Forgot Password
Pentax Camera Forums Home
 
Log in or register to remove ads.

Showing results 1 to 25 of 131 Search: Liked Posts
Forum: Film SLRs and Compact Film Cameras 1 Day Ago  
Pentax ME Super after cleaning artifacts
Posted By CristiC
Replies: 13
Views: 470
From looking at the google drive pictures, I maintain my opinion that the development process in that lab ruined your film. It is a C-41 process that is different than black-and-white processing. If you develop another BW film (someplace else) and it looks OK then you have the answer. Different chemicals, different machine, different handling of the film strip, making sure that the strip does not touch another another strip of film adjacent to it.

---------- Post added 04-17-24 at 02:02 PM ----------

From the images embedded above, there is a piece of cloth/fabric that holds the upper edge of the mirror. That fabric is damaged and torn, a bit to the left from the center of that edge. It may allow light leak from above, through the eyepiece and pentaprism. You can verify that through exposing another film and at each frame, after setting focus, you cover the viewfinder (light-tight) with a cap or a piece of duct-tape, before pressing the shutter. If the problem is gone then you know where the light is leaked from. It's the viewfinder. You definitely need to send that camera to repair.

---------- Post added 04-17-24 at 02:10 PM ----------

With no film in the camera, no lens attached, looking at the front, the mirror, set the dial to position B, next to 125x. Arm the shutter with the lever, then press the shutter and hold it pressed. If there is a bright light from behind, shining through the viewfinder and you see that through the torn fabric at the edge of the mirror, while the mirror is up, then you have found the problem. That doesn't exclude the wrong handling of the color film at the lab, which is the second problem.
Forum: Troubleshooting and Beginner Help 2 Days Ago  
looking for a lens to shoot handheld in museums
Posted By CristiC
Replies: 24
Views: 961
Forum: Troubleshooting and Beginner Help 3 Days Ago  
Clackers' Beginners Tip 105: Grids for Softboxes
Posted By CristiC
Replies: 6
Views: 735
:D yes. Bold font is much better. :D
Forum: Pentax K-1 & K-1 II 04-12-2024, 12:18 AM  
K-1 and K-1 Mark II firmware update
Posted By CristiC
Replies: 14
Views: 1,201
According to Latest PENTAX K-1 Mark II Firmware Update : Software Downloads | RICOH IMAGING

Changes to V2.42 from V2.41
[Corrected items]
  • Corrected --- In firmware versions 2.40 and 2.41, there was an issue where the operation becomes unstable after shooting when the white balance setting is set to "Multi-pattern Auto WB".

  • Improved stability for general performance.


When this update is done, the contents of version 2.41 and earlier will be also updated.
When this update is done, you will not be able to restore back to version 2.41 or earlier.

---------- Post added 04-12-24 at 10:31 AM ----------

Even if "there is nothing wrong with my Pentax K-1" I recommend to enjoy all the minor updates that Ricoh is providing to us.

Some fixes ("corrected items") may be small improvements that you have never encountered as a problem with your camera. Nevertheless, software engineers deemed it necessary to improve something and they did the right thing: they made an improvement available to everyone. It is a good sign that a software product is maintained, revised, fixed if necessary - all that on a regular basis. I am happy with frequent updates, may they be small or big.

The fact that this update is a small one is also a good sign - we enjoy a mature product that doesn't need much fixing.
Forum: Pentax K-3 III 04-10-2024, 12:18 PM  
Remote Shutter Release
Posted By CristiC
Replies: 14
Views: 471
No. One device (this third unit, with antenna) is the radio trigger, held in your hand separately, it has THE button that gives a radio signal going out to multiple radio receiver units, each of them connected to their camera with a proper cable. You do not press the shutter release on a camera, you press only the button on the trigger device and then both cameras go off. You may hold one of the cameras in your hand but you don't press its shutter.

---------- Post added 04-10-24 at 10:32 PM ----------

Now I see that amazon link, it's the same idea. You need two of those, for just their receiver part. One handheld radio trigger will signal to both receiver units, if they are set on the same channel. It's even cheaper than what I suggested.
Forum: General Photography 04-10-2024, 08:25 AM  
Why use a real camera?
Posted By CristiC
Replies: 29
Views: 1,307
I agree. Taking a picture is one thing, possibly done easier with some device compared to another device, possibly investing less personal effort and knowledge than with the other device, but in the end it is a known fact that the smartphone does more than taking a picture. It spies on you as well.

