Forgot Password
Pentax Camera Forums Home
 
Log in or register to remove ads.

Showing results 1 to 7 of 7 Search: Liked Posts
Forum: Pentax DSLR Discussion 02-12-2020, 01:24 PM  
Are we really THAT rare?
Posted By Cynog Ap Brychan
Replies: 7,248
Views: 989,383
I have a mint MX-1.... it's not for sale!
Forum: Pentax K-1 & K-1 II 02-17-2016, 06:05 PM  
The burning question for me ...
Posted By Adam
Replies: 5
Views: 1,208
Yes, we are going to do a complete test of all DA lenses.
Forum: Pentax News and Rumors 02-17-2016, 12:48 AM  
Full K-1 Spec list
Posted By RonHendriks1966
Replies: 770
Views: 97,289
No flash means that this part is not tested, so better batter life for the camera without flash. You can see this best between K-3 and K-3ii
Forum: Pentax News and Rumors 02-15-2016, 01:04 PM  
Full K-1 Spec list
Posted By RonHendriks1966
Replies: 770
Views: 97,289
This is CIPA measurements. The OnBoard-Flash is used in 50% of the shots. That is why K-3 is so much less then K-3ii. No flash, no influence on the result in measurements. The wifi and GPS are not used in this test.
Forum: Pentax K-5 & K-5 II 10-21-2012, 03:18 PM  
Pentaxian for one day
Posted By MPrince
Replies: 41
Views: 4,286
Well, just pick up a Nikon D600 instead.

Oh, wait....

maybe not.....

http://forums.dot.dpreview.com/forums/thread/3276435 (delete the "dot." to read the thread)
Forum: Pentax News and Rumors 09-17-2012, 12:39 PM  
Photokina 2012: First impressions by Falk Lumo
Posted By Quicksand
Replies: 246
Views: 36,572
Jeez.

Ricoh has owned Pentax for less than a year at this point.

In my experience working with engineers in high-tech companies, it can take around three years for a new product to be planned, designed, developed, and released. Three years. That's a very reasonable development cycle, especially in a smallish company with limited development resources.

Looking backward from right now, two of those years would have been during the Hoya ownership, when everybody around here KNEW things were pretty lean at Pentax. There were rumors about engineers being cut loose, rumors about the company being shopped around -- and look, it clearly WAS shopped around! We know that now.

Nonetheless, they recently still squeezed out the 645D, the Q, the K-01, the K-5 II/s, the O-GPS1, and a few lenses. That's not too bad under the circumstances.

And Ricoh is really showing some signs of commitment. Look at the Photokina presence. We're seeing better advertising now.

Maybe Hoya worked on FF, I don't know. But if they didn't, Ricoh has a pretty big and long-term job to pull one together, even if they fully intend to do exactly that.

Yes, Pentax is behind the big boys. Digital-era Pentax has ALWAYS been behind Nikon and Canon. Remember, from 1999-2003, Pentax had no DSLR at all. That's not very long ago.

Canon introduced its first FF model in 2003, and Nikon in 2007. Obviously, that failure to compete is what caused Nikon to shrivel up and die, because everyone who ever wanted a FF bought a 1Ds. Wait, hold on, they didn't? Nikon did not fall further and further behind without an FF to compete with Canon?

I understand the current lack of FF is bothering a number of people here. I get it. I don't blame people for switching brands. But it's not like 2012 is some kind of historic special year for FF, "now or never."

If Pentax develops and releases a nice, competitive FF model with some compelling features, they'll do fine. Maybe it will be 2013, or maybe 2014, or 2015. Maybe there won't be a stampede to buy them out, but when was the last time Pentax experienced that?

In the meantime, there are an awful lot of APS-C DSLRs yet to be sold. I see piles and piles of APS-C starter kits at Costco, and people are apparently buying them.

Cameras come, cameras go. People come, people go.

There's a huge crowd of APS-C DSLR people out there, and if there isn't a viable Pentax upgrade path, then some of them will upgrade to Canon/Nikon FF. Many won't. I don't see that equation changing this year, next year, or anytime soon.
Forum: Pentax K-5 & K-5 II 05-23-2012, 04:23 AM  
K-5 for sports-photography
Posted By RonHendriks1966
Replies: 1,741
Views: 343,503
That is a fantastic shot. Well I discussed this before with someone and our conclusion was that dipping the K-5 with a seald lens up to 30 cm wouldn't cause any problems. It is all about pressure and at that level things aren't so difficult for the sealing. Still it takes stregth to do such a thing!

Credits for this!
Search took 0.00 seconds | Showing results 1 to 7 of 7

 
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 05:54 AM. | See also: NikonForums.com, CanonForums.com part of our network of photo forums!
  • Red (Default)
  • Green
  • Gray
  • Dark
  • Dark Yellow
  • Dark Blue
  • Old Red
  • Old Green
  • Old Gray
  • Dial-Up Style
Hello! It's great to see you back on the forum! Have you considered joining the community?
register
Creating a FREE ACCOUNT takes under a minute, removes ads, and lets you post! [Dismiss]
Top