Forgot Password
Pentax Camera Forums Home
 
Log in or register to remove ads.

Showing results 1 to 25 of 49 Search: Liked Posts
Forum: Pentax News and Rumors 09-12-2020, 08:58 AM  
Sticky: An important message from the moderators
Posted By Wheatfield
Replies: 323
Views: 64,750
Participating in a Facebook group means becoming part of something akin to the Borg Collective. So far I have managed to avoid drinking Zuckerberg's Kool-aid. Social media is anything but social.
Facebook is especially toxic.
Forum: Pentax News and Rumors 07-04-2020, 12:03 AM  
Sticky: An important message from the moderators
Posted By yucafrita
Replies: 323
Views: 64,750
I would recommend that new registered users have a read-only phase, where they can read but not post. Maybe a week or two. Supposedly they already read the forum before registering, but this is not necessarily the case. With read-only access they could familiarize themselves with the forum

I am not sure if this is applied already or not but a read-only phase for those memebers who post trouble could help. As a cool-down phase.
Forum: Troubleshooting and Beginner Help 08-28-2019, 03:16 AM  
Can you recommend a good "budget" tripod?
Posted By macman24054
Replies: 28
Views: 3,019
I have one of these and they are rock solid. I use it to shoot real estate and commercial shoots. You would be hard pressed to beat it when it come to performance for what you pay.
Forum: Troubleshooting and Beginner Help 08-27-2019, 03:31 PM  
Can you recommend a good "budget" tripod?
Posted By MarkJerling
Replies: 28
Views: 3,019
Forum: Pentax News and Rumors 03-20-2019, 11:08 AM  
Lens roadmap: Tanaka-san spills the beans
Posted By biz-engineer
Replies: 360
Views: 33,503
The way I see how cameras for photography have evolved in 20 years:
- a lot of discussions went online, along with arguing, bashing, fanboyism, without much content relevant to photography per say
- cameras and lenses have been loaded with more and more electronics, more software and more mega of smaller pixels, sensor size remained small
- camera equipment with popular sensor size (24x36) are expensive, and a little larger costs a kidney and true medium format costs as much as a brand new BMW berlin
- camera/lens value drops faster than ever before, it's getting closer and closer to consumer electronics
- as soon as the new camera model with new gadgets is out, no one wants the previous model that does 99% of the same 14bits digital images
- a number of senior people have tremendous know-how but that know-how will be gone because the younger generations are aligned with DPReview excel awards decided if the camera does 4K and has 500 AF points....
- it is not possible to take images with less than 300 AF points and 10 frames per seconds anymore
- in the meantime, a number of b&m shops, photography studios and labs have closed
- the volume of photographs uploaded online has dramatically increased (thanks to more and more frames per seconds)
- the quality of content/composition hasn't increased, eventually decreased, it's quantity of snapshots taken in a hurry at high frame rates
- the null cost of development of a a digital photograph made it free to upload photographs for which no one would have paid a cent to a film lab to develop on even post card size paper
- yet, more of the same lenses are needed due to change of lens mounts, for use again with the same 14bits digital sensors, and camera models obsolete in less than 3 years
- good photos printed on quality paper at decent sizes is becoming not so common, at least much much less common than 45Megapixels photographs partially displayed on 1920x1080 or 3840x2160 displays...
== End Of Rant ==
Forum: Pentax News and Rumors 11-30-2018, 02:15 PM  
Photography LIfe lists two Pentax DSLR's in the Top Ten
Posted By swanlefitte
Replies: 30
Views: 5,727
Careful this poem is designed to trip you up. The road not taken is the one he doesn't takes or the one others didn't? All the difference in a good or bad way? Both roads haven't had the leaves trampled and seem equal. The decision isn't seen as different until after the travel.

That is the problem with novice camera buyers, there is no way to know what matters to you until you learn with the camera you need to buy. Once you have a camera what you learn is based on what it has and not what it lacks.
Forum: Pentax K-1 & K-1 II 09-21-2018, 07:12 AM  
Repeatability of image in focus using non-central focusing points on K-1
Posted By CarlJF
Replies: 14
Views: 1,179
Light level has nothing to do with it. The points all have the same sensitivity to light, they're all rated at -3 EV. The diiference is simply because the 2.8 points are more precise than the 5.6 ones.