Just using it, due to the nature of the camera app and the ecosystem that app is installed on, third parties get to be informed about your habits, preferences and location. This will be monetized later, no matter if you agree or not, no matter if you are aware of it or not. The convenience of using an app on a phone (that you carry anyway) has a price. You give up on privacy. Some countries enforce legislation that make it mandatory for app designers to ask for your permission. In reality that doesn't matter much.

I will always prefer to carry a real &unconnected camera for that reason as well. The other extreme is valid too - consider to not taking a picture at all! Instead, cherish the moment and live it viewfinder-less.
Forum: Pentax News and Rumors 04-08-2024, 02:44 PM  
Poll: Do you see a Pentax Half-Frame in your future? Best of PF Newsletter March 6 Poll
Posted By CristiC
Replies: 165
Views: 7,807
In anticipation of the Pentax half-frame camera I could not wait any more. Today I developed my second film, exposed on a half-frame "toy camera". Bergger Pancro 400, black and white, the whole 72 frames of it, developed in Ilford ID-11 at 1+1 dilution. 14 minutes at 22C. I was going for the grain and the ISO 400 experience, meaning shorter exposure time for handheld snapshots in good daylight, 1/200 or faster, in order to avoid blur.

The whole purpose of this half-frame experiment of mine is to not worry about camera settings, the way I do with digital. Full auto settings, relying on film exposure latitude, focus-free as well. Not even zone-focus. F8 & be there.

I am challenged with catching the "decisive moment", almost always half a second too late. Now with a thumb wheel film advance, without frame stop, there is no "fps" - maybe 2 shots in 20 seconds. An opportunity shot too early means 10 seconds of missed follow-up opportunities. So I got rid of technical hurdles, such as going through the checklist of exposure triangle and focus confirmation, in order to pay attention to just the framing and the right time to press the shutter. Work in progress. I feel young again, young green padawan I mean, lacking 10.000 shots of experience.

To the choice of film: The previous ISO 100 experience (on this half-frame tool) was sub-optimal for snapshots, I used a tripod, but got a feeling for what sharpness to expect. Dialed down 4 notches, 'cause it's far from a Pentax Ltd quality with regard to lenses. Going now to ISO 400 to a film that allows for a lot of over-exposure. Yes I got that '80s film look, the grain and timeless feeling. Worlds apart from the medium format film look. (A roll of 120-format film will be developed tomorrow.)

The limitations that I experience now give me a new energy to further experiment, until I find "the look", the character of the tool, the knowledge of when to use it and how. Going to Ilford Delta 3200, then Kodak T-MAX P3200 (pulled) and then the sharpest Kodak 400 TMAX. If still unhappy at the end I'll weld the damn thing to a tripod and use Rollei RPX 25, Adox Scala 50, Agfa AVIPHOT 80 derivatives (SPUR, Adox etc).

Then the next chapter will be snapping strobist-style. I haven't fitted a flash yet, that needs some tinkering, soldering, resistors and optocouplers. Pentax beware! Hotshoe mandatory! Or at least a PC-sync port, off-camera flash.

Sometme later I will take the thing apart and glue/fit a Pentax DA-15mm to it, or a DA-21mm. The Pentax half-frame can possibly prevent that from happening, if it comes soon enough. Save the TYCH, you hear me?
Forum: Troubleshooting and Beginner Help 03-29-2024, 03:28 AM  
Burst speed slowed down while P-TTL compatible flash attached
Posted By CristiC
Replies: 23
Views: 733
Tested a Godox TT350 C, which is a very small flash unit, Canon protocol, placed on the hotshoe of my Pentax KP camera. Canon and Pentax protocols are compatible regarding the pins for this flash unit, it can be used directly on the hotshoe of a Pentax camera. Here comes the trick: The flash unit is not used to illuminate the subject, it is placed in wireless master mode, same as a radio trigger on channel 7, group A. This radio master is talking to a remote Godox AD 200 flash unit which works on the same channel 7, group A, as a slave unit. Lo and behold - it fires a burst of 6fps on my Pentax KP!

