|
Forum: Pentax DSLR Discussion
04-27-2009, 08:52 AM
|
| |
It is heart breaking when you see some one with Nikon on auto settings getting better result while you are using all you knowledge with Pentax still not happy with the result.
It all depends, if you are there solely for taking picture, I'd say stick with Pentax and learn more and spend more time taking picture and refine your skill.
But if you are there to enjoy the event and want to go home with great picture, I'd switch to Nikon with auto setting, you'll be able to snap here and there without going through your head calculating this and that and watch for the lights source etc, etc.
I know I can get more pictures I like on Pentax, but again, I also get more picture that is not good because I forgot to change the setting, or by the time I'm ready, the moment is gone.
Ferdy
|
|
Forum: Pentax SLR Lens Discussion
03-07-2008, 11:57 AM
|
| |
Thanks for the link. I'm thinking of getting this lens to replace my 18-55, my reasoning is that 18-55 do not have enough reach for me. While I do have 50-200, the last few times I lost the moment once I got my lens changed.
Looking at at the lens comparison, 18-250 is not worse than 18-55, it may be a bit better. And it is comparable to the 50-200.
|
|
Forum: Pentax SLR Lens Discussion
02-11-2008, 02:02 PM
|
| |
Metalfab,
How do you like your 18-250? I'm contemplating of getting one. My reasoning are:
1. I always want one since Tamron announce they 28-200 back when I'm shooting with film
2. I'm not too happy with my 18-55, I only get goot sharp images when it is at least f8.
Thanks,
Ferdy
|