To make it simple, the way a phase detect autofocus system work is by splitting the image in two slits. When the two images are the same (in phase), it means the image is in focus. If the image in one slit is blurry relative to the other it means the focus is too far or too near. Now, the farther the slits are separated, the more accurate the system is. In a 2.8 point, the slit are a distance calibrated to give proper focus based on an aperture of 2.8. In a 5.6 point, the slits are nearer and calibrated for an aperture of 5.6. Why then not all points are calibrated for 2.8 ? It's because the larger distance between teh slits require a larger aperture to cover both. Thus, in a 2.8 point, you need at least a lens with an aperture of 2.8 to cover both slits. Since many lenses aren't 2.8 or larger, this would mean the AF system would not work with many lenses. Thus 5.6 is kind of the lowest common denominator since it probably covers 99% of lenses. The center points also have both pair of slits: 2.8 and 5.6. So, if a lens slower than 2.8 is used, they still work but fall back to the regular 5.6 slits and are then no better than any other points. On the other hand, if a lens with an aperture of 2.8 or larger is used, the center points will use their 2.8 slits to give more precise and accurate focus. And this is exactly what you observe with your 1.4 lens: the center 2.8 AF points gives you more precise and accurate focus than the other 5.6 ones. This is to be expected and what the 2.8 points have been designed to do.
Forum: General Photography 08-29-2018, 09:47 AM  
"I had a dream." What determines the base ISO of a digital sensor?
Posted By normhead
Replies: 75
Views: 4,483
Have to say, after a brief gander, what he's talking about is that essentially, there is not ISO in digital. There is the base reading put out by the sensor, which is the same in every instance, and then there is baking done by the rest of the camera to create the effect of an ISO change for jpeg shooting. Why is it necessary to understand this... because for us film shooters, the only way to make a film faster was to increase the size of the grain. So, faster film was by definition, lower res. Larger grains but fewer of them.

Digital is different, you have the same number of pixel sites whether high or low ISO, the base exposure at the sensor level is taken at one value. All the camera does is change the mid point in a sort of internal "levels" way. That is relevant to jpeg export, because jpeg throws out the unused date that was made extraneous buy shifting the mid point.



And the shadow detail from the second. That is where the DR comes into play. In my experience, if you shoot at ISO 400 and achieve that look, in my experience, you will not be able to get the richness the original image has in the sky. The sky has to be properly exposed.

To prove ISO invariance he would have had to try and normalize both a 400 ISO image and a 100 ISO image and shown they were the same. He claims the simulated 400 ISO image is demonstrating ISO invariance, but to do that he should have used a 400 ISO image and tried to get the same result out of them.



In his opening line he defines th parameters. Understanding those restrictions, when you understand you are only talking about ISO invariance when discussing what he calls, "Back end noise", the concept is pretty limited in use and application.

However, I often shoot base ISO at 2 under , 1under, even , 1 over and 2 stops over, in a sunset sequence. And from that perspective this is all nonsense. I can tell you without fear of contradiction, one of those exposures will give you the best image, although sometimes the exposure you need is half way between the two and 2 of the 5 will give you almost identical images.

So in my expereince, ISO invariance is irrelevant. What there is, on a given sensor there is a point at which the mid point on the curve is positioned at an optimal spot to produce the best image. But where that point is, is highly subjective, to the point where I've given up anticipating it. And that mid point is changed, not by the ISO but on how long the exposure time is and how much light is allowed to reach the sensor relative to the scene you are trying to capture.

So to mee the whole question of ISO invariance is subject to the absolute need to get the best exposure for your subject. How does ISO invariance help with that? Why are we talking about it. Where is the practical application. Especially since the changes are subjective. If you have a scene with 20 EV and you only can capture 15 of it, how long you expose lets you control whether you throw out the top five EV, the bottom 5 EV, or some combination of the two extremes. That is an aesthetic decision that has nothing to do with ISO invariance. And to me that to me is the issue. I'm not sure why ISO invariance is important, but to me, it's a non-issue. It doesn't address how to get a good image.

And much of what is explained in the linked article is irrelevant, because it's either over simplified, or irrelevant to the point., and because as admitted by the author, their are no ISO invariant cameras.

All you need to know is, that once your camera starts using digital enhancement, your post processor can do the same with raw files. But that's not true at all with in any circumstance with jpeg files. And it's not true where for aesthetic reasons you want more or less light than the camera can capture and use your exposure time to control the actual number of photons hitting each pixel site.

So, apart from the observable obvious, digital enhancement usually sucks, which can be explained other ways than a term as nebulous as "ISO invariance" I'm not seeing any useful application for this knowledge. It's like someone invented a topic for no apparent reason.