So the trick is to use a Godox radio trigger for Canon on a Pentax camera hotshoe. The Pentax-specific radio trigger gives only 2fps.
Forum: Pentax SLR Lens Discussion 03-27-2024, 12:31 PM  
How many lenses do you have?
Posted By CristiC
Replies: 2,038
Views: 190,307
I don't know how many lenses I have. Until recently there were N minus one lenses, because one was hidden for 2 years under my mother's bed and I completely forgot where it was. A Canon EF 400mm f/5.6 - quite good for birds and wildlife and much lighter than most of the long lenses.

I don't have heaps and heaps, but Pentax lenses for film (28, 31, 50, 28-80) , lenses for crop-sensor Pentax KP (15Ltd, 8-16, DA*11-18, 18-135, 35 Ltd, 55-300) , lenses for full-frame Pentax (Irix15, 50, 100, 70-210) , Canon lenses in many shapes, sizes and focal lengths, EF and EF-S, then 4 or 5 Sony E-mount lenses, two Pentacon Six lenses and darkroom enlarger lenses too.

Some of the lenses I keep at hand, some in backpacks, some hidden from my wife, some in each of the three places where I alternately live. At least 2 lenses are within a 3 meter radius near me at all times, even when I sleep.
Forum: Pentax News and Rumors 03-27-2024, 06:15 AM  
Poll: How fast do you update firmware? Best of Pentax Forums Newsletter March 27 Poll
Posted By CristiC
Replies: 22
Views: 1,140
:D:D:D I have a wide grin on my face. Ear to ear. Those poll options! Delicious! In fact, I do have an idea or two on how to update the K1000. It's the missing metering system. That needs a firmware.

Because I am an engineer, I am working with software and I am actually involved with software bugs, my statement comes as a subject matter expert: Yes, all software has bugs.
Sometimes we call it "it's a feature, not a bug!" (har, har, :lol:) I heartily recommend the Dilbert cartoons and the Monkeyuser website which depicts software reality as it is.


So yes, everybody, please enjoy your firmware updates ASAP. As soon as possible. Sometimes the "possible" part depends on reputation gained. "Let someone else go first!" is good advice, indeed.


For the non-technical among us, a DSLR camera has a computer inside, that's the electronic parts you can see, if you take your camera apart. There is more to it, things that you cannot see, inside those electronics, it's software. In an analogy to a cooking book, the book cover, the paper pages are the hardware that you can touch and the recipes, the actual cooking instructions which you figure out, based on the text, an idea, that is the software, which you can't touch. As soon as you turn your camera on, there is some software which is executed at startup, enabling the whole system to (hopefully) work as intended. The software part which is provided with your camera, when it leaves the factory, is called firmware. Sometimes they figure out later how to improve that software, either fix things or add new features, and then they allow the users to change the old software with a new software. That is the "firmware update" process.

What can go wrong? Imagine Homer Simpson, eyeballing the turning tip of a cordless drill, pointed at his face. Below the text: SLOW MAN AT WORK. Have you seen that T-shirt?
Well, things do go wrong. In our case, the domain-specific language is "to brick" the damned thing. You perform a firmware update and then, for reasons that are beyond you, the camera doesn't start up any more, doesn't function at all, you're just holding a useless brick. They organized throwing contests in Finland, with Nokia 3110 bricks, you know, but they were all happy and excited - unlike you, holding a Pentax brick. Don't throw it, the Ricoh company can possibly help.

Actually, what is a bug?

Wikipedia says: "A software bug is an error, flaw or fault in the design, development, or operation of computer software that causes it to produce an incorrect or unexpected result, or to behave in unintended ways." I disagree. Yes I do.

My definition goes: "A software bug is a deviation from a published software requirement or specification." This is deep, man! It's not just anything that is deemed incorrect or unexpected. It has to be a breech of contract! If it's not a broken requirement or a deviation from a published (not any, but a legally binding) specification, then it's not a bug! It's something else, a sighting, an observation, something unexpected, something that maybe needs to be dealt with, but it's not a bug.

Software isn't made on-the-go, out of the blue, sold as a product "as is". Someone commissions work to be done by software engineers and lays out what is wanted. Requirements. The more, the better. If that leaves room for interpretation - then it will be misinterpreted, unless later corrected with more specific requirements.


