose, so that might be a reason for the brighter images.

Anyhow, I've owned a K-5 and D7000 as well. I agree with what most everyone have said. For my hands (small glove sizes), the K-5 felt better ergonomically. Although I liked the dual SD card slots of the D7000, it made the grip fatter and I felt I didn't have as secure a grip as i did with the K-5.

Nikon's SWM lenses destroy Pentax's SDM in terms of speed and accuracy. Screw-drive lenses are about the same when it comes to AF speed. However, there is nothing on the Nikon side that's equivalent to any of the Pentax Limited lenses. I never realized how unique or light-weight the Limiteds were until I started shooting with Nikon.

A lot of people talk about lens choices and how Nikon has more, but in reality, if we're talking lenses specifically for cropped sensors (like the K-5 or D7000), Pentax still outnumbers either Nikon or Canon. Off the top of my head:

DA/DFA 15, 21, 35, 40, 55, 70, 100, 200, 300, 11-17, 12-24, 16-50, 18-55, 18-135, 50-135, 50-200, 55-300, 60-250.

In comparison Nikon's DX lineup:

DX 10.5, 35, 50, 85, 10-24, 12-24, 18-55, 16-85, 17-55, 18-105, 18-200, 55-200, 55-300.

But of course, you can always use Nikon's full frame lenses on the APS-C bodies :)
Forum: Canon, Nikon, Sony, and Other Camera Brands 10-05-2012, 11:59 PM  
Fujifilm X-E1 or Pentax K-5/K-5II
Posted By einstrigger
Replies: 39
Views: 16,514
I love the output of what I've seen from the X-Pro 1. If the X-E1 is exactly like it in terms of image quality, I'm very tempted to make it my new travel cam. The bundled kit lens (18-55mm f2.8-4) makes a great all around lens which I think would be perfect for street shooting and travel. Slow AF I can deal with, but I'd like to see exactly how slow and how well the evf performs. So now, it's just a matter of waiting for the reviews...
Forum: Pentax K-30 & K-50 05-22-2012, 01:54 PM  
K-30 vs. the Nikon D3200
Posted By einstrigger
Replies: 83
Views: 40,355
I would take a K30 over the D3200 any day. The D3200 uses a pentamirror (yuck) versus a pentaprism as used by the K30. Look through the viewfinder of a camera with a pentaprism in low-light (or at night) versus a pentamirror to see the difference. The pentaprism is much brighter and provides 100% coverage. What you see through the viewfinder is what you'll get. Other features that come to mind where the K30 is superior to the D3200:

1. dual control wheels vs. one
2. 6 FPS burst vs. 4 FPS
3. weather sealing vs. none
4. AE bracketing 3 exposures vs. none
5. focus peaking vs. none
6. AF with all Pentax AF lenses vs. AF only with Nikon AF-S lenses
7. AF with 9 cross-type points vs. 1 cross-type
8. In-body stabilization vs. lens only

I think those features are worth the $150 extra over the D3200, but if history tells us anything, the street prices will usually be lower after a couple months.
Forum: Post Your Photos! 05-06-2012, 11:43 AM  
Black & White Ode to Ellen Von Unwerth
Posted By einstrigger
Replies: 2
Views: 1,243
I was trying to mimic Ellen Von Unwerth's work similar to the high contrast B&W photos she always does for the Guess ad campaigns. All photos shot with a Pentax K-5 and DA 70mm with grain intentionally added. Yeah, we buy these expensive cameras and lenses only to make them look more analog :lol: All comments welcome.





Forum: Canon, Nikon, Sony, and Other Camera Brands 04-27-2012, 09:54 AM  
Olympus XZ-1 Photos thread
Posted By einstrigger
Replies: 87
Views: 13,964
Some photos from the XZ-1 and a trip to Thailand
Forum: Troubleshooting and Beginner Help 03-21-2012, 03:46 PM  
should I have buyer's remourse?
Posted By einstrigger
Replies: 27
Views: 3,248
To the OP, if you're happy with the K-r, then you're not missing anything. It actually takes Pentax a bit longer to introduce a new model versus Canon or Nikon. Just look at Canon with the T1i, T2i, T3i, and to be announced T4i. In the same time span, Pentax has moved from the K-x to the K-r.