I find it interesting that you would imply if I did the work, I would think what you think. Well, I've done the work , many times on many images, and i don't think what you think. And the link you posted is neither peer reviewed nor technically relevant in all of it's information. I'd compare it to a guy quoting a bunch of accepted knowledge and trying to sneak a new concept into it, without doing the work he needed to do to prove his point. Especially since he says in his opening, it doesn't exist and provides no examples to show why he says that, even though if included, that would be the most valuable part of the article.

I'm a great fan of science, pop science like this, not so much.
My objection is not that it's not a thing, my objection is that, it's a worthless thing.

Relevant to the the notion of ISO invariance when you use 400 ISO you use a 4 time less light hitting the sensor than you would at 100 ISO. IN a simple system that will cost you two stops of dynamic range. Claiming ISO invariance is to claim that this does not effect not he final image, noise etc.

Nonsense.

Very interesting topic though. As long as you remember, Low ISO means more light hits the sensor, less ISO means less light hits the sensor, and that you can have too much or too little light hitting the sensor for the image you are trying to create, so you understand the limitations of Invariance, it could be useful for some people, I'm just having trouble thinking of who it might be and for what application.

The fundamentals, expose properly, use the lowest possible ISO, use high ISO to shorten shutter speed, not increase IQ, and as far as i can tell, Invariance makes little difference to what you need to think about.
Forum: Troubleshooting and Beginner Help 12-30-2017, 01:18 PM  
Auto EV Compensation
Posted By Unregistered User 8
Replies: 11
Views: 1,097
Hi Hidrieus, I did a little " digging " and found this, I hope it answers some of your questions. Good luck in 2018. :)


Auto ev compensation
Forum: Welcomes and Introductions 10-11-2017, 01:37 PM  
Largest exhibition-quality prints from a K10D
Posted By ChristianRock
Replies: 12
Views: 1,130
It depends on who you ask... personally I'd have no issues with printing 20x30 from my K10D because I've had very good results from a 7.2MP camera :eek:

This site says 10MP+ gets the highest quality rating for 20x30 prints. Costco recommended is 8+MP. But then others like Dry Creek Photo, say that 9000x6000 is the minimum recommended for 20"x30". That's 54MP. So for them, even the 645Z isn't good enough for 20x30. :eek:

It just proves that whatever you think, you can probably find someone on the internet that agrees with you :lol:

Regarding keeping the K10D, I'm happy with mine, I am happiest with it than with any other camera I've shot with at ISO 100. But I also added a more modern entry level camera as a backup and for low light/better AF situations. First I had a K-r which I bought and sold for the same price (150 dollars). I was mostly happy with the K-r but last year I got a used K-S1 for 240 dollars, for better AF and a better viewfinder. So for the price of a lens, you can have a backup body which considering how old the K10D is getting, is probably a smart move. It doesn't have to be a K-3, there's plenty of Pentax bodies 16MP and over that would work very well for a backup to the fantastic K10D :) And who knows, you might end up liking the new camera better and then the K10D becomes the backup... for those of us on a budget, I think that's a very workable solution. For those with a large budget, they can just get a K-1 :lol:
Forum: Post-Processing Articles 09-18-2017, 12:47 AM  
Get "that CCD look" with the K-3 / K-3II and Lightroom
Posted By Dartmoor Dave
Replies: 119
Views: 34,195
As I got to the end of the Lightroom trial version that I'd used to try out the CCD preset, I decided that I didn't want to use Lightroom anymore but I did want to keep using the preset. So I converted the preset to a camera profile for use in Photoshop as follows:

Open a completely untouched DNG in the Lightroom trial version and apply Mike's CCD preset. Don't make any adjustments other than that. Then in the "Export" section of Lightroom, use "Export With Preset" to create a copy of the original DNG with the CCD preset adjustments embedded in it.

Now run the free Adobe Profile Editor and open the new DNG that you created. Under the "Options" menu, click on "Apply Camera Raw Adjustments" to bring the embedded CCD preset into effect. Then under the "File" menu use "Export Profile" to create a new camera profile with the CCD preset included. Give it whatever name works best for you. It's also worthwhile using the File / Save Recipe option so that you can easily tweak the adjustments in future if you want to.

Now, when you open Camera Raw, you will have the profile to apply the CCD preset available under the usual profiles drop-down.