So Pentax found ways to make our lives better. If their software engineers behave according to industry's best practices, it's a reason to be happy and perform firmware updates. However, my understanding as a gaijin, this profession of software developer is not kept in high regard in Japan, so we might get further bugfixes along the way. I am looking forward to any firmware that enhances functionality but that genius quote still stands.

With doctors, when they mess up, it's called "malpraxis". Very common, unfortunately, more than people are aware of. With software engineers it's called insufficient testing, along with low maturity requirements. Reputation is built hard, over many years, and it gets lost in an instant.
Forum: General Photography 03-24-2024, 08:26 AM  
Distractions
Posted By CristiC
Replies: 42
Views: 1,749
A) About the time (and place) for everything. If accompanied by fellow hobbyists, then it's definitely not the time for deep focus on one's own mission but a time to chatter and socialize as well. If receiving advice is not wanted, then maybe it's the time to give good advice and help others grow. I know, some teaching skills or patience with others might be required. It's the mindset that matters, on location. Don't fixate on your mission if the environment is hostile. Adapt.

B) About the place, I was told about distancing habits of true Finns in Finland, where having the rifle shouldered, one shouts to the other: "Hello neighbor, that's close enough!" - while looking through binoculars, to the other. There are vast distances, up north, and less people. For locations further south, the neutral density filter has been invented. Have you tried long exposure landscapes with a "big stopper" that blocks 10 or 15 stops of light - and passing humans as well? Including their dogs. Marvelous.

C) About "the mission": While carrying heavy artillery to location, such as tripod/monopod, F2.8 glass or camera gear in excess of 4kg for just the lens and camera, I can understand the frustration when bystanders intrude. Having all that gear carried all the way to that location implies that one must get results, right? Wrong. Adjust the mission to reconnaissance then. Observe. Return once more, when the light is better. Return several times, until the planets align, the light is right, the crowd is gone and your mission is so clear that you don't even perceive the impediments.

D) Mitigation. Would a not-so-subtle roll of red-and-white striped tape help to delimit an area around? One has to carry some additional sticks with the tape, as well. Form a triangle, one stick behind you, one to your left and one to your right. 20m of tape would suffice. Or not?

E) Acceptance. Well, it was not meant to be. Why feel bad about it, frustration is a choice. Yes it is. One can practice meditation, clear the mind, even in the most crowded and noisy location.

F) Do better. Carry a Ricoh GR III next time. Or a half-frame film camera that doesn't need any settings, nor thinking. Plan ahead, next time, when heavy artillery is involved, to consider all the factors, including bystanders.

G) Master the craft. If arrived on location and also having the proper skill level with you, then it simply won't matter if "continual chatter, criticism and unhelpful suggestions" happen in the background. If it matters, then the skill level has not been attained yet. I am on a journey of life-long learning. In the next life as well.
Forum: Welcomes and Introductions 03-22-2024, 07:14 AM  
Hello from Lima, Perú!!
Posted By CristiC
Replies: 9
Views: 310
Hello from Romania and welcome to an active membership on this forum. I was just reading content for several years too and then I decided to contribute as well. Have you seen this part of the forum? Post Your Photos! - PentaxForums.com
Forum: Film SLRs and Compact Film Cameras 03-21-2024, 01:15 AM  
Poll: How much would you pay (USD) for the new Pentax half-frame film camera?
Posted By CristiC
Replies: 84
Views: 2,710
If one has a hammer, everything around seems to be nails. You relate to what you know.

I do have Pentax 35mm film cameras as well. Full-frame, that is. It's not the current subject and neither is it the same use-case. I do have several medium format film cameras. 6x6, 6x9 and 6x4.5. These are to be used in different circumstances and do not compete in the same sport as the upcoming Pentax half-frame camera.

The quality of the negative, with 35mm half-frame, does not have "to beat" digital, neither medium format film. It just has to be good enough for the purpose. This purpose, not that purpose. I know it is good enough, just as BigMackCam said above.

