|
Forum: Sold Items
07-17-2011, 11:45 AM
|
| |
| |
|
Forum: Sold Items
05-28-2011, 09:27 AM
|
| |
| |
|
Forum: Sold Items
05-27-2011, 05:47 AM
|
| |
| |
|
Forum: Pentax K-r
05-16-2011, 07:57 AM
|
| |
| |
|
Forum: Pentax K-r
04-16-2011, 10:51 AM
|
| |
brilliant: i'l try it. thank you much
|
|
Forum: Pentax K-r
04-15-2011, 08:43 AM
|
| |
i agree intuitively with the better-to-underexpose, but read the other day in the excellent 'the art of photography' by bruce barnbaum to bias the histogram to the right, that is, to lean towards overexposure. he has a whole explanation for this going, which on a whole makes good sense. probably one of the reasons i thought my K-r underexposes. but i'm giving raw a go.
|
|
Forum: Pentax K-r
04-10-2011, 11:33 PM
|
| |
thanks for the info - i think the metering system (centre-weighted) could maybe be part of the problem? i'll fix that, and see how it goes. most of the pictures (jpg) were taken in program mode on a "bright" setting, hence the +0.7.
|
|
Forum: Pentax K-r
04-10-2011, 12:18 PM
|
| |
I have a new K-r with a (I think) underexposure problem, the same as Adam Scorey mentions in his review of the K-r in Digital SLR User Magazine, March 2011. My question is this: does the K-7 and/or the K-5 have the same tendencies for underexposure as my K-r, or not? So, would it solve my problem to get the more expensive body, or am I on may way to something else? A typical cross section of photo's taken with this K-r is here p - a set on Flickr
kind regards
|
|
Forum: Welcomes and Introductions
03-01-2011, 10:50 PM
|
| |
good day to all: new here, but log time a pentax user and supporter (since my dad's sv up to k-r)
look 4ward to learn more...
|