There is another easier method for those using later versions of Camera Raw that can be found using Google. But for those like me, who are happy sticking with an older version of Photoshop rather than feeding Adobe's voracious maw, the above method will work.
Forum: Post-Processing Articles 08-09-2017, 01:03 PM  
Get "that CCD look" with the K-3 / K-3II and Lightroom
Posted By BigMackCam
Replies: 119
Views: 34,195
UPDATE: The following article has been revised to reflect newly-optimised Lightroom settings and example images. For a limited time, you can also download the CCD Effect preset for Lightroom HERE.


Get "that CCD look" with the K-3 / K-3II and Lightroom

Many people feel that the colour rendition from Pentax's earlier CCD sensor cameras is superior to that of later CMOS sensor models. Although the K-3 and K-3II are my day-to-day cameras, more recently I've been shooting extensively with a GX-10 - Samsung's clone of the Pentax K10D - and I've become a huge fan. Whether it's down to the sensor, the camera's colour profiling or a combination of the two, I really can't say for sure; but, the results are very appealing - punchy, saturated, almost film-like images, with very little post-processing needed to achieve great-looking results.

So fond am I of the GX-10's output that I decided to develop a Lightroom preset that would re-create "that CCD look" for my K-3 and K-3II photos.

I started by taking two photographs of an X-rite ColorChecker Passport, one with the GX-10, the other with the K-3. Both cameras were fitted with the same model of lens (the Pentax-F 28-80 f/3.5-4.5), to avoid optical differences in contrast and colour reproduction. The photos were taken in RAW format using the DNG file type (which, importantly, embeds a copy of the camera profile).

I imported both photos into Lightroom 6 and ensured all settings were at Lightroom's default values, with no presets or user defaults applied. I then selected the "Embedded" profile for each photo (to use the camera profiles rather than Adobe's), and set the white balance for both images using the eye-dropper tool on the same mid-grey square of the Passport.

From this point, all adjustments would be to the K-3 image alone, trying to match against the GX-10 "master" image as closely as possible.

I fine-tuned the exposure level so that the mid-grey tones were at the same luminosity for both photos (within +/- 0.5, as there was some variance of values across the square).

I adjusted the contrast so that the "darkest black" and "brightest white" squares had the same luminosity. This required some minor tweaking of exposure to keep the mid-tones at the right level, as contrast adjustments appeared to have a non-linear effect on the tone curve. Now, each of the grey-scale squares showed luminosity values very close to those in the GX-10 image.

The remaining adjustments would deal with colour reproduction - specifically hue, saturation and luminosity for each colour.

In the Camera Calibration section of Lightroom, I adjusted the hue and saturation of the Red Primary, Green Primary and Blue Primary channels to get those primary colours as close as possible. Since there is no luminosity adjustment for these, it's impossible to get them exactly right - but we can place them in the ball park.

At this point, a casual comparison of the colours in both images was already much closer than before.

Next came the really time-consuming part...

In the Color section of Lightroom, I adjusted (and re-adjusted!) the hue, saturation and luminosity of each colour to achieve a close match for each coloured square in turn. As you'd expect, adjustments for each colour had a knock-on effect to one or more of the others, and there was a great deal of back-and-forth fine-tuning required. Small, incremental adjustments were vital to avoid significant impact on related colours, which had to be tweaked to counteract any minor changes.

I was unable to get every coloured square matching exactly, but it was very close.

I saved the adjustments as a user preset, checking the Contrast, Color Adjustments, Process Version and Calibration boxes to ensure all the relevant settings were saved.

Then, on a sunny day with no clouds (rare in my part of the world!), I took some test shots of real scenes side-by-side with both cameras, and tried out the new preset on the K-3 files. The results were good, though not quite as good as I'd hoped - in particular, the green and yellow balance wasn't quite right, and the saturation and luminosity of light-blue skies wasn't what it should be. So, I went back to the ColorChecker Passport images and fine-tuned the adjustments before re-applying them to the test shots. After many iterations over several days, I eventually reached a point of diminishing returns; the results were so close that further tweaking would have little additional benefit and more than likely be detrimental.

Here's a "before" and "after" example of the preset being applied to an indoor test shot of some coloured pencils:


What's interesting about this example is how little difference there is in the greens, as vivid greens are something the CCD sensor cameras are revered for. From my testing in normal shooting conditions, it seems this is largely due to luminosity and saturation of yellow and orange rather than a radical difference in green tones.