You might not want one. I do. Some people do. Hopefully young people, who never heard of pentaxforums.com, will want one. For those who know that they want one, the next question is: How badly do you want the new gadget? ASAP? 300 bucks badly? More? Less? It's not an auction here, you know, there isn't limited supply, heck - it's just anticipation and forum talk. Not even solicited by Pentax/Ricoh. Just us here.
Forum: Pentax Camera and Field Accessories 03-19-2024, 04:21 AM  
D FA 150-450mm F4.5-5.6 Monopod setup
Posted By CristiC
Replies: 23
Views: 1,029
It's not about orientation by lens collar. When you have a set height of the monopod then you look through the viewfinder and then you feel an immediate need to tilt a bit, up or down, to frame the subject. That is why the heavy Manfrotto monopod goes along with a tilting head like this https://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/554098-REG/Manfrotto_234RC_234RC_Swiv...981&

If you use a large ballhead, this tilting action is easier on the 90 degrees groove, because that is holding all the weight and still alows for easy tilt. There is a friction setting, but don't keep that too tight, allow for a fluid tilting movement.
Forum: Photographic Technique 03-19-2024, 09:51 AM  
Tiffen Black Pro-Mist Filter
Posted By CristiC
Replies: 6
Views: 508
creates "blooming of the highlights" and lowers contrast. How much? You decide.
















You Tube



Forum: Digital Processing, Software, and Printing 03-19-2024, 09:43 AM  
Separating multi-exposure .dng files?
Posted By CristiC
Replies: 13
Views: 542
short answer: no.

The multiple exposures yielded exactly one DNG file with additive impact on the individual pixels. There is no such thing as separate images that can be stacked and un-stacked. The camera does not work with "layers" that you undo or re-do. The layer concept in the post-processing software works in a different manner, by storing those actions you do to an initial image - which is there already, in this case. Neither would an AI-tool do well in this case, only a hike up there, back again.
Forum: Pentax News and Rumors 03-13-2024, 04:07 AM  
Poll: Does (lens) size matter? Best of Pentax Forums Newsletter March 13 Poll
Posted By CristiC
Replies: 55
Views: 2,705
I am missing an option in the poll: The best lens is the one that you have with you.

Some argue that the best lens is always the one that you left at home.

This was a tough choice for me because it's tearing my heart every time. Shall I take the big heavy Canon-L glass & cameras with me or shall I take my Pentax Limited lenses. Take the K1-II or take the Pentax KP? KP with grip or without grip? It depends so much on the walking distance and altimetric difference (uphill) and it depends on the occasion. Weight matters a lot when traveling.

Then the 77 is definitely not "kinda large"! And there is no reason to avoid taking both: Pentax ME Super, on film, with the FA 77mm Limited (with aperture control ring) AND the Pentax KP (digital) with the DA 70mm F2.4 Limited

Just like the bad habit of chimping on the digital display, I developed a strange need to shoot digital first, check histogram, maybe enable spot metering, shoot digital again, M mode, then take the film camera and replicate the frame on film as the last step.
Forum: Pentax Full Frame 02-14-2024, 05:48 AM  
Pentax - In Praise of Usability (article)
Posted By CristiC
Replies: 10
Views: 1,128
Thanks for the link to the article. It made me feel that I belong as well to the group of people who use a Pentax DSLR camera and enjoy using it at the same time. Unlike other brands and models that I have used but not enjoyed as much (or at all).
This pretty much covers the whole content of the article, which otherwise is a waste of time, just like me wasting words here about that. We all knew that already, Pentax cameras have good ergonomics. I'd better get a beer now.
Forum: Pentax News and Rumors 03-08-2024, 04:18 AM  
Poll: Do you see a Pentax Half-Frame in your future? Best of PF Newsletter March 6 Poll
Posted By CristiC
Replies: 165
Views: 7,807
I have learned from user wkraus that the upper limit to image quality that one can expect from half-frame 35mm film is much higher than I thought.


see https://www.pentaxforums.com/forums/16-pentax-news-rumors/466070-film-camera...ml#post5907564


19009_23_half 17x24 film area test by WK Tests, on Flickr

- which blew my mind - just click on the red link above to see the image on flickr



The trick is to use
  • a high quality lens - let's hope that Pentax won't be cheap here;

  • a tripod - because a long exposure of 1s can't be done handheld;

  • a very special film, ADOX CMS 20 II PRO - which is ISO 20, not 100, not 200;

  • a special developer solution, ADOTECH IV, made for just that ADOX CMS 20 film;

  • a good scanner.