The latest and greatest is always desirable, but mastering your own skills as a photographer will yield better results than a newer camera.
Forum: Pentax News and Rumors 04-18-2012, 10:25 AM  
Lens prices and our channel strategy in the U.S. - Ned Responses
Posted By einstrigger
Replies: 716
Views: 65,023
It's nice to be able to go into a B&M store to test a product, but inevitably, pricing and convenience are the ultimate deciding factors for most people. Best Buy can attest to this as they've been on the news recently for announcing 50 store closings which they blame in part on the "show room" effect. That is, when shoppers go into their store, test out a product, get some info, and then find the item for less online. What they are not understanding is, most shoppers are more likely to buy electronics like TVs, computers, and cameras based on price. That 5% to 10% price difference matters to the average consumer which leads to purchases through Amazon, B&H, or Adorama, versus a B&M like Best Buy, Target, or Walmart.

In terms of convenience, yes, it's nice to be able to go to a local store, but many figure this to now be a hassle when you factor in: time to travel, cost of fuel, looking for parking, searching for the item if they even have it in stock, knowing more about the product than the sales clerk, getting sales pitches on extended warranties, waiting for a cashier, and then being accosted by a receipt checker. I.e., the typical Best Buy experience.

Compare that to shopping online where it's easy to find good, well-reviewed products, with free shipping, and lower prices (even with taxes). For the consumer, it doesn’t make much sense to pay more for the in-store experience when there are not real measurable benefits, aside from instant gratification.
Forum: Troubleshooting and Beginner Help 02-27-2012, 01:56 PM  
K-5 vs D7000 again
Posted By einstrigger
Replies: 25
Views: 3,448
Pentax zooms are definitely cheaper than their Nikon counterparts, but therein is the difference between the two companies. Nikon maintains cropped and full frame cameras, so they tend to have a bias towards the latter in their offerings (14-24, 24-70, 70-200, 24, 35, 50, 85, 105, etc.). Where as Pentax is bias more towards APS-C and thus offering more lenses with focal lengths toward that end (16-50, 50-135, 60-250, 15, 21, 35, 40, 70, 100, etc.).

Unless you're shooting extreme telephoto (300mm+), I don't see how people can say the lens lineup "isn't there" for Pentax.

I do agree, the cheapy fast primes aren't as readily available, but it seems Pentax realizes this too. Hence, we now have the DA 35mm f2.4 (a tiny bit slower than Nikon's 35 f1.8, but it is cheaper too) and the upcoming DA 50mm f1.8. People say Pentax needs an 85mm f1.8, but I think the DA 70mm fills in that spot nicely and is actually affordable for what it is (about $545 new). The build quality is definitely a level up from the cheaper Nikon lens.

Anyhow, I've owned both the D7000 and K-5. Although there were many features that I liked about the D7000, I ended up with the K-5 for very specific reasons:

1. Ergonomics. I prefer the button placement (ISO, WB) on the K-5 in addition to the size and weight. I have small hands and the grip of the K-5 suited me more.
2. DNG file format. The files from the K-5 seemed more malleable to post-processing and I like the open format of DNG.
3. Pixel mapping. I had hot pixels in my original D7000 and had to mail it in for service.
4. Robust bracketing. 5 exposures, one press of the shutter.
5. Highlight protection. D7000 seemed to blow highlights more for me, so I typically set -1EV by default.
6. Weather Sealing. The K-5 is sealed better than the Nikon, which helped during a recent trip to Thailand with my DA* 16-50mm.

Of course, there were features that I preferred on the Nikon (i.e. flash support, "My Menu", 1/250 x-sync, SWM versus SDM, and tethering), but none of that has prevented me from achieving the photos I want with the K-5. Both are very capable cameras in the right hands, but that's the nature of the beast. Is it the right camera in your hands?
Forum: Post Your Photos! 02-26-2012, 04:00 PM  
People DA Starz and a Limited
Posted By einstrigger
Replies: 9
Views: 870
Couple shots from yesterday's shoot with various lenses.

DA 21mm Limited


DA* 16-50mm


DA* 55mm
Forum: Pentax DSLR Discussion 02-02-2012, 03:05 PM  
A great day for Pentaxian
Posted By einstrigger
Replies: 11
Views: 1,838
Although I don't care for the K-01, I agree it's great to see development continue under Ricoh. I'm excited that new lenses are in the pipeline along with an updated teleconverter (FINALLY). Although I love my K-5, I would sell it in a heartbeat if Pentax announces a full frame. And gadzooks, if we ever get updated flashes, I would probably have a heart attack.
Forum: Lens Sample Photo Archive 07-28-2011, 05:14 PM  
Pentax DA 12-24 f/4 AL ED IF Samples
Posted By einstrigger
Replies: 187
Views: 56,172
One of my most used zooms...love the wide angles.