It's worth studying that example image in detail. At a glance, you'd be forgiven for thinking the adjusted image is merely brighter, with a little more contrast. But if you look at each pencil individually, you'll see some quite significant changes in hue, saturation and luminosity, while the white, black and grey shades are (as they should be) nearly identical in both shots :)

Since completing this exercise, I've applied the preset to a number of K-3, K-3II, and even some K-5 images from my Lightroom library. The outcome is just what I'd hoped for... the photos have more of "that CCD look" I've come to appreciate so much. Greens and browns are warmer (great for landscape work), blues are richer, light-blue skies are somewhat deeper and better defined against clouds, yellows and oranges are brighter, while reds are a real treat - more orange than scarlet and not so over-saturated.

Of course, no preset or any amount of post-processing can re-create the fun of using a particular camera. For those who've never owned one of Pentax's CCD-sensor models (or their Samsung cousins), I highly recommend picking one up at the right price, since - at lower ISO settings - they produce wonderful images. I'll continue to use my GX-10 regularly, as it's a great bit of kit - but these adjustments provide a solid basis for reproducing at least some of that signature CCD look with the K-3 and other Pentax CMOS sensor cameras.

For those who'd like to try this out, here are some screen captures of the relevant settings (remember to save them as a preset so you can apply them all in one go!). And, if you do try it, please let me know how you get on! :)






... and, just to finish, here's one more test shot from the K-3, taken in my back garden, with the CCD preset applied (and no other adjustments, save for exposure and white balance sampled from a known grey area). It certainly has the warmth and saturation I was hoping for :D


Thanks for reading!
Forum: Pentax SLR Lens Discussion 08-30-2017, 07:23 PM  
How does stopping down the lens move the focus point forward/backward?
Posted By ScooterMaxi Jim
Replies: 6
Views: 1,454
It seems that the fast 85s are the Nirvana of challenging focus shift experience, but all lenses have some form of focus shift (no matter how minor). The main criticism of the Zeiss Planar, Nikon, and even the lowly Samyang 85 designs are entirely consistent - focus shift is a factor requiring (minor) compensation. Work within the limitation. Stop down to focus precisely accordingly. Use live view magnification for precision stopped down focusing for exacting results, and understand that a very limited range of apertures have a meaningful impact. From f/4 and beyond on a crop sensor (f/5.6 for FF), the DoF eliminates the need for absolute precision related to focus shift.
Forum: Pentax SLR Lens Discussion 08-29-2017, 05:05 PM  
How does stopping down the lens move the focus point forward/backward?
Posted By MarkJerling
Replies: 6
Views: 1,454
What you're experiencing is called "Focus shift" and is a result of spherical aberration in the lens elements.

Here's a diagram that attempts to explain what happens when your stop down:



Here's some threads where the issue is discussed:
https://www.pentaxforums.com/forums/58-troubleshooting-beginner-help/202565-focus-shift.html
https://www.pentaxforums.com/forums/10-pentax-slr-lens-discussion/176200-foc...st-lenses.html
https://www.pentaxforums.com/forums/10-pentax-slr-lens-discussion/133222-ape...cus-shift.html
Forum: Pentax News and Rumors 08-11-2017, 08:42 AM  
DFA*50 1.4 coming
Posted By mee
Replies: 3,156
Views: 353,117
Perhaps. Yet I've seen photographers with rather detestable attitudes create fantastic work esp when it comes to landscape, nature, and architecture work. Artists can be an interesting bunch. I guess one wouldn't want someone angry as their portrait or wedding photog though...


Some people just don't feel the need to share their work on a discussion forum though. Be it because they are confident in their work and skill (don't need the empty kudos), value their privacy, or just don't see the value in sharing their work on such a medium. There are lots of reasons for that.. more than just those three... and not just because they may or may not have a 'good' attitude.


:lol:
Forum: Pentax DSLR Discussion 05-25-2017, 05:01 AM  
Metering problem with uncoupled lenses
Posted By Dartmoor Dave
Replies: 11
Views: 1,179
The inaccuracy of stop-down metering with M42 lenses on DSLRs is caused by the focusing screen. The camera's built-in meter reads the amount of light hitting the screen, but the focusing screens used in modern DSLRs don't have linear light transmission as you stop down. There's no reason why they should, since they are designed only with open aperture metering in mind. A bright viewfinder image with the lens wide open is considered much more important than accurate stop-down metering, because stop-down metering is not how a DSLR is intended to work.

So metering inaccuracy is inevitable with M42 lenses on a DSLR. Many people use the camera's built-in meter and apply exposure compensation, but personally I use a combination of Sunny 16 and an incident meter.
Forum: Troubleshooting and Beginner Help 01-25-2017, 01:52 PM  
Problem with ME Super
Posted By NZ_Ross
Replies: 3
Views: 854
The winding on problem is a well known one for the ME Super. Here is a














You Tube



video on the issue and how to repair.