I am viewing digital images on a big screen, 28" diagonal, 4K resolution. The source image half-frame, that has 17mm x 24mm, enlarged more than 10x, looks quite good.

Here is the german language link to that special film: | CMS 20 II that I can order in the European Union.

Now I am very curious how the KODAK T-MAX 100 and the T-MAX 400 will look like, enlarged 10-13x from that 17x24mm frame. I will definitely order some ADOX film, then ILFORD PANF PLUS 50, then ROLLEI RPX 25, to be developed with ILFORD PERCEPTOL.
Forum: Pentax News and Rumors 03-08-2024, 09:00 AM  
Film camera news
Posted By CristiC
Replies: 333
Views: 17,404
Twin lens reflex (TLR) is meant for cheap manual focus. You use the upper lens to manually turn it into focus (using ground glass) and by doing so, the coupled lower lens achieves focus as well. You're right with the weight and expense. That's why medium format TLRs are simple 80mm.

For the "high-end" compact we might expect a modern rangefinder "mechanism"/ device to find out a subject distance and then drive (screw-drive?) the distance setting of a K-mount lens accordingly.

Feeling silly, I would build a Frankenstein - DIY twin lens reflex camera with dual K-mount, the upper one for digital readout of the KAF info and then manually adjust the lower lens to match that, to get a half-frame (or square! 24x24) frame on film through the lower lens. It would be a digital & analog hybrid. Heck - I would send the info from the upper lens to some augmented reality glasses and still get a 35mm film exposed, based on that.

Since we will have to wait (a lot) for the second / third / fourth step of the Pentax film project experiment, I would not rule out augmented reality to inform me through glasses what a film-loaded compact camera would see. And still expose film.
Forum: Pentax News and Rumors 03-08-2024, 08:29 AM  
Film camera news
Posted By CristiC
Replies: 333
Views: 17,404
I like the TLR concept! :D However, asaru is right. This TLR will certainly not be the second step and neither the third step.

While I do have a lot of lenses, the doubling of them on a single camera is limited to some fixed focal length (such as for a normal field of view, 50mm equivalent) and not many glass elements, just pancake. Bye-bye K-mount zooms.
Forum: Pentax News and Rumors 03-08-2024, 05:35 AM  
Film camera news
Posted By CristiC
Replies: 333
Views: 17,404
Let's imagine a not-so-compact, more high-end film camera, still on half-frame, that uses interchangeable lenses with Pentax K mount, such as the:Not only that these lenses have a distance scale, but they have screw-drive AF. Now let's suppose the camera isn't a SLR. No mirror. Guess-focus a.k.a. zone focusing. There could be a clever, small, electronic way to "read" the current focus distance, by means of the screw drive, which has no motor in this camera - but could have a rotary encoder in the camera! There could be a viewfinder overlay to show 3 or 4 zones of focus: MFD, 1m, 3m, infinity. Or a precise digital display of the manually preset distance, but no AF.

If the overlay would show a selectable aperture then I'd be happy. Imagine an automatic exposure mode and an exposure compensation wheel. A vertical list of apertures in the viewfinder - similar to the Pentax ME Super - but instead of shutter speeds a list of apertures. The wheel would change the active selected aperture, away from a metered value, to give +1 or +2 or -1 exposure compensation. An analog indicator arrow, to show the deviation, would be nice. Maybe just a small digital indication of the current aperture value and an arrow for the exposure compensation, deviating to the plus or minus side from a middle point, according to the wheel.
Forum: Pentax News and Rumors 03-07-2024, 02:02 PM  
Film camera news
Posted By CristiC
Replies: 333
Views: 17,404
WOW. Just WOW.



19009_23_half 17x24 film area test
Pentax KX, Tokina AT-X Macro 90mm 1:2.5, Asahi Pentax Y48(Y2) SMC yellow filter, f/4.7, 1 sec.

Adox CMS 20 II Pro film/Adotech IV 1+14 developer

================================================
Well, I don't think that it counts, because of the (very good) lens. I would wait for the Pentax camera, with whatever lens they will build in. And then ISO 100, not less :) Preferably Kodak 400 TMAX too. It's for snapshots, after all.

