Forgot Password
Pentax Camera Forums Home
 
Log in or register to remove ads.

Showing results 1 to 1 of 1 Search:
Forum: Pentax K-1 & K-1 II 09-25-2018, 05:48 AM  
K1 to K1 Mark II or not II
Posted By Pikselisiirto
Replies: 39
Views: 6,523
Pentax said that accelerator noise reduction has more data for processing than what there is in a RAW file. This should mean that it is impossible to get same or better results from a RAW file. I'm really interested to know, if this is true or is it just a convenient feature which you cannot turn off. Same thing with dynamic pixel shift (image stacking) which suppose to use IBIS readings for alignment, but does image stacking provide same results anyway? They gave promising features, but the truth is vague at the moment. Improved AF might be just a better algorithm which they could add to K-1 or they use accelerator to do more complex AF calculations. How much there is difference especially with AF tracking when the target pass infinity focus area and is coming closer and closer to your camera? This is where K-1 AF is unstable, right?
Search took 0.00 seconds | Showing results 1 to 1 of 1

 
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 07:00 PM. | See also: NikonForums.com, CanonForums.com part of our network of photo forums!
  • Red (Default)
  • Green
  • Gray
  • Dark
  • Dark Yellow
  • Dark Blue
  • Old Red
  • Old Green
  • Old Gray
  • Dial-Up Style
Hello! It's great to see you back on the forum! Have you considered joining the community?
register
Creating a FREE ACCOUNT takes under a minute, removes ads, and lets you post! [Dismiss]
Top