My ME Super has the same issue.
Forum: Visitors' Center 08-31-2015, 03:53 AM  
DSLR virus
Posted By interested_observer
Replies: 5
Views: 1,484
Several items are in play here. First of all I doubt that your camera is infected for several reasons.
  • To infect a camera, the virus would need to re-flash the program storage of the camera (as the Nikon software does when a new program comes out from Nikon). Next the virus would need to be able to run on the specific type of computer chip in the camera - usually an Arm/DSP (digital signal processor) chip. A virus designed to run on a PC will not be able to do this.

  • The USB interface to the camera is another matter. When you connect the camera, the camera appears to be a new device to the PC. The PC needs a driver installed in order to communicate with the camera. If you had connected the camera to the PC before - the PC probably lost the driver or it's corrupted. If this is the first time you connected the two, the PC does not have the driver installed.

  • The SD card that was previously infected. If it was cleaned its is ok. The real danger is that the PC was not fully cleaned, or that perhaps you used the SD card in another infected computer and it re-infected your PC. It is possible for a virus to survive on an SD card that was reformatted. Essentially it carves out an area on the card that is not subject to being reformatted. This is fairly new and I doubt that it is the case.

Your main concern is the PC, and to some extent the sd card. The camera is the least of your concerns.

:cool:
Forum: Pentax News and Rumors 05-13-2015, 11:11 AM  
B&H ad plugs k-3II
Posted By Na Horuk
Replies: 42
Views: 7,827
I just saw a short K-3II review in a German photo magazine. Here it will be released at 999euro, which is a good introductory price! Seems like a great camera at a great price, will be difficult to resist :D I think even Canikon and Sony users will have to admit that

I am surprised so many people are confused about the pixel shift technology, whining that the camera has to be on tripod, subject has to be still, and that SR cannot be used at the same time. Well, duh! Its just like HDR, only instead of dynamic range, it is resolution. Things have to be still for that. And if things have to be still, then SR is pointless anyway. Its a special function that is used for special purposes, not for your everyday photos. You can use SR for low light handheld stuff and pixel-shift for product photos, still life, maybe even abstract photography and landscapes, or you can use HDR bracketing - depending on what your needs are. But people immediately start whining that they cannot use all of those modes at the same time for every snapshot they take... Im surprised nobody whines that the astrotracer doesn't capture stars when you shoot in broad daylight...
Forum: Troubleshooting and Beginner Help 05-07-2015, 05:29 PM  
Solved - What setting am I missing? (Images in PS CC look grainy, but are not)
Posted By Sagitta
Replies: 5
Views: 3,200
^^^

It was the auto-sharpening applied in the PS options.
Forum: Homepage & Official Pentax News 02-04-2015, 03:06 PM  
Pentax Full Frame DSLR Officially Announced!
Posted By goodnight
Replies: 61
Views: 7,652
FULL FRAME?!
Forum: Pentax DSLR Discussion 01-21-2015, 12:10 PM  
Katz-Eye vs. Stock Screen vs. Focusingscreens.com
Posted By romay
Replies: 26
Views: 4,201
I had both. First I used a Katzeye on my K-5, then I switched to ee-S, then back to Katzeye. My K-3 now also has a Katzeye.

I didn't like the ee-S so much since I found the split prism to be much more accurate.

Yes, metering is less consistent, but that's only a problem if you shoot JPG (I never do that).
After a few days, you know by instinct how to compensate for exposure.

The split prism/micropsirm combo with rule of thirds grid and circle is perfect for composition. I can't see how this could ever impair me, in fact, my composition became better with the KatzEye.
I use it together with the O-ME53 viewfinder and I can focus spot-on with my 1.4 lenses through the viewfinder.
As for the problem with using slow manual glass with a KatzEye: don't do that. You bought the thing to focus fast lenses spot on. Slow manual lenses are not a usecase for split-prisms.

You won't need opti-brite, it's not worth the extra money.

Most importantly;
* Make sure to shim the screen correctly.
* Seriously, make sure you put the correct shim
* Double and triple check for focus accuracy with your fastest and longest lens. Don't be afraid to try out many shims

Installing the focus screen needs a dust-free environment. Go to your bathroom, turn on the shower so it washes all the dust out of the air.
Use gloves. Never ever touch the screen with your bare fingers.
Use pliers to extract the old screen. Don't scratch the screen. Every scratch will be prominently visible in your viewfinder.
If you find dust, use a blower. In very severe cases, use isopropyl alcohol and optical paper.
Use your thickest shim, insert new screen, do a focus check.
If you're not spot on, rinse and repeat with the next smaller shim.

