Forum: Pentax SLR Lens Discussion
02-21-2009, 08:32 AM
|
|
It's only been used from planes, and the owner actually delivered it to pentax for "service". That means it's probably in very good shape. But I'm gonna pick it up myself, and therefore get the chance myself
|
Forum: Pentax SLR Lens Discussion
02-21-2009, 08:01 AM
|
|
I mean compared to other similar lenses. Like the sigma 70-200
|
Forum: Pentax SLR Lens Discussion
02-21-2009, 06:08 AM
|
|
Okay, thank you for a wonderful post!
A last question: if I can get this lens for 1170 us dollars is it a must-buy?
|
Forum: Pentax SLR Lens Discussion
02-21-2009, 04:50 AM
|
|
Okay, this lens for $1170 is a sure buy?
|
Forum: Pentax SLR Lens Discussion
02-21-2009, 04:11 AM
|
|
I know that it doesn't change physically. My point is that the 80-200 mm will look like a 80-200mm on a 35 mm, but the sigma 70-200mm will look like a 105-300mm lens on a 35 mm. Or am I wrong?
|
Forum: Pentax SLR Lens Discussion
02-21-2009, 02:21 AM
|
|
I'm sorry for the confusion. The FA* 70-200mm would be 50-135 mm on my K20D? But the sigma would be 70-200? So it can't really be compared? I'm a little bit confused:p cause the reason I don't want the DA* 50-135mm is that I want more tele.
|
Forum: Pentax SLR Lens Discussion
02-21-2009, 01:48 AM
|
|
I know that, but the pentax 80-200mm is made for 35 mm... So, it will actually be 120-300mm on dSLR?
|
Forum: Pentax SLR Lens Discussion
02-21-2009, 01:31 AM
|
|
Btw, isn't the pentax made for fullformat and therefore equivalent to 120-400 or something on APS-C dSLR?
|
Forum: Pentax SLR Lens Discussion
02-15-2009, 03:54 AM
|
|
Okay, thank you. I almost sold all my stuff to get this one. I'd rather have the Sigma if it's equally good.
|
Forum: Pentax SLR Lens Discussion
02-15-2009, 03:13 AM
|
|
12000 NOK, thats about 1770 USD
|
Forum: Pentax SLR Lens Discussion
02-15-2009, 02:29 AM
|
|
I just came across a used copy of the FA* 80-200, and since I am on the look for such a lens I was wondering how much it was worth?
|