Forum: Photographic Technique 10-11-2011, 11:21 AM  
Photographer Looking For People to Do Their Job Without Pay
Posted By einstrigger
Replies: 14
Views: 1,633
This post on Craigslist is hilarious, but hits home with me and I assume many others.



Original link here. I found this to be the case recently with a lot of Talent for Hire ads on Craigslist.
Forum: Photographic Technique 10-11-2011, 10:26 AM  
Camera buying is emotionally draining
Posted By einstrigger
Replies: 11
Views: 1,634
Warning. Long story, read if you're super bored. No refunds on minutes lost from your daily routine :D

So a lot of people say car buying is all based on emotions, but I'd say camera buying can be the same. I've been watching for a good price on a Nikon D700 and recently came across a used one on the Amazon.com Marketplace. If you've never used it before, it's like Amazon's version of eBay, where buyers can purchase items from other vendors besides Amazon. These items can range from new or used, payments are made through Amazon, and then feedback can be left for the seller. Anyhow, yesterday morning, I find a used Nikon D700 in "Like New" condition for $1,350.00 USD. Of course, I'm astounded, because these cameras typically average $1900-$2200 used, depending on their condition. I thought to myself "Really?!? No way!" and then looked at the seller's feedback rating, which was 94% positive. I thought to myself "94% ain't bad. You can't please everyone, maybe there's just one disgruntled buyer or something?"

Well, I then noticed he wanted buyers to contact him by email before making the purchase, so I immediately shoot off an email requesting more info on the condition of the camera, how many actuations, etc. In the meantime, the thought is floating in my head, "Maybe I should just buy it now. What if someone else buys it before he answers my question? That's a damn good price!" That was all at about 10am, Columbus Day morning.

Now as I'm going about my day, I'm constantly checking my phone to see if I had any replies to my email. The feeling was the same if not worse than waiting for a call from a girl you like :p Meanwhile, I'm picturing myself using the camera, thinking about the depth of field of a full frame, even looking online at Compact Flash memory. Then, at about 2:30pm, like a voice from the heavens, I get an email reply!

In the email, he mentions the following:




At this point, my brain just goes numb and all I can hear is the chorus from Handel's Messiah continually sounding "Hallelujah! Hallelujah! Hall-laayy-looo-yaahh!"

Of course, thinking nothing of it, I instantly reply saying "Yes! I'd like to buy the camera. Here's my shipping address..." The reply was within 2 to 3 minutes from the seller's own email, so I figured I had my claim on the camera.

Minutes go by. Nothing. Then a half hour. Still nothing. Then an hour to 2 hours. Zilch. Frantic, I looked at Amazon again and see that the camera was no longer listed in the Used section.

"Nooooooo!" I screamed in my mind. "Did someone else buy it? Crap I should've just added it to the cart and checked out." And like a madman, I start hitting F5 to refresh Amazon's page to see if a mistake had been made. At this point, I got pretty sad thinking to myself that I had missed the deal of the century and someone else out there was going to be playing with a practically new D700. I kept beating myself up mentally over and over about how I should have just pulled the trigger early instead of being so inquisitive, especially since the seller had 94% positive feedback and Amazon has buyer protection.

Anyhow, at this point it is late in the evening and I'm still perusing sites like eBay, Craigslist, and Fred Miranda. All of which had used D700's for $1900 to $2300. So again, I prolong the masochistic self-torture on how I missed an awesome deal, but eventually manage to get to sleep with dreams of camera gear. Pathetic? Yes, absolutely.

The Next Day.

Now, I woke up this morning and surprise, surprise, what's this? It's an email from the seller! I think to myself, "There truly is a God!" and in the email he wrote:



Hallelujah chorus plays again and I am wide awake with a big grin from ear to ear. That is, until I receive a subsequent email:






QuoteQuote:

The seller requests to be paid via MoneyGramŪ Money Transfer.
To submit the payment with MoneyGram Money Transfer you have the following option:
Pay for the transfer with cash at a local MoneyGram agent.
Click here to locate the agents in your area.
To confirm your payment with Amazon send the payment detaills from Money Gram: Confirm Payment
Use this secure way to confirm your payment only if you feel unsafe to release the payment details directly to your seller.If you need further assistance contact Customer Center by Clicking here
Once the payment was sent, provide the following information:
1) Reference Number (MoneyGram Reference Number):
2) Sender name :
3) Sender address :
4) City where you sent the money from:
5) Amount sent:
Then wait for the confirmation that the payment was received. After that you will receive the tracking number for your product.
The funds will not be released under any circumstances! We will hold the payment until you will send us your confirmation that you have received, inspected and you agree to keep the item. When we will have your confirmation we will transfer the funds to the seller. If the item it is not what was described you will ship it back to the seller and we will refund your money 100%.

