|
Forum: Pentax K-1 & K-1 II
04-22-2018, 09:52 PM
|
| |
It does look that way but it is also less detailed and I wonder if that is what the OP is talking about. There are noticeable differences in detail elsewhere in the image as well with the iso 800 losing to the iso 100 but none that would make the 800 image a reject.
Mike
|
|
Forum: Pentax K-1 & K-1 II
04-22-2018, 06:28 PM
|
| |
Is this what we are talking about? Both images processed in Iridient with no changes except a bump to +3 in exp for the iso 800 image. The crops viewed in FastStone viewer at 200%. Note the smoothness in the iso 800 image. Is that just iso 800 quality? The histograms are different in the 0-64 range but look very similar from there on. Again processed with Iridient.
I've been watching this thread because I am thinking of buying the K-1 ii. I previously owned the K-1 and thought it to be an excellent camera particularly with pixel shift but owning sony and sigma on both of which I could share lenses I sold the K-1. Now looking again with the hope that dynamic pixel shift will be an effective alternative.
Mike
|