Once you have the correct shim, it's a joy to focus manually. Actually, MF with split-prism can be more accurate than AF with some very fast lenses. You also notice easily when the AF missed - if you have quickshift, you can correct focus in the last split-second, which is cool.
Forum: Pentax SLR Lens Discussion 01-07-2015, 03:14 AM  
Sigma 17-70 "Contemporary": compatibility problems with Shake Reduction
Posted By sTi
Replies: 151
Views: 26,517
I recently bought a Sigma 17-70 C and took lots of pictures with my K-5 II to decide whether I received a good copy that is worth keeping. The good news is that the lens delivered very nice image quality, AF was always spot on at all focal lenghts (I took my test shots at 17, 21, 31 and 70mm) and there was no sign of decentering or other optical or mechanical problems. However, I discovered a compatibility problem with Pentax’s Shake Reduction (SR) function that, much to my regret, left me no choice but to return this otherwise nice lens. Please read on...

The Problem:
It took me a while to figure this out - I first noticed that some shots at 17 and 21mm were not sharp. I first suspected optical problems, but further tests proved that the lens is generally very sharp there as well. If there, the unsharpness looked like it was caused by camera shake. What I failed to understand was how it was possible to have so much blurred pictures at 17 and 21mm while none taken at 31 and 70mm, even shot with the same shutter speed, showed any sign of it. Weird…
To provoke the issue I took a series of pictures at shutter speeds where SR really matters, e.g. 1/13 or 1/10 seconds at 17mm. Result: About 9 out of 10 images showed camera shake, some of them quite pronounced.
It looked like this (100% crop): http://i.imgur.com/m5CoJ03.jpg

Now it’s getting interesting! A cross-test with my DA 18-135 (@18) and DA 15 (also at 1/13 or 1/10 seconds) showed the opposite behaviour: 9 out of 10 images were pin-sharp, only 1 showed slight signs of camera shake. Back to the 17-70, this time with SR deactivated: Only about 5 out of 10 images were blurred, and to a lesser extent than with SR activated. This led me to the conclusion that somehow SR is actually making things worse at short focal lengths. But why is SR malfunctioning here? To find out, I took a closer look at the metadata of the images created by the lens.

To function correctly, Pentax’s SR needs to know the actual focal length of the lens. Reason: the longer the focal length, the bigger the countermovement of the sensor needs to be for a given amount of camera shake. Please note we’re dealing with two values here:

1. The “normal” focal length information that can be read with almost any image editor from the EXIF data.
2. The focal length used for the SR mechanism (this is found in the so-called “manufacturer notes” metadata).

Most of the time 1. and 2. will be identical, but a different value in 2. is needed e.g. for lenses with internal focusing whose actual focal length changes with focus distance. The SR mechanism always uses the 2. value.

Now the problem: The “normal” focal length information is transmitted by the 17-70 to the camera without issues, but the “SR focal length” is plain wrong at the short end. This can clearly be seen in the metadata, where “focal length” is always correct but “SR focal length” is wrong at shorter focal lengths (I tested 17 and 21mm; from 31mm upwards it seemed OK). See for yourself the metadata of three shots at 17 or 21 mm: http://imgur.com/a/EFjUt

While “normal” focal length is correctly reported as 17mm or 21mm for all, “SR focal length” can be any value from 31mm to 70mm(!). This obviously leads to a malfunctioning of the SR mechanism, which overcorrects the camera shake and thus blurs the image.
At longer focal lengths (31mm and above) both focal length values are identical in the metadata and SR seems to work correctly.

My guess is that Sigma forgot to ensure that this value is transmitted correctly. You have to remember that they do not officially licence the K-mount and rely on reverse-engeneering the communication protocols between lens and camera. It’s easy to forget a seemingly harmless value in the manufacturer notes. However, in this case it causes real damage and makes SR useless at shorter focal lengths. Even worse, it actually amplifies the camera shake (SA - Shake Amplification :eek:) and leaves the user no option but to disable SR at these focal lengths.

By the way, you can also see the weird SR behaviour in action during Live View: The image seems somewhat “jerky” and panning movements look really strange at the short end. If you zoom beyond 28mm or so the behaviour goes back to normal.