E-mail Address: aristacamera@live.com

Ship from Address:
Richard Restianuh
2501 Algoma St Apt A
Stevens Point
WI 54481
United States

Payment Address:
Dan Bitner
Via Piemonte 108
I-00187
Roma
Italy



Uh huuuuhhhh...

Now mind you, all of this was in an official looking Amazon email, with headers, links, and what not. But I was really suspicious of the payment method and the fact that some of the links led to a "live.com" domain instead of "amazon.com". My suspicions were justified, as a simple Google search showed me this was a routine scam on Amazon, frequently done with other cameras or electronics. In any case, I did not redact any names or emails so others can see the potential fraudsters involved.

So the point of this story? As cliched as the saying goes, if a deal seems too good to be true, it probably is. But boy, what an emotional roller coaster! Watch out for AristaCamera on the Amazon Marketplace.
Forum: Pentax K-r 10-03-2011, 02:10 PM  
Poll: K-r reliability poll
Posted By einstrigger
Replies: 30
Views: 5,942
Sometimes people are beyond the 30 day return, so the cameras can't be sent back. The e-dial issues for me didn't occur until after the 30 day period, otherwise this camera would be on it's way back to Abes of Maine instead of CRIS.
Forum: Photographic Technique 09-27-2011, 11:14 AM  
Stealing camera lenses off tourists
Posted By einstrigger
Replies: 17
Views: 3,574















Youtu.be




I can see copycats out there trying this. Just be alert if you're asked directions and a map is placed over your camera.
Forum: Post Your Photos! 09-15-2011, 10:40 AM  
People Weekend cupcakes
Posted By einstrigger
Replies: 6
Views: 1,712
Some shots over the weekend where we were trying for a retro vibe. Don't know if that was achieved, but the models liked the results, so I guess that's what mattered. Payment made with cupcakes :p

K-r, DA* 16-50mm



K-r, DA* 16-50mm



K-r, DA* 16-50mm. I blew the highlights on this one :( and tried to salvage what I could. She still liked it though.




Different model and a different camera. Shot with a Nikon D7000, Nikkor 24-70mm. These were shot in the front yard of the house where we did the cupcake shoot.



Forum: Photographic Technique 07-25-2011, 02:03 PM  
MY first outdoor photoshoot, what do I need?
Posted By einstrigger
Replies: 21
Views: 11,367
Like most have said, put your subject in a shaded area and use a reflector to soften the harsh shadows. Here's a video tutorial:

video episode 26, outdoor portrait photography tips #2 | pro photo life link

If you're really frugal, go to the Home Depot or Lowes and get a foam insulation board. One side is silver and the other is white. They range in sizes with the largest being 4'x8' (great for studio bookends). Buy a small one for about $5 and you have an instant reflector. Of course, they aren't collapsible, but they're great in a pinch.
Forum: Pentax SLR Lens Discussion 07-28-2011, 02:12 PM  
Which lens should i buy
Posted By einstrigger
Replies: 15
Views: 3,473
Blurring the background depends on a couple things including your aperture (F number), how far your subject is from the background, and how far away you are from the subject. Although not one of the best lenses, your Tamron 18-200 can certainly achieve the blur.

It's pretty easy to practice. Setup a subject or object about 6 feet away from a contrasting background (i.e. trees, shrubbery, wall, etc) Set your lens to a fixed length like 70mm. Move the aperture to the lowest it will go. Stand 5 feet away from the object, focus, and take a photo.

Look at the output you have. Step one foot back and try again. Look at the results. Now try stepping forward so you're about 4 feet away, take a photo. Keep repeating at different distances, but don't change your focal length by zooming or your F-number.

The idea is to look at the results so you can understand how distance affects the depth of field and how things will be blurred. Typically, the longer the focal length the easier it is to blur the background. Once you get the hang of it, try the same exercise with other focal lengths (i.e. 85mm, 100mm, 200mm, etc).
Forum: Pentax Compact Cameras 06-28-2011, 10:50 AM  
Why I'm not happy with the Pentax Q
Posted By einstrigger
Replies: 25
Views: 4,944
I think Pentax is trying to access what they feel is an untapped market with the Q. But, I feel the pricing, not the camera, is the biggest blunder for something with this size & sensor. They simply don't have the cachet to market an $800 cutesy-mini-cam like say...Leica.

