|
Forum: Film SLRs and Compact Film Cameras
06-24-2014, 12:10 AM
|
| |
Some shots from a recent motorbike adventure through Spain/France:
Both shot with an MX, 'M' 40mm f/2.8 lens and Velvia 50.
|
|
Forum: Film SLRs and Compact Film Cameras
06-24-2014, 12:07 AM
|
| |
Thanks! I'll give the next roll a go at 320 then and see how I get on. They do claim on their website that you can rate it anywhere from 200 - 2000 ISO without the need to push/pull...
|
|
Forum: Film SLRs and Compact Film Cameras
06-23-2014, 03:27 PM
|
| |
I just got my first roll of this back from being developed, here's a couple of examples:
They were all shot rated at ISO 500 without any correction filters in fading daylight, the last one with only light from a convenient streetlight.
In all I'm really impressed with the film, though perhaps not the most accurate of colour renditions it produces pleasant, if a little cold skin tones and seems to have an impressive exposure latitude. Anything really underexposed is somewhat grainy but that's not entirely unappealing at times.
|
|
Forum: Post Your Photos!
06-08-2014, 03:22 PM
|
| |
Nice, I love a clean Mk.2 VW
|
|
Forum: Pentax Medium Format
04-02-2014, 02:53 PM
|
| |
I managed to get some useable frames from a roll of Ilford HP5 which was dated as expired in 1984, funnily enough I got them with a second hand TLR as well, an old Polish WZFO Start II.
Here's one of the shots:
 |
|
Forum: Film Processing, Scanning, and Darkroom
03-03-2014, 01:05 AM
|
| |
The scan was done by a local shop (who also developed the film) so I'm not really sure what equipment or software was used for the scan I'm afraid.
|
|
Forum: Film Processing, Scanning, and Darkroom
03-02-2014, 11:18 AM
|
| |
Thanks for the prompt response folks, I'll pop back into the shop next time I'm passing and see if they'll re-scan them for me.
|
|
Forum: Film Processing, Scanning, and Darkroom
03-01-2014, 01:25 PM
|
| |
Hi all,
I recently got some scans back from a local photo shop and there's what I can only describe as ghosting around some of the higher contrast outlines. I've had a look at the negatives on a lightbox (admittedly without a proper loupe) and as far as I can tell there's no sign of them on the film. Am I right in thinking this is a problem with the scanning process? I've included an example here, taken at f16, 1/250 shutter speed on Ilford HP5 (in date), the ghosting is most evident around the outstretched hand and the wooden wall behind it.
Any help much appreciated,
Ben
|