---------- Post added 03-07-24 at 11:10 PM ----------

@wkraus thank you so much for this tip - I must get it, unbedingt. | CMS 20 II
Forum: Pentax News and Rumors 03-07-2024, 01:59 AM  
Poll: Do you see a Pentax Half-Frame in your future? Best of PF Newsletter March 6 Poll
Posted By CristiC
Replies: 165
Views: 7,807
The elephant is smaller than you think because the young customers of a new Pentax half-frame compact camera will use their smartphones, 99.9% of the time, in order to digitize their film and then instantly share results on social media, by using the same scanning app. Film development can either be done at home or by mail-order. Printing small images on paper will not be the main use-case. The end results will be viewed on small digital screens. The reason to do so is "the film look" and the authenticity conveyed by such snapshots, which contrast the flood of altered, AI-generated, digital images. Because this is a small snapshot camera, not an artist's tool of choice.
Forum: Pentax News and Rumors 03-05-2024, 02:50 AM  
Film camera news
Posted By CristiC
Replies: 333
Views: 17,404
So the main market segment is young people who never had a camera before, but for sure held smartphones, while growing up. They will get a small gadget, probably cute, colorful, no grip. The purpose is to demonstrate authenticity of snapshots in a world full of AI-fakes. Imperfections, such as nearly missed focus, will be ok. Film-related artifacts such as scratches, dust, sprocket-holes "will be a feature, not a bug". Image consumption will be on the smartphone, after scanning. Some of that will probably be smartphone-based as well.

Also, the film will not be destined for archival in most cases. That means a film development process which can do without extended archival washing.

How about a simplified process, using monobath chemicals? For black-and-white film, developed at home, this CineStill DF96 Monobath seems interesting, especially with a daylight loading tank, no lab, no darkroom, no light-tight change-bag, just done near the kitchen sink.

Compared to my usual processing, starting with preparation of proper dilutions for the liquid chemicals, then having multiple steps of soaking the film in different liquids, like: pre-wash (sometimes), then developer bath, then stop bath, then fixer bath, then a 10-minute wash with demineralized water, then finally a short bath in diluted wetting agent - all that seems a bit too much, compared to a simplified monobath process.

They advertise these features:
  • Processing for traditional B&W film in 1 bath

  • Chemical transport is not regulated

  • Room temperature processing methods for 68-82°F (20-28°C)

  • Temp tolerance is +/-2°F (1°C)

  • Worlds fastest process at 80°F (27°C) in just 3min!

  • Push/Pull processing by adjusting temp. +/- 10°F (6°C)

  • Reusable, all-in-one solution.

  • Processes over 16+ rolls of film (1000ml)

  • Process 1-8 rolls at a time

  • Extremely versatile self-completing process

  • No special processor needed (use standard processing tanks and reels)

  • Fully archival

  • Odor-free

  • Economical!


Here is some blog post on what others have experienced, including a recommendation for beginners.

Once dried, an uncut roll of film would be scanned using a gadget (that can be 3-D printed) which holds the smartphone. Its most advanced feature would be just the translucent diffusion plate, held against some light-source, such as your home window. An app would detect the frames and beep when the film is manually advanced to the proper scanning position, with negative to positive inversion happening for image preview, all done by the app, possibly with one-touch sharing to social media as well.

The purpose why I wrote all this is to show that beginners and young people can do this at home, by themselves, not needing a lab to process and scan their film.

As for color processing, there is a CS41 "COLOR SIMPLIFIED" 2-BATH KIT FOR PROCESSING COLOR NEGATIVE FILM AT HOME (C-41 CHEMISTRY). I'll write about that after I figure out myself how easy it is.
Search took 0.01 seconds | Showing results 1 to 25 of 131

 
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 01:54 AM. | See also: NikonForums.com, CanonForums.com part of our network of photo forums!
  • Red (Default)
  • Green
  • Gray
  • Dark
  • Dark Yellow
  • Dark Blue
  • Old Red
  • Old Green
  • Old Gray
  • Dial-Up Style
Hello! It's great to see you back on the forum! Have you considered joining the community?
register
Creating a FREE ACCOUNT takes under a minute, removes ads, and lets you post! [Dismiss]
Top