|
Forum: Pentax DSLR Discussion
01-14-2019, 01:15 PM
|
| |
given the weight, i would take a Q,:lol: but i also appreciate you want better resolution and image quality, dynamic range etc...
|
|
Forum: Pentax DSLR Discussion
01-14-2019, 11:11 AM
|
| |
's
Perhaps this was a mis understanding on my part, because i agree with you, you simply want to switch bodies between one or the other, with a lens for each body that makes the best overall use of that camera's feature, this lends to wide on full frame and normal to tele on crop sensor
|
|
Forum: Pentax DSLR Discussion
01-14-2019, 05:33 AM
|
| |
For me I don't see the need to have wide angle for both formats, unless you already do,
Much of the reason for 2 bodies is to not change lenses, even with APS-C sensors I have a 10-20 on one body and a 28-75 on the other most of the time, and took advantage of the FOV of full frame when I first moved to digital by taking WA shots on film and longer (tele) shots on digital because that is what the different formats offered.
|
|
Forum: Pentax DSLR Discussion
01-13-2019, 02:06 PM
|
| |
24 is not really wide enough in my opinion.
When I got my *istD it came with an FA J 18-35
I used this lens on my PZ-1 and my other lenses on the *istD. This gave much wider field of view for ultra wide shots. When I went fully digital I got a sigma 10-20 (cropped sensor lens) it got me even wider fov than the 18-35 on full frame.
Now that I have a K1 I am considering what to shoot at the wide end. Probably my samyang 14/2.8
|