I too really wished Pentax would've spent R&D in other areas including:

1. New teleconverters
2. Ditching SDM for something faster and not prone to dying
3. New flash system with at least 1/250 sync
4. More support for tethered shooting
5. WR limiteds or more WR lenses (i.e. 12-24mm, 55-300mm, etc.)
Forum: Pentax K-r 03-11-2011, 11:26 AM  
K-r Spring Photos?
Posted By einstrigger
Replies: 9
Views: 3,690
Sorry, don't have much more than this. That and I'm reserving my ideas for this month's photo contest.

Forum: Pentax K-5 & K-5 II 12-14-2010, 04:15 PM  
K-5 or d7000 ?
Posted By einstrigger
Replies: 78
Views: 21,389
I'm "test driving" a D7000 right now until the stain issue with the K-5 has been remedied. I briefly had a K-5 before returning it due to the sensor stain issue. Anyhow, I've been playing with the Nikon for a while and here are some quick impressions:

Things I like:
1. Accessories that came with the camera seem better than Pentax. Real caps for the body and lens that screw on versus the push-ins that Pentax uses for kits. The battery charger seems more versatile as you can plug it directly into the wall (like an Eneloop charger) or use the included chorded plug (like the K-5 charger). Also love the hard plastic rear LCD cover versus buying the cheap film protectors for my Pentaxes.

2. Live view and the dedicated movie recording button seems better implemented with the Nikon. I've always disliked turning the mode dial button to get to movie recording on the K-7/K-5. On the Nikon, you just flick the Live view switch and then press the button to begin recording.

3. Size and build quality of the Nikon is also quite good. I was expecting a big camera, but it really is not much larger than a K-5.

4. Dual SD cards. Wonderful idea, especially considering the file sizes cameras produce these days. I'm using a 16GB class 10 card which the camera guesses amounts to 420+ or so photos. When you toss in video, space goes quick and having a second card at the ready without swapping is nice.

5. 1/250s flash synch. Not much to say about this other than wishing I could do this on a Pentax. Honestly though, I do mostly manual flash shots, so it's not that big of a deal.

Things I didn't like:

1. WB and ISO button placement sucks. Maybe I just got used to the ISO button on my Pentax, but I agree with DPR's opinion on this. When I shoot my left hand is typically cupping the base of the camera with my thumb, index, and middle fingers to adjust focal length on the lens. Having to bring my thumb away from that position to search for the ISO button slowed me down and seemed counter intuitive. Of course, you can set Auto-ISO and not have to contend as often, but it's still not as intuitive compared to the K-5.

2. Shutter sound. It's not loud, but it's definitely not as quiet as the K-5. Even when you put the D7000 in "Q" (for quiet shutter release) mode, it still is louder than the K-5. I think someone described the K-5's shutter release sounding like a stick of butter hit through a tennis racket.

3. Grip. For what it's worth, I figure I have medium to large sized hands (I wear med in most motorcycle gloves). For me, the D7000's grip felt fatter than the K-5. I guess that's the best I can describe it. I felt like I could grip the K-5 more securely because my fingers covered more of the grip on the K-5 versus the Nikon. The dual SD card slot on the grip probably contributed to this (hence why I'm calling it fat).

4. Build. Ok, I know I mentioned it as an aspect that I liked above, but when comparing it to the K-5, I felt the K-5's build was better. Although well built, the D7000 just seemed more "plasticky" when compared to the K-5. I'm chalking that up to the extra seals that the K-5 has in addition to more magnesium alloy. The K-5 being a smaller camera, still felt more hefty if not substantial.

5. AF in movie mode. I was excited about this feature, but realize it's just a gimmick. For one, it's super slow and for two, it's really loud. The stereo mic is located close to the lens, so if you're recording a movie and have it on AF, you can expect to capture all the noise involve with the camera trying to focus. MF is much quicker and quieter.

Anyhow, that's my subjective initial impressions, as I'm still getting to know the camera and put it through the paces. If anything, it's making me miss having the K-5 around :D Thanks for reading.
Search took 0.00 seconds | Showing results 1 to 22 of 22

 
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 09:25 PM. | See also: NikonForums.com, CanonForums.com part of our network of photo forums!
  • Red (Default)
  • Green
  • Gray
  • Dark
  • Dark Yellow
  • Dark Blue
  • Old Red
  • Old Green
  • Old Gray
  • Dial-Up Style
Hello! It's great to see you back on the forum! Have you considered joining the community?
register
Creating a FREE ACCOUNT takes under a minute, removes ads, and lets you post! [Dismiss]
Top