Forum: General Photography
12-19-2018, 12:10 PM
|
|
Nonetheless, every single shot of the Eiffel Tower (as an example) has a personal rendering. I have played the same golf course for 30 years and even though I am hitting from a 'similar' predictable area, the outcome is infinitely different each time. Photography to me, is analogous to golf in that fashion. Some people try and duplicate Iconic shots, others render them towards an individualistic interpretation, while others still--attempt to go where none or few shooter have gone before. Photography, regardless of method or camera used, has always been about self-expression and that's primarily why I am drawn to it. The subjectivity of imaging is what makes it an art.
|
Forum: General Photography
12-15-2018, 02:05 PM
|
|
Exactly REH: individual renditioning is infinite -- sometimes I find myself taking photos of the same things/places/people with different cameras lenses and lighting...It's like DNA, the same "ingredients" often produce different offspring (PHOTOS). Anyway......
|
Forum: General Photography
12-15-2018, 11:00 AM
|
|
I look at photos like this as thus: Just like an old movie, it's not a rerun if you've never seen it and there is always the human differential added top the mix. Give 3 photographers a similar camera, lens and tripod. Set them up on a scenic overlook and I'll guarantee you, you will receive 3 variations of the same locale...Isn't that the point?
|