Forum: Sold Items
09-10-2009, 11:33 PM
|
|
But,
You had to comment, right?
:D
|
Forum: Mini-Challenges, Games, and Photo Stories
09-10-2009, 11:26 PM
|
|
Man,
I confess, I thought I owned this one... :D
Hey, I'd rather be # 2 , it's easier!
Regards,
Mike
Awesome edit, Mr. Riley!
Regards,
Mike
|
Forum: Pentax DSLR Discussion
09-10-2009, 10:05 PM
|
|
Are you talking to me?
LOL, oh wait, that's a different battle I'm having with myself... :lol:
Regards,
Mike
|
Forum: Sold Items
09-10-2009, 09:47 PM
|
|
|
Forum: Sold Items
09-10-2009, 09:38 PM
|
|
Gosh,
I'd chime in with what a great deal this was, but if I did...
I'd get a lame, "warning"
Best of luck with your sale.
Regards,
Mike
|
Forum: Pentax DSLR Discussion
09-10-2009, 09:17 PM
|
|
Hi Mike, I'm Mike and I'd love to take a stab at it, but I won't give much more than postage for it...:(
Sorry,
Mike
|
Forum: Pentax SLR Lens Discussion
09-10-2009, 09:10 PM
|
|
So, you own the DA* 16-50mm f2.8?
Look, and I'll be the first to admit, I bought and still own a K100D non-super because, it was stupidly in-expensive... But, I've looked at test shot, after test shot of the Canon "L" 24-70mm f2.8 and it's nothing special. Seriously, I'd grade it worse than that but I'm being kind and trying not to get banned...
Regards,
Mike
|
Forum: General Talk
09-10-2009, 09:00 PM
|
|
Oh, for love of St. Pete... :fedup::fedup::fedup::fedup::fedup::fedup: Oh, it was soooo funny! But, but, I bet Wayne Brady is still going through intensive therapy over that.
Oh my,
Mike :fedup:
|
Forum: Pentax SLR Lens Discussion
09-10-2009, 08:39 PM
|
|
Not to be a an ***, but what "Normal" zoom by, lets say, Canon do you speak of?
"Normal", back in the day, meant 50mm. So the DA* 50-135 would an amazing "normal" to telephoto lens... But, you say WA... Wide, meaning what? On a crop sensor we need to be at say, 16mm to be "Wide"... DA* 16-50 f2.8 another "amazing" lens...
What were you looking for again? :D
Regards,
Mike
|
Forum: General Talk
09-10-2009, 08:20 PM
|
|
Is Simmons behind, like, a podium? Like, for the whole thing? Otherwise, I don't think I can watch it... :fedup:
Regards,
Mike
|
Forum: Video Recording and Processing
09-10-2009, 06:24 PM
|
|
Good question... This leads me to this question for the OP:
Did you upgrade to Snow Leopard? If so, the Adobe app may not be looking for the totally new version of Quicktime X that ships with 10.6.
When you install Snow Leopard, Mac OS 10.6, you have the option to install Quicktime 7 in addition to the New Quicktime X.
So, in short if you're a Snow Leopard user and have not installed Quicktime 7 [ it should be available in the "Additional Installs" folder on your SL DVD] then you should, as I bet that's what the Adobe app is looking for.
Regards,
Mike
|
Forum: Pentax SLR Lens Discussion
09-09-2009, 10:24 PM
|
|
All I can say is thanks, and good luck. :D
Who made what and when in the world of lens production from 40, 50yrs ago right up to present day is so convoluted and confusing that I've become convinced we'll never know for sure.
About the *nons... One of those fast 55mm lenses was labeled Cosinon, right? And, many modern 55mm f1.2 lenses are Cosina lenses, says so right on the beauty ring. Modern Carl Ziess MF 35mm lenses are produced for Zeiss via Cosina. Cosina made lenses and 35mm SLRs for just about everyone including probably our very own Pentax.
So, I think Cosina made a lot of lenses past and present that are referred to as Tomioka. Tomioka was certainly a producer of lenses in the '50's and '60's as was Cosina and Tokina and Tamron and... well... It's dark this deep in the weeds. Like Zeiss designed lenses of way back gave rise to very similar designs by other producers, I think many so called Tomioka lenses are more inspired by Tomioka design rather than actually produced by Tomioka manufacturing.:D
Again, good luck.
Regards,
Mike
|
Forum: Troubleshooting and Beginner Help
09-09-2009, 03:17 PM
|
|
Yeah, I don't know why anyone would disassemble a lens so completely. Especially, if we're just talking about a little fungus.
Just spin off the "beauty ring" remove three screws, remove front element group. Or if going through the back, just set focus so the rear lens element is sticking out the farthest and unscrew it.
I repeat, there's no reason to disassemble the lens to anywhere near the extent shown above.
That would scare me too. :D
Regards,
Mike
|
Forum: Mini-Challenges, Games, and Photo Stories
09-09-2009, 11:57 AM
|
|
Here's my go...
Regards,
Mike
|
Forum: Weekly Photo Challenges
09-08-2009, 11:10 PM
|
|
Just got the Sigma 70mm macro from larryinlc, and took it for a short walk. Great lens. I hope I can grow into it.
Regards,
Mike
|
Forum: Troubleshooting and Beginner Help
09-08-2009, 10:36 AM
|
|
First, you need to determine where the fungus is. If it up front? Is it out back? Then open the lens fron the end that's closest to the problem.
That link is good, but I think they go too far unnecessarily. The first part is right about unscrewing the "beauty ring" to get to the three screws that hold on that front element group. If the fungus is up front and you follow the instructions to remove the front element group, you can probably clean it and put the group back. Done.
Same if you're going in from the back. I'd only go as far as necessary. You don't need to take the mount off to get the rear elements out. They just unscrew.
Regards,
Mike
|
Forum: Mini-Challenges, Games, and Photo Stories
09-07-2009, 09:34 AM
|
|
Cool, thank you very much, and congrats to the winner Ansbert and to all the other entrants.
Regards,
Mike |
Forum: Pentax SLR Lens Discussion
09-07-2009, 01:41 AM
|
|
Wrong, wrong, wrong! You don't want a flange type at all. The thickness of the flange, no matter how thin is what causes loss of infinity focus. The original Pentax adapter is the best and it sits down inside of the k-mount, with NO external flange at all.
Regards,
Mike
|
Forum: General Talk
09-06-2009, 05:24 PM
|
|
I'm drunk on cheap wine... What r U drunk on?
Regards,
Mike
|
Forum: Post Your Photos!
09-05-2009, 12:29 AM
|
|
I don't know what it means, but I really like the even numbered ones a lot.:)
Regards,
Mike
|
Forum: Pentax DSLR Discussion
09-04-2009, 09:15 PM
|
|
That's better. :D
I almost bought the little Nikon, but the deal was off when I learned it had no AF servo motor.
Regards,
Mike
|
Forum: Pentax DSLR Discussion
09-04-2009, 05:03 PM
|
|
Look, I know you speak the truth. But, dood... I own one. :(
Now, cut it out. :D
Regards,
Mike
|
Forum: General Talk
09-04-2009, 01:29 PM
|
|
|
Forum: Pentax DSLR Discussion
09-04-2009, 01:19 PM
|
|
I paid $320 or $340 [after rebate] for a BRAND NEW K100D Body Only, a couple of years ago so...
Regards,
Mike
|
Forum: Pentax SLR Lens Discussion
09-02-2009, 03:46 PM
|
|
Well, as the old saying goes... Without pics, this thread is useless.
Regards,
Mike
|