Forgot Password
Pentax Camera Forums Home
 
Log in or register to remove ads.

Showing results 1 to 25 of 82 Search: Liked Posts
Forum: Pentax DSLR Discussion 05-31-2016, 04:31 PM  
A trip down memory lane with Pentax and a few others...
Posted By PALADIN85020
Replies: 7
Views: 1,871
I was musing today how far I’ve come in photography since I first started taking pictures.

Interestingly, I was able to find some photos of the various cameras I’ve owned over the years, and arrange them in chronological order. In a way, this exercise down memory lane in reality has traced the history of photography to a large extent, from about 1949 to the present.

First, here’s a picture of me taken about 1949 with my very first camera. It was a real beauty; the famous Donald Duck Camera. Please excuse the fuzziness of the photo – my dad was then using a 1930s-vintage fold-out bellows Kodak.



Here’s some modern-day pictures, taken by others of that camera in some detail.



It used roll film, had a fixed lens, and you advanced the film until a new number showed in a round red-screened hole in the back of the camera.



In doing some research, I discovered that this little camera could be obtained from Sears, Roebuck from 1946 on for the grand sum of $2.98! Here’s an ad from that era:



Well, I used that camera for a while, but I was starting to get a lotta laughs from a lotta folks whenever I proudly showed it off. By 1953, I had become the owner of a REAL camera, a genuine Ansco Shur Shot box camera. To use, you held it against your belly for stability, framed your shot in a little window (there were 2, one for horizontal and one for vertical), and gently pressed the red shutter lever. The lens was fixed, as was the exposure. No control other than you had to have some daylight to take a picture.



Well, that camera served me for 5 or six years. It was my mainstay in high school, and I took lots of shots of my high school sweetheart with it. I had picked her out of the herd pretty early, and eventually she asked me to marry her!

My dad had been using an old Bolsey 35mm camera by that time, and then when he acquired a deluxe Leica IIIF for serious work, he let me use it. The Bolsey line was very active, as the founder, formerly from Russia, made cameras for our armed services. Here’s a picture of the B2 model that could use a flash unit. Everything was manual, but you could adjust the focus, the exposure time, and the aperture. Armed with that and a cheap exposure meter, I was in business with a much more sophisticated camera. I started to use it while in college.



Just for reference, here is picture of my dad’s Leica. He occasionally let me use it – it was state of the art in the mid- to late 1950s. It had 3 interchangeable lenses, a “wide angle” 35mm, a standard 50mm, and a “telephoto” 135mm. It had a gizmo on the top that you could aim it with. It was adjustable for parallax and for the specific lens used. Leica lenses were then renowned for clarity – and they still are today. When my dad passed in 1987, I inherited this camera and had it refurbished, as the silk screen shutter had developed some holes.




As a point of information, here’s something about the Leica company in Germany that you might not have known:


Well, that old Bolsey served me fairly well until the mid-1980s. I felt somewhat handicapped in that I didn’t have a single-lens reflex camera that allowed you to frame the picture through the camera’s lens. At K-Mart one day, they had a sale on the Pentax K1000. It wasn’t fancy, but it had interchangeable lens capability, and a built in “match the needle” light meter. It was manual everything, including focus, but it worked splendidly. It was my mainstay camera for years, and I really got serious about photography with it.



Around 2005, a revolution was taking place. Digital photography. I was a bit hesitant to take the jump, but I decided to buy an inexpensive Kodak point-and-shoot to experience this new technology in 2005. This was the Kodak CX6445 Zoom. It was capable of all of 4 megapixels (whatever they were). It produced .JPG-format photos and you could save them on a memory card. Initially, to process them into actual hold-in-your-hand photos, I took the memory card to the drug store and let them process them and put them on a compact disk for storage. I no longer have this camera, but here’s a picture of it, taken off the internet:



I soon discovered that I could process the images on my own computer with the proper software, and I really missed having a more sophisticated single lens reflex camera. That’s when my love affair with Pentax started – they were offering a relatively inexpensive digital SLR in 2007 that gave me a 50% jump in megapixels – six of them! Boy, I bought it in a flash – it was a return to the control of the old K-1000, but with the ease of digital technology. It came equipped with an 18-55mm zoom lens. Automatic focus, and either automatic or full manual control. Here is the K100D:



All things bear improvement, and Pentax came up with a new one in 2009. TWELVE megapixels, and faster everything. The lenses I had for all my older Pentax cameras would fit and work – why not? Enter the K200D. I gave my K100D to a granddaughter who was getting interested in photography, and it’s served her well. My 200D became my new workhorse as I retired and became a freelance writer/photographer. Here it is:



Technology marches on. In August of 2011, my wife and I celebrated our 50th wedding anniversary with a two-week trip to Hawaii. The new Pentax K-5 had just come on stream, with an amazing 16 megapixels – It had features I was itching to use on the trip, and believe me, I think I photographed everything in Hawaii with it. I had a new 18-135 zoom lens that was moisture resistant, as was the camera. Perfect for Hawaii, and I did not have to change lenses for the whole trip. Marvelous. The K-5 was indeed state-of-the-art in 2011, and I reveled in using it.



In 2013, Pentax introduced the 24 megapixel K-3, which became the new company flagship. It was a dream, and enabled me to do things photographically I could never do before. The older K-5 quickly became my backup camera. Here’s the K-3, with so many features I can’t address them here without writing a book.



So now I’m completely happy with my equipment. The K-3 and seven lenses to accomplish everything I could imagine photographically.

But Pentax has just introduced the K-1 full-frame digital SLR as its new flagship – it has 36 megapixels! Think of the HUGE pictures I could generate with that…

Ah well. I think I’ll take a breather before I take that jump. It’s been fun to review all the cameras I’ve used over the years, from Donald Duck to hell-for-leather Pentax digital SLRs.

John

http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/artists/paladin
Forum: Lens Clubs 04-05-2016, 01:24 AM  
The 15mm Limited controls my mind - club
Posted By therion
Replies: 12,402
Views: 2,288,128
Greetings from High Tatras National Park Slovakia !!!



Pentax K-3, smc Pentax 15/4 Limited


Pentax K-3, smc Pentax 15/4 Limited


Pentax K-3, smc Pentax 15/4 Limited


Pentax K-3, smc Pentax 15/4 Limited


Pentax K-3, smc Pentax 15/4 Limited


Pentax K-3, smc Pentax 15/4 Limited


Pentax K-3, smc Pentax 15/4 Limited


Pentax K-3, smc Pentax 15/4 Limited


Pentax K-3, smc Pentax 15/4 Limited


Pentax K-3, smc Pentax 15/4 Limited


Pentax K-3, smc Pentax 15/4 Limited
Forum: Pentax News and Rumors 03-18-2016, 03:24 AM  
Pentax K-1 Officially Announced
Posted By ffking
Replies: 1,581
Views: 215,669
I think one has to put in a word of caution here - I think people do actually understand this, but it's worth stating all the same: the K-1 wasn't made to compete with anybody - it was, as far as I can judge, made to give the best thought out FF High-IQ rather than specialist sports/action camera that they could produce at a price which would appeal to enough people. They knew here was enough pent up demand in the Pentax community to justify the project and that's where they focussed it. Other manufacturers, retailers, magazines might for their various reasons feel threatened or pit it against other offerings, but I honestly don't think that competition was in the minds on the designers to any greater extent than noting what others were offering and trying not to be wanting in those areas.
Forum: Pentax News and Rumors 03-14-2016, 01:53 PM  
Da* 70-200 is shipping in canada!
Posted By shardulm
Replies: 150
Views: 21,390
Stunning indeed. .. but my 50-135 will stay. There is no lens like this out there in the market by any manufacture that performs like a 70-200 but weighs like an 18-55.
This D-FA*70-200 is the only * optics in their FF stable and is pretty much guaranteed to perform like their other * optics.
But there is nothing like 50-135 out there given its weight, WR and IQ. period.
Forum: Pentax Medium Format 11-24-2015, 03:32 AM  
Post your medium format photos!
Posted By sculptormic
Replies: 20,443
Views: 3,162,924
© Michiel Schierbeek 2015, Berck, France

Forum: Lens Clubs 10-22-2015, 03:43 AM  
HD Pentax-D FA 24-70mm F2.8 Club
Posted By Rondec
Replies: 1,279
Views: 211,730
I thought I would go ahead and make a dedicated thread with some photos from this new lens. I hope others feel free to add their own photos as well as they get their copies. I'll just say up front that I am not a professional and not a great lens tester. Photos will probably not be perfect, but hopefully they are good enough to show a little bit of the features of the new lens.

I guess a few comments about the build. It is a big lens -- bigger than the 16-50 f2.8, which is pretty good sized in my book. Of course, it is an f2.8 lens that covers a full frame image circle. Not surprising, but it isn't a small lens. Auto focus is silent and feels fast. I know Pentax listed this as an "SDM" lens, but it feels faster than the SDM lenses I own (16-50, 50-135, 55, 200) and it seems to lock focus quickly on a K3. The zoom ring is in front of the focus ring which is something that I am not used to and took a little bit of adjustment. I did not do any manual focusing, so no comments really on that aspect of the lens.

This is my son at 70mm and f2.8 -- normally I'd crop this a little bit, but I thought I would leave it as originally shot so folks can see the whole frame.

Vince by Vincent1825, on Flickr

70mm and f4

Vince by Vincent1825, on Flickr

A few shots that look a bokeh.

70mm f4

Bokeh Test by Vincent1825, on Flickr

70mm f2.8

Bokeh Test by Vincent1825, on Flickr

70mm f2.8

Maple Leaf by Vincent1825, on Flickr

A couple of landscape shots.

24mm f4

Country Road by Vincent1825, on Flickr

63mm f8

Sunset by Vincent1825, on Flickr

A couple of shots looking at flare. I would say it is better than the 16-50 when it comes to flare (not hard to be better than that lens), but not nearly as good as Pentax primes (also not unexpected). I would normally have fixed the flare in these photos, but I left for the purposes of showing what it looks like.

24mm f2.8

Vince and Elliot by Vincent1825, on Flickr

24mm f4

Sunset by Vincent1825, on Flickr

I hope these photos are helpful and again, I apologize if the photos weren't perfect, focus points weren't right, etc.

Edit: I will mention that I did make a review in the Pentax Forums' review section and have a lot of images there from both the K3 and K-1. Several members have PMed me as well and I am glad to answer any questions that I can with regard to its performance versus other lenses that I have used.
Forum: Lens Clubs 04-28-2015, 01:02 PM  
DA Limited Zoom Club
Posted By voy-tech
Replies: 1,029
Views: 231,647
Few shots from last weekend, when I was showing some friends who recently moved to Portland area what they can find in their "backyard"

Elowah Falls:


Latourell Falls:
Forum: Pentax News and Rumors 04-23-2015, 07:27 AM  
K-3II to be announced soon
Posted By JimC1101
Replies: 797
Views: 94,625
Well, at least Pentax solved the problem of the flash sync speed of only being 1/180. It is now 0. :)
Forum: General Photography 02-17-2015, 02:45 PM  
Is photography only for the rich.?
Posted By mikeSF
Replies: 165
Views: 12,303
no matter what you start with, photography can quickly make you poor.
Forum: Pentax Medium Format 03-31-2015, 08:31 AM  
Post your medium format photos!
Posted By Dominia
Replies: 20,443
Views: 3,162,924
645D + Pentax 645 DFA 55/2.8

somewhere far away in Siberia






Forum: Canon, Nikon, Sony, and Other Camera Brands 03-01-2015, 02:06 AM  
Post your Sony RX100 Pictures Here
Posted By mark lj
Replies: 436
Views: 85,036
Dog walking pic from the other morning



Farming in Martindale by Mark Littlejohn, on Flickr
Forum: Pentax K-5 & K-5 II 02-26-2015, 04:56 AM  
Report from a Pentax photojournalist
Posted By Zelig
Replies: 34
Views: 5,443
Hi, I'm a photojournalist from Portugal and I've always used Pentax cameras in my work. Previously I've owned a K-5 and currently I'm using a K-5II, which I find it quite capable camera.

In my work I travel all over the country and in a small country like Portugal you quickly end up knowing all other photojournalists. In four years I've never came across any other photojournalist shooting Pentax. As you might guess they all use Canon or Nikon. More recently a friend of mine started to use two Fujifilm cameras and I also came across two guys using a Fuji and an Olympus as a second camera.

I can’t compare my camera with cameras from other brands because I've never used any other brand. But comparing the K5II with the K5 I would have to say that the K5II has a much better autofocus system. With the K5 I had a lot of problems with autofocus especially in low light, bright backgrounds and with certain types of artificial light sources. I was spending more time checking for accurate focus then in composing. All this ended with the K5II, a few days after starting using it all my worries were gone. I was finally shooting paying attention to the composition trusting that the camera was focusing accurately! Nowadays I simply assume that the out of focus photos have been my error not the camera.

I also have a K10 but I can’t actually compare it with the K5 or the K5II because I’ve never used it in my work, in other words, I've never used it the same extreme conditions.

Photojournalism is quite demanding when it comes to focusing, you need the camera to focus fast, accurately and in the most extreme lighting and physical conditions - most of the time you are being pushed, squeezed and bumped by other photographers, cameramen, reporters and the public and it’s hard to keep the camera still. Other times you are walking backwards and shooting at the same time or you are holding your camera up high with one hand using live view to shoot over the crowd.

Things I like about the K5II
(From the point of view of my work)
  • The autofocus, is accurate and fast enough for me. I must add that I don't do sports, many photojournalist that I know also do sports, mainly soccer, but I don't.

  • The size - I've small hands and the K5II body size is perfect for me - much better than the K10. This also allows me to use a relatively small shoulder bag with the camera, 3 lenses and one speedlight.

  • The weight, for obvious reasons. I should mention that main arguments the Fuji/Olympus users talk about is size and weight and the electronic viewfinder and its ability to see the exposure compensation in real-time. That’s really handy.

  • It’s only 16MP - for me this seems to be a good compromise between image quality, cropping capability, file size and computer processing times.

  • It’s silent.

Things that could be better
  • I desperately need cross type focusing points outside the central area. If the K3 had this I would have bought it. Probably 50% of my photos have the main subject outside the central area. What is going on around him, where he is or with whom he is its always extremely important. To be able to show it I have to move my main subject to the sides of the frame and I need focusing points there.

  • Writing speed to the SD card. I'm constantly reviewing what I shoot. I usually don't burst shoot more than 3 or 4 frames, but when I do I end up waiting for the camera to write it to the SD card before being able to review and shoot again. Not a frequent issue for me but sometimes under pressure it feels like an eternity. Browsing between photos it’s actually fast enough but using the directional keys is not always very practical when you go back and forward. The Canon wheel seems more practical but it also needs more space, more space means a bigger camera and I’m not interested in a bigger camera.

  • I like to choose the AF Point so I always shoot in the Focus Select mode. Once again the directional keys are not very practical or fast enough. With more than 11 AF Points something like a small joystick might make more sense.

  • One thing I miss from the K5 is the ability to compare photos side by side. If I remember correctly I didn't use it very often in my professional work but in my personal work or while traveling without a computer I used it a lot.

  • A brighter and bigger viewfinder is always welcome.

  • Another luxury feature I would like is a screen brightness automatic adjustment system like smartphones have. I frequently change from full bright daylight to indoor darkness. I've my screen adjusted for bright daylight but this setup makes underexposed indoor photos look correctly exposed.

  • And of course even better high ISO. Usable high ISO is never enough. I would no doubt frequently use 6400 or even 12800 ISO if it had enough quality.

Why I haven’t upgrade to the K3
Cameras are like viruses. If they find the proper environment to spread they will. For cameras the right environment is something I don’t have – money! So I’m immune to that virus. I obviously would like to upgrade to the K3 and the main reason I didn’t was money.

Another reason that made me stop was file size and what that implies in terms of storage capacity and computer processing times. Future experience might prove otherwise but right now I don’t really need more resolution. More resolution would (probably) only increase the cropping capability but I’m really close to the physical limit there. To crop even more I would also need lenses with more resolution. Right now my laptop is able to deal with the K5 files comfortably I’m not sure if that is still true with bigger files.

But the main reason for not upgrading were the AF Points. If the K-3 had cross type AF Points beyond the central area I would have bought it. Actually I would like to have AF Points in the extreme corners of the frame!

Future Pentax FF
It was with enormous joy that I received the announcement of the Pentax FF. We are still far from knowing the specification but this will be a camera that I will most certainly buy - but probably only after the first price drop.

And now some photos.



Angela Merkel, German Chancellor, with Pedro Passos Coelho, Portuguese Prime-Minister, during her visit to Portugal.


Pedro Passos Coelho, Portuguese Prime-Minister. I would like an AF Point where his eyes are.


Portuguese Prime-Minister arriving at a Conference in Tivoli Hotel in Lisbon. I enjoy these top views a lot. Here I wanted to frame the big circle on the pavement.


The bridge on the background is a Golden Gate Bridge look alike and is one of the architectonic symbols of Lisbon. I wanted to catch the bridge but I knew I would
be in trouble with the strong bright background. I took my chances and then photoshoped a lot. The photo has an HDR look which gives it a surreal look.


Mariano Rajoy, Spanish Prime-Minister, with the Portuguese PM during the XXV Portuguese-Spanish Summit.
I like these photos, like the one above with Angela Merkel, where you have the feeling that you’re intruding on a private conversation.


Them again, two years later, during the next Summit.


Boris Tadic, President of Servia, visit to Portugal. Not a very interesting photo but very fun to do. This is a handheld panorama of 4 or 5 frames.
Before the car with President Boris Tadic arrived I shoot the 5 frames of the panorama mentally taking note where the corner of each frame was.
When the car finally arrived and he stepped out I re-shoot the frames that I needed.


Portuguese PM visiting the “Champalimaud Foundation” in Lisbon. I like the simplicity of the composition. Once again the main subject it’s
on the extreme right because I wanted to show the logo on the wall and tell the viewer where he was.


Same visit. Good architectonic buildings are always an inspiration. This particular place has a glass roof (skylight) creating a huge light contrast between
the corridor and the surrounding ares. When editing the photo I noticed the geometric shape of the corridor and intensified this difference.


PM talking during the "KPMG Gala". Simple composition taking advantage of the geometry created by the light.


Fredrik Reinfeldt, Swedish Prime-Minister with the Portuguese PM.


Fredrik Reinfeldt, once again. Just to show you the city of Porto on the background. The city that gives its name to the famous “Vinho do Porto” (Port Wine).


Juan Manuel Santos, President of Colombia, during his visit to Portugal.


Nicolas Maduro, President of Venezuela, during his visit to Portugal.


Portuguese (ex) Minister of Economy talking to the press. Once again a top view and a very simple background. My colleagues on the left look really busy :)


Portuguese PM giving an interview for a TV channel. The web environment gives you the freedom to play with such compositions.


Portuguese Prime-Minister in his Office during an interview for Brunswick Group. Some photos simply ask for B&W.


PM visit to the “Machado de Castro National Museum.” The focus is on the statue in the extreme right upper corner.


Same Museum. It was very dark, I think its ISO 5000.


Another panorama during the visit to the same Museum.


Another panorama – It seems that I need to buy an extreme wide-angle. PM on the right bottom corner.


I particularly like this photo. It was taken during the PM’s visit to the “Ancient Art Museum” in Lisbon. The Museum is full of Oil-paintings and the photo looks like one!


That's it.

P. S. - I've been reading this forum since 2007 so I would like to thank all those who make it possible. Thx
Forum: Pentax Q 02-17-2015, 02:31 PM  
Ol Harold Shoots the Nakomis General Store
Posted By CWRailman
Replies: 12
Views: 2,033
As I noted last year, I was giving several friends Q10’s for Christmas. I have also mentioned that we are using the Q series cameras for types of photography not common to most folks. Here is an example.

Ol’ Harold received a new Pentax Q10, 12.4 mp digital mirrorless camera for Christmas. Among it’s many features, the small size of this camera allows the photographer to get into some really tight spots and get quality shots that may be impossible to achieve with a larger camera.

The Nakomis General store was built by Ol’ Harold from a HO scale, wood and card stock, HSM/Classic Miniatures Silver Plume Store kit. (The Prototype for this model still stands in Silver Plume Colorado.) It has a rather complete detailed interior including merchandise, clerk and patrons. Unfortunately due to the position this structure occupies on the railroad that detail cannot be seen by the naked eye. In fact it was almost forgotten until this image was captured.



Here is the setup Ol’ Harold used to capture the Nakomis General Store Detail.

First the two story station in Nakomis, near the tracks, had to be partially dismantled. This necessitated removing some wiring and a few trees. A temporary backdrop was put into position behind the store to block out undesirable background distractions. Next the Pentax Q10 was worked into position. A series of blind test shots were taken and did not produce the anticipated images so a mirror was placed behind the camera. In this manner Ol’ Harold was able to see the LCD screen on the back of the camera and make the necessary adjustments to properly compose the photograph. Note the distance of about 6.5 inches between the front of the lens and the structure. This arrangement would not be possible with a larger camera.


The Q’s size and it’s ability to get good depth of field are two of the reasons I am advertising this camera to those who enjoy building models and photographing them. You can see more of Ol’ Harold’s modeling work at Fall River Line
Forum: Canon, Nikon, Sony, and Other Camera Brands 11-10-2014, 01:41 AM  
Some Full-frame shots & thoughts
Posted By mark lj
Replies: 5,592
Views: 734,844
Proud and honoured to say that I've just been named the UK Landscape Photographer of the Year for 2014 with this image from Glen Coe



A Beginning and an End - Winner UK Landscape Photographer of the Year 2014 by Mark Littlejohn, on Flickr

I also had two Highly Commended and one Commended in the awards so what you might call a good year. The £10,000 first prize is quite nice as well.
Forum: Film SLRs and Compact Film Cameras 12-03-2014, 05:12 PM  
Grad ND filter question
Posted By jatrax
Replies: 12
Views: 1,406
You can also use a bit of cardboard sized to fit or cover the filter with solid paper until you get it in the right place. Then remove the paper or replace the cardboard with the filter. It does take a bit of fiddling to get it right.
Forum: Welcomes and Introductions 11-01-2014, 01:43 PM  
Outdoor enthusiast
Posted By MJJSASK
Replies: 10
Views: 867
Hello from the great white north. I followed this website when I pined for an DSLR in school. I knew I loved the robustness and speed and small size of the pentax system. I've captured shots with my MF lenses that rival my brother's system worth 3-300x more! I also can take my camera out way more taking photos he never would, scared of his heavy bulky pricy camera getting on the way or getting abused. Discrete, fast, backwards compatible glass, economical, robust, Pentax has made me a happier photographer.
Forum: Canon, Nikon, Sony, and Other Camera Brands 09-19-2014, 02:02 PM  
Just bought a new camera from apple
Posted By kakapo
Replies: 6
Views: 966
Actually you paid for the logo - just happens that it has the camera and phone attached :D
Forum: Pentax Medium Format 09-19-2014, 09:54 AM  
Past the 10k mark on my Pentax 645z, user review
Posted By rcdurston
Replies: 33
Views: 8,669
I have just past the 10,000 frame mark on my 645z, its at 10823 and sleeping for the weekend.
I got it a couple of months ago and have been using it almost exclusively for my advertising work. I'm very happy with it so far, for the most part.
Here are my top TEN lists for it

Some thing that do bother me though are,
1. AF zone is too small (center 25% of the frame only)
2. inconsistent AF accuracy
3. wait time to use the aperture and ss wheels after firing off a frame
4. the grip, too small
5. SD slots too close to strap point, relocate the strap mounts please
6. missing cap for PC connection
7. wait time to turn on LV after firing off a few frames
8. cable release option besides FluCard
9. FA collar AF/MF switch, PITA
10. tunnel like viewfinder, your eye needs to be lined up perfectly to see 100% of the frame

things I love, beyond the resolution, decent lenses (for the money), ISO sensitivity
1. rear monitor, huge
2. dual SD slots, my Mobi wifi card works wonderfully at speed with the camera
3. weight, nice balance
4. solid lens mount
5. side tripod mount
6. comprehensive menu
7. Live View magnification, the only true way I have found to get accurate focus
8. Matrix metering is usually spot on
9. Long battery life, one battery lasts almost all day, around 1000-1300 frames even with the wifi card transmitting
10. Three WB preset favourites, great to swing back and forth through while testing a scenario

I don't use the camera everyday. I now have three systems from 3 separate brands that I use on shoots; Pentax 645z, Nikon D800 (lightweight back up to the 645z) and the Canon 5D mk3 for lighter file size work.
Saying that, I'm working on a 25 day project, shooting 50 locations with 50 hero shots and over 450 extra scenarios. I'm half way right now and the Pentax is shining. Most of the time I don't bother using the other cameras for the smaller or lighter work because I'm enjoying the the Pentax especially with the 45-85 and the 35 prime. The Nikon has been consistently jamming when needed the most and the Canon now feels like a Fisher Price toy.
When I'm done this project I willing be thinking about sending the camera in to have all the lenses calibrated with the body, specifically checking the focus.
Overall I give it an 8.5/10

Rob
Forum: General Photography 09-07-2014, 11:39 AM  
SLRlounge article, bts family shot with k5
Posted By Usuqa
Replies: 7
Views: 2,127
Attachment 236497

I got an article published on SLRlounge.com, a BTS look into how I shot the noble family image with my k5.
Feel free to check it out, and if their is any questions please let me know.
Forum: Pentax News and Rumors 07-31-2014, 07:59 AM  
Photokina!
Posted By monochrome
Replies: 855
Views: 104,691
It's Bush's fault.
Forum: Photographic Industry and Professionals 07-28-2014, 04:38 PM  
Crop Sensors vs Full Frame :: Crop Or Crap?
Posted By i83N
Replies: 44
Views: 5,180















Youtu.be





---------- Post added 07-29-14 at 02:52 ----------

after this video i hope for new mirrorless by pentax
Forum: Pentax SLR Lens Discussion 03-26-2009, 05:46 PM  
LBA Anonymous!!!
Posted By monochrome
Replies: 297
Views: 27,794
The 12 Steps of Lens Buyers Anonymous
  1. We admitted we were powerless over lenses - that our camera bags had become unmanageable.

  2. Came to believe that a Marketplace greater than ourselves could restore us to sanity.

  3. Made a decision to turn our will and our lenses over to the care of the Forum members, through the Marketplace, as we know them by their PayPal addresses.

  4. Made a searching, fearless and thorough inventory of our camera bags.

  5. Admitted to the Marketplace, to ourselves, and to another special person (looking over our shoulders as we type) the exact nature of our finances.

  6. Were entirely ready to have the Marketplace remove all these defects of rational judgment about shooting with what we have, not what we dream about.

  7. Humbly asked the Marketplace to remove our excess lenses for a reasonable price.

  8. Made a list of all buyers we had harmed by refusing to sell, and became willing to make amends to them all.

  9. Made direct amends to such buyers wherever possible, except when to do so would just injure them with this affliction.

  10. Continued to take inventory of our camera bags, and when we bought something we didn't need promptly sold it.

  11. Sought through taking photographs and posting them in the forum to improve our conscious contact with the members, seeking only a vision of the Golden Spiral and the skill to carry that out.

  12. Having had an artistic awakening as the result of these steps, we tried to carry this message to other Lens Buying Addicts, and to practice these principles in all our lustful affairs with camera equipment.

Forum: Pentax Full Frame 01-03-2014, 08:50 PM  
Online Photographer: FF will die out, except...
Posted By RGlasel
Replies: 401
Views: 33,364
I'll add my 2 cents regarding resolution and display size. Just because someone builds a 110 inch TV or a 50 MP digital camera, doesn't mean there is a market for it, beyond bored rich people. Digital technology has brought the cost of taking a picture and showing it to someone else to the absolute minimum value, namely zero. How many pictures are viewed on a display smaller than a 4x6 print? Look at the typical size of a photo posted on Facebook. It could be programmed to fill your monitor, instead you get something small enough to be viewed on a smartphone. How much dynamic range or sharpness can you appreciate on your phone? The effect on society of all this is that any image of higher quality than a phone camera shot is a work of craftsmanship, just like woodworking or quilting.

Excellent woodworkers can sell pieces that they make, a very select few with good business sense can even make a living at it, but most modern woodworkers do it solely for their own benefit. There are lots of woodworking tools for sale, so there is a viable market beyond furniture manufacturers and home renovation contractors. In fact, tool manufacturers probably make more money from amateur woodworkers than professionals. I think the camera market is very similar. No one buys a phone camera, it comes for free with the phone, so the mass market is looked after. For the craft market, there are more choices than you can shake a stick at. Buyers of better-than-phone cameras have to make a decision on which format gives them the greatest reward for the amount of disposable income they have. There is no new technology in FF digital cameras that isn't available in APS-C or any other interchangeable lens camera. Since there is no leap of technology required to build FF digital cameras, a manufacturer already producing DSLRs in other formats can easily enough add a FF camera to their lineup, if it makes business sense to them.

Consumers of images can't tell if a picture was taken with a FF camera or an APS-C camera, but they can tell the difference between a point and shot and a DLSR. However, when the consumers of images can't tell the difference between DLSR formats, professional photographers can produce marketable images with less than a FF camera. Some people want the very best, regardless of the cost, but how long are photographers taking pictures for their own benefit going to keep spending the extra money for FF? In the near term, Ricoh can produce a FF camera without a major capital investment, so it doesn't take a huge number of customers to justify adding a new FF camera, but in the long term, the FF market can only be headed in one direction. Bigger cameras and lenses are more expensive to manufacture, so FF will never have a cost advantage over other ILS cameras. New camera technology can be just as easily added to other formats as FF, so we will never see a resurgence in FF because of technological advances. So yes, FF digital cameras will die, but it may not be in my lifetime.
Forum: Mini-Challenges, Games, and Photo Stories 01-11-2014, 07:50 AM  
Thematic Top Ten 2013
Posted By dcBear78
Replies: 103
Views: 12,052
I know mine aren't up to some of the standards here. I've only been into this photography thing for a year. Bought my first camera for myself (K-30) at Christmas last year after only ever having crappy P&S or phones. But saying that I am happy with my progress so far.... In chronological order....





First and only acceptance into the PEG










I enjoyed my first year of camera ownership enough I purchased an upgrade...


edit: Only just processed this one but taken last year


And last a photo I definitely should not put here, as we are not allowed cameras at work. But I love how it turned out and it's something unique I can share.


With the way 2014 is going so far, I am going to have a much harder time picking only 10.
Forum: Mini-Challenges, Games, and Photo Stories 12-31-2013, 09:53 PM  
Thematic Top Ten 2013
Posted By K McCall
Replies: 103
Views: 12,052
This thread is so incredibly inspiring! I've made it my resolution to get outside and take more photos for 2014, but still, I took a few I'm happy with during the past year. Thanks for coming up with this thread, dane.dawg!

#1:

#2

#3

#4

#5

#6

#7

#8

#9

#10
Search took 0.01 seconds | Showing results 1 to 25 of 82

 
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 05:30 AM. | See also: NikonForums.com, CanonForums.com part of our network of photo forums!
  • Red (Default)
  • Green
  • Gray
  • Dark
  • Dark Yellow
  • Dark Blue
  • Old Red
  • Old Green
  • Old Gray
  • Dial-Up Style
Hello! It's great to see you back on the forum! Have you considered joining the community?
register
Creating a FREE ACCOUNT takes under a minute, removes ads, and lets you post! [Dismiss]
Top