Forgot Password
Pentax Camera Forums Home
 
Log in or register to remove ads.

Showing results 1 to 7 of 7 Search: Liked Posts
Forum: Pentax SLR Lens Discussion 11-09-2014, 09:52 AM  
43mm Pentax Ltd vs 50mm Pentax M (1.4) vs 50mm Pentax M (1.7) vs 50mm Sears MC (1.7)
Posted By easyreeder
Replies: 15
Views: 4,388
The kids and I had a minute to test four K mount lenses.

43mm Pentax Limited
vs
50mm Pentax M (1.4)
vs
50mm Pentax M (1.7)
vs
50mm Sears MC (1.7)

Constant: F 2.8 ISO 100 1/30

Below, or on vimeo at no crop and 400%.

Forum: Pentax Full Frame 09-23-2014, 10:21 AM  
Poll: Photokina 2014 - FF
Posted By easyreeder
Replies: 797
Views: 96,099
There's also Panasonic and Fuji. Two more irrelevant startups I suppose. Oh, uh, yes, facts. According to forbes:

Fujifilm Holdings
Market Cap $13.04 B

Sony
Market Cap $20.15 B

Samsung Electronics
Market Cap $186.47 B

Panasonic
Market Cap $28.45 B

Ricoh
Market Cap $8.38 B

Or, uh, yes, end of Sony and Samsung. This morning, I whipped out my Pentax laptop, checked my emails, and grabbed my Pentax Galaxy to check my calendar. I had a little video editing to do, so I plugged in my HD screen, a Pentax 27 inch. Then I stole a half hour of me time with my Pentax Playstation. Then, kind of lazy to be watching tv in the afternoon, but I just couldn't resist my Pentax flatscreen.
Forum: Pentax Full Frame 09-10-2014, 05:11 PM  
Poll: Photokina 2014 - FF
Posted By easyreeder
Replies: 797
Views: 96,099
Actually, I didn't want to post this because I thought it'd be trollish, but I shoot with a friend who has a 7D, so we get to compare it to the K3 all the time, and the end result is that the Pentax M lens I gave him is now his go-to on that camera.
Forum: Pentax Full Frame 08-31-2014, 07:22 PM  
How to push the Pentax Full-Frame Idea and get that FF out faster...
Posted By easyreeder
Replies: 1,493
Views: 184,511
Tesla wants one. He's not going to be the only one. Or, he'll buy his ff Nikon for what he wants, and so and so will buy their ff Sony for what they want, and someone else will buy a, gag, samsung APSC for 4k. At this point, specs like ff aren't a luxury. Pentax has to retain its current users, attract new users, and "convert" users from other brands (although I question how loyal anyone is to a brand these days). Updates to the technology are inevitable, and ff just seems obvious.
Forum: Pentax Full Frame 06-05-2014, 09:42 AM  
How to push the Pentax Full-Frame Idea and get that FF out faster...
Posted By easyreeder
Replies: 1,493
Views: 184,511
Low light and noise. The crop factor also has to be applied to the aperture value, so your 1.4 is a 2.2, your 4 is a 6.4. More pixels in a smaller area means more noise (when there's noise). And the higher resolution isn't just to blow things up the size of buildings, it's so you have more information in post—to crop, apply effects, colors, whatever. And, as you say, the wide angle. And, back to the aperture, ff affords the shallow depth of field that one can achieve at very low apertures (while I tend to agree with you here, the dof conversation seems overstated, since Pentax has lenses that go crazy shallow).
Forum: Pentax Full Frame 06-08-2014, 06:56 AM  
Chasseur d'Images announces Pentax FF for the next Photokina
Posted By easyreeder
Replies: 85
Views: 12,450
Thanks so much for your thoughtful response. I'd differ with you on a few points.

Yes, a declining and mature market, but the DSLR market will increasingly tap into the camcorder and film market. People don't like to talk video, but there it is. When I talk to my kids about a photographer who just takes stills, they think it's the dumbest thing they ever heard. To them, the first choice is "picture or video?" Also, the lag here is increasingly the hardware of the computers, not the cameras: 4k video is well within the range of filmmakers—it's the edit hardware that's prohibitive.

Entry level people aren't more likely to start APS-C. Not when there are full frame entry-level cameras. When full frame reaches that market segment (and by then the cameras will be the same size as APS-C cameras), APS-C will be well on its way to obsolescence. But, FF may not reach that market for a few years. Enthusiast market? By the end of this year (look at the Sony and Canon offerings), it's going to be very difficult to sell a new APS-C camera to an enthusiast. Pentax has to diversify into FF. Committing fully to APS-C at this time is poorly advised. (And the K mount is an ff mount, with FA lenses that can be updated in the short term.)

Current FF people aren't going to switch gear. More or less that's true. But people upgrading from APS-C, and there will be a lot of those in the next few years, will be open to the possibility. They need new lenses anyway. It's also been my experience that Canon folks don't love their lenses. On the video side, many Canon shooters rent lenses.

I do love my Pentax lenses, as do, by the way, my Canon buddies, who are using them with adapters. It bums me out to think of leaving Pentax, and the upgrade path from my K3 is prohibitive. To get the control I have in the K3, I'll have to drop 3-4 grand on, for example, a Canon. Maybe I could spend less on the forthcoming Sony A99 updated camera (the A99 is an obvious model for Pentax, by the way, because it allows for the APS-C crop factor, and APS-C lenses).

Anyway, I'm the market, I think. I came in entry-level with Pentax a few years ago, then upgraded (pre-ordered) to the K3, which is a beast, and now I'm planning to move up again—and the move, seems pretty obvious, is FF. Basically, I want to get the aperture values of ff lenses (without the APS-C crop). I'll watch what comes out until the end of the year, and if Pentax isn't there, I'm going to Canon or Sony. I'm not fond of Sony, but the sensors are Sony, and at least the A mount has a history.

Oh, and by the way, I've spent quite a bit of money on Pentax, but the lack of FF has put a moratorium on that. I'm wait and see now. And I'm not the only one. I don't know if any company can afford that kind of bleed.
Forum: Pentax Full Frame 06-08-2014, 06:29 AM  
Do you really need a FF ? Why ?
Posted By easyreeder
Replies: 311
Views: 27,907
A sunny outdoor location (anywhere you have to stop down) is the best test venue for a mirrorless. It's the lowlight situation (where the mirrorless doesn't mechanically have those wide aperture values) that you're going to see a marked difference. A 2.8 on a micro four thirds camera is something like an 8.4. That's going to be a really challenging aperture value in low light.
Search took 0.00 seconds | Showing results 1 to 7 of 7

 
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 12:53 AM. | See also: NikonForums.com, CanonForums.com part of our network of photo forums!
  • Red (Default)
  • Green
  • Gray
  • Dark
  • Dark Yellow
  • Dark Blue
  • Old Red
  • Old Green
  • Old Gray
  • Dial-Up Style
Hello! It's great to see you back on the forum! Have you considered joining the community?
register
Creating a FREE ACCOUNT takes under a minute, removes ads, and lets you post! [Dismiss]
Top