|
Forum: General Talk
05-08-2009, 01:27 PM
|
| |
I agree that the effect of humankind on the eco-system is undeniable however, most of the clear cutting and things of such occur in third-world countries. This being said, why is it that we think it would be a good idea to allow the populations in these areas to flourish? Would it not make more sense (logically) to consolidate our assets in the areas that are thriving and allow nature to diminish those civilizations that cannot make it. This obviously is hypothetical. I am all about all natural, organic, hormone/drug free food, small farming, Distributist economy, and as I am Catholic, helping as many people as I can. When people start talking about global climate this or that, and human impact on the world, they do not follow their logic out which would be, if you really think we as humans are fighting for survival of the planet, and we are causing ALL of these problems, then we need to REDUCE, not INCREASE humankind. I reiterate that this is NOT my stance, but just a conversation. What do you think?
|