I strongly suspect this is a general issue with all copies of this lens and probably affects all Pentax camera bodies with SR. Unfortunately, all the images I found on the web from other Pentax users of this lens had most of their metadata stripped (Adobe products regularly do this) and no longer contained the manufacturer notes which show the “SR focal length” value. So to confirm the issue it would be great if owners of the lens could test their copy in the 17-21mm range to find out if this issue applies to all copies of the lens (and to all cameras). You can check the “SR focal length” value (both for JPG and Raw files) with programs like PhotoMe, or just upload them somewhere and I can check for you. Thanks!

Possible Solutions/Workarounds:
For now, the only option is to deactivate SR at shorter focal lengths because it does not reduce but actually amplifies camera shake. This won’t cause motion blur at shorter shutter speeds like 1/100 or above (where you wouldn’t need SR anyway :hmm:), but at speeds where SR matters it will actually work against you...

The Next Steps:
I guess the only party that can truly solve this problem is Sigma. Hopefully it is fixable with a firmware update of the lens. But I fear this will probably be regarded as a minor issue (I disagree!) that only applies to their least important supported camera mount.
As soon as others confirm the problem with their copies of the lens, I will notify my local Sigma representatives (Sigma Germany) of this issue and point them to this thread, and I encourage you to do the same in your part of the world. Maybe then we’ll have a chance that Sigma HQ takes notice of this problem and will try to fix it.

I will update this thread if I receive any news from Sigma regarding this problem.

Please note that I cannot do any further tests with this lens as I returned my copy to the seller. I will happily buy a copy again as soon as Sigma resolves this problem, because otherwise I really liked the lens.

-----------------
UPDATE:
Believe it or not, Sigma has already addressed this issue and published a firmware update that is supposed to fix the SR misbehavior. Kudos to Sigma for this quick reaction and for caring about their customers!
Further Information: https://www.pentaxforums.com/articles/pentax-related-news/sigma-addresses-17-...ion-issue.html
Forum: Pentax DSLR Discussion 09-09-2008, 09:06 PM  
Debug menu for *ist DS v2.01+
Posted By frank
Replies: 6
Views: 6,323
Here you go:

1. Power OFF
While pressing [AE-L]+[INFO], turn the camera on.
Firmware is desplayed on LCD.
Press [MENU]->[MENU]->[INFO] within 5 seconds.
You can see DEBUG mode screen.
Press [MENU] to bring up the menu
By pressing [Right key],Make [DEBUG MODE DIS] to [DEBUG MODE EN].
Then, Press [OK].
2. Press [MENU], then get to the Setup menu.
By pressing [Up key], select AF TEST.
By pressing [Right key], go into AF TEST menu.
By pressing [Down key], select FOCUS CORR.
now you can adjust shift amount by pressing [right key] or [left key].
(*Don't touch AF Area Test.)
Add value for back focusing, minus for front focusing
after changing the value, Press [OK] to save.
3. Test your camera that Focus is corrected.
(repeat step 2. till you are satisfied w/ the result.)

RETURN TO NORMAL MODE:
4. Power OFF
While pressing [AE-L]+[INFO], turn the camera on.
Firmware is desplayed on LCD.
Press [MENU]->[MENU]->[INFO] within 5 seconds.
You can see DEBUG mode screen.
Press [MENU] to bring up the menu
By pressing [Right key],Make [DEBUG MODE EN] to [DEBUG MODE DIS].
Then, Press [OK].

It shoud work ;)


I guess I've been getting in and out of debug mode so frequently, I can change an AF value in a matter of seconds (on Ds, DL, K100D) :D
Forum: Film SLRs and Compact Film Cameras 01-21-2014, 03:08 PM  
The goofiest winder ever? ME Winder II
Posted By hks_kansei
Replies: 12
Views: 2,577
This sounds normal, my one sounds the same and works fine.
it IS actually flipping the mirror then winding, but it does it so quickly it's hard to hear the change.





It's possible that the mechanism that links with the winder wasn't located correctly and was slipping.
If you press the winder button without a camera attached it just winds endlessly, it may have been slipping before finally catching and winding the film on.

Double check it's attached solidly, and flat.
Search took 0.00 seconds | Showing results 1 to 25 of 49

 
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 05:26 AM. | See also: NikonForums.com, CanonForums.com part of our network of photo forums!
  • Red (Default)
  • Green
  • Gray
  • Dark
  • Dark Yellow
  • Dark Blue
  • Old Red
  • Old Green
  • Old Gray
  • Dial-Up Style
Hello! It's great to see you back on the forum! Have you considered joining the community?
register
Creating a FREE ACCOUNT takes under a minute, removes ads, and lets you post! [Dismiss]
Top