Forum: Photographic Technique
10-28-2012, 01:03 PM
|
|
yeah first one is yellow but other one is "normal" :)
|
Forum: Digital Processing, Software, and Printing
10-18-2012, 06:32 PM
|
|
I found out i like spooky images, horror images etc... How to get em from landscapes? Is there any way to get the FOG into the pictures to make em spooky? Anyone have some advices on this?
This is the example of picture i took and processed it to be spooky but with adding some fog and stuff it could be better...
Here it is: OOOO9525 | Flickr - Photo Sharing! |
Forum: Pentax DSLR Discussion
10-16-2012, 03:52 PM
|
|
If i were you i would buy K-5 without any thoughts. If you love to shoot a lot of videos then K-30 but for everything else k-5 i better.
|
Forum: Photographic Technique
10-11-2012, 03:42 PM
|
|
Yeah you got the point there but i was asking what suits eyes better in this situation and not looking like it's on other planet... (maybe little:)) In situation where this old house is in main focus with so much of it around it, trees and stuff do we really need to HDR it or it's ok with a lot of shadows and blackness around because i'm primarly shooting this old house and should i care only about house or on all around it that is not so nice to shoot at.
BTW which picture you like more.
|
Forum: Photographic Technique
10-11-2012, 03:23 PM
|
|
thanks all!
@ HockeyDay
That's exactly what i wanted to evoke, to make some discomfort ambient on viewers with those colors. I would like to make more mages like this but no idea why it's hard to take picture and paint it like this. Still figuring out what kind of light when shooting is needed for that.
|
Forum: Photographic Technique
10-11-2012, 03:08 PM
|
|
|
Forum: Photographic Technique
10-07-2012, 11:59 AM
|
|
Yeah, I noticed there must be some "special" lightning caue it's imposible to do it on all photos. I still have to find what kind of light is there to understand it :) If anyone knows i would be appreciate to have that knowledge: ))
|
Forum: Photographic Technique
10-07-2012, 11:41 AM
|
|
|
Forum: Photographic Technique
10-07-2012, 03:42 AM
|
|
This was HDR on level 2 and it got like this, Pic was take in the early morning around 6 o'clock. I got exactly what i wanted from this picture! I removed ChromAB etc but edges are still the same. I don't know if that's edges from bad roofs or something i don't know but i cna't reove it unles i go in Photoshop to remove it pixel by pixel. No other way caue i think there is whiteness on the roof. WB was on Auto.
And I underexposed sky badly cause it was bad in my eyes, i needed something dark. it looked ok but i needed darkness to fit my eyes :)
|
Forum: Photographic Technique
10-07-2012, 02:09 AM
|
|
|
Forum: Photographic Technique
10-07-2012, 01:23 AM
|
|
I have no idea how to remove that halos.
|
Forum: Photographic Technique
10-07-2012, 01:10 AM
|
|
|
Forum: Troubleshooting and Beginner Help
09-23-2012, 05:40 PM
|
|
Thanks!
Yeah, i was shooting fight event with 18-55 and seagulls with F100-300. I think both lenses are somewhat ok but only OK :)
|
Forum: Troubleshooting and Beginner Help
09-23-2012, 07:19 AM
|
|
What could possibly go THAT wrong??
@all I'm not the only shooter ofc cause it will be my first expirience but as people are saying flash is most important thing so i wonder what to use to have a normal usable shots. And I guess k-5 is good in terms of wedding photography because as i noticed everyone on wedding are carying Full Frames, mostly mk2 and stuff.
|
Forum: Troubleshooting and Beginner Help
09-20-2012, 09:58 AM
|
|
I've noticed 1 thing. If im machinegunning one seagull and first one looks ok all them will look good. If first one is bad theyre all bad. It's all the time like that.
I'm not machinegunning all the time i let it to focus for afc and continue, doing little pauses.
Hmm never tried turning off SR. Maybe that would fix some pictures... Will try it next session but nw when i think not sure how it can work. Have to test it. Are People usually turning off SR for pics like this????
Btw all of my images are cropped. I don't have many full shots on seagulls at all cause i'm shooting wild seagulls not the ones in harbours that are used to people so it' kind a hard to catch im close enough for full frame.
|
Forum: Troubleshooting and Beginner Help
09-20-2012, 04:08 AM
|
|
Thanks!
But why i'm asking is when i'm taking shots there is a lot of images to throw away cause their IQ is so bad. But i guess it has to be that way and that's why i'll try panning just to see how it works. Or maybe to get the monopod hmm.. not sure.
|
Forum: Troubleshooting and Beginner Help
09-20-2012, 04:00 AM
|
|
A yeah but i was thinking on quality of the images :)
|
Forum: Troubleshooting and Beginner Help
09-20-2012, 03:54 AM
|
|
A haa here is my set with following AF.C shots and in next few days i'll be trying panning. Seagull - Galeb - a set on Flickr
But what is producing better images in general?
|
Forum: Digital Processing, Software, and Printing
09-19-2012, 03:25 PM
|
|
hmmm yeah, you got the point there.
|
Forum: Digital Processing, Software, and Printing
09-19-2012, 11:21 AM
|
|
:) I ask for anyones opinion cause you're all pros for me imho. I like everyones opinion so plz... :)
|
Forum: Digital Processing, Software, and Printing
09-19-2012, 10:03 AM
|
|
Yo cna't see exif? i think it's possible to see it on most pictures?
|
Forum: Troubleshooting and Beginner Help
09-19-2012, 09:57 AM
|
|
As i'm offered to shoot at wedding ceremony i'm wondering what flash i have to buy to make PERFECT :) pictures there? I'm owner of K-5 and is it capable of shooting on wedding without problems? Doing igood pictures and stuff?
|
Forum: Troubleshooting and Beginner Help
09-19-2012, 06:44 AM
|
|
yeah. But i'm interested in one thing. If i'm trying to take some photo in move, like seagull or something. Is it better for me to FOLLOW seagull with my camera and click or to have it a place waiting for seagull to enter my view and take shot?? What will take better image?
|
Forum: Digital Processing, Software, and Printing
09-19-2012, 06:41 AM
|
|
@ MysteryOnion
No idea really if you look at these pictures it looks ok i think. I found some sweet spot on it on about 210mm and it looks nice as far as I can see but i'm not really sure about lenses OLD like this do they produce those effects under "normal" or not.
@ civiletti
A yeah yours looks nice but no idea i think it's liiitttllleee overexposed? or i'm wrong? I think i'll expose my image about 0.5 f-stop and post it on flickr again :) And also is it all just about people taste or is it some kind of "must" in photography for pictures to look like you made it? Btw here is comparision photo for people to tell what suits their eyes better, picture 1 or 2. https://dl.dropbox.com/u/69090258/compar231.jpg
EDIT: Is it better for me to FOLLOW seagull with my camera, put AFC and click for burst or to have camera in a place waiting for seagull to enter my view and take shot?? What will take better image?
|
Forum: Digital Processing, Software, and Printing
09-18-2012, 08:44 PM
|
|
@ Mysteryonion
Yeah i think there are some problems with Chromatic abberations or something like that. On Edges it's putting some PURPLE color all over pictures making some of the good shots very useless. I have to use a lot of lens correction in lightroom to somehow delete it but the edge is still there. I'll post some shots with it when i get back from work.
@ Civileti more exposure? No idea i think this is more then A LOT :) I like a lots of light and i ws also reffering shots are veery exposed? or i'm wrong?
@ Paulusje
Yeah but when i'm getting it back i feel like there's a lot of black in pictures loosing details and stuff.. maybe i'm wrong have no idea but pictures then looks somehow "shadowy"..
@ Zapodmonsters
About that Blue on picture 8017 i think i can get that blue in lightroom on a lot of pictures somehow but still have to get how :))
@GTP17
Yeah i figured out about leaving some space and stuff and i'm tryying to do for last pictures. And about blur of the wings i have no idea. On every picture where i put that blur i got response like It's not sharp, it's not clean bla bla so i really hav to find a good momentum where it will look good, blured and sharpped at once :) I'm in photography for less then 1 month so if you have some ideas pls...